Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0033, written 21 Jan 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 21 Jan 2026 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2026-0033 |
| Deceased | Dhananji Dona |
| Coroner | Emma Serrano |
| Coroner area | Staffordshire |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Royal Stoke University Hospital; and 2. NHS England. 1 CORONER I am Emma Serrano, Area Coroner, for the Area Coroner for Staffordshire. 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 3rd October 2024, I commenced an investigation into the death of Mrs Dhananji Denawakage Dona. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 20 January 2026. The conclusion of the inquest was a short form conclusion a natural cause, with a neglect rider. The cause of death was: 1a. Septic shock and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulopathy I b Urine infection and Septic Miscarriage 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH i) Mrs Dona attended the Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke on Trent. She was pregnant and had noticed bleeding and was suffering from abdominal pain. She was suffering from SEPSIS as well as miscarrying. There was a delay in her assessment in the A&E department, and the SEPSIS screening tool was not used. ii) There is a specific National Early Warning Score matrix for prenatal women. This was not used in the A&E department as, despite national guidance to say this should be used in all departments of a hospital, it was only used in the maternity department of the Hospital. iii) This led to a delay in her diagnosis and treatment of the SEPSIS. iv) She continued to deteriorate whilst in hospital and, passed away on the 2 October 2024. v) Evidence heard at inquest was that, earlier diagnosis and treatment for SEPSIS would have meant that Mrs Dona would have survived. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 1 [IL1: PROTECT] my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 1. That although the specialist National Early Warning Score matrix for prenatal women, should be used within the whole of the hospital, it still was not, and there were no plans to introduce this within a reasonable timescale. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 18 March 2026. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: 1. Family of the deceased. 9 21 January 2026 Miss Emma Serrano Area Coroner Staffordshire 2 [IL1: PROTECT]
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Emma Serrano
Area Coroner
Stoke on Trent and
North Staffordshire Coroners Service
Stoke Town Hall
Kingsway
Stoke-on-Trent
ST4 1HH
Dear Coroner,
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
9th March 2026
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Dhananji Denawakage
Dona who died on 2nd October 2025.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 21st
January 2026 concerning the death of Dhananji Denawakage Dona on 2nd October
2025. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would
like to express my deep condolences to Mrs Dona’s family and loved ones. NHS
England is keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Mrs
Dona’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.
Your Report raises concerns that although the specialist National Early Warning Score
(NEWS) matrix for prenatal women should be used within all departments of a hospital,
it still was not in this case, and there were no plans to introduce this within a reasonable
timescale. Your report does not specify Mrs Dona’s gestation, but references that she
had miscarried.
NHS England has developed the national Maternity Early Warning Score (MEWS) in
direct response to findings from the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the
UK, which have consistently highlighted the need for a dedicated, standardised early
warning system for pregnancy and the postnatal period. These enquiries show that
delayed recognition and escalation of clinical deterioration remain important, recurring
themes.
Currently, the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) is the mandated scoring
system used across the NHS for detecting deterioration in adults who are not
pregnant. NEWS2 is widely implemented in care settings outside of acute maternity
services. However, physiological parameters in pregnancy differ significantly from
those of the non‑pregnant population. Normal ranges for heart rate, blood pressure,
respiratory rate and oxygen saturation change during pregnancy and the early
postpartum period.
Applying non‑pregnant thresholds to pregnant women can therefore:
• Delay early recognition of deterioration
• Generate unnecessary false‑positive escalations
• Create variation and risk in the clinical response
To address this, NHS England has developed MEWS as a separate scoring tool using
evidence‑based, pregnancy‑specific thresholds, which more accurately reflect
physiological changes from conception to four weeks postpartum. This ensures
deterioration can be recognised and escalated appropriately and consistently.
The national MEWS matrix removes variation by providing a single, standardised tool
for use across England in all care settings where a woman may present, including
those outside maternity units (e.g. emergency departments, general wards,
ambulance service environments).
In October 2025, when Mrs Dona passed away, there was no published NHS England
guidance on the use of the national MEWS in non‑maternity clinical areas due to initial
focus being on implementation in acute maternity services.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) had previously published
a Medtech Innovation Briefing (MIB205) in February 2020. This briefing clearly stated
that NEWS2 should not be used for pregnant women, as the physiological changes of
pregnancy make NEWS2 inappropriate and potentially misleading for this population.
However, this important caution is not clearly articulated in either:
• NICE Clinical Guideline CG50 (2020) Acutely ill adults in hospital: recognising
and responding to deterioration https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg50 ; or
• The revised NICE Guideline NG255 (2025) Suspected sepsis in pregnant or
recently pregnant people: recognition, diagnosis and early management
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng255 .
NICE has confirmed that it plans to review the use of Modified Obstetric Early Warning
Scores (MEOWS) and consider making recommendations on it within guideline
NG255. The current guideline version addresses the management of suspected
sepsis both outside and inside acute hospital settings. NHS England will engage with
NICE throughout the guideline update process to ensure that considerations regarding
the use of MEWS / MEOWS in non‑maternity care environments are appropriately
reflected. This updated guidance is expected to be published in February 2027.
MEWS implementation forms part of wider national commitments to improve maternity
and neonatal safety.
