Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026

Barbara Wingate

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0088, written 10 Feb 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report10 Feb 2026
Reference2026-0088
DeceasedBarbara Wingate
CoronerCatherine Wood
Coroner areaKent and Medway
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Kent and Medway Coroners' Service 
Oakwood House 
Oakwood Park 
Maidstone 
Kent 
ME16 8AE 

Date: 10 February 2026 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:   

The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 

Kent County Council 

Medway Council 

Kent and Medway Integrated Care board 

1. CORONER 

I am Catherine Wood  Area Coroner for Kent and Medway  

2. CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 29 May 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Barbara Wingate. The 
investigation concluded at the end of the inquest . The conclusion of the inquest was 

A narrative "She died as a consequence of injuries sustained following a fall contributed to by 
avoidable delays in diagnosing and treating her pelvic fractures." 

1a   Multiple Organ Failure 

1b   Hypoxic Cardiac Arrest with Aspiration 

  
   
 
  
  
  
  
  
 1c   Multiple Fractures 

1d    Fall 

 II    Ischaemic Heart Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, heart Failure 

4. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Barbara Wingate was a 71 year old woman with a past medical history of hypertension, atrial 
fibrillation and cardiac failure and was on anticoagulants. She fell at home on 18 May 2025 
and an ambulance was called who took her to Medway Maritime hospital having pre-alerted 
the hospital and classifying her as a "silver trauma". She was seen in the emergency 
department just before midnight but there were no beds in the resuscitation department and 
she was instead taken to the Rapid Assessment Unit when she should have gone to the 
resuscitation department and a full trauma call initiated. She was assessed by a nurse but only 
seen by a doctor just after 01.30 am. An x-ray revealed some spinal abnormalities and the 
following morning around 08.30 she was in significant pain and pelvic imaging was suggested. 
She was admitted under the care of the medical team but the pelvic x-ray was not undertaken 
before she collapsed around 4 pm that afternoon. Imaging revealed multiple pelvic fractures 
and the major haemorrhage protocol was commenced. She suffered a cardiac arrest and was 
intubated and ventilated and a return of spontaneous circulation achieved. She was stabilised 
and transferred to Kings College Hospital around 22.00 by which time she was hypoxic and 
hypotensive despite inotropic support and intubation and ventilation. She was transfused with 
blood and blood products, stabilised and transferred to Intensive Care. She died on 21 May 
2025 as a consequence of multiple organ failure due to hypoxic cardiac arrest with aspiration 
in turn due to bleeding and pain from her multiple fractures following her fall. 

5. CORONER'S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my 
opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances 
it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  - 

Evidence heard at the inquest revealed that the resuscitation department where Mrs Wingate 
should have been admitted was full and the evidence indicated that this was and is almost a 
daily occurrence at the Trust. The court heard that the main issue is trying to discharge a 
patient to a suitable area in the hospital to free up a cubicle or bay in the resuscitation 
department. This in turn is due to beds being occupied by patients who are medically fit to be 
discharged. On any given day the court heard that up to a third of the hospital beds can be 
filled with patients who are fit to leave hospital.  

The court heard that the main delay is in discharging patients to appropriate settings or 
placements and the Trust have taken all steps they can internally to improve the flow of 
patients through the hospital.  From the evidence it would appear that those responsible for 
providing care in the community including both the social care providers and the community 
healthcare providers are not providing either timely appropriate care packages in the patient's 
home or a bed in an alternative placement be that a nursing home or residential home 
placement. The evidence suggested that where patients were self funding the delays in 

  
  
  
  
 discharge were less acute. 

This means patients are kept in hospital for longer and thus are more at risk of contracting 
hospital acquired illness themselves which could lead to their own death but are also blocking 
beds which are needed to treat patients who require acute care. This is leading to patients 
being kept longer in the emergency department and reducing available space to receive new 
critically ill patients. Both of these options can lead to death as seen in this case and there is 
clearly a risk of death for others requiring clinical care in an acute hospital. 

6. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you are all  have 
the power to take such action. 

7. YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely 
by 8 April 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8. COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons 
Mrs Wingate's family, Medway NHS Foundation Trust and Kings College Hospital NHS 
Foundation Trust.  

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He 
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. 
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

10 February 2026 

Signature 

Catherine Wood Area Coroner for Kent and Medway

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Kent County Council (PDF)
To: Catherine Wood, Area Coroner for 
Kent, and Medway  

Kent County Council  
Corporate Complaints  
County Hall 
Maidstone, Kent 
ME14 1XQ 

RE: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths 

This report has been prepared in response to a request from the coroner for a 
Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths dated 10 February 2026 in 
respect of the death of Mrs Barbara Wingate.  

Firstly, I would like to offer my condolences to the family and friends of Mrs 
Wingate. 

