Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026

Janet Daniels

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0202, written 2 Feb 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report2 Feb 2026
Reference2026-0202
DeceasedJanet Daniels
CoronerSean Horstead
Coroner areaEssex
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedEast Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

The Chief Executive Officer, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation 
Trust. 

1  CORONER 

I am Sean Horstead, area coroner, for the coroner area of Essex 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 
2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 14th October 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Janet 
Sylvia Daniels, aged 74 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the 
inquest on the 30th January 2026.  Janet Sylvia Daniels died on 6th of October 
2024 at Colchester General Hospital, Turner Road, Colchester, Essex from 
Pulmonary Thromboembolism caused by Sepsis arising from Hickman Line 
infection on a background of chronic kidney disease 3A and congestive cardiac 
failure. 

The conclusion of the inquest was a Narrative Conclusion reflecting the 
(admitted) shortcomings in the Trust’s communication with Mrs Daniels and her 
family that preceded - and followed - the transition to end of life care and the 
timing of, and clinical basis for, the withdrawal of active treatment which, in turn, 
probably impacted the timing of her death. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Mrs Daniels died from a recognised complication of a necessary medical 
procedure in the context of significant clinical frailty contributed to by multiple co-
morbidities and previous surgical interventions.  Her death occurred 6 days after 
the withdrawal of treatment including intravenous fluids and antibiotics. 

On Friday 27th September 2024 Mrs Daniels confirmed to her Responsible 
Clinician - in terms - that, notwithstanding very significant pain levels and 
concerns about continuing to live with her reduced quality of life, she wished to 
continue treatment, specifically including an anticipated further six weeks of 
antibiotic treatment.  It was acknowledged by the Trust that she had capacity to 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 make these decisions about her immediate future care, management and 
treatment. 

On the morning of Saturday 28th September a decision was made by a 
Specialist Palliative Care Nurse and a Senior Registrar to move Mrs Daniels to 
end of life care and they initiated an Individualised Care Plan for Last Days of 
Life (ICPLDL) but did so without clearly relaying or discussing the decision, or 
explaining (or documenting) the clinical reasons for the decision, to either the 
(capacitous) patient or her family, including those who held Lasting Power of 
Attorney for Health and Well-being.  (A copy of the LPA had been provided to 
the Trust on Mrs Daniels’ admission). The Trust accepted that there was a 
failure to communicate appropriately with the family to ensure that they, and Mrs 
Daniels, fully understood that a transition to ‘last days of life’ care was deemed 
clinically appropriate and/or the basis for that decision. 

The decision appeared to have been made by reference to the patient’s 
presentation over a two-hour period on the morning of the 28th (although the 
evidence indicated that Mrs Daniels had been sat up in bed that morning, 
drinking tea, eating cereal and conversing with her family).  Neither the patient 
or her family were informed of potentially relevant clinical features, including Mrs 
Daniel’s significantly improved CRP levels, only very moderately raised white 
cell count (indicating, according to her Responsible Clinician Consultant, that 
her Sepsis had stabilised and was controlled) and, for her, her stable kidney 
function. 

In this context, the agreement of the family members on Sunday 29th September 
to discontinuation of intravenous antibiotic treatment was made on the basis of 
partial and incomplete information.  In evidence the family confirmed that such 
agreement would not have been forthcoming had the fuller clinical picture been 
explained to them.  Her Responsible Clinician Consultant confirmed in  evidence 
that Mrs Daniels would probably not have died on 6th October 2024 had  
intravenous antibiotics and fluid continued to be administered as she had clearly 
indicated she wished to happen - and the family would have wished to have 
happened, had the clinical position been discussed with them as, the Trust 
accepted, in should have been.  

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action 
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

The Trust accepts that there was a significant failure on the part of clinical and 
nursing staff to communicate effectively with Mrs Daniels and her family in 
respect to critical clinical decision making, and the basis for such clinical 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 decision making, relating to her transition to end of life care, directly impacting 
their involvement in decision making regarding the withdrawal of treatment, as 
required by Trust Policy and Guidance.   

Evidence from Trust witnesses, including the Langham Ward Manager/Nursing 
Sister and two Langham Ward Consultant Gastroenterologists indicated that 
clinical and nursing staff were insufficiently familiar with the principles set out in 
the Trusts relevant policies and guidance, including the Trust Palliative Care 
Guidance issued in April 2025, regarding the relevant considerations involved in 
the transition from palliative care to end of life care. 

Taken together, these two features give rise to a risk that patients and family 
members may not be appropriately consulted with respect to the basis for and 
timing of end-of-life care and, accordingly, that withdrawal of active treatment 
may be prematurely undertaken. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
and your organisation have the power to take such action.  

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 30th March 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is 
proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons: 

Via their instructed lawyers, the family of the deceased.  

