Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0652, written 24 Nov 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 24 Nov 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0652 |
| Deceased | Colin Wiles |
| Coroner | Sally Robinson |
| Coroner area | City of Kingston Upon Hull and the County of the East Riding of Yorkshire |
| Category | Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards) · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 3 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Hull University Teaching Hospital 2. NHS England 3. East Riding of Yorkshire Council Adult Social Care and Health I am also sending this to Yorkshire Ambulance Service and Humberside Police Right Care Right Person lead as it may be of interest to these agencies and the family of Mr Colin Wiles. 1 CORONER I am Sally Robinson, Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of East Riding of Yorkshire and City of Kingston Upon Hull. 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 11th April 2023 an inquest was opened and adjourned into the death of Colin Wiles aged 79 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 25th October 2024, the conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion. Conclusion: Narrative - Colin Wiles died at Hull Royal Infirmary following admission for a collapse at home. Multifactorial issues led to a worsening of pre-existing health conditions and hypothermia which were contributed to by self-neglect. His medical cause of death was recorded as: 1a. Type 2 Respiratory Failure 1b. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Hypothermia 2. Frailty and Chromic Kidney Disease; Paranoid Schizophrenia 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Colin Wiles lived alone in a home he owned. He had a history of diagnosed mental health and was concordant with medication for Schizophrenia. He enjoyed a good relationship with his mental health nurses and GP and was deemed capacitous throughout his treatment in recent years. Colin had a good and loving relationship with his daughter and with his sister. Colin elected to live in a house which did not have fully functioning mains services due to a variety of reasons. He received advice on his living situation from various agencies, but he appeared to be content in his way of life. This self-neglect however meant that he 1 did not always keep his house warm although he did have a coal fire and access to oil heaters, and he did cook his own meals when not at family members’ houses. There had been attempts at helping Colin access repairs for his house following various admissions to hospital and a safeguarding referral was made by the Safeguarding Adults team at Hull Royal Infirmary on 13th February 2023 as Colin was about to be discharged home from hospital and his house needed work. The Independence and Advice Hub were to screen that referral, but Colin was discharged home before contact was made with him. On 6th March 2023 Colin was assigned a social worker and support was offered. Colin was offered alternative living arrangements for a short while but declined with capacity to make his own decisions. On the 7th March 2023, the social worker once again visited Colin, and this time support was accepted from the Red Cross. On 8th March Colin was discharged home. Due to ongoing concerns a Vulnerable Adults Risk Management (VARM) meeting was suggested. The Red Cross did support Colin but raised concerns about his house. Colin declined further support on 10th March 2023 but said he knew what to do if he needed support in the future. A VARM meeting was not held, which was an accepted missed opportunity by East Riding Adult Social Care and Health. Colin’s hospital admissions prior to his death concerned a general decline and hypothermia and he was warmed up at hospital. Colin’s daughter arranged to visit Colin on 26th March but upon attendance there was no response to knocking or phone calls. She rang the police with a concern for welfare call. She was advised this was a health concern and as such under the Right Care Right Person Policy she should ring for an ambulance which she duly did at 17:57. The call was answered at 17:59 which constituted a delay of 1 minute and 50 seconds. The call was coded as a Category 3 call, which on the information provided was the correct category. The caller was advised the service was extremely busy but was not advised how long the delay was likely to be. Calls were made to the patient, but the line was constantly engaged as reported by his daughter. At 03:35 on 27th March 2023 an ambulance arrived at Colin’s house. This was response time of 9 hours and 38 minutes was accepted by Yorkshire Ambulance to be an excessive response time. Colin was seen through the window collapsed and the fire and rescue service were summonsed by ambulance to attend and effect entry which they did at 04:00 hours. Colin was critically unwell when the ambulance crew assessed him, and he was conveyed under blue lights and sirens Hull Royal Infirmary who were pre alerted by the ambulance that he was en route. Despite best efforts at Hull Royal Infirmary, Colin sadly passed away at 15:00 hours on the 27th March at Hull Royal Infirmary. Due to excessive handover times at Hull Royal Infirmary on that date Colin was not handed over to Emergency Department staff until 05:48 hours, having arrived at the emergency Department at 04:27 hours. This was a delay of 1 hour and 21 minutes. At 02:58 on 27th March 2023 the CSP level was escalated to Level 3, as Category 3 response times had increased to 10 hours and 5 minutes. A total of 160 ambulance hours were lost on that date waiting for patient transfer at Hull Royal Infirmary which equates to 16 x 10 hr ambulance shifts. 