Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0182, written 7 Feb 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 7 Feb 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0182 |
| Deceased | Ella Murray |
| Coroner | Catherine Wood |
| Coroner area | Mid Kent and Medway |
| Category | Child Death (from 2015) · Suicide (from 2015) |
| Organisation named | North East London NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 3 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Mid Kent and Medway Coroners' Service Oakwood House Oakwood Park Maidstone Kent ME16 8AE Telephone: Email: Date: 7 February 2025 Case: REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: State for Health and Social Care, the Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board. , Chief Executive NHS England and , Secretary of 1. CORONER I am Mrs. Catherine Wood, Area Coroner for Mid Kent and Medway 2. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 23 November 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Ella Louise Murray who was 13 years old at the time of her death. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest . The conclusion of the inquest was suicide plus a narrative "Ella died as a consequence of hanging herself shortly after being seen by mental health care professionals. She intended to end her life and had told the mental health team she would do so or would harm others so that she would go to prison. There was a failure to undertake an adequate, or any, risk assessment and take any further steps to ensure Ella's safety on 14 November 2024." 1a Asphyxia due to Hanging 1b 1c 1d II 4. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Ella was 13 years old when she died at Kings College hospital on 15 November 2023 as a consequence of asphyxia due to hanging. Ella had a history of self-harm and had taken 2 overdoses, the first in December 2022 and the second in August 2023, with a self inflicted burn in February 2023 requiring treatment at a specialist burns unit. Ella's home life was complicated and she had been involved with social services in the form of Early Help intervention in the Autumn/Winter 2022/2023 although their involvement ended in February 2023. She had also been referred to school counselling services due to concerns about her mental health with low mood and suicidal ideation and was seen by a counsellor between April and July 2023. Her counsellor was able to provide some support but referrals made to the child and health adolescent mental health services were not progressed further. She was seen by the Crisis team from mental health services after her August overdose but declined further support from them and it was unclear if this was Ella or a combination of Ella and her parent’s choice. A referral had been made by her school to social services in July 2023 when Ella disclosed a sexual assault to a member of staff at the school. Social services did not speak to Ella in July and having spoken to her mother considered that she did not reach their threshold for engagement and the school raised their concerns about this at the time. In the Autumn term there were clear signs that Ella was struggling at school and had said she wanted to move schools, a further referral was made to social services in September 2023 and Ella disclosed the name of the person who she said had assaulted her and the member of staff was duty bound to act on this disclosure and involved police. This led to some friction and there were discussions about how to support Ella but some conflict arose between school and home about the best way to deal with this and Ella's behaviour at school, including not attending lessons. Over the weekend of 10-12 November 2023 Ella had been out with friends and had a sleepover and came back tired and her parents found some messages on her phone which were deemed inappropriate by them. On 13 November 2023 Ella disclosed to a member of staff at school that she wanted to kill herself. The school completed a high risk mental health form for Ella to take with her to hospital and made arrangements for her to be picked up and taken by family to hospital. Ella was taken to Medway Maritime hospital by her stepfather and triaged and referred to the Crisis Team at a separate Mental Health Trust and a member of their team came to assess her in the emergency department. She was seen and reported her mood as low but denied intent to end her life but reported ongoing self-harm and suicidal ideation and requested an admission to hospital. She was assessed as being of medium risk of harm and a decision was made to see her at home by other members of the mental health team. That evening she argued with her parents and ran away from home barefoot and a stranger called the police on her behalf. She told police she was frightened of her stepfather and was worried about returning home. Whilst on the call to police her Mum arrived and took her home giving the call handler their address as she left. The police followed up the next morning. Ella was kept off school the next day and a member of the mental health home treatment team visited in the afternoon. Her documentation shows that she was aware that Ella had run away from home and that she said she would harm herself or others in order to go to prison and was documented as being suicidal and was hearing derogatory voices. The nurse contacted the safeguarding team at 16.02 after she had seen Ella and made a referral to social services. Ella’s mother was on the telephone after the nurse had visited and went up to Ella’s room where she found her hanging . She called an ambulance and began cardiac massage on her daughter. The ambulance arrived and the crew continued with resuscitation attempts and a return of spontaneous circulation was obtained. Ella was taken by helicopter to Kings College hospital and was deeply unconscious on arrival and was admitted to critical care where she died shortly after 2pm on 15 December 2023. 5. