Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0101, written 21 Nov 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 21 Nov 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2026-0101 |
| Deceased | Timothy Reading |
| Coroner | James Puzey |
| Coroner area | Worcestershire |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. The Chief Executive of the Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust (“BSMHFT”) 2. The Chief Executive of NHS England 1 CORONER I am James Puzey, assistant coroner, for the coroner area of Worcestershire 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 3 On 20 January 2025, Senior Coroner, David Reid, commenced an investigation into the death of Timothy Thomas Reading. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 12 November 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was that death was due to suicide and the medical cause of death was hanging. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Timothy Thomas Reading died on 9 January 2025 at 54 Red Lion St Alvechurch. He was 48 years old. He had a history of mental illness dating back to his 20s. in 2023 he was arrested for an offence of stalking under s.4A of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. Initially he was in prison but later transferred to hospital in December 2023. Ultimately he pleaded guilty and he was made subject of a hospital order pursuant to the provisions of s.37 the MHA 1983. He was an inpatient on the intensive care ward at BSMHFT’s Meadowcroft facility then on the acute ward at Mary Seacole House in Birmingham. He was released back into the Community under the provisions of a CTO dated 9.10.24. A planning meeting was held at Mary Seacole House on 20.8.24 to formulate plans to support Tim pursuant to the provisions of s.117 of MHA. On 22.10.24 Tim was discharged to the Bromsgrove CMHT. They had not been involved in planning support for Tim with BSMHFT. They and Tim’s GP asked for a copy of the s.117 support plan from BSMHFT but did not receive one. The minutes of the meeting of 20 August 2025 referred to a plan but no plan was drafted and what was being proposed in the meeting was general, non-specific and inaccurate as to who would be responsible for mental health provision in the community. 1 I found that there was no s.117 plan created; also, That such a plan was necessary to chart Tim’s reintegration into community living. The handling of the transition for Tim from inpatient to care in Worcestershire was slow and disjointed; There was no handover between the responsible clinicians in Birmingham and Bromsgrove; Those who knew him best, namely his family, concluded that he was not coping and they told BSMHT in November 2024. Their view, which I accept, was that Tim struggled without meaningful activity and structure. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – (1) The absence of a formal documented s.117 plan agreed by all those responsible for a patient’s care and treatment upon discharge into the Community from a lengthy inpatient stay creates a risk of disjointed, disorganized and inadequate support for vulnerable people suffering serious mental health conditions. This, in turn, may cause them to feel unsupported and helpless. BSMHFT did not provide a Plan despite requests to do so. S.117 is intended to ensure that patients receive planned and structured support tailored to their requirements. Such planning was absent in this case. (2) I was informed by the Representative of BSMHFT that there is no national guidance from the NHS or other source that explains what a s.117 plan should address. If so, this represents a lacuna which gives rise to concern that mental health providers are unclear as to the component elements for a s.117 plan and the degree or depth of planning required for individual patients. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe BSMHFT and the NHS generally have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE 7 You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 2 namely by 16 January 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: BSMHFT HWHCT. I have also sent it to the Chief Executive of NHS England as it raises a matter of concern to the Health Service generally I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response. 21 November 2025 James Puzey 9 3
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Legal Department
Uffculme Centre
52 Queensbridge Road
Moseley
Birmingham
B13 8QY
Date:
13 January 2026
Mr J Puzey,
HM Assistant Coroner,
Coroner’s Court
Martins Way
STOURPORT ON SEVERN
DY13 8UN
Dear Mr Puzey,
Prevention of Future Death report into the death of Timothy Thomas Reading
Thank you for the Prevention of Future Deaths (PFD) Report dated 21 November 2025 in relation to the
death of Mr Reading. I would like to take this opportunity to offer my sincere condolences to the family
of Mr Reading at this very sad time. I would like to begin by offering assurances that the Trust is a learning
organisation and when we identify care which could have been improved, we take actions to improve
care for other patients in the future.
I note from your PFD report there were two aspects of care you have raised concern with, one relating
to the trust. We will therefore aim to respond to the issue raised below:
The absence of a formal documented s.117 plan agreed by all those responsible for a patient’s
care and treatment upon discharge into the Community from a lengthy inpatient stay creates a
risk of disjointed, disorganized and inadequate support for vulnerable people suffering serious
mental health conditions. This, in turn, may cause them to feel unsupported and helpless.
