Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0321, written 26 Jun 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 26 Jun 2026 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2026-0321 |
| Deceased | Susan Dale |
| Coroner | Sally Robinson |
| Coroner area | East Riding and Hull |
| Source | judiciary.uk record |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1.Westfield Residential Home Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire 2. Care Quality Commission I am also sending this to the family of Susan Dale. 1 CORONER I am Sally Robinson, Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of East Riding of Yorkshire and City of Kingston Upon Hull. 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 1st May 2026 an inquest was opened and adjourned into the death of Susan Dale aged 78years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 25th June 2026, the conclusion of the inquest was accidental death. Mrs Dalew dies at Hulk Royal Infirmary after being admitted from Westfield Residential Home Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire. Mrs Dale had suffered fall at the home the day previously. She had had several falls in the home in the preceding weeks and some of these resulted in head injury. Mrs Dale was found to have suffered bilateral subdural hematomas and was for conservative management. Mrs Dale had a diagnosis of dementia and had recurrent UTIs and had presented at hospital with inflammatory markers suggestive of infection although of unknown ethology. Antibiotics were started but Mrs Dale’s condition failed to improve and the decision was for end of life care. Mrs Dale sadly died on 18th April 2026. The case of death given by the hospital doctor was: 1a Subdural haematoma 2. Dementia and frailty. Fall was added at inquest at 1b but it was not possible to say which fall had caused the subdural haematoma or indeed if the last fall exacerbated an already developing clinical situation. 1 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mrs Dale was a resident at Westfields Residential Home and had been for a number of months. She required help with eating drinking and personal care. On the morning of 8th April 2026 Mrs Dale was being assisted with her morning routine by a care assistant in the home. As the care assistant was helping Mrs Dale into her wheel chair Mrs Dale became unsteady and fell to the floor. The statement of the care assistant does not detail her injuries but the accident report says Mrs Dale banged her hand. A l retrospective entry on the advanced care cloud system details a hearsay report of the fall and states that Mrs Dale had a small graze to the back of her head where she had banged it. The statement says the care assistant came on shift at 0700 and is silent on the time of the fall. The advanced care cloud entry says the tome of the incident was 11.56hrs and the accident report which states Mrs Dale banged her hand and makes no mention of her head,. The accident report states the fall occurred at 09.00hrs. Following the fall the care assistant went to call the GP. 111 was not called. Some hours later a different staff member noticed Mrs Dale was deteriorating and she appear to be possibly having a stroke, An ambulance was called and Mrs Dale was taken to hospital and did not return to the home before she sadly died.. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – (1) The record keeping in the home appeasers to be inaccurate and inconsistent (2) The falls policy of the home states that there are number of scenarios to consider before lifting a resident for the floor and states that the resident should not be moved until clinical assistance arrive. One such situation is if head, neck, back or hip injury is suspected. The incident log on advanced care cloud states there was ahead injury yet Mrs Dale was moved and no clinician saw her until she worsened and an ambulance was called. Inaccuracies in reporting can lead to missed opportunities to provide care and inaccurate time recording of incidents can lead to the accurate appraisal of the developing clinic picture being made more difficult which in turn would lead to a delay in medical assistance being sought. This could lead to resident safety being compromised and deaths occurring. (3) The senior care worker who came on shift later that day said she did not receive any hand over from the staff going off shift. This is a 2 concern as observations need to be carried out when someone has fallen and banged their head and a handover would detail such incidents and whether there are any concerns with residents. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation has the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 21st August 2026. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: the family of Susan Dale and the Manager of Westfield Residential Home Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 [DATE] 26th June 2026 Sally Robinson, Assistant Coroner [SIGNED BY CORONER] 3
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Care Quality Commission
Citygate
Gallowgate
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 4PA
www.cqc.org.uk
Sally Robinson
HM Assistant Coroner
Coroner's Court
The Guildhall
Alfred Gelder Street
Hull
HU1 2AA
18 August 2026
Dear HM Assistant Coroner Sally Robinson,
Prevention of future death report following inquest into the death of Susan
Dale
Thank you for sending the Care Quality Commission (CQC) a copy of the prevention
of future deaths report issued following the sad death of Susan Dale.
We note the legal requirement upon CQC to respond to your report within 56 days,
by 21 August 2026.
The registered provider of Westfield Residential Home is Westfield Residential Home
Ltd. They have been registered with CQC since 7 January 2011.
The provider’s location Westfield Residential Home is located at 16 Carr Lane,
Willerby, Hull, HU19 6JW. The provider is registered for the following regulated
activity: ‘Accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care’. The
provider is not permitted to provide nursing care at this location.