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – (1)During the course of the inquest it became clear that Ella was a child in a complex family situation and showing signs of deterioration of her mental health. Her school had raised concerns about her with social services and taken steps to make sure she was seen by healthcare professionals when she indicated to staff at school she wanted to end her life on 13 November 2023. She was assessed by mental health nursing staff and accepted to the caseload of the Intensive Home Treatment Team. She was seen the following day and told the staff nurse who saw her that she was frightened of her stepfather and had run away from home barefoot and police called but she was brought back home by her mother who “grabbed her face” the morning she was seen. She told the nurse that she did not want to be in the family home and would rather go to prison and would harm herself or others is she had to stay at home. (2) This disclosure led to the nurse making a Safeguarding Referral but this was made after she left Ella’s home and no urgent steps were taken to remove Ella either to a hospital bed or to ask social services to consider if she should be removed from the family home. Her school had raised concerns about her and she herself had indicated she wished to end her life. Evidence heard at the inquest was that this was the procedure in place and there is no shared access to records for all agencies and no way to convene an urgent multi-agency meeting to determine if Ella was safe to remain at home. Had steps been taken to share information between her school, social services and the mental health providers when she attend the emergency department on 13 November 2023 or early the following day rather than leave her at home she may have been removed from her home and may still be alive today. (3) Whilst there were concerns about the level of risk assessment undertaken on 14 November 2023 senior staff at the Trust gave evidence that she did not meet the criteria for admission to a hospital bed. This was difficult to reconcile with the documentary evidence as she was clearly crying out for help and her school had recognised this. No one agency involved had access to all the relevant information and concerns about Ella across the health, social care and education arenas. Evidence given suggested that shared records would assist but the ability to respond to urgent concerns would require a system change. (4)It was brought to the court’s attention that the new Children’s Wellbeing and Schools bill includes a duty to share information to promote safeguarding. In addition the local authority may convene a strategy meeting under s47 of the Children Act 1989 although the speed of convening a meeting would depend on availability and would obviously not be as swift as for example attending an accident and emergency department. If a multiagency meeting had been convened this may have prevented Ella’s death and such action may reduce the risk of death for other children being in a similar position. 6. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 4 April 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8. COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons Ella's parents and grandparents, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, Kent Social Services Department, Medway MNHS Foundation Trust, Kent Police and Highstead School and to the Kent and Medway Safeguarding Board. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 7 February 2025 Signature Catherine Wood, Area Coroner for Mid Kent and Medway
3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
From
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for
Patient Safety, Women’s Health and Mental Health
39 Victoria Street
London SW1H 0EU
Our ref: PFD – 25-02-07 - MURRAY
HM Coroner Catherine Wood
Kent and Medway Coroners Service
Oakwood House
Oakwood Park
Maidstone
Kent ME16 8AE
By email: Kentandmedwaycoroners@kent.gov.uk
21st August 2025
Dear Mrs Wood,
Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 7 February 2025 sent to the Secretary of State
about the death of Ella Louise Murray. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for
Patient Safety, Women's Health and Mental Health.
Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Ella’s death,
and I offer my sincere condolences to her family and loved ones. The circumstances your
report describes are very concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to
my attention.
I understand that NHS England and Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board have also
received this report and I trust that they will adequately address your concerns at the local
level. I look forward to reading their responses and working with them on any proposed
changes.
For matters that fall outside of this Department’s direct responsibility, I would respectfully
signpost you to the Department for Education (DfE), which leads on child safeguarding policy
and related legislation and is better placed to respond to these elements of your report. I
understand that they are preparing a separate response addressing those elements and my
response references DfE policy where relevant.
Your report raises concerns that, if a multiagency meeting had been convened under section
47 of the Children Act 1989, Ella’s death may have been prevented, and such action may
reduce the risk of death for other children in a similar position. I would like to assure you that
the expectation is that a section 47 enquiry will normally be initiated to determine any action
required to safeguard and promote the welfare of a child who is suspected to be suffering or
is likely to suffer significant harm. Local authority social workers should lead assessments
under section 47 of the Children Act 1989.
Similarly, the expectation is that the police, health practitioners, teachers and school staff
and other relevant practitioners should help the local authority in undertaking its enquiries.
