Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0266, written 2 Jul 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 2 Jul 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2026-0266 |
| Deceased | Caroline Harris |
| Coroner | Nicholas Graham |
| Coroner area | Oxfordshire |
| Source | judiciary.uk record |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths report Caroline Harris (died on or
before 27/07/2023)
NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
, Director of Adult Social Services, Oxfordshire County Council
1
CORONER
I am Nicholas Graham, HM Area Coroner, for the coroner area of Oxfordshire.
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On the 31 August 2023 an Inquest into the death of Caroline Diane Harris was opened.
Her body was found on the 26 July 2023 at her home address. An investigation was
commenced and concluded at the end of the inquest on the 27 June 2024
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Ms. Harris was 51 years old when she was found deceased at her home address on 26
July 2023. She was found in the bathroom in an advanced state of decomposition. A
post-mortem examination was carried out on 3 August 2023. A medical cause of death
could not be ascertained.
I reached a Narrative Conclusion as follows:
‘Caroline Harris had a long-standing diagnosis of severe mental illness. In August 2022,
she refused to continue taking her monthly antipsychotic medication, and her mental
health deteriorated. Information relating to Ms. Harris’ decision to stop taking her
medication, as well as concerns raised by Thames Valley Police about a decline in her
mental health, was not passed on to the Adult Mental Health Team. Consequently, they
were unable to supervise her adequately. On 26 July 2023, Caroline was found
deceased at her home. Although it has not been possible to ascertain a medical cause
of death due to decomposition, it is likely that she died from a natural cause,
exacerbated by self-neglect.’
Caroline attended a monthly clinic to receive her antipsychotic medication. Evidence
was given that at the time there was no clear process for passing information onto the
Adult Mental Health Team (AMHT) should patients not attend and/or decline to take their
medication. Had the AMHT been notified then evidence was given that they would have
undertaken intensive and assertive follow up. Nor was Caroline’s GP notified of this
development. Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust have reviewed their operating
procedures to address these concerns.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
In March 2023, Thames Valley Police passed on a report about Caroline to the Mult-
Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) which raised concerns about her behaviour and
mental state and dishevelled appearance. The report stated that it was, ‘Shared in the
interests of safeguarding as may be having relapse’.
MASH undertook a review of the report and concluded that Caroline was not at risk but
may have needs for care and support from the local authority. The information was
passed to the Council’s Adult Social Care Team who in turn passed the information onto
Caroline’s GP. Evidence was given that the Adult Social Care Team were unable to
directly refer to AMHT, even if they had considered it necessary. As the GP was not
made aware that Caroline had declined to attend the clinic to receive her medication,
she saw no need to refer the Police report to AMHT.
Evidence was given that AMHT took a different view regarding the Police report and
would have viewed the report as evidence of Caroline relapsing. AMHT’s view was that
such a report met the criteria for being shared with them, and with their knowledge of
Caroline’s past history of self-neglect and non-compliance with taking medication, it
ought to have been shared with them; and had it been done so it would have been
followed up assertively and urgently including undertaking home visits and the possible
use of compulsory powers under the Mental Health Act.
My concern is that important information regarding a deterioration in mental health was
not shared with the appropriate Team who may have been able make appropriate
interventions and to have taken steps to avoid a fatal outcome.
You should consider a review of how such information is assessed and shared between
the respective agencies.
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In the Coroner’s opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths, and the
coroner believes that your organisations have the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 27 August 2024. I, the Area Coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons
• The family of Ms. Harris
• Ms Harris’ GP
• Oxford Health NHS Trust
• The Chief Constable, Thames Valley Police
I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.
I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it
useful or of interest.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest.
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about
the release or the publication of your response.
