Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0134, written 16 Dec 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 16 Dec 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2026-0134 |
| Deceased | Walter Pollyn |
| Coroner | Ian Potter |
| Coroner area | Kent and Medway |
| Category | Community health care and emergency services related deaths |
| Organisation named | Medway NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Kent and Medway Coroners' Service Oakwood House Oakwood Park Maidstone Kent ME16 8AE Date: 16 December 2025 REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The Chief Executive, Medway NHS Foundation Trust 1. CORONER I am Mr. Ian Potter, Area Coroner for Kent and Medway 2. CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 3 September 2024 an investigation was commenced into the death of Walter Perekuno POLLYN, aged 67 years at the time of his death on 16 August 2024. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest, heard by me on 16 December 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was Natural causes 1a Pneumonia 1b Polymyositis 1c 1d II 4. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Walter Pollyn was admitted to Medway Maritime Hospital on 19 July 2024 following an unwitnessed fall and increased confusion. On admission, he tested positive for Covid-19 and was placed on oxygen therapy due to respiratory complications. Following a Speech and Language Therapy (SALT) assessment, Mr Pollyn was made 'nil by mouth' (NBM) due to oropharyngeal dysphagia. The advice of the SALT team was not followed and water was repeatedly left within Mr Pollyn's reach. On 24 July 2024, Mr Pollyn drank half a glass of water, despite being NBM. Mr Pollyn aspirated the water which did not assist his overall condition. On the afternoon of 24 July 2024, Mr Pollyn's condition deteriorated further and he was intubated following his transfer to ITU. On 14 August 2024, following discussions with Mr Pollyn's family, he was place on an end of life care pathway. Sadly, Mr Pollyn in hospital on 16 August 2024. The immediate cause of Mr Pollyn's death was pneumonia, which was multifactorial. Those factors included aspiration pneumonia. It is not possible to quantify to what extent each factor contributed to Mr Pollyn's death. Nonetheless, Mr Pollyn should not have been in the situation (on 24 July 2024) where he was able to consume half a glass of water unsupervised, which was not in line with the Trust's policy. 5. CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. I wish to acknowledge that the Trust's After Action Review (AAR) highlighted a number of matters and there was evidence at the inquest that the Trust has addressed some of those matters. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. - (1) Having been made 'nil by mouth', the evidence was that this was well documented in Mr Pollyn's records, a sign indicating that he was nil by mouth was placed above his bed, and the board within the ward kitchen was also updated. Despite this, the records indicate that numerous members of nursing staff ensured that water was placed at Mr Pollyn's bedside (which would be standard practice were Mr Pollyn not 'nil by mouth' at the time). While the Trust has updated the relevant policies and sought to disseminate messaging to staff in this regard, I was not reassured that this is solely a matter of policy. The number of staff involved and the period of time over which the issue of unsupervised access to water persisted is potentially suggestive of underlying attitudinal issues. (2) Following on from the above, I heard in evidence that the production of some patient records is a simple tick-box exercise, which is not a concern in itself. However, the impression created by the evidence was that staff members were ticking the box to indicate that water was placed/replaced at the bedside (and following through on that action) because that was the norm for most patients on the ward. This indicates that staff missed the entries in the notes about 'nil by mouth' and the other visual cues that were clear. While I heard that the Trust intends to undertake a review of record keeping, which may not be completed until March 2026, I was given insufficient reassurance that this specific concern is being addressed. 6. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 1st May 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8. COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: Mr Pollyn's family. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who she believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 16 December 2025 Signature Ian Potter, Area Coroner for Kent and Medway
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Medway Maritime Hospital Windmill Road Gillingham Kent ME7 5NY 1 May 2026 Mr Ian Potter Area Coroner Kent and Medway Coroner’s Court Oakwood House Oakwood Road Maidstone ME16 8AE Dear Sir, Re: Inquest touching on the death of Walter Pollyn - Prevention of Future Deaths Regulation report We refer to your Prevention of Future Deaths (PFD) report dated 16 December 2026, which was sent to the Trust on 6 March 2026, and our response to which is due on 1 May 2026. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in the PFD report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Mr. Pollyn’s family. On behalf of Medway NHS Foundation Trust (‘the Trust’), I want to assure the family and you that the concerns have been acknowledged, considered, and acted upon. The Trust fully acknowledges the concerns outlined in the PFD report, especially that the incident within Mr Pollyn’s care, were not merely a failure of policy adherence, but also reflected deeper behavioural, cultural, and system factors. Although relevant policies and documentation were in place at the time, they were not consistently applied in practice, leading to unsafe care and avoidable risks. In response, the Trust has taken a whole system approach, tackling both the specific clinical issues related to ‘nil by mouth’ care and the underlying cultural and behavioural factors that contributed to those failures. Addressing the immediate patient safety risks (‘nil by mouth’ care) A detailed Trust-wide ‘nil by mouth’ care improvement