Background
On 20 April 2026,
the registered manager of Westfield Residential
Home, submitted a statutory notification to CQC informing us of the death of Susan
Dale, who was using the service. The notification did not include any information
about previous falls or any involvement from the coroner.
Following receipt of the Regulation 28 Report, CQC have initiated a review of this
incident in line with our specific incident guidance. CQC also conducted an
unannounced inspection of Westfield Residential Home on 21 July 2026. The
matters of concern highlighted in the Regulation 28 Report helped to inform our
inspection activity and ensure there was a particular focus on record keeping, safe
management of falls and handover processes.
Matters of concern
CQC assess Registered Persons against the regulatory framework relevant to the
service provided, as well as accepted best practice and relevant national policies. It
is not for CQC to instruct how a Registered Provider meets the standards required,
but to assess whether the relevant standards are being met as expected and take
appropriate action for any identified failures. Therefore, CQC cannot speak directly to
the matters of concern raised outside of our role as a regulator and our assessment
of the Registered Provider during our unannounced inspection.
In respect of the matters of concern as they relate to the care provided to Susan
Dale, further assessment is ongoing as part of our specific incident process in order
to determine whether any relevant breaches have occurred and whether any criminal
enforcement action should be considered as a result.
During our unannounced inspection, in respect of any ongoing risk posed to service
users, CQC did not identify any issues relating to the matters of concern raised that
would require any regulatory action.
1. The record keeping in the home appears to be inaccurate and
inconsistent.
Susan Dale’s care records will be reviewed as part of our specific incident
process to determine whether there are any regulatory breaches in respect of
record keeping, and if so, what potential impact such breaches may have had
in order to determine whether criminal enforcement action should be
considered.
During our recent inspection of the service last month, we reviewed record
keeping in overarching general terms. Evidence available and gathered did
not demonstrate poor record keeping overall, however, it is important to note
that CQC’s inspection methodology follows a sampling approach, and
therefore this does not mean there were not some shortfalls in some records.
CQC contacted the provider, as the registered provider of Westfield
Residential Home, to seek assurances regarding the actions taken in
response to receiving the Regulation 28 letter, including the steps they had
taken regarding inaccurate and inconsistent record keeping.
The provider advised that they have moved to a new electronic care planning
system, which includes integrated accident and incident forms. They stated
this system supports staff to record accidents and incidents more clearly and
consistently.
2. The falls policy of the home states that there are number of scenarios to
consider before lifting a resident for the floor and states that the
resident should not be moved until clinical assistance arrive. One such
situation is if head, neck, back or hip injury is suspected. The incident
log on advanced care cloud states there was a head injury, yet Mrs Dale
was moved and no clinician saw her until she worsened and an
ambulance was called. Inaccuracies in reporting can lead to missed
opportunities to provide care and inaccurate time recording of incidents
can lead to the accurate appraisal of the developing clinic picture being
made more difficult which in turn would lead to a delay in medical
assistance being sought. This could lead to resident safety being
compromised and deaths occurring.
The management of Susan Dale’s fall will be assessed in line with CQC’s
specific incident guidance.
In relation to our recent inspection of the service last month, we reviewed falls
management as part of our assessment of whether the service was providing
safe care and treatment to all who use the service. Evidence available and
gathered in respect of this identified no concerns with the management of
falls.
CQC contacted the provider, as the registered provider of Westfield
Residential Home, to seek assurances regarding the actions taken in
response to receiving the Regulation 28 letter, including the measures
implemented to prevent a similar incident from occurring in the future.
The provider advised that a staff meeting had been held to discuss the
lessons learned. They stated that during the meeting, staff were introduced to
the Falls and Accident Guidance that had been developed to provide a clear
procedure for responding to accidents or incidents. The provider also
confirmed that the falls policy and associated procedures were discussed with
staff.
3. The senior care worker who came on shift later that day said she did not
receive any hand over from the staff going off shift. This is a concern as
observations need to be carried out when someone has fallen and
banged their head and a handover would detail such incidents and
whether there are any concerns with residents.
The management of Susan Dale’s fall will be assessed in line with CQC’s
specific incident guidance.
In relation to our recent inspection of the service last month, we reviewed
handover processes as part of our assessment of whether the service was
providing safe care and treatment to all who use the service. Evidence
available and gathered in relation to handover processes between staff did
not identify any concerns.
