Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026

REDACTED

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0245, written 29 Apr 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report29 Apr 2026
Reference2026-0245
DeceasedREDACTED
CoronerJames Bennett
Coroner areaBirmingham and Solihull
Sourcejudiciary.uk record
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

1

2

3

4

OFFICIAL

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: NHS England.
CORONER

I am James Bennett Assistant Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull.
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 21 October 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of 

. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 2 April 2026.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

 had no known mental ill-health and was an experienced Operational Department

Practitioner based at Birmingham Children's Hospital. During his shift on 07/10/25 he
was informed of a conduct issue. A risk assessment noted he could travel home safely
and having family at home was a supportive factor. He was informed he should not come
into work the following day whilst a decision was made about an investigation, and that
he would be telephoned the following morning with an update. The following morning, on
08/10 around 5:30-6:00am, contrary to instructions, he attended the hospital and
accessed a secure drug store and removed anaesthetic medication and intravenous
cannula equipment. This was the last known sighting. From 8:45am his employer
attempted to contact him via telephone without success to inform him he was to be
suspended pending an investigation. Concerns were escalated around 1:30pm that he
was a missing person. When it was revealed he had accessed the hospital, a search was
undertaken and he was found in the afternoon deceased in a bedroom in on-call
accommodation having deliberately injected himself with the anaesthetic. The medical
cause of death was confirmed at post-mortem as 1a. Self-injection of 

. The conclusion was that death was the consequence of suicide.

5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:

1. The Trust level investigation identified concerns that NHS England guidance  - e.g. (a)
NHS England Misconduct Policy ‘Every organisation has a duty of care to protect its
employees from and prevent incidents of sexual misconduct’; and (b) e-learning
‘Understanding Sexual Misconduct in the Workplace’ – omits to deal with how to discuss
and manage the alleged perpetrator when a member of staff. It does not cover when the
Trust may need to conduct a risk assessment of the likely impact on the staff member of
being confronted with a serious allegation, when they may need to inform the police
promptly, or advise on what factors impact the need for a prompt decision on suspension
and withdrawal of easy access to fatal drugs. Since this incident the local Trust has
updated their policies so that a same day decision is made on these matters and in a
similar incident in the future it is likely the staff member would have been immediately
suspended and had their access to fatal drugs removed. My concern is that NHS England
guidance continues to omit such considerations and at a local level Trusts are not fully
assessing the risks.

OFFICIAL

 OFFICIAL

6

7

8

9

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the
power to take such action.
YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 24 June 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons:

1. Family of 
2. Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust.

.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who she believes may find it
useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of
your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief
Coroner.
29 April 2026

Signature:

James Bennett Assistant Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull

OFFICIAL

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from NHS England
Mr James Bennett 
Assistant Coroner  
Birmingham and Solihull  
The Birmingham and Solihull Coroner’s Court  
Steelhouse Lane 
Birmingham 
B4 6BJ 

National Medical Director  
NHS England  
Wellington House 
133-155 Waterloo Road  
London 
SE1 8UG 

8 June 2026  

Dear Mr Bennett, 

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – 
who died on 8 October 2025.  

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 29 April 
2026 concerning the death of 
 on 8 October 2025. In advance 
of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express 
  family  and  loved  ones.  NHS  England  is  keen  to 
my  deep  condolences  to 
 care have been 
assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about 
listened to and reflected upon.   

NHS England takes the sexual safety of staff and patients very seriously and we have 
produced  a  comprehensive  suite  of  documents  to  ensure  that  NHS  employers  are 
taking  their  legal  responsibilities  around  sexual  harassment  prevention  seriously. 
These include:  

•  The Sexual Safety Charter – an aspirational set of principles that all NHS trusts 

and ICBs have signed up to;  

•  The national sexual misconduct policy framework – an adaptable framework for 
trusts and ICBs to use to develop their own local sexual misconduct policies;  
•  Understanding sexual misconduct in the workplace – base level training for all 
employees to be aware of issues surrounding sexual misconduct, disclosures 
and appropriate behaviours.  

Your Report raised concerns about whether these documents are clear enough about 
how  to  support  employees  who  are  perpetrators  or  alleged  perpetrators  of  sexual 
harassment in the NHS.  

We  take  support  for  all  those  involved  in  these  processes  very  seriously. 
Organisational  support  for  these  individuals  is  contained  within  the  national  policy 
framework which makes clear that support should be provided to all involved. This is 
done in several places within the framework:  

•  Under the review group section of the policy framework, it is recommended that 
organisations  set  up  review  groups  for  specially  reviewing  any  case  with  a 
sexual component. In this section, we make clear that a risk assessment should 

                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 be  done  for  all  those  involved  which  should  include  assessment  of  possible 
harm and where police should be contacted.  

•  The associated review group checklist is clear that support should be offered 
to  all  those  involved  and  a  risk  assessment  should  be  contact  to  support 
wellbeing and to reduce any further harm. 

•  The responsibilities for HR teams includes making clear that HR should offer 

support to everyone involved in a report.  

The national sexual misconduct policy framework makes clear that risks to individuals 
should  be  immediately  assessed  and  steps  should  be  taken  once  an  allegation  is 
reported.  Steps  such  as  suspension  or  removing  access  to  fatal  drugs  should  be 
considered,  but  these  actions  would  not  be  governed  specifically  by  a  sexual 
misconduct policy. These decisions would typically be governed by policies relating to 
managing conduct (disciplinary), competence, professional standards regulations or 
medications management.  

NHS  England  are  also  taking  further  steps  to  ensure  that  harm  arising  from  going 
through  the  process  of    an  employee  relations  case  is  mitigated.  We  are  currently 
reviewing  the  investigations  training  offered  to  every  trust  HR  team  in  the  country, 
which has a significant focus on sexual misconduct clear sections on how to reduce 
harm from these processes for all parties. We are also developing a national conduct 
and competence policy framework which will have key sections on planning support 
for those involved in the process and risk assessment.  

I  would  also  like  to  provide  further  assurances  on  the  national  NHS  England  work 
taking  place around  the  Reports  to  Prevent Future  Deaths.  All  reports received  are 
discussed  by  the  Regulation  28  Working  Group,  comprising  Regional  Medical 
Directors,  and  other  clinical  and  quality  colleagues  from  across  the  regions.  This 
ensures  that  key  learnings  and  insights  around  events,  such  as  the  sad  death  of 
, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us 
to  pay  close  attention  to  any  emerging  trends  that  may  require  further  review  and 
action.   

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please 
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.  

Yours sincerely,  

National Medical Director  
NHS England

Related reports

Other reports by James Bennett

See all →

Track James Bennett

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching James Bennett, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.