Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Susan Barrett

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0590, written 29 Sep 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report29 Sep 2025
Reference2025-0590
DeceasedSusan Barrett
CoronerSean Horstead
Coroner areaEssex
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedEast Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

1

2

3

4

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

 Chief Executive Officer, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS

Foundation Trust, 

CORONER

I am Sean Horstead, area coroner, for the coroner area of Essex

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations
2013.

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 2nd August 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Susan
Margaret Barrett, aged 81 years’. The investigation concluded at the end of the
inquest on the 18th September 2025.

The conclusion of the inquest was a Narrative Conclusion focussed on those
aspects of the inadequate care, management and treatment that probably more
than minimally contributed to the avoidable deterioration of an ultimately fatal
sacral pressure ulcer.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Susan Margaret Barrett died on 30th July 2024 on Trinity Ward, Fryatt Hospital,
419 Main Road, Essex from Sepsis arising from Osteomyelitis caused by a
Grade 4 sacral pressure ulcer on a background of Dementia.

The identified and significantly sub-optimal care leading to the deterioration of
the sacral pressure ulcer to Grade 3 initially arose during Mrs Barrett’s eight-day
period as an in-patient in Colchester General Hospital.  The deterioration
continued following her return home under the care of the Community Nursing
Team and the Tissue Viability Service, with the ulcer progressing to Grade 4
and the subsequent confirmation of infection to the bone resulting in the sepsis
from which she died.  Significant deficits in the communication between the

1

 Community Nursing Team and Tissue Viability Service led to at least a two-
month delay in Mrs Barrett receiving the daily nursing care that, it was agreed by
the witnesses, she should have received shortly after her discharge from
Hospital and would likely have a made a significant difference to the rate and
nature of the deterioration of the pressure ulcer.  Evidence was received, and
accepted by the Court, that these aspects of causative failures in care have
been addressed.

5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –

The evidence disclosed that Mrs Barrett received optimal care following her
transfer from Colchester General Hospital acute care to Trinity Ward in the
Fryatt Community Hospital.

However, serious concerns were raised in evidence by East Suffolk and North
Essex NHS Foundation Trust (ESNEFT) witnesses relating to the impact and
consequences of an absence of embedded, dedicated Tissue Viability Nurses
(TVNs) and a Tissue Viability Service (TVS) across the two ESNEFT
Community Hospital Sites which, together, involve three Wards (including Trinity
Ward) with, cumulatively, some 77 patient beds.

The Community Hospital Wards are Nurse Practitioner led and based on a GP
model but since 2023 have seen the withdrawal of embedded TVNs or a TVS
across all Wards.  The evidence from both the Colchester General Hospital
Matron and the Community Tissue Viability Lead Nurse confirmed that whilst
this has been formally recognised as a ‘risk’ - and attempts at mitigation have
been attempted - the steps taken have been inadequate.

In her evidence the Tissue Viability Lead Nurse confirmed that she had raised
and escalated her concerns regarding the change in policy and informed the
Court that she had felt it necessary to “block” some transfers of vulnerable
patients from the Acute Hospital to the Community Hospital, expressly on the
basis that the absence of an embedded TVS gave rise to a serious risk of the
deterioration of these frail and vulnerable patients’ pressure ulcers to the extent,
she confirmed, that such transfers presented a risk of future deaths.
Notwithstanding the ‘blocking’ she has been required to resort to, she made
reference to an increase in pressure damage in the Community Hospital Wards
in a 2025 three month period compared to the same period in 2024.

6

2

 7

8

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you
and your organisation have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this
report, namely by 20.11.2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken,
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is
proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following
Interested Persons:

The husband of the deceased.

I have also sent it to Essex County Council, Adult Safeguarding, who may find it
useful or of interest.

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or
summary form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who he
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me,
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of
your response by the Chief Coroner.

9

25.09.2025                       HM Area Coroner for Essex Sean Horstead

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (PDF)
Mr Sean Horstead 
Area Coroner for Essex 
Essex Coroners Service 
Seax House 
Essex County Council 
Victoria Road South 
Chelmsford 
CM1 1LX 

Dear Mr Horstead 

Colchester District General Hospital 
Turner Road  
Colchester  
CO4 5JL 

20 November 2025 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS – INQUEST TOUCHING UPON THE DEATH OF MRS 

SUSAN MARGARET BARRETT WHICH CONLUDED ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2025 

I write in  connection with the above-mentioned Inquest and the  Regulation 28  Report to Prevent 

Deaths issued by yourself on 25 September 2025 (“the Report”). 

The Report highlighted concerns relating to the impact and consequences of an absence of embedded, 

dedicated Tissue Viability Nurses (“TVNs”) and a Tissue Viability Service (“TVS”) across the two East 

Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (“the Trust”) Community Hospital Sites. 

The information presented below is intended to describe the actions which have been taken/are being 

taken by the Trust to mitigate the risk of future deaths and address the concerns you have raised. 

RECRUITMENT OF ADDITIONAL TVN RESOURCE TO EMBED A TVS ACROSS COMMUNITY HOPSITAL 

SITES 

The  Medicine  and  Community  Services  North  East  Essex  division  within  the  Trust  have  confirmed 

funding for 0.6wte Band 6 Tissue Viability CNS as a substantive post.  

The Establishment Control Form was submitted on 07/10/25 and was approved by the finance team 

the same day.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The Trust are actively recruiting for the role, and a recruitment advertisement has been posted for 

this role.  

Once  appointed  the  successful  candidate  will  undertake  Tissue  Viability  Services  across  the  Trust 

Community Hospital Sites 

The Trust hopes that the above information demonstrates the actions being implemented by the Trust 

and adequately responds to your concerns 

I would like to personally extend our sincerest condolences to Susan’s family for their loss. 

If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Yours sincerely 

Chief Executive Officer 
East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust

Related reports

Other reports by Sean Horstead

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.