Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0518, written 14 Oct 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 14 Oct 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0518 |
| Deceased | William Roath |
| Coroner | David Reid |
| Coroner area | Worcestershire |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Chief Executive, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Trust Headquarters Level 1 Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham Mindelsohn Way Edgbaston Birmingham B15 2GW. 1 CORONER I am David Donald William REID, HM Senior Coroner for Worcestershire. 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 18.12.24 I commenced an investigation and opened an inquest into the death of William Henry ROATH. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 13.10.25. The conclusion of the inquest was that Mr. Roath “died as the result of an accident”. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH In answer to the questions “when, where and how did Mr. Roath come by his death?”, I recorded as follows: “On 29.10.24 William Roath, who lived with a number of significant background medical conditions, was admitted to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham after falling down concrete steps outside New Road Surgery, Bromsgrove. He was found to have suffered skull fractures and a traumatic brain injury which were treated conservatively, but went on to suffer a number of episodes of aspiration pneumonia. He was transferred for further rehabilitative treatment to Worcestershire Royal Hospital on 28.11.24, but while there developed another chest infection, likely the result of aspiration. He was kept comfortable, and declined and died there on 12.12.24.” 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 1 While Mr. Roath was being treated for a traumatic brain injury at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, a nurse documented on 20.11.24 that he was coughing and spluttering when receiving food and documented that staff were “not to continue to feed patient”. Mr. Roath was then reviewed by a doctor that same day, who documented that there should be a SALT ( Speech & Language Therapy Team ) assessment, but did not record any advice about whether Mr. Roath should remain Nil by Mouth in the meantime. A referral was not made to the SALT team for another 5 days, during which time nursing staff continued to feed Mr. Roath orally. The consultant who gave evidence about the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust’s ( the Trust’s ) own investigation into this issue told the inquest: (a) Any member of staff can make a referral to the SALT team, and in this case it should have been clearly agreed and set out who would be making the referral recommended on 20.11.24; (b) The reviewing doctor should also have documented that Mr. Roath was to be made Nil by Mouth until a further SALT assessment had been carried out; (c) Continued oral feeding between 20-25.11.24 contributed to the development/worsening of Mr. Roath’s aspiration pneumonia which was diagnosed on 21.11.24; (d) The failure promptly to assess and treat the worsening in Mr. Roath’s swallowing ability which was identified on 20.11.24 amounted to a failure to provide a basic level of care. Having heard evidence from a Senior Sister on Ward 409, where Mr. Roath was treated throughout his admission, I was satisfied that sufficient measures had been taken to try to ensure that nursing and healthcare staff did not repeat the omissions which had been identified at the inquest. When the same question was asked of the consultant in respect of doctors at the Trust, the inquest was told: “a Trust-wide communication will go out to all members of staff that SALT referrals in cases of aspiration can be made by any healthcare professional, and should be made by the professional who recognizes a risk of aspiration.” I am therefore concerned that, so far as doctors at the Trust are concerned, nearly 12 months after the relevant events, no action has yet been taken to try to ensure that the errors made by the doctor who reviewed Mr. Roath on 20.11.24 are not repeated. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you, as the Chief Executive of the Trust, have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 9 December 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following: (a) , Mr. Roath’s daughter and next of kin. 2 I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 14 October 2025 David REID HM Senior Coroner for Worcestershire 3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
9th December 2025 For the attention of Mr David Reid HM Senior Coroner for Worcestershire Dear Mr Reid Inquest touching the death of William Roath Response to Regulation 28 Report to prevent future deaths I am writing in response to the Regulation 28 notice issued following the conclusion of the Inquest on 13 October 2025 touching the death of Mr Roath who died at the Worcestershire Royal Hospital on the 12/12/24. We have carefully considered the concerns raised within your report to prevent future deaths and would respond as follows. University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust was deeply sorry to learn of the death of Mr Roath following his discharge from Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham and transfer to Worcester Royal Infirmary on 28th November 2024. The inquest into his death, held 13th October 2025, concluded that Mr Roath died by accidental death following a fall down steps…. He suffered skull fractures and a traumatic brain injury and went on to suffer a number of episodes of aspiration pneumonia. He was transferred to Worcester …. but deteriorated further, most likely as a consequence of further aspiration pneumonia. The inquest heard that Mr Roath had initially been nil by mouth but after an assessment by the Speech and Language Team (SALT) on 19th October 2024, he was cleared to receive a textured diet in bite sized pieces. Further concerns were raised about Mr Roath’s swallow on 20th October and, regrettably, 5 days elapsed before another SALT referral was made. When Mr Roath was reviewed by SALT on 25th October, his swallow was deemed unsafe. In the intervening 5 days, Mr Roath had continued to receive an oral diet intermittently and he had developed and been treated for a