Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0088, written 10 Feb 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 10 Feb 2026 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2026-0088 |
| Deceased | Barbara Wingate |
| Coroner | Catherine Wood |
| Coroner area | Kent and Medway |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Kent and Medway Coroners' Service Oakwood House Oakwood Park Maidstone Kent ME16 8AE Date: 10 February 2026 REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Kent County Council Medway Council Kent and Medway Integrated Care board 1. CORONER I am Catherine Wood Area Coroner for Kent and Medway 2. CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 29 May 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Barbara Wingate. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest . The conclusion of the inquest was A narrative "She died as a consequence of injuries sustained following a fall contributed to by avoidable delays in diagnosing and treating her pelvic fractures." 1a Multiple Organ Failure 1b Hypoxic Cardiac Arrest with Aspiration 1c Multiple Fractures 1d Fall II Ischaemic Heart Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, heart Failure 4. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Barbara Wingate was a 71 year old woman with a past medical history of hypertension, atrial fibrillation and cardiac failure and was on anticoagulants. She fell at home on 18 May 2025 and an ambulance was called who took her to Medway Maritime hospital having pre-alerted the hospital and classifying her as a "silver trauma". She was seen in the emergency department just before midnight but there were no beds in the resuscitation department and she was instead taken to the Rapid Assessment Unit when she should have gone to the resuscitation department and a full trauma call initiated. She was assessed by a nurse but only seen by a doctor just after 01.30 am. An x-ray revealed some spinal abnormalities and the following morning around 08.30 she was in significant pain and pelvic imaging was suggested. She was admitted under the care of the medical team but the pelvic x-ray was not undertaken before she collapsed around 4 pm that afternoon. Imaging revealed multiple pelvic fractures and the major haemorrhage protocol was commenced. She suffered a cardiac arrest and was intubated and ventilated and a return of spontaneous circulation achieved. She was stabilised and transferred to Kings College Hospital around 22.00 by which time she was hypoxic and hypotensive despite inotropic support and intubation and ventilation. She was transfused with blood and blood products, stabilised and transferred to Intensive Care. She died on 21 May 2025 as a consequence of multiple organ failure due to hypoxic cardiac arrest with aspiration in turn due to bleeding and pain from her multiple fractures following her fall. 5. CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. - Evidence heard at the inquest revealed that the resuscitation department where Mrs Wingate should have been admitted was full and the evidence indicated that this was and is almost a daily occurrence at the Trust. The court heard that the main issue is trying to discharge a patient to a suitable area in the hospital to free up a cubicle or bay in the resuscitation department. This in turn is due to beds being occupied by patients who are medically fit to be discharged. On any given day the court heard that up to a third of the hospital beds can be filled with patients who are fit to leave hospital. The court heard that the main delay is in discharging patients to appropriate settings or placements and the Trust have taken all steps they can internally to improve the flow of patients through the hospital. From the evidence it would appear that those responsible for providing care in the community including both the social care providers and the community healthcare providers are not providing either timely appropriate care packages in the patient's home or a bed in an alternative placement be that a nursing home or residential home placement. The evidence suggested that where patients were self funding the delays in discharge were less acute. This means patients are kept in hospital for longer and thus are more at risk of contracting hospital acquired illness themselves which could lead to their own death but are also blocking beds which are needed to treat patients who require acute care. This is leading to patients being kept longer in the emergency department and reducing available space to receive new critically ill patients. Both of these options can lead to death as seen in this case and there is clearly a risk of death for others requiring clinical care in an acute hospital. 6. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you are all have the power to take such action. 7. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 8 April 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8. COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons Mrs Wingate's family, Medway NHS Foundation Trust and Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 10 February 2026 Signature Catherine Wood Area Coroner for Kent and Medway
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