CQC contacted the provider, as the registered provider of Westfield
Residential Home, to seek assurances regarding the actions taken in
response to receiving the Regulation 28 letter, including the measures
implemented to ensure effective communication and handover of information
between shifts.
The provider advised that the new electronic care planning system also has
an inbuilt handover function, which staff are able to read and verbally discuss
at the beginning of each shift. A file for senior carers has also been
implemented and is being updated as an ongoing resource. They informed us
this contains master copies of relevant documents and guidance tools to
support senior carers in their role.
The provider also advised that 24/7 on-call support is available to staff, who
are aware that they can seek advice at any time, day or night. They advised a
further senior carers’ meeting has been planned for September, to continue to
embed knowledge and good practice.
Thank you for drawing our attention to this matter and sharing this important
information with us.
Please do not hesitate to contact us via our customer contact centre on 03000 61 61
61 if you have any further queries.
If you do contact us, please quote CQC reference
Yours sincerely,
Deputy Director of Adult Social Care
Care Quality Commission
North East Area,
North Region,
Response to Regulation 28 Report – Susan Dale 1. Documentation and Governance As part of the Home’s ongoing commitment to continuous quality improvement, a new electronic care management system has recently been introduced to replace the previous record- keeping platform. Staff training is currently being delivered as part of the phased implementation to ensure all staff are confident and competent in using the new system. The platform incorporates integrated accident and incident reporting, body maps and observation charts, providing a streamlined and consistent approach to recording and reviewing incidents. This system ensures time stamped and consistent logs are made which are then reviewed by management for further action before they can be signed off. Furthermore, all seniors have been instructed to use the ‘witness’ portions of these forms to ensure two members of staff are logging one accident at the same time to ensure consistency. The incident reporting process now incorporates a structured three-stage workflow: The attending care staff member records the initial details of the incident. The senior member of staff reviews the information, completes any additional documentation required and authorises the record. The incident is then electronically escalated to management for review, oversight and confirmation that any appropriate follow-up actions have been considered. In addition, monthly governance audits of all accident and incident records have been incorporated within the new system. These audits provide ongoing oversight of documentation, support continuous monitoring of practice and assist in identifying further opportunities for staff development and service improvement. 2. Reinforcement of Training and Professional Development The Home recognises the importance of continually strengthening staff knowledge and maintaining a consistent approach to the assessment and management of incidents. To support this commitment, additional training and educational sessions are being delivered to reinforce existing policies and procedures relating to witnessed falls, unwitnessed falls and situations where a resident has sustained an injury or is unable to explain what has occurred. A dedicated staff meeting and practical learning workshop has been scheduled for 9 July 2026, during which staff will revisit the home’s procedures for assessment, observation, escalation and documentation. The session will further reinforce the circumstances in which advice should be sought from NHS 111 or emergency services, ensuring staff remain confident in recognising when urgent clinical assessment may be appropriate. As part of this programme, all staff will receive comprehensive guidance notes covering: the assessment of residents following falls or suspected injuries; circumstances where residents should not be moved, including where head, neck, spinal, pelvic or hip injuries are suspected; indicators requiring immediate escalation to emergency services; post-incident observations and ongoing monitoring; documentation standards; and internal reporting and management escalation procedures. These sessions form part of the Home’s wider programme of continuous professional development and are intended to further enhance staff knowledge, promote consistency of practice and support the delivery of safe, person-centred care. 3. Reflective Supervision Reflective supervision sessions have commenced for the staff members involved in the incident, beginning on 29 June 2026. These sessions are being undertaken as part of the Home’s routine commitment to professional development and reflective practice. They provide an opportunity to reinforce existing policies and procedures, discuss learning points, identify any additional training requirements and support continued professional growth. The Home remains committed to maintaining high standards of care through ongoing education, regular competency assessments, robust governance processes and continual review of practice to ensure learning and development remain embedded throughout the service. 4. Documentation Updates Policies of the month at Westfield are now already in circulation in which an emphasized and updated Falls policy will also be given to any existing and any new staff. A system of Resident of the Day has also already commenced which demonstrates: care plans reviewed risk assessments reviewed mobility checked falls risk updated documentation audited A new structured handover process is now replacing the old paperback diary format at Westfield ensuring all members of staff can access the same information readily, to ensure all staff are well educated on each residents health. Westfield Residential Home recognizes the importance of continuous quality improvement and will continue to monitor the effectiveness of these measures through regular audits, competency assessments, governance meetings, and management oversight to ensure they remain effective and responsive to residents' needs.
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Sally Robinson, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.