Health practitioners should provide appropriate specialist assessments. The lead health
practitioner may need to request and co-ordinate these assessments. Health practitioners
should also ensure appropriate treatment and follow up health concerns. The police should
help other organisations and agencies understand the reasons for concerns about the child’s
safety and welfare by sharing information and make available to other practitioners any other
relevant information gathered or known to inform discussions about the child’s welfare.
The DfE’s Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, which is currently being considered by
Parliament, aims to strengthen these arrangements by placing a duty on local safeguarding
partners (local authorities, police forces, and integrated care boards) to establish
multiagency child protection teams (MACPTs) with a minimum membership to include a
social worker, police officer, registered health practitioner, and person with education
experience.
As part of this, the Government’s Families First Partnership programme is delivering the
national rollout of reforms to family help, multi-agency child protection and family group
decision-making, including delivery of MACPTs. The programme guide sets out the
responsibilities of the MACPT members, including to facilitate better communication and
information sharing among practitioners and agencies. This is available at: Families First
Partnership programme - GOV.UK
I trust that the responses from NHS England or Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board
will address why this may not have happened in Ella’s case and what mitigations have been
put in place.
Your report also raises concerns about information sharing. To share information lawfully,
NHS organisations must comply with the principles set out in data protection legislation, the
General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and the common law duty of confidence. They
should also apply the Caldicott Principles which have been established by the National Data
Guardian for Health and Social Care to govern how data is shared by health and care
organisations.
The Caldicott Principles make clear that the duty to share information can be as important
as the duty to protect patient confidentiality. Healthcare professionals should have the
confidence to share information in the best interests of their patients, within the framework
set out by the Principles, and be supported by the policies of their employers, regulators and
professional bodies to do so.
All NHS organisations, as part of their information governance arrangements, are required
to have in place Caldicott Guardians who have responsibilities to safeguard and govern the
use of patient information and can provide advice in circumstances where there may be
uncertainty about disclosure.
Finally, and more widely, the Government is committed to tackling suicide as one the biggest
killers in this country. The Suicide Prevention Strategy for England sets out priority areas for
action to prevent suicides. This includes the need to provide tailored, targeted support to
priority groups, which includes children and young people, people who have self-harmed and
people in contact with mental health services, providing effective crisis support within and
outside of the NHS.
We recognise that too many children and young people like Ella are not getting the support
that they need with their mental health. That is why we are investing an extra £688 million
this year to transform mental health services by hiring more staff, delivering more early
interventions, and getting waiting lists down so young people can have the best possible start
in life.
We want to intervene much earlier to support better outcomes for children and young people.
That is why our 10 Year Health Plan sets out how we will work with schools and colleges to
better identify and meet children's mental health needs by expanding mental health support
teams in schools to cover 100% of pupils by 2029/30, and by embedding mental health
support in the new Young Futures hubs, to ensure there is no 'wrong front door' for young
people seeking help.
I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.
All good wishes,
Chief Nursing Officer’s Directorate
NHS Kent and Medway
Floor, Gail House
Lower Stone Street
Maidstone
ME15 6NB
2
nd
Mrs Catherine Wood
Area Coroner,
Mid Kent and Medway
Sent via email
Dear Mrs Wood,
Inquest into the death of Ella Louise MURRAY
I write in reference to the Prevention of Future Death Report made on 7th February 2025 to
Chief Executive NHS England and the Kent and Medway Integrated Care
, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care,
Board (ICB).
Thank you for sharing your concerns with us. We have liaised with Medway Foundation
Trust (MFT) and North East London Foundation Trust (NELFT - who are the provider for
children’s and young people’s mental health services in Kent & Medway) in the compilation
of this response.
NHS Kent and Medway is a commissioner of health services and the health lead statutory
safeguarding partner for both children and adults. Please note that neither the ICB Safeguarding
team or the Child Death Review team had direct contact with Ella or her family.
Ella was known to North East London Foundation Trust’s Children and Young People (NELFT)
services who are commissioned by NHS Kent and Medway to provide child and adolescent
mental health services.
I outline below the chronology of events following notification of Ella’s death, from a Child Death
Review perspective, which the ICB Safeguarding Team participates in.