Processes and challenges at the time of the death 

Kent County Council’s Short Term Pathways Team is a team of social care 
staff who support the hospital discharge pathways. The team works in 
partnership with Medway NHS Foundation Trust and based on a hub and 
spoke model, is part of the Integrated Discharge Team working at Medway 
Maritime Hospital. The team is also a partner in the Medway Hospital Transfer 
of Care Hub which is a system-level coordination point that includes a multi-
agency team of health, social care, and voluntary sector agencies. 

KCC attends daily Transfer of Care Hub meetings, Monday to Fridays, where 
discussions take place regarding patients with the most complex discharge 
support needs to agree the most appropriate discharge pathway for those 
individuals.  

At the time of Mrs Wingate’s death, KCC operated a Discharge to Assess 
model and home first approach in line with national statutory discharge 
guidance, Hospital discharge and community support guidance - GOV.UK. 
The Local Authority continues to operate this model. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 There is a significantly lower number of people leaving Medway Maritime 
Hospital from KCC’s boundary areas and with KCC commissioned support 
than from partner and neighbouring authorities. KCC typically receives an 
average of 11 referrals per week to support people with discharge from 
Medway Hospital. This level of demand has remained consistent from the time 
preceding the death of Mrs Wingate until present day. 

The number of bed days lost due to people occupying acute beds who have 
No Criteria to Reside attributable to KCC is typically below 5% of the total bed 
days lost at any given time. This has also remained fairly consistent from the 
time preceding the death of Mrs Wingate until present day. 

Over 95% of people whose discharge is supported by KCC, are discharged 
back to their own home with an enablement service provided by Kent 
Enablement at Home. This is KCC’s in-house service that provides 
assessment and enablement support for people in their own home. 

For the particular week that Mrs Wingate died, KCC received an average 
number of referrals for people who were discharged back to their own home 
and the average time from referral to discharge for these individuals was 2.5 
days. 

Current processes and challenges and change made. 

During this period Kent Enablement at Home were experiencing a high 
number of vacancies within the team, with a 30% vacancy factor which 
impacted on the referral to discharge time. A recruitment campaign and 
efficiencies created within referral processes has reduced this time to 1.8 
days. This has been consistent for the last three months and is in line with key 
performance indicators set by Medway Hospital of a 48 hour timescale for 
discharge back to a person’s own home.  

A small number of people are discharged to a short-term bed where they 
receive a period of enablement and/or assessment of their longer-term care 
and support needs. The majority of these people are discharged to KCC’s 
Adult Short Stay Services which are in-house enablement beds. During the 
time that Mrs Wingate died, the average time for discharge to be facilitated 
from the time of referral to the Short-Term Pathways team was 5.3 days. 
Improvements have been made to the referral processes for this pathway, and 
the current average transfer of care time is 3 days.  

Ongoing challenges beyond the control of the Council 

Despite the improvements made to the length of stay for people with No 
Criteria to Reside attributable to KCC, our data clearly shows that 50% of 
referrals experience delays beyond the control of KCC. The main reasons for 
these delays are availability of discharge documentation, medication, and 
transport availability. These delays are reported in Medway Hospital’s No 

2 

 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Criteria to Reside report and KCC continue to work with the trust in identifying 
themes and trends that delay hospital discharge.  

Improvements identified  

KCC continues to review hospital discharge practice and guidance in 
collaboration with system partners. The local authority is currently undergoing 
a review of the Short Term Pathways practice and processes, and the 
commissioning of hospital discharge services. KCC will continue to focus on 
the principles of Discharge to Assess and home first with the ambition of 
further increasing timely discharges into Pathway 1 home-based services.  

Yours sincerely 

Corporate Director, Adult Social Care and Health 
Kent County Council 

3
Response from Kent and Medway ICB (PDF)
Office of the Chief Nursing Officer 
NHS Kent and Medway 
2nd Floor, Gail House 
Lower Stone Street 
Maidstone 
ME15 6NB 

Private and Confidential  

Catherine Wood 
Area Coroner for Kent and Medway 
Kent and Medway Coroners' Service 
Oakwood House 
Oakwood Park 
Maidstone 
Kent 
ME16 8AE 

Sent via email 

7 April 2026 

Dear Ms Wood 

Regulations 28 and 29 Reports regarding Barbara Wingate 

I write in response to the Prevention of Future Death Report dated 10th February 2026, sent 
pursuant to paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 concerning the death 
of Barbara Wingate on 21st May 2025. 

The Coroner raised the following concern(s): 

1.  Evidence  heard  at  the  inquest  revealed  that  the  resuscitation  department 
where  Mrs  Wingate  should  have  been  admitted  was  full and  the  evidence 
indicated  that  this  was  and  is  almost  a  daily  occurrence  at  the  Trust.  The 
court heard that the main issue is trying to discharge a patient to a suitable 
area in the hospital to free up a cubicle or bay in the resuscitation department. 
This in turn is due to beds being occupied by patients who are medically fit 
to be discharged. On any given day the court heard that up to a third of the 
hospital beds can be filled with patients who are fit to leave hospital. 