To: Catherine Wood, Area Coroner for Kent, and Medway Kent County Council Corporate Complaints County Hall Maidstone, Kent ME14 1XQ RE: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths This report has been prepared in response to a request from the coroner for a Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths dated 10 February 2026 in respect of the death of Mrs Barbara Wingate. Firstly, I would like to offer my condolences to the family and friends of Mrs Wingate. Processes and challenges at the time of the death Kent County Council’s Short Term Pathways Team is a team of social care staff who support the hospital discharge pathways. The team works in partnership with Medway NHS Foundation Trust and based on a hub and spoke model, is part of the Integrated Discharge Team working at Medway Maritime Hospital. The team is also a partner in the Medway Hospital Transfer of Care Hub which is a system-level coordination point that includes a multi- agency team of health, social care, and voluntary sector agencies. KCC attends daily Transfer of Care Hub meetings, Monday to Fridays, where discussions take place regarding patients with the most complex discharge support needs to agree the most appropriate discharge pathway for those individuals. At the time of Mrs Wingate’s death, KCC operated a Discharge to Assess model and home first approach in line with national statutory discharge guidance, Hospital discharge and community support guidance - GOV.UK. The Local Authority continues to operate this model. There is a significantly lower number of people leaving Medway Maritime Hospital from KCC’s boundary areas and with KCC commissioned support than from partner and neighbouring authorities. KCC typically receives an average of 11 referrals per week to support people with discharge from Medway Hospital. This level of demand has remained consistent from the time preceding the death of Mrs Wingate until present day. The number of bed days lost due to people occupying acute beds who have No Criteria to Reside attributable to KCC is typically below 5% of the total bed days lost at any given time. This has also remained fairly consistent from the time preceding the death of Mrs Wingate until present day. Over 95% of people whose discharge is supported by KCC, are discharged back to their own home with an enablement service provided by Kent Enablement at Home. This is KCC’s in-house service that provides assessment and enablement support for people in their own home. For the particular week that Mrs Wingate died, KCC received an average number of referrals for people who were discharged back to their own home and the average time from referral to discharge for these individuals was 2.5 days. Current processes and challenges and change made. During this period Kent Enablement at Home were experiencing a high number of vacancies within the team, with a 30% vacancy factor which impacted on the referral to discharge time. A recruitment campaign and efficiencies created within referral processes has reduced this time to 1.8 days. This has been consistent for the last three months and is in line with key performance indicators set by Medway Hospital of a 48 hour timescale for discharge back to a person’s own home. A small number of people are discharged to a short-term bed where they receive a period of enablement and/or assessment of their longer-term care and support needs. The majority of these people are discharged to KCC’s Adult Short Stay Services which are in-house enablement beds. During the time that Mrs Wingate died, the average time for discharge to be facilitated from the time of referral to the Short-Term Pathways team was 5.3 days. Improvements have been made to the referral processes for this pathway, and the current average transfer of care time is 3 days. Ongoing challenges beyond the control of the Council Despite the improvements made to the length of stay for people with No Criteria to Reside attributable to KCC, our data clearly shows that 50% of referrals experience delays beyond the control of KCC. The main reasons for these delays are availability of discharge documentation, medication, and transport availability. These delays are reported in Medway Hospital’s No 2 Criteria to Reside report and KCC continue to work with the trust in identifying themes and trends that delay hospital discharge. Improvements identified KCC continues to review hospital discharge practice and guidance in collaboration with system partners. The local authority is currently undergoing a review of the Short Term Pathways practice and processes, and the commissioning of hospital discharge services. KCC will continue to focus on the principles of Discharge to Assess and home first with the ambition of further increasing timely discharges into Pathway 1 home-based services. Yours sincerely Corporate Director, Adult Social Care and Health Kent County Council 3
Office of the Chief Nursing Officer NHS Kent and Medway 2nd Floor, Gail House Lower Stone Street Maidstone ME15 6NB Private and Confidential Catherine Wood Area Coroner for Kent and Medway Kent and Medway Coroners' Service Oakwood House Oakwood Park Maidstone Kent ME16 8AE Sent via email 7 April 2026 Dear Ms Wood Regulations 28 and 29 Reports regarding Barbara Wingate I write in response to the Prevention of Future Death Report dated 10th February 2026, sent pursuant to paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 concerning the death of Barbara Wingate on 21st May 2025. The Coroner raised the following concern(s): 1. Evidence heard at the inquest revealed that the resuscitation department where Mrs Wingate should have been admitted was full and the evidence indicated that this was and is almost a daily occurrence at the Trust. The court heard that the main issue is trying to discharge a patient to a suitable area in the hospital to free up a cubicle or bay in the resuscitation department. This in turn is due to beds being occupied by patients who are medically fit to be discharged. On any given day the court heard that up to a third of the hospital beds can be filled with patients who are fit to leave hospital. 