The Kent and Medway Child Death Review Service (CDR) were notified on 16/11/23, within 24
hours of Ella’s death, by both Police and Kings College Hospital, in line with statutory guidance.
The Initial CDR standard operating processes were followed; a notification of death was sent out
to all known involved partners, and involvement summaries requested.
A Joint Agency Response (JAR) meeting was scheduled for 20/11/23 (delayed only by the
weekend). A patient summary was received from her general practitioner (GP) on 16/11/23, as
well as information from social care, stating that Ella was known to Kent Integrated Children’s
Services, and with contact details for the relevant team. Social care informed the Child Death
Review team that an initial strategy meeting had already taken place and details from the
meeting were shared.
‘With You’ charity identified to the Child Death Review (CDR) team on 16/11/23, a summary of
their involvement, and Kent Community Health Foundation Trust (KCHFT) shared that Ella was
not open to any KCHFT services at the time of her passing, but that she had recent school
health involvement for counselling. From KCHFT records they believed Ella was also known to
mental health services. It has been confirmed that Ella was known to North East London
Foundation Trust (NELFT) who provide mental health services.
On 20/11/23 the named nurse for safeguarding at Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells Trust (MTW)
informed the Child Death Review team that Ella had not been seen by this Trust in any capacity.
The Joint Agency Response was well attended on 20/11/23 and chaired by the Designated
Doctor, supported by the Child Death Review team, including specialist nurse and family liaison
team. There was representation at the Joint Agency Response from NELFT; Primary Care;
Kings College London NHS Hospitals Trust (King’s College Hospital); Education - Safeguarding;
Designated Nurse for Safeguarding Children, South East Coast Ambulance Service (SECAmb);
Kent Children’s Social Care; Police and Schools. Actions from the Joint Agency Response were
that there would be a further strategy meeting on 23/11/23; that NELFT would send chronology
reports to CDR team; that there was a Section 47 (A Section 47 Enquiry is initiated to decide
whether, and what type of, action is required to safeguard and promote the welfare of a child
who is suspected of, or likely to be, suffering significant harm) now in place for all children; and
a request for clarity on the location of Ella’s death.
At the Joint Agency Review the link to Ella potentially knowing two other young people through
school/ the local rugby club, who sadly died by suspected suicide, were identified by Police/
school. Joint Agency Review attendees were informed that the school were already seeking
support for students and staff, and Police were going to reach out to the rugby club to ensure
they had access to support for other rugby club members.
For all suspected child death by suicides, the Child Death Review team routinely links with the
Kent and Medway Integrated Children’s Services Suicide Prevention Programme Manager,
based in Kent County Council’s Public Health Team, for the purpose of monitoring, prevalence,
and intelligence across Kent. Ella’s case was shared and the suspected link with two other
recent deaths also noted.
The Child Death Review team were notified by Kent Safeguarding Children Multiagency
Partnership (KSCMP) on 27/11/23 that a notification for a Local Children Safeguarding Practice
Review (LSCPR) had been received and that a Rapid Review would be convened.
On 01/02/24 the coroner’s office confirmed that Ella did not have a post-mortem; the cause of
her death had been confirmed as asphyxia due to hanging and that the coroner would bring
Ella’s case to inquest.
06/02/25 Child Death Review team informed by Designated Nurse that Local Children
Safeguarding Practice Review had been published on the Kent Safeguarding Children
Partnership Board (KSCPB) and link to the report.
25/03/25 – Ella’s case was presented at a Child Death Review Meeting, which convened and
was chaired by Kings College Hospital for the purpose of review and analysis, and identified
matters relating to the death, contributory and modifiable factors. Kent and Medway Child
Death Review team and Designated Doctor attended, alongside representation from Kent
Safeguarding Children Multi-Agency Partnership, North East London Foundation Trust, and
Education. Matters of concern from the Preventing Future Deaths (Regulation 28), were
discussed and reviewed, and details from the published Local Safeguarding Children’s Practice
Review were shared and action updates given. Following the Child Death Review Meeting,
Ella’s case review will be presented at Kent & Medway Child Death Overview Panel.
The specific action for the Child Death Review Team from the published Local Safeguarding
Child Practice Review (LSCPR) for Ella and her older sibling was as follows:
The Kent and Medway Child Death Review team will ensure any groups e.g. any sports teams/
etc. are routinely considered as part of the Child Death Review process to meet this
recommendation.