2.  The court heard that the main delay is in discharging patients to appropriate 
settings or placements and the Trust have taken all steps they can internally 
to  improve  the  flow  of  patients  through  the  hospital.  From  the  evidence  it 
would  appear  that  those  responsible  for  providing  care  in  the  community 
including  both  the  social  care  providers  and  the  community  healthcare 
providers  are  not  providing  either  timely  appropriate  care  packages  in  the 
patient's home or a bed in an alternative placement be that a nursing home 
or residential home placement. The evidence suggested that where patients 
were self-funding the delays in discharge were less acute. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Letter reference: 2026.02.10 PFD - Barbara Wingate 

3.  This means patients are kept in hospital for longer and thus are more at risk 
of contracting hospital acquired illness themselves which could lead to their 
own death but are also blocking beds which are needed to treat patients who 
require  acute  care.  This  is  leading  to  patients  being  kept  longer  in  the 
emergency department and reducing available space to receive new critically 
ill patients. Both of these options can lead to death as seen in this case and 
there is clearly a  risk of death for others requiring clinical care in an acute 
hospital. 

I am responding on behalf of NHS Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board (ICB) to the 
concerns in your Regulation 28 and 29 reports. The concerns relate to the risk to critically unwell 
patients when emergency departments (EDs) are congested and transfer to an appropriate 
inpatient bed is delayed.  

NHS Kent and Medway takes your findings very seriously and we offer our heartfelt condolences 
to the family of Mrs Barbara Wingate. 

While the majority of patients leave our hospitals when they are well enough to go home, we 
know more needs to be done to prevent the delays that some experience. These delays can be 
for a number of reasons from internal hospital processes to the complexity of arranging ongoing 
care before a patient can be safely discharged.  

I would like to outline the steps we have taken to reduce unnecessary bed occupancy by 
improving the discharge process and how ongoing support is organised.  

As you are aware, NHS Kent and Medway has a statutory oversight role in making sure providers 
of care, including acute hospital trusts, meet the standards set out in the NHS Constitution.  

The Medway Care Transfer Hub now acts as the single coordination and escalation point for the 
Local Authority and Health to support patients requiring new residential or nursing placements. 
This ensures consistent, person-centred decision making and removes delays associated with 
variable processes. The Hub provides weekly reports to the ICB on performance, issues, and 
escalations.   

Discharge pathways 

Over the last six months we have taken coordinated actions with Medway Council, Medway 
Foundation NHS Trust (MFT) and wider system partners to make several improvements to the 
main, nationally agreed pathways, which are used by the hospital for discharge. The pathways 
have been developed to address individual patient need and circumstances: 

1.  Strengthening same‑day discharge (Pathway 0, the national discharge definition, simple 
discharge home) – MFT have implemented a structured daily approach to maximise safe 
same-day discharge once a patient is deemed medically fit. This includes senior clinical 
review, early identification of patients suitable for discharge, and prompt resolution of 
simple barriers. This process is now fully operational and monitored through daily hospital 
management mechanisms. 

Page 2 of 3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Letter reference: 2026.02.10 PFD - Barbara Wingate 

2.  Expanding the Home First/short‑term support capacity (Pathway 1, Discharge home with 
short-term support) – capacity for short-term care at home has been increased so more 
people can leave hospital safely with e necessary support. Oversight of capacity, flow and 
performance is provided through the Medway System Discharge Group, a local MDT 
approach supporting discharge. 

3.  Increasing access to short-term community rehabilitation beds (Pathway 2) and reducing 

transfer delays – work is underway to expand access to short-term community 
rehabilitation beds improving onward flow for patients who no longer need acute inpatient 
care. A new bed-coordination (brokerage) function will be operational by quarter three of 
2026 ahead of winter with clear accountability for timely allocation and progress monitored 
monthly through ICB assurance routes. 

The ICB and MFT have also jointly identified a programme of work focused on reducing hospital 
avoidable delays for patients whose discharge is delayed by internal processes or hospital-based 
constraints. This work runs in parallel to the community pathway improvements described above.  

The Medway Care Transfer Hub now acts as the single coordination and escalation point for 
patients requiring new residential or nursing placements. This ensures consistent, person-centred 
decision making and removes delays associated with variable processes. The Hub provides 
weekly reports on performance, issues, and escalations.  

NHS Kent & Medway ICB acknowledges that delays in discharge increase the risk of harm for 
people waiting in the ED for specialist inpatient care. The actions set out above constitute the 
system’s agreed, time-bound programme reviewed with the national team on a quarterly basis to 
address those risks. Oversight arrangements ensure that delivery continues to be monitored 
closely, with escalation through formal governance routes where necessary.  

If you require any further information or clarification, I would be happy to provide this.  

Yours sincerely 

Chief Nursing and Quality Officer 

Page 3 of 3

Related reports

Other reports by Catherine Wood

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.