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who he 
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, 
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of 
your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

02.02.2026                     HM Area Coroner for Essex Sean Horstead 

3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (PDF)
Mr Sean Horstead 
Area Coroner for Essex 
Essex Coroners Service 
Seax House 
Essex County Council 
Victoria Road South 
Chelmsford 
CM1 1LX 

Dear Mr Horstead 

Colchester District General Hospital 
Turner Road  
Colchester  
CO4 5JL 

30 March 2026 

Our Reference: COL2550 

REGULATION 28 TO PREVENT DEATHS - INQUEST TOUCHING UPON THE DEATH OF JANET 

SLYVIA DANIELS WHICH CONCLUDED ON 31 JANUARY 2026 

I write on behalf of ESNEFT in response to the Prevention of Future Deaths Report dated 02 

February 2026, issued pursuant to paragraph 7, Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 

2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

The  concerns  identified  relate  to  a  risk  that  patients  and  family  members  may  not  be 

appropriately  consulted  with  respect  to  the  basis  for  and  timing  of  end-of-life  care  and, 

accordingly, that withdrawal of active treatment may be prematurely undertaken. 

The  Trust  fully  recognises  the  importance  of  patient  and  family  involvement  in  decisions 

relating to the withdrawal of active treatment and commencement of end-of-life care plans. 

The Trust remains committed to continuous improvement in the quality and safety of care 

provided to patients and their families. 

The  information  presented  below  is  intended  to  describe  the  actions  which  have  been 

taken/are being taken by the Trust to enhance governance arrangements and patient safety 

safeguards to mitigate the risk of future deaths and address the concerns you have raised. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 DEFINITION OF PALLIATIVE CARE 

The Hospital Palliative Care Team are a team of Palliative Medicine Consultants and Clinical 

Nurse  Specialists  who  provide  an  inpatient  hospital  advisory  service,  working  alongside 

treating teams and co-ordinating with community services.  

Palliative  care  is  often  provided  alongside  active  treatment  and  even  potentially  curative 

treatment at times. The involvement of the Palliative Care team does not mean that someone 

is being treated as being in the last days of life. 

End of Life Care (EOLC) is defined by GMC as care in the last year of life; and care in the last 

days of life centres around support for the dying person and those important to them in the 

last hours and days of life. The individualised care plan for the last days of life (ICPLDL) is an 

individualised  plan  of  care,  enabling  us  to  support  the  dying  person  and  those  who  are 

important to them when they approach the last days of life. This focuses on symptom control, 

psychosocial, spiritual and carer support. 

INVESTIGATION AND GOVERNANCE REVIEW 

The Trust has undertaken an extensive Governance review of policies and procedures which 

has led to: 

  A review of the Trust’s End of Life Care Policy and associated procedures 

  A review of documentation and escalation processes 

  A review of the training which is offered throughout the Trust 

  The  delivering  of  a  presentation  at  the  Trust  wide  Multidisciplinary  Team  half  day 

meeting  on  19  March  2026,  which  included  recognising  dying,  communication  and 

Mental Capacity Assessments (MCA) and Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA). 

  A review of the case at the Medicine and Care of the Elderly Governance half day on 

11 February 2026. 

  A review the case and EOL policies at the End-of-Life Steering Group 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 ACTIONS IMPLEMENTED 

To strengthen governance oversight, the Trust has implemented the following measures: 

Policy Revision 

The Trust Palliative Care Guidance issued in April 2025 has been amended to provide clearer 

guidance as to which members of staff can make the decision to commence the EOLC plan. 

Furthermore, the guidance now provides more information on commencing the ICPLDL and 

recognising dying. 

A new standalone guide has been drafted specifically for care in the last days of life, focusing 

on recognising dying, communication (how to have sensitive and honest conversations with 

patients  and  their  families)  and  starting  the  ICPLDL.  Terms  to  be  avoided  when  discussing 

EOLC with patients and their family have been included. The Trust is aiming for completion 

and Trust wide distribution in May 2026. 

The  Trust  e-learning  for  EOLC  is  being  aligned  with  the  updated  EOLC  policy  and  a  new 

additional ‘Hospital Care in the Last Days of Life Guidance’. This guidance includes Epic (The 

Trust’s new Electronic Patient Record) processes, clearer wording on ICPLDL and terms to be 

avoided when discussing EOLC with patients and their family. Again, the Trust is aiming for 

completion by May 2026. 

EOLC conversations and Documentation of the same 

The updated Palliative Care Guidance now provides detail on mandatory areas of discussion 

with patients and family and documentation requirements in respect of EOLC, escalations and 

reversibility of conditions.  