In response to this, the Kent and Medway Child Death Review team have confirmed that it is
already routine practice to involve known organisations in child death processes as soon as they
are identified following a death, as per the Child Death Statutory Guidance. In order to evidence
this further, the Child Death Review Team will be undertaking an audit within this cohort of
children.
Work has commenced a system wide Child Death Review process, to ensure appropriate gap
analysis is mapped to the new NHS England Child Death Protocol and in preparation for the
soon to be published Independent Review into Kent & Medway’s Child Death arrangements.
Feedback from the Rapid Review following notification for a formal Local Safeguarding
Child Practice Review (12/12/23)
Following the Joint Agency Review on 20/11/2023, NHS Kent and Medway Designated Nurse
for Safeguarding Children made a Serious Incident referral for Ella’s death, as per the local Kent
Safeguarding Children’s Partnership process. As a statutory safeguarding partner, NHS Kent
and Medway, have a responsibility to inform the other safeguarding partners of serious incidents
they think should be considered for a practice review.
Following notification to Kent Safeguarding Children Multi-Agency Partnership (KSCMP) of
Ella’s suspected death by suicide, where neglect may have been a feature, a decision to notify
the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel was made. Requests for agency information
were sent on 27/11/2023. This included requests to NHS Kent and Medway (for GP information)
and Health Providers across Kent and Medway. Summaries were presented to a virtual Rapid
Review Group on 13/12/2023 and the Groups recommendation was sent to the Child
Safeguarding Practice Review Panel. Single agency summaries from health identified learning
and actions, such as practitioners to employ professional curiosity during assessments and,
where there is disparity between the voice of the child and parent wishes, that practitioners
should make a conscious effort to explore and explain the potential impact of non-engagement
of the child to the parent.
A Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review (LSCPR) was undertaken. The period under review
and scope was June 2019 and November 2023. The Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review
considered Ella and her sister, it focused on multi-agency safeguarding practice and the factors
that support good practice, as well as identifying what areas of safeguarding practice might have
been different to enhance future practice. Four themes were identified that the analysis draws
upon. Within theme one there is a section on including making referrals or requests for support
and decision making as well as identified learning.
The Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review overview report was published on 30th January
2025.Recommendations within the report are being actioned and monitored via the multi-agency
safeguarding arrangements in place within the Child Death Overview Panel and via the Learning
Implementation Group.
Kent and Medway safeguarding team have been supporting NELFT in response to an
outstanding recommendation for a related Rapid Review which may support the Regulation 28
response for Ella.
NELFT held a multi-agency meeting and have agreed to formulate a child focussed safety plan,
this will be shared with the child’s school (and social worker, if identified) for every child who has
a safety plan. Alongside this, NELFT have agreed to develop an escalation flow chart for
professionals, to include a Single Point of Access contact and Multi-Disciplinary Team meeting
escalation process. This would include the sharing of the safety plan with other necessary
agencies and points, in which referrals to social care for escalation should be completed. Once
rolled out an audit will be completed, which will meet the recommendation outlined in another
Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review.
As part of the ICBs response to a number of suicides of children and young people during
2023, a series of learning events have taken place. The first focused on North East London
Foundation Trust (NELFT - our children and young people mental health services provider)
and their learning as an organisation. The second focused on the patients’ and their families’
perspective to ensure their voices were engaged as part of wider learning. The third focused
on system wide/inter agency working in November 2024. This event will culminate in a
system wide improvement plan that will include a focus on agency information sharing, risk
assessments and decision making among others. Work on a shared risk protocol across
system partners has already commenced.