In March 2023, NHS England published the Three‑Year Delivery Plan for Maternity
and Neonatal Services. MEWS implementation is a key requirement within Theme 4:
Standards and structures that underpin safer, more personalised, and more equitable
care.
NHS England has developed national digital specifications
the
implementation of the national MEWS across both maternity and non‑maternity clinical
environments. These specifications are designed to ensure consistency and
interoperability across electronic patient record (EPR) systems, reducing variation in
how deterioration is recognised, recorded, and escalated.
to support
Draft versions of the specifications have already been circulated to digital suppliers via
the NHS Futures platform ahead of their planned formal publication in Spring 2026.
This early dissemination aims to enable suppliers and organisations to begin aligning
or configuring their systems in preparation for national rollout, thereby supporting safer
and more consistent digital recognition of deterioration in pregnant and recently
pregnant women across all care settings.
Further to this, NHS England published the Maternal Care Bundle (MCB) in January
2026. This sets out evidence‑based standards across five key clinical areas to be
implemented nationally by March 2027. MEWS is an essential component of Element
2: Pre‑hospital and Acute Care.
This element requires:
• The implementation of the national MEWS across all settings for women who
are, or have been, pregnant within the previous four weeks
• Timely obstetric and/or obstetric physician review in accordance with MEWS
escalation timeframes based on total score and clinical concern
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Mrs
Dona, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us
to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and
action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
NHS England
Royal Stoke University Hospital Executive Suite Springfield Newcastle Road Stoke-on-Trent Staffordshire ST4 6QG 17 March 2026 STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Ms Emma Serrano Area Coroner Stoke-on-Trent and Staffordshire Dear Ms Serrano Dhananji Denawakage DONA Further to your letter dated 21 January 2026, I am pleased to provide a response under paragraph 7 of Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroner’s (Investigations) Regulations 2013, addressing your concerns surrounding the death of Dhananji Denawakage Dona. Recorded Circumstances of the Death “Mrs Dona attended the Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke on Trent. She was pregnant and had noticed bleeding and was suffering from abdominal pain. She was suffering from SEPSIS as well as miscarrying. There was a delay in her assessment in the A&E department, and the SEPSIS screening tool was not used. There is a specific National Early Warning Score matrix for prenatal women. This was not used in the A&E department as, despite national guidance to say this should be used in all departments of a hospital, it was only used in the maternity department of the Hospital. This led to a delay in her diagnosis and treatment of SEPSIS. She continued to deteriorate whilst in hospital and passed away on the 2 October 2025. Evidence heard at inquest was that earlier diagnosis and treatment for SEPSIS would have meant that Mrs Dona would have survived.” Concerns During the course of the inquest, you felt that evidence revealed matters giving rise for concern. In your opinion, matters for concern are as follows. “That although the specialist National Early Warning Score matrix for prenatal women, should be used within the whole of the hospital, it still was not, and there were no plans to introduce this within a reasonable timescale.” You reported this matter under Paragraph 7, Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroner’s (Investigations) Regulations 2013. In your opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths. Action Taken The University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust has taken the issues highlighted during the inquest seriously and indeed, I am grateful that you have raised your concerns to which a response is provided below. Across the UK, the national direction for maternity safety is being driven by the Saving Babies’ Lives Care Bundle and includes national maternity safety initiatives, which emphasise early identification and escalation of maternal deterioration. As part of this, the national Maternity Early Warning Score (MEWS) has been mandated for adoption across . all NHS Trusts (by March 2027) to ensure consistent, standardised monitoring of pregnant, and recently pregnant, women in every clinical setting. Nationally, progress has been slower than intended due to delays in digital supplier readiness and variation in local electronic patient record capabilities. UHNM is on a similar trajectory to other Trusts across the UK. NHSE is responsible for the safety improvement programme across England. The current digital systems used across UHNM are unable to support the introduction of the new National Maternal Early Warning Score (MEWS). We have engaged with our supplier colleagues, System C, and with regional and national colleagues regarding options; they have confirmed the inability of our current systems to be adapted to accommodate the MEWS. However, in response to the Regulation 28 received, and the national directive to implement the national MEWS, UHNM have established an operational group to develop a Trust wide approach which is appropriate for all applicable clinical areas. ‑ In the short-term, a paper based MEWS process will be rolled out across the organisation ensuring that this is fully implemented by the national directive timeframe of March 2027. This roll-out will be supported by appropriate training and will be aligned with national guidance and local governance processes. Clearly, as this safety critical pathway must be implemented consistently and reliably across all areas of the organisation where pregnant patients may present (including the Emergency Department, Acute Medicine, Surgical areas, and any outpatient or assessment settings), it is essential that a robust, Trust wide training programme is delivered prior to implementation. This will ensure that staff across all clinical environments understand the escalation framework, associated clinical triggers and the governance requirements linked to MEWS. Our longer-term strategy will look at progressing work to explore the development of an in-house digital solution to support implementation of the MEWS, whilst also awaiting the provider of the existing digital observations platform to complete the required software updates; we will endeavour to implement whichever appropriate digital solution is available first. I do hope that the above information provides assurance that the Trust has taken the concerns raised at the inquest seriously and that you are content with the response that has been provided. Should you wish to discuss any aspect of this report further, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Yours sincerely Chief Executive .
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.