2 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – (1) No Vulnerable Adult Risk Management meeting was held despite multifactorial concerns with Mr Wiles’ comorbities and self neglect leading to poor living conditions and increased risk to his safety (2) It does not seem clear whether callers are advised to call the emergency services back if they continue to have concerns. (3) The waiting times for ambulances to hand over patients at Hull Royal Infirmary were excessive that day leading to 160 hours of lost ambulance time. (4) There appears to be an issue with no criteria to reside patients and the ability to hand over patients into ED in Hull Royal Infirmary who arrive in emergency ambulances. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation has the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 22nd January 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period and acknowledge it is the Christmas and New Year period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: the family Colin Wiles, Yorkshire Ambulance Service and Humberside Police as well as the agencies identified at the top of this report. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 [DATE] [SIGNED BY CORONER] 24th November 2024 Sally Robinson, Assistant Coroner 3 4
3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
County Hall Beverley East Riding of Yorkshire HU17 9BA Telephone (01482) 393939 www.eastriding.gov.uk Director of Locality Wellbeing and Safeguarding RESPONSE TO REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS FOLLOWING THE INQUEST TOUCHING THE DEATH OF COLIN WILES PROVIDED BY – HEAD OF SERVICE, SAFEGUARDING AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, ADULT SOCIAL CARE AND HEALTH, EAST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE COUNCIL There are four MATTERS OF CONCERN to note in this regulation 28 report. The local authority can respond only to MATTER OF CONCERN (1) as follows: No Vulnerable Adult Risk Management meeting was held despite multifactorial concerns with Mr Wiles’ comorbities and self neglect leading to poor living conditions and increased risk to his safety The evidence submitted to the inquest demonstrates how a Vulnerable Adult Risk Management (VARM) meeting was considered by the social worker in this case but did not happen. Whilst Mr Wiles was resisting formal care interventions and was believed to have the mental capacity to make that decision, he was continuing to engage with professionals and accept some, if not limited help, which was a protective factor. A VARM would more often be requested for those people who are at risk but refusing all contact with services, although a VARM could have been used in this case to assure all professionals that they were doing all they could to support and safeguard Mr Wiles and give Mr Wiles the opportunity to comment on whether there was anything else he thought they could do to support him. The local authority adult social care and health service (ASCH) and the east riding safeguarding adults board (ERSAB) recognise that the use of VARM should be a key consideration and mechanism in the practice system to ensure it is utilised for all people for whom it would be of benefit. There is an opportunity for the system to utilise the VARM process more regularly when supporting people in circumstances like Mr Wiles to ensure that professionals are working together with and for the person concerned and accept that this is an area for continuous improvement. The current VARM procedure is available to all professionals and people in the east riding on the ERSAB website and guides them through the processes and paperwork involved (included as appendix 1). Training is provided to practitioners across the health and care system in the east riding on the use of VARM both through the ERSAB and the local authorities internal learning and skills team. To enable development in this area, the ERSAB and ASCH have collaborated with Hull City Council’s safeguarding adults board and Adult Services to review and renew the VARM procedure to contemporise the approach and develop a more seamless and accessible procedure in this geographical area. The VARM training is therefore currently under review and will be relaunched following the completion of this work to ensure and enable an effective roll out of the new procedure which will be called Multi Agency Risk Management (MARM) meeting procedure. This is expected to be finalised in early 2025. VARM training is not currently a mandatory requirement for staff in ASCH staff however, MARM training being mandatory for practitioners going forward will be considered by the service at our practice development board which is chaired by our Head of Service for Safeguarding and Quality Assurance. Interim Executive Director of Adult Social Care and Health (DASS)
Ms Sally Robinson
HM Assistant Coroner
East Riding of Yorkshire and
City of Kingston Upon Hull
The Guildhall
Alfred Gelder Street
Hull
HU1 2AA
Dear Coroner,
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
22 January 2025
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Colin Wiles who died on
27 March 2023
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 24
November 2024 concerning the death of Colin Wiles on 27 March 2023. In advance
of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express
my deep condolences to Colin’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to
assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Colin’s care have
been listened to and reflected upon.
My response to the Coroner focuses on those areas of concern that sit within NHS
England’s national policy and programme remit. It is appropriate for the other
organisations you have addressed your Report to, Hull University Teaching Hospitals
NHS Trust and East Riding of Yorkshire Council Adult Social Care and Health, to
address the local and system concerns you raise.
You raised the concern that it does not seem clear whether callers are advised to call
the emergency services back if they continue to have concerns.
