Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0283, written 5 Apr 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 5 Apr 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0283 |
| Deceased | Christopher Townsend |
| Coroner | James Puzey |
| Coroner area | Worcestershire |
| Category | Road (Highways Safety) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. 2. 1 CORONER , General Secretary of the Auto Cycle Union I am James Puzey, assistant coroner, for the coroner area of Worcestershire 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 22 June 2023 HMSC David Reid commenced an investigation into the death of Christopher William Townsend, aged 43. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 5 April 2024 which I heard. The conclusion of the inquest was that the medical cause of death was pneumonia as a result of multiple injuries sustained in a motor cycle accident and that Mr Townsend died as a result of an accident. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 4 Christopher William Townsend died on 8 June 2023 at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham. He was involved in a motor accident on 4 June 2023 whilst participating in an organised grass-track motor-cycle and side-car race. He sustained multiple chest and abdominal injuries from which he did not recover 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – (1) The risk assessment prepared for the grass-track event on 4 June 2024 was a downloaded proforma from the ACU publication “ACU Requirements for Safety Precautions At All Track Race Events Held Under An ACU Permit”(p.19 of 26). This document listed pre-populated control measures to address a list of pre-populated risks. The control measures were ticked “yes” or “no” by the organiser to indicate whether they were in place. The assessment of the level of that risk as high, medium or low was also pre- populated. This did not amount to a process that could produce an event 1 specific risk assessment nor did it encourage organisers to record meaningful conclusions about controlling risk at their event. I was told by this was a pro-forma for grass track events and that more complex, event specific risk assessments were produced for other types of event. He also confirmed that the risk assessment pro-forma were under review by the ACU and he produced an example of a potential new pro-forma requiring significantly more individual assessment and input. I accept that the ACU is taking steps to address the inadequacy of the grass track event risk assessment process. that (2) However, in my questions to he confirmed that there is no requirement for organisers of events held under the ACU Regulations to prepare an event-specific Safety Plan at either National or Club events. There is such a requirement for ACU events held on an international/European permit (paragraph 3.26 National Sporting Code 2023). that whilst it is not an ACU requirement to prepare such a plan for Club/National events it is open to organisers to do so. Appendix 3 of the ACU’s publication provides an example of contents list of an event safety plan. confirmed (3) Planning for safety at motorsport events to which the public are admitted must be thorough, comprehensive and verifiable by being recorded. This allows organisers to record and disseminate safety arrangements for their events. The risks may differ in scale, but not substantially in nature, as between international and national/club events. (4) In my opinion, in the absence of such methodical planning and recording there is a risk of future deaths arising from the current arrangements for safety planning at ACU track race events. (5) I have carefully considered evidence as to the reviews that are being undertaken by the ACU of their procedures and guidance. This was provided in his written evidence, his answers in oral evidence and in the letter from him dated 5 April 2024. I have also carefully considered the cogent of DWF, in particular as to submissions on behalf of the ACU by Chief Coroner’s Guidance Note 5 (November 2020), especially paragraph 7 thereof. Nonetheless, I remain of the opinion that in the absence of a requirement for a recorded safety plan for each event there is a risk that future deaths will occur. (6) Since the inquest has provided me with statistics of injuries and fatalities at events governed by ACU rules and procedures. It does not allay my concerns but rather confirms that serious injuries and fatalities do occur at these events not infrequently. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION 2 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: (General Secretary Auto Cycle Union and I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 April 2024 HMAC James Puzey 3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Response to the Coroner's Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths
1
THIS RESPONSE IS MADE ON BEHALF OF
Auto Cycle Union Limited ('ACU')
2
REGULATION 28 REPORT
This response follows a report by HMAC James Puzey. For ease of reference, sections
3 to 5 below are copied from the Coroner's report.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 22 June 2023 HMSC David Reid commenced an investigation into the death of
Christopher William Townsend, aged 43. The investigation concluded at the end of the
inquest on 5 April 2024 which I heard. The conclusion of the inquest was that the
medical cause of death was pneumonia as a result of multiple injuries sustained in a
motor cycle accident and that Mr Townsend died as a result of an accident.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Christopher William Townsend died on 8 June 2023 at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital,
Birmingham. He was involved in a motor accident on 4 June 2023 whilst participating in
an organised grass-track motor-cycle and side-car race. He sustained multiple chest and
abdominal injuries from which he did not recover
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
(1) The risk assessment prepared for the grass-track event on 4 June 2024 was a
downloaded proforma from the ACU publication “ACU Requirements for Safety
Precautions At All Track Race Events Held Under An ACU Permit” (p.19 of 26).