presumed aspiration pneumonia. He initially improved and was transferred to Worcester for ongoing care but sadly succumbed to his illness. The Trust’s witnesses highlighted that aside from his risk of aspiration, Mr Roath had remained at significant risk of death as a direct result of his traumatic brain injury and its sequelae. The inquest heard that UHB had put in place measures to ensure that nursing staff and healthcare assistants would not repeat the identified omissions relating to the safe management of swallowing problems and risk of aspiration. In the case of medical staff, however, based on the evidence presented at inquest, insufficient action appeared to have been taken to prevent a recurrence of this incident. University Hospitals Birmingham wishes to assure the court that its policies explicitly identify the role of all patient facing staff, including doctors, in managing patients with swallowing problems and who are at risk of aspiration. The Trust also has monitoring processes in place to ensure that swallowing-related patient safety incidents are identified. Responsibilities and monitoring processes are outlined in the Trust Policies: Controlled Document 1201 "Dysphagia Management Standard Operating Procedure” (SOP) (Current: April 2023- April 2026) 6.2.2 Consultant and Medical Team. All clinical decisions regarding dysphagia management must be agreed by the clinical team, the consultant has overall responsibility for the patient’s care. Controlled Document 1209 “Nil by Mouth Standard Operating Procedure” V2 (Current: April 2023- April 2026) Section 4: Implementation and monitoring It is the clinical responsibility of the whole team looking after the patient who is NBM (Nil By Mouth) to ensure appropriate and adequate nutrition, hydration and medicine administration is actioned in a timely way from the point the patient is advised to be nil by mouth. Section 11: The controlled document lead (Consultant SALT) will lead the audit of the SOP. The audit will be undertaken in accordance with the review date and will include: • Adherence to the SOP • Any untoward incidents or complaints • Anything else as appropriate • Patient Experience Feedback (for example compliments, complaints and PALS - where applicable) , Consultant Speech and Language Therapist (Dysphagia and Altered Airways), leads the audit as a part of the ‘Trust Safer Swallow QIP’ and confirms the audit has been improved in 2025 to provide more robust quality assurance. This has included development of a quality dashboard, quarterly ‘safer swallow’ meetings and local audit on local usage of bed signs. The most recent audit cycle reviewed the period Jan to Aug 2025. Safe swallowing falls within the remit of the Trust’s Nutrition and Hydration Improvement and Governance Group. Following a review of all Trust Patient Safety Priorities (PSP) in November 2025, the Chief Medical Officer & Chief Nursing Officer have agreed that Nutrition & Hydration will remain as a Trust PSP in 2026. Leadership, membership and Terms of Reference for the Nutrition and Hydration Improvement and Governance Group have been refreshed, and now leads the Group. The Nutrition and Hydration Group reports to the Chief Medical Officer & Chief Nursing Officer at the Group Clinical Quality Meeting. Training of medical staff Further, we wish to assure the court that in the intervening period since Mr Roath’s admission, both senior and resident doctors have in fact received training on roles and responsibilities in relation to patients with swallowing problems including the mechanism by which to refer patients to SALT. Specifically: 1. Between October 2024 - October 2025, 1141 doctors underwent PICS training which specifically details how to request SALT to review a patient (data provided a Digital Nurse Specialist in the UHB IT team) 2. All consultants joining UHB have undergone training on referral to SALT and Dietetics with detailed information on swallow assessment and referral. In the last 12 months, at least 83 new consultants have received this training with registers kept. 3. SALT provide annual training to the “Hospital Preparation Course IPE Lecture” (University of Birmingham (UoB)) for final year UoB medical students, last provided on June 13th 2025, which includes information on referral to SALT. Production and distribution of a Patient Safety Notice The inquest heard that further Trust-wide communications on SALT referrals were due to be delivered to all patient-facing staff. This communication in the form of a Patient Safety Notice entitled “Inpatient referrals to the Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) team across UHB” was distributed on 7th November 2025 via the following , Deputy Head of Clinical Governance and means, as confirmed by Patient Safety: The safety notice has been disseminated via the following methods: • Intranet: • Uploaded to the patient safety notice page • Front page of ‘The Hub’ (‘latest news’) – UHB’s internal Communications platform • Radar notice distributed to all ward managers and sisters, Clinical Service Leads, governance leads, Clinical Delivery Groups, and all (178) LLS Learning Ambassadors (LA’s): • Note: Clinical Service Leads and ward managers are expected to print and post on safety boards and share with staff in handovers and huddles for a period of two week. • Direct email to: Site Directors of Nursing and Clinical Governance teams • Onward dissemination by others as follows: • Chief registrars – who send via WhatsApp groups • Medical and nursing education teams for inclusion in Resident Doctor • newsletter Inclusion in the ‘Risky Practice’ governance newsletter for UHB Emergency Departments • Library team for posting in the Libraries across site A Trust-wide staff notice was also sent to all Medical, Allied Health Professionals and Nursing teams. In summary, we would like to assure you that we consider the omissions in Mr Roath’s care at UHB which contributed to his death, as matters of the upmost priority. In the intervening year, we have taken steps not only to improve the comprehensive training of doctors in relation to recognising and acting upon swallowing problems, but also to strengthen the wider clinical governance framework around safe swallowing. With best wishes Chief Executive Enclosure:
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.