The work undertaken by NELFT as part of the system wide action plan is summarised below
and relates specifically to how they are enhancing information sharing processes: -
A Professional Consultation line is now operational in their Single Point of Access
Raising staff awareness of the need to share information with other agencies as per risk
management and safeguarding principles
Delivery of training around Consent, GDPR, Mental Capacity Act and Gillick Competence
Gathering consent (from young people and their families) to share information with other
agencies at point of referral (through our single point of access)
Training programme for Risk Formulation developed for rollout across the organisation
for children and young people, moving away from risk stratification
Safety planning advice sheet developed and shared with partner agencies to enhance
access to NELFT services for consultation regarding cases of concern
Safety planning advice developed for young people, their families and carers to highlight
the support NELFT offer and how to access other suitable agencies
Work with Kent and Medway Care Records colleagues to enhance the information
available on this platform to other healthcare providers
In addition, Kent & Medway ICB has implemented the Kent and Medway Care Record
(KMCR), which supports inter agency access to health and social care records. The level of
visibility recommended is largely in place, although continued work to support use of the
system is ongoing. There are no current plans to have a direct interface between education
and the KMCR, but Kent County Council front door teams, who act as a single point of
contact for requests for support at an intensive level or above for children, young people and
families, ensuring these requests are directed to the appropriate service for ongoing support
and intervention all have access and can communicate information, where applicable to
colleagues
I hope this letter provides you with assurance that actions have been taken to address the
concerns raised.
Yours sincerely
Signed on behalf of
Chief Nursing Officer
NHS Kent and Medway ICB
Chair |
Chief Executive |
Page 4 of 4
Mrs Catherine Wood
HM Area Coroner
Mid Kent and Medway
Coroner Service Team
Cantium Houe
Sandling Road
Maidstone
ME14 1XD
Dear Coroner,
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
28 March 2025
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Ella Louise Murray who
died on 15 November 2023
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 7
February 2025 concerning the death of Ella Louise Murray on 15 November 2023. In
advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to
express my deep condolences to Ella’s family and all those who loved and cared for
her. NHS England are keen to assure the Coroner and Ella’s family that the concerns
raised about Ella’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.
My response to the Coroner focuses on those areas of concern that sit within NHS
England’s national policy or programme remit. It would not be appropriate at this
juncture for NHS England to provide comment on actions taken by Kent & Medway
Integrated Care Board, Kent Social Services or the Local Authority involved in Ella’s
care.
You have raised various concerns in your Report, including that there was a failure to
undertake an adequate, or any, risk assessment and take any further steps to ensure
Ella's safety, including urgently removing Ella either to a hospital bed or otherwise
liaising with social services. You have also raised the concern that there was no shared
access to records for all agencies and no way to convene an urgent multi-agency
meeting.
Your Report echoes recommendations made from previous reviews into suicides of
children and young people (CYP). The 2020 Kent Safeguarding Children Multi-Agency
Partnership Review of Suicide in Children and Young People noted concerns about
the risk assessment process and warned against using short-cuts or abridged
assessments in place of more thorough processes. The review also recommended
that school teaching staff were better integrated into interprofessional safeguarding
networks, a change that HM Coroner’s Report suggests would have better supported
Ella.
Both the Kent Safeguarding Review and the 2021 National Child Mortality Database
(NCMD) Suicide Report, published in October 2021, recommended improved
information sharing between agencies. Across the 108 deaths included in the NCMD
Report, the most common issue reported was poor communication and information
sharing between professionals. The second most common issue was poor quality
referrals.
As your Report raises, the 2024-25 Children’s Wellbeing and School’s Bill will address
these concerns. The Bill strengthens the role of education in multi-agency
safeguarding arrangements as well as creating a clearer legal basis for information
sharing. This is facilitated by the inclusion of a common identifier.
Ella’s case includes learnings for teams across NHS England and local organisations,
as well as more broadly. It is NHS England’s understanding that Kent and Medway
Integrated Care Board will be responding to the Coroner separately with a system-
level response detailing the local actions taken. NHS England will consider the ICB’s
response in due course. My colleagues from national NHS England teams have also
provided the below input.
National CYP Mental Health Team
Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) are a vehicle for integrated planning, to ensure that
those who need it have access to comprehensive mental health support which is
integrated across health, social care, education, and the voluntary sector. The vision
for greater local system integration and autonomy is being implemented for specialised
mental health, learning disability and autism services, by giving responsibility for a
given population to Provider Collaboratives. Provider Collaboratives will improve links
to other care settings, to improve the whole pathway and reduce reliance on the most
specialised services by reinvesting in community provision.
National Safeguarding Team
The NHS England South East regional safeguarding team will, through established
governance arrangements, have oversight of Kent and Medway Integrated Care
Board’s actions to implement the learning to improve safeguarding at both the Local
Safeguarding Children Partnership and within all commissioned services.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Ella,
are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay
close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching North East London NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.