The Trust has now looked at the inpatient care and CMHT care around the s.117 plan on the back of
your concerns. Section 117 of the Mental Health Act 1983 places a joint duty on the NHS Integrated Care
Board and local authority to provide aftercare services for individuals detained under certain sections of
the Act following discharge.
This duty is not automatic; it only applies where there are ongoing health or social care needs arising
from the mental disorder and aimed at reducing the risk of relapse or readmission. The Trust has a form
within Rio which clearly sets out the relevant areas for the s.117 meeting and ensures that both
healthcare and social care are signed up to the plan. I attach for ease a copy of a blank form which
shows all the relevant areas in one place and will ensure comprehensive plans in an easily accessible
and shareable document. All staff in Acute care have been reminded to use this form in the future and
this has also been discussed at team meetings.
In respect of the CMHT transfer to the new CMHT, the Clinical Directors for CMHTs will be raising the
case and reminding staff of the need to provide verbal and written handover to external Trusts receiving
service user subject to s.117 aftercare at the Community Clinical Governance Committee on 27th Jan
8
2026. They will also be formally writing to all the Consultant Psychiatrists outlining that this must be done,
to ensure that receiving teams are fully aware of the s.117 requirements during the handover period and
there is therefore consistency in care.
I hope that you will now be assured that the s.117 process is now robust within the organisation. If you
require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Yours sincerely
Chief Executive
BSMHFT
Mr James Puzey
HM Assistant Coroner for Worcestershire
Worcestershire Coroner’s Court
The Civic
Martin’s Way
Stourport-on-Severn
Worcestershire
DY13 8UN
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
7 April 2026
Dear Coroner,
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Timothy Thomas Reading
who died on 9 January 2025.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 21
November 2025 and received by NHS England on 24 February 2026, concerning the
death of Timothy Thomas Reading on 9 January 2025. In advance of responding to
the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep
condolences to Timothy’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to assure the
family and yourself that the concerns raised about Timothy’s care have been listened
to and reflected upon.
Your Report raised concerns around the absence of formal documented Section 117
plan agreed upon by all those responsible for a patient’s care and treatment upon
discharge into the community from a lengthy inpatient stay. This creates a risk of
disjointed, disorganised and inadequate support for vulnerable people suffering
serious mental health conditions which may cause them to feel unsupported and
helpless. Your report also raised concerns around lack of national guidance from the
NHS or other sources that explain what a Section 117 plan should address. This
represents a gap which gives rise to concern that mental health providers are unclear
as to the component elements for a Section 117 plan and the degree or depth of
planning required for individual patients.
NHS England Mental Health colleagues have advised that there is clear guidance set
out in the Mental Health Act Code of Practice on Section 117 aftercare which includes
planning based on the person’s individual needs. It includes examples such as
ensuring the person’s wider social, cultural and spiritual needs are met and specifies
that after care should aim to support people in regaining or enhancing their skills, or
learning new skills, in order to cope with life outside of hospital. Before deciding to
discharge or grant more than a very short-term leave of absence to a patient, or to
place a patient onto a Community Treatment Order (CTO), the responsible clinician
should ensure that the patient’s needs for after-care have been fully assessed,
discussed with the patient (and their carers, where appropriate) and addressed in their
care plan. If the patient is being given leave for only a short period, a less
comprehensive review may be sufficient, but the arrangements for the patient’s care
should still be properly recorded
In addition to this, the Community Mental Health Framework states that ‘every person
who requires support, care and treatment in the community should have a co-
produced and personalised care plan that takes into account all of their needs, as well
as their rights under the Care Act and Section 117 of the Mental Health Act when
required’.
There is also statutory discharge guidance which covers Section 117 care. This states
that ‘a personalised care and support plan, as a result of a ‘what matters to me’
conversation with the patient, should be prepared and available to support discharge
with input, where relevant, from family members, chosen carers and relevant
professionals.’ This is underpinned by the NHS England guidance on comprehensive
model of personalised care. NHS bodies and local authorities in England have a
statutory duty to have regard to the statutory discharge guidance as well as the Mental
Health Act Code of Practice.
We note that your report has also been addressed to the Trust who will be better
placed to respond to the concerns raised around the absence of Section 117 plan
provided by the Trust despite it being requested.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of
Timothy, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps
us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and
action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
NHS England
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.