This document listed pre-populated control measures to address a list of pre-
populated risks. The control measures were ticked “yes” or “no” by the organiser
to indicate whether they were in place. The assessment of the level of that risk
as high, medium or low was also pre-populated. This did not amount to a
process that could produce an event specific risk assessment nor did it
encourage organisers to record meaningful conclusions about controlling risk at
their event. I was told by
that this was a pro-forma for grass track
events and that more complex, event specific risk assessments were produced
for other types of event. He also confirmed that the risk assessment pro-forma
were under review by the ACU and he produced an example of a potential new
pro-forma requiring significantly more individual assessment and input. I accept
that the ACU is taking steps to address the inadequacy of the grass track event
risk assessment process.
(2) However, in my questions to
he confirmed that there is no requirement
for organisers of events held under the ACU Regulations to prepare an event-
specific Safety Plan at either National or Club events. There is such a
international/European permit
requirement
for ACU events held on an
(paragraph 3.26 National Sporting Code 2023).
confirmed that whilst it
is not an ACU requirement to prepare such a plan for Club/National events it is
open to organisers to do so. Appendix 3 of the ACU’s publication provides an
example of contents list of an event safety plan.
(3) Planning for safety at motorsport events to which the public are admitted must
be thorough, comprehensive and verifiable by being recorded. This allows
organisers to record and disseminate safety arrangements for their events. The
risks may differ in scale, but not substantially in nature, as between international
and national/club events.
(4) In my opinion, in the absence of such methodical planning and recording there
is a risk of future deaths arising from the current arrangements for safety
planning at ACU track race events.
(5) I have carefully considered
evidence as to the reviews that are being
undertaken by the ACU of their procedures and guidance. This was provided in
his written evidence, his answers in oral evidence and in the letter from him
dated 5 April 2024. I have also carefully considered the cogent submissions on
behalf of the ACU by
of DWF, in particular as to Chief Coroner’s
thereof.
Guidance Note 5
Nonetheless, I remain of the opinion that in the absence of a requirement for a
recorded safety plan for each event there is a risk that future deaths will occur.
(November 2020), especially paragraph 7
(6) Since the inquest
has provided me with statistics of injuries and
fatalities at events governed by ACU rules and procedures. It does not allay my
concerns but rather confirms that serious injuries and fatalities do occur at these
events not infrequently.
6
ACTION TAKEN
explained that safety planning was required for all ACU permitted
In evidence,
events; however, the information was spread across a number of documents. For
example, it was explained that the Supplementary Regulations that are prepared before
an event detail a number of matters relating to safety.
accepted that a recorded
safety plan is required for some events, and that he would ask the Board of Directors to
consider making this a requirement for all ACU permitted events.
The ACU's Board of Directors have considered the concerns raised and will ensure that
a document entitled Safety Plan is a requirement for all ACU permitted events from the
start of the 2025 season. The content of the Safety Plan will continue to be discussed by
the relevant people within the ACU to ensure that comprehensive guidance is provided
to event organisers in readiness for the 2025 season.
7
SIGNED
On behalf of Auto Cycle Union Ltd
8
DATE OF RESPONSE
16 May 2024
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.