action plan has been developed and implemented to directly address the potential gaps identified during the Inquest. This action plan includes: • Trust-wide, regular ‘nil by mouth’ audits to evaluate adherence to best practice, including staff’s ability to correctly identify ‘nil by mouth’ patients and the accuracy of documentation. • Recurrent Trust-wide ‘nil by mouth’ audits for non-procedural patients, initially conducted on a quarterly basis while improvements are embedded. A baseline audit was completed in March 2026, with a re-audit scheduled for June 2026. Audit findings are reviewed by the Fundamental Standards of Care Group (a Trust-wide steering and quality improvement group focused on enhancing fundamental nursing care, including nutrition and hydration, handover, mouthcare, and personal hygiene), and are escalated to the Patient Experience Sub-Committee and the Patient Safety and Harm Prevention Sub-Committee. • Targeted education and training to enhance staff understanding of ‘nil by mouth’ status, supervised sips of water, and the clinical risks related to aspiration. This training is provided face-to-face alongside nutrition and hydration education, reinforced through Harm-Free Care study days, daily ward handovers, and safety huddles. Training compliance is tracked via a central training database. • Clear visual controls and environmental safeguards, including revised bedside signage, tracking board flags, and standardised prompts, aim to reduce reliance on memory or assumptions. These include standardised bedside signage stating ‘supervised water only,’ removal of unsupervised water jugs, visible ‘nil by mouth’ indicators on electronic patient tracking boards, and clear documentation prompts. All signage and visual controls are being standardised through the Fundamental Standards of Care Group. Introduction of a structured ‘nil by mouth’ checklist for non-procedural patients to minimise practice variations and ensure key safety steps are not overlooked. • Strengthened multidisciplinary communication to ensure all staff groups involved in bedside care, including housekeeping and support staff, are included in safety huddles and handovers. • • Digital system improvements, including exploration of automated electronic patient record (EPR) alerts to identify documentation conflicts, such as when provision of water is recorded for a patient marked as ‘nil by mouth’. Oversight of these actions is provided through established governance structures, including the Fundamentals of Care Group, Patient Experience Sub Committee, Patient Safety and Harm Prevention Sub Committee, and the Quality Assurance Committee. These bodies operate with defined review cycles (detailed in Group Terms of Reference) to ensure sustainable improvement rather than relying on one-off compliance activities. Addressing behavioural and cultural contributors Crucially, the Trust has recognised that the issues highlighted in this PFD report go beyond processes and include normalised behaviours, such as task-driven ‘box ticking’, and reliance on routine practice rather than individualised risk assessment. To address this, the Trust has integrated the ‘nil by mouth’ improvement work into its Cultural Transformation Programme, a multi-year Board-led initiative aimed at addressing the behavioural, leadership, and attitudinal factors that impact patient and staff safety. Phase 1 of the Cultural Transformation Programme (completed in September 2025) involved extensive listening sessions (events where staff can share their views, wishes, and feedback based on their experience), workforce surveys, and a Board cultural competence review. This work identified consistent themes including: Inconsistent application of policy in practice • • Reduced challenge and escalation in pressured environments • Normalisation of unsafe workarounds • Fear of speaking up • Variable leadership visibility and accountability. Some of these themes are directly related to the issues uncovered in Mr Pollyn’s case. These insights have informed a series of high-impact actions already in progress, including: • Stronger leadership accountability frameworks that explicitly connect behaviours to appraisal, recognition, and consequences. • Board-level oversight of culture and safety, with regular progress review • integrated into formal governance. Improved psychological safety and speaking up initiatives, ensuring staff feel able to challenge unsafe practice without fear. • Targeted development for middle and senior leaders, recognising their critical role in setting behavioural norms at ward level. • Clear reinforcement that patient safety outcomes — not task completion — define success. Assurance of sustainability The Trust is clear that reassurance cannot be given through policies or training alone. Therefore, improvements are being integrated through: • Recurrent audit and measurement • Visible leadership ownership • • Cultural metrics alongside clinical performance data • Ongoing monitoring through Patient Safety and Harm Prevention Sub- Integration into existing safety and quality governance Committee and Board reporting. The Trust is committed to ensuring that the lessons learned from this case lead to lasting improvements in how patients at high risk of aspiration are identified, protected, and cared for — and in how staff are supported, while complacency is challenged and addressed. Summary The Trust accepts that Mr Pollyn’s death highlighted unacceptable gaps in practice and culture. Significant measures have been taken, and are ongoing, to address both the specific clinical risks identified by the Coroner and the wider cultural factors that allowed these risks to persist. On behalf of the Trust, I am confident that these combined measures materially reduce the likelihood of a similar death occurring in the future, and the organisation remains committed to continuous oversight, learning, and improvement. We thank the learned Coroner for raising this matter with us and for highlighting an opportunity to improve our process. Yours sincerely, Deputy Chief Medical Officer Medway NHS Foundation Trust
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Medway NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.