9
02/07/2024 Mr N Graham
HM Senior Coroner
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Prevention of Future Deaths Report (Regulation 28): Oxfordshire County Council’s response Contents Prevention of Future Deaths Report (Regulation 28): Oxfordshire County Council’s response Coroners matters of concern Executive Summary Social and Health Care Response 2 3 4 Prevention of Future Deaths Report (Regulation 28): Oxfordshire County Council’s response The Coroner’s matters of concern as detailed in the Regulation 28 report are as follows: Background: In March 2023, Thames Valley Police passed on a report about Caroline (Miss Caroline HARRIS) to the Mult-Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) which raised concerns about her behaviour and mental state and dishevelled appearance. The report stated that it was, ‘Shared in the interests of safeguarding as may be having relapse’. MASH undertook a review of the report and concluded that Caroline was not at risk but may have needs for care and support from the local authority. The information was passed to the Council’s Adult Social Care Team (ASCT) who in turn passed the information onto Caroline’s GP. At the Coroner’s inquest evidence was given that the ASCT were unable to directly refer to Adults Mental Health Team (AMHT), even if they had considered it necessary. As the GP was not made aware that Caroline had declined to attend the clinic to receive her medication, she saw no need to refer the Police report to AMHT. Evidence was given that AMHT took a different view regarding the Police report and would have viewed the report as evidence of Caroline relapsing. AMHT’s view was the criteria for being shared with them, and with their that such a report met knowledge of Caroline’s past history of self-neglect and non-compliance with taking medication, it ought to have been shared with them; and had it been done so it would have been followed up assertively and urgently including undertaking home visits and the possible use of compulsory powers under the Mental Health Act. Reg 28 extract of concerns raised: My concern is that important information regarding a deterioration in mental health was not shared with the appropriate Team who may have been able make appropriate interventions and to have taken steps to avoid a fatal outcome. You should consider a review of how such information is assessed and shared between the respective agencies. Prevention of Future Deaths Report (Regulation 28): Oxfordshire County Council’s response Executive Summary This document is in response to the Regulation 28 report from the Coronors, relating to Caroline Harris (died on or before 27/07/2023), for the purpose of Prevention of Future Deaths. The document describes the steps already taken prior to the hearing by The Social and Health Care Team, who are the initial point of contact for Adult Social Care into Oxfordshire County Council, regarding potential safeguarding concerns for Oxfordshire residents. The Social and Health Care Team act as the ‘Front Door’ to Adult Social Care within Oxfordshire. The team, as that initial point of contact, support Oxfordshire residents through strength based conversations to ascertain their needs and either signpost them to the voluntary care sector or begin their journey within Oxfordshire County Council’s (OCC) Adult Care Service. The team can also order basic equipment for residents, reducing unnecessary waiting times for simple but meaningful tools to improve their lives. The Social and Health Care Team also screen out of hour contacts predominantly from Thames Valley Police and South Central Ambulance Service, which highlight potential safeguarding concerns of vulnerable adults residing in Oxfordshire. As it stands, the team deals with approx. 20,000 out of hours contacts each year. The Social and Health Care Team acknowledges that action should have been taken to share the Police report with Adult Mental Health Teams (AMHT), as Caroline Harris had been open to that team previously. Prevention of Future Deaths Report (Regulation 28): Oxfordshire County Council’s response Coroner’s concern: My concern is that important information regarding a deterioration in mental health was not shared with the appropriate Team who may have been able make appropriate interventions and to have taken steps to avoid a fatal outcome. Action taken prior to the inquest: 1. Oxfordshire Safeguarding Adults Board Safeguarding matrix states for situations where self-neglect is reported: "All standard interventions must be used first to manage risk e.g. Care Management/Care Plan Approach/Multi- Disciplinary Team”; The Social and Health Care Team will primarily complete referrals to Adult Social Care, Mental Health Care (via GP) or other appropriate services, such as housing or voluntary sector agencies. The team will raise a safeguarding referral if a person does not consistently engage with offered services or where there are concerns about their mental capacity to make decisions about their care and support. 