2. The court heard that the main delay is in discharging patients to appropriate settings or placements and the Trust have taken all steps they can internally to improve the flow of patients through the hospital. From the evidence it would appear that those responsible for providing care in the community including both the social care providers and the community healthcare providers are not providing either timely appropriate care packages in the patient's home or a bed in an alternative placement be that a nursing home or residential home placement. The evidence suggested that where patients were self-funding the delays in discharge were less acute. Letter reference: 2026.02.10 PFD - Barbara Wingate 3. This means patients are kept in hospital for longer and thus are more at risk of contracting hospital acquired illness themselves which could lead to their own death but are also blocking beds which are needed to treat patients who require acute care. This is leading to patients being kept longer in the emergency department and reducing available space to receive new critically ill patients. Both of these options can lead to death as seen in this case and there is clearly a risk of death for others requiring clinical care in an acute hospital. I am responding on behalf of NHS Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board (ICB) to the concerns in your Regulation 28 and 29 reports. The concerns relate to the risk to critically unwell patients when emergency departments (EDs) are congested and transfer to an appropriate inpatient bed is delayed. NHS Kent and Medway takes your findings very seriously and we offer our heartfelt condolences to the family of Mrs Barbara Wingate. While the majority of patients leave our hospitals when they are well enough to go home, we know more needs to be done to prevent the delays that some experience. These delays can be for a number of reasons from internal hospital processes to the complexity of arranging ongoing care before a patient can be safely discharged. I would like to outline the steps we have taken to reduce unnecessary bed occupancy by improving the discharge process and how ongoing support is organised. As you are aware, NHS Kent and Medway has a statutory oversight role in making sure providers of care, including acute hospital trusts, meet the standards set out in the NHS Constitution. The Medway Care Transfer Hub now acts as the single coordination and escalation point for the Local Authority and Health to support patients requiring new residential or nursing placements. This ensures consistent, person-centred decision making and removes delays associated with variable processes. The Hub provides weekly reports to the ICB on performance, issues, and escalations. Discharge pathways Over the last six months we have taken coordinated actions with Medway Council, Medway Foundation NHS Trust (MFT) and wider system partners to make several improvements to the main, nationally agreed pathways, which are used by the hospital for discharge. The pathways have been developed to address individual patient need and circumstances: 1. Strengthening same‑day discharge (Pathway 0, the national discharge definition, simple discharge home) – MFT have implemented a structured daily approach to maximise safe same-day discharge once a patient is deemed medically fit. This includes senior clinical review, early identification of patients suitable for discharge, and prompt resolution of simple barriers. This process is now fully operational and monitored through daily hospital management mechanisms. Page 2 of 3 Letter reference: 2026.02.10 PFD - Barbara Wingate 2. Expanding the Home First/short‑term support capacity (Pathway 1, Discharge home with short-term support) – capacity for short-term care at home has been increased so more people can leave hospital safely with e necessary support. Oversight of capacity, flow and performance is provided through the Medway System Discharge Group, a local MDT approach supporting discharge. 3. Increasing access to short-term community rehabilitation beds (Pathway 2) and reducing transfer delays – work is underway to expand access to short-term community rehabilitation beds improving onward flow for patients who no longer need acute inpatient care. A new bed-coordination (brokerage) function will be operational by quarter three of 2026 ahead of winter with clear accountability for timely allocation and progress monitored monthly through ICB assurance routes. The ICB and MFT have also jointly identified a programme of work focused on reducing hospital avoidable delays for patients whose discharge is delayed by internal processes or hospital-based constraints. This work runs in parallel to the community pathway improvements described above. The Medway Care Transfer Hub now acts as the single coordination and escalation point for patients requiring new residential or nursing placements. This ensures consistent, person-centred decision making and removes delays associated with variable processes. The Hub provides weekly reports on performance, issues, and escalations. NHS Kent & Medway ICB acknowledges that delays in discharge increase the risk of harm for people waiting in the ED for specialist inpatient care. The actions set out above constitute the system’s agreed, time-bound programme reviewed with the national team on a quarterly basis to address those risks. Oversight arrangements ensure that delivery continues to be monitored closely, with escalation through formal governance routes where necessary. If you require any further information or clarification, I would be happy to provide this. Yours sincerely Chief Nursing and Quality Officer Page 3 of 3
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.