The  Trust utilises  the  NHS  ‘ReSPECT’  (Recommend  Summary Plan  for  Emergency  Care  and 

Treatment)  form.  This  document  is  filled  out  collaboratively  by  the  patient,  their  family 

(where appropriate) and a healthcare worker. It details what is important to the patient when 

it comes to decision making about their care and treatment and is particularly relevant for 

patients with complex care needs and for people who are nearing the end of their lives. It is 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 designed  to  assist  healthcare  professionals  to  undergo  thorough  conversations  with  the 

patient  and  their  family.  The  ReSPECT  form  has  now  been  embedded  into  the  patient 

dashboard on Epic, so that is easy to access, complete and refer to when care plans are being 

made. 

Additionally,  the  Trust  uses  the  ‘What  matters  to  me’  (WMTM)  approach  to  patient  care 

conversations. This is an NHS approach which focuses on the understanding patient priorities, 

values, and needs to guide personalised care and improve wellbeing. WMTM enables patients 

to document their priorities, using tolls like the “About Me: What Matters to Me” form, which 

captures information about: 

  Key people and relationships 

  Communication preferences 

  Daily routines and wellbeing 

  Strengths, skills and goals 

  Support needs and concerns 

  Preferences for care and treatment decisions.  

The completed form has also been added to the Epic dashboard where it used to support and 

develop  personalised  care  plans.  The  form  can  be  completed  independently,  with  family 

and/or healthcare staff.  

Patients and Family members are provided with a copy of the ‘Last Days of Life’ leaflet during 

the first stage of EOLC planning/discussions. The leaflet explains what relatives can expect 

when someone is thought to be in the last few days of life, and how hospital staff will support 

both the patient and those important to them. The leaflet provides the following information: 

  What to expect physically during the last days of life 

  Comfort and care 

  Emotional and spiritual support the Trust can provide 

  Visiting and practical support 

  What can occur during the final moments 

  What to expect after death 

  Guidance on organ and tissue donation 

Introduction of new Electronic Patient Record (Epic) 

 
 
 
 Since October 2025, the Trust has implemented a new electronic patient record system, Epic. 

The  Trust  has  consolidated  a  vast  number  of  separate  systems  into  one  sole  system  that 

encompasses all the patient notes. This provides unified, one record per patient for all clinical 

and administrative data. The impact for patients is as follows: 

  Safer care 

  Better appointment coordination 

  Access via MyChart 

 

Improved outcomes 

  Less repetition 

  A lifelong record 

  Secure storage 

  Better communication 

  Streamlined care 

  MyChart app for health record visibility, including a proxy access option 

Epic makes it easier for staff to access the ‘How to start ICPLDL’ guidelines via the Epic patient 

dashboard.  Additionally,  when  a  clinician  commences the  care plan  it is  now  a  mandatory 

requirement  within  Epic  (which  cannot  be  bypassed)  for  that  clinician  to  document  their 

details. This creates a sole point of reference. 

There is a section on Epic where the LPA can be recorded and uploaded. Mental capacity and 

best interest decisions are recorded in the same section. These are accessible on the patient’s 

dashboard on Epic. 

A medical safeguarding lead has now been appointed  to support safeguarding and mental 

capacity within the Trust. 

Communication and Education 

The Trust has carried out further education and upskilling on MCA and best interest decision 

making.  The  Trust  continues  to  deliver  on-going  face  to  face  education,  e-learning  and 

communication  skills  (this  includes  how  and  when  to  use  the  ReSPECT  forms  and  WMTM 

forms).  These  training  sessions  have  reinforced  expectations  regarding  escalation, 

documentation, and multidisciplinary communication in EOLC decisions. 

 
 
 
 
 The Trust focussed on mental capacity and best interest decision making at the January 2026 

Medicine  and  Care  of the  Elderly Governance half  day.  Following  on  from  the writing  and 

sharing of ‘A brief guide to Mental Capacity Act’ at the end of 2025. 

The Trust has delivered and continues to deliver Mental Capacity Act training for staff on all 

wards and has booked additional Mental Capacity Act seminars at the local university. 

Band  6s  and  Band  7s  have  attended  advanced  communications  training  and  all  staff  have 

attended MCA and Deprivation of Liberty (DOLs) training sessions. 

Audit and Ongoing Monitoring 

To ensure sustained compliance the Trust audits and monitors the following: 

  The  Trust  completes  a  monthly  data  collection  for  the  accountability  framework. 

ICPLDL commencements are measured on this audit at ward, division and Trust level.  

  Any identified non-compliance is subject to review and appropriate remedial action 

through divisional governance processes. 

The Trust hopes that the above information demonstrates the actions being implemented by 

the Trust and adequately responds to your concerns. 

I would like to personally extend our sincerest condolences to Janet’s family for their loss. 

If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Yours sincerely 

Interim Chief Executive Officer 

East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust

Related reports

Other reports by Sean Horstead

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.