2. Where the person is presenting primarily with a mental health concern and additional concerns about self-neglect, lack of access to food and/ or medication or difficulties with finances or tenancy, the report is shared with the person’s GP for mental health assessments and referrals; in addition, Social and Health Care Team will make direct contact with the person in order to signpost them to other appropriate agencies Oxfordshire County Council has worked with healthcare partners and was able to reinstate access to mental incident where health records on the 16 August 2023, following a critical access was removed by the NHS. 3. A critical incident took place in August 2022, and had an impact on how the Social and Health Care Team processed reports from the Police and Ambulance Service. To mitigate the loss of mental health systems, where mental health involvement needed verification, the Social and Health Care Team would contact AMHT. This was achieved by telephone or email. Through the screening process, each report is discussed and the necessary action agreed with a Social Worker before action was taken. 4. Once access to mental health records was reestablished, process improvements and changes to all incoming safeguarding reports were implemented from August 2023, guidance/training material on this task was updated and shared to all members of the team. 5. As a learning from the critical incident in August 2022, where online systems failed, we have worked with partners to ensure that there are robust business continuity plans in place. These include the use of manual processes to instances where there are ensure that checks are still being made on all potential safeguarding concerns. 6. 7. Training was undertaken by the Specialist Customer Service Advisors and Professional Support Team in August 2023. At this time the reintroduction that all reports are checked against health databases (EMIS, HIE, RIO) to confirm Prevention of Future Deaths Report (Regulation 28): Oxfordshire County Council’s response GP details and NHS numbers, and to establish active or recent involvement with mental health services/and or other health professionals. As these systems give a broader view of the person referred across Health records. 8. This is in addition to checks made to the Council’s own Adult Social Care systems, which will provide records of any previous interactions or involvements. The collective data gathering cross checking across multiple systems plus verification from the Professional Support Team (Social workers and Occupational Therapists), who sit within the Social and Health Care Team, gives us robust decision making and corroboration. 9. For quality assurance, decisions made by Specialist Customer Service Advisors are checked by Social Workers, Occupational Therapists, Team Leaders and the Training Officer. This forms part of the quality assurance undertaken monthly to upskill the Customer Service Advisors and ensure that the correct decisions are being made. This is done across all of their work and various contact channels. 10. The guidance issued to the Social and Health Care Team in August 2023, is shared with the person’s GP in the following states that a report circumstances. a. Where the main concern expressed is of mental health difficulties, and; b. Where the person is not recorded under any health database to be already supported by a secondary mental health team. The team will send an accompanying email to the GP making clear the reasons why the report has been shared and request that the GP informs the Social and Health Care Team of any follow-up. The email will also request that the GP informs the team of any needs that may fall under the social care remit requiring further contact from the Social and Health Care Team. 11. Where the situation appears to be urgent the team will either: Immediately contact the GP via telephone and discuss concerns, or; a. b. Escalate the case to the Professional Support Team for further evaluation and decision. Action Taken immediately following the inquest: 1. A full review of the process and decision making in regard to decision making was made in July 2024 to ensure that this situation does not arise again. 2. All staff involved in decision making were reminded in the daily team huddle of the process changes implemented in August 2023 and to be ‘professionally curious’ when looking at persons records and using all tools available to paint a picture of that person’s circumstances. As this has been standard practice since August 2023, we are now confident that this is fully embedded into the Prevention of Future Deaths Report (Regulation 28): Oxfordshire County Council’s response Social and Health Care Team. 3. Where access to online records like RIO for mental health, is not possible the team must immediately email AMHT to check for mental health involvement before action is taken. The Social and Health Care Team will continue to follow up with AMHT until a response and decision is reached. In the unlikely event that contact cannot be made with AMHT, this is escalated to Team Leaders who will contact their counterparts in AMHT. Summary Since the Regulation 28 Order was received in July 2024, and the Social and Health Care Team have reviewed and improved processes, to make sure that appropriate checks, sharing of reports and decisions are made in conjunction with their updated guidance when screening safeguarding reports. This has been done to avoid any future issues and to ensure that important information is shared with the appropriate internal teams and external partners. The additional layers of checking online systems and liaising with the Professional Support Team, gives added assurance that there is consistency in decision making and ongoing learning for the Specialist Customer Service Advisors within the Social and Health Care Team Prevention of Future Deaths Report (Regulation 28): Oxfordshire County Council’s response
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Nicholas Graham, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.