Instructions on worsening conditions, including specifically to call back on 999 should
the patient’s condition change or deteriorate, are standard components of the case
exit script. If the call is made via a second party, ambulance services should ensure
there is a process in place to be assured the caller is able to monitor the condition of
the patient, and that they can be called back when the patient is not able to call back
or answer a call themselves. If this was not provided in a clear and easy to interpret
manner, this is a matter for the relevant ambulance service to resolve locally as a
training issue for their call handlers.
You also raised a concern over the waiting times for ambulances to handover patients
at Hull Royal Infirmary, which were excessive on 27 March 2023, leading to 160 hours
of lost ambulance time.
Excessive hospital handover delays remain a key issue for the NHS. Rapid handovers
are essential to ensure patients reach definitive care promptly, which includes both
those waiting to receive care in the emergency department (ED), and those waiting in
the community. NHS England are continuing to work with trusts and services with
significant handover challenges at the ‘front end’, alongside recognising the
importance of reducing length of stay and timely discharge to maintain adequate
patient flow and allow new patients to be handed over more promptly to EDs.
To deliver this, the NHS’s ambitions for 2024/25 have been set out in the NHS priorities
and operational planning guidance. These are:
•
•
improve A&E performance with 78% of patients being admitted, transferred, or
discharged within 4 hours by March 2025
improve Category 2 ambulance response times relative to 2023/24, to an
average of 30 minutes across 2024/25
NHS England’s operational planning guidance has asked systems to focus on three
areas to deliver these ambitions:
1. maintaining the capacity expansion delivered through 2023/24
2. increasing the productivity of acute and non-acute services across bedded and
non-bedded capacity, improving flow and length of stay, and clinical outcomes
3. continuing to develop services that shift activity from acute hospital settings to
settings outside an acute hospital for patients with unplanned urgent needs,
supporting proactive care, admissions avoidance, and hospital discharge.
Evidence of the impact of system actions to improve patient flow and relieve pressures
on EDs includes:
•
tens of thousands more people received the care they needed to return home
quickly and safely due to the expansion of same day emergency care (SDEC)
services
• on average, around 500 fewer patients a day had to spend the night in hospital
because of a discharge delay, and 13% more patients received a short-term
package of health or social care to help them continue their recovery after
discharge
• urgent community response teams provided 720,000 people with an alternative
to going to hospital between April and January 2024
• virtual wards have supported more than 240,000 people to get the hospital-
level care and monitoring they needed in the comfort of their own home
Additionally, during 2024/25, providers have access to £150 million of funding to
support specific local improvement plans for urgent services, including for mental
health care. These new improvements will support patients being treated more quickly
in A&E or by other services in the community. Up to £150 million will also be available
to incentivise the best performing areas and those that improve fastest. The NHS and
local authorities will also work together to expand intermediate care services, both in
people’s own homes and in community beds, thanks to the additional £400 million
Better Care Fund (BCF) available to support further improvements in hospital
discharge. There will also be further improvements to, and co-ordination of,
community-based services that support people to avoid ambulance call-outs and
hospital admissions, by treating people in the most appropriate place for their level of
need.
NHS England will also be prioritising:
•
•
•
improving length of stay for all admitted patients (specifically emergency
admissions with a length of stay of 1+ day)
reducing delays
improving length of stay in NHS commissioned community beds
My regional colleagues for North East and Yorkshire have also engaged with Humber
Health Partnership, of which Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust is a
member, regarding the concerns raised in your Report. We note and welcome the
actions they are taking to reduce ambulance handover times and restore patient flow.
We are advised that the Trust has also implemented a Temporary Escalation Space
(TES) and Boarding Standard Operating Procedure to improve patient flow and
increase availability of beds for patients attending the Emergency Department. I refer
you to Humber Health Partnership’s response to your Report for further information.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Colin,
are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level, and helps us to pay
close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
3 February 2025 Ms Sally Robinson Assistant Coroner The Guildhall Alfred Gelder Street Kingston Upon Hull HU1 2AA Dear Ms Robinson Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Colin Wiles We write further to your Regulation 28 Report dated 24th November 2024 and extend our condolences to the family of Mr Colin Wiles. Below, we address the concerns raised in points (3) and (4) of your report. (3) The waiting times for ambulances to hand over patients at Hull Royal Infirmary were excessive that day, leading to 160 hours of lost ambulance time. We recognise that delays in ambulance handovers have a significant impact on patient safety, timely care delivery, and ambulance availability for responding to community emergencies. On 9th December 2023, we implemented the 045 Handover Plan at Hull Royal Infirmary, which involves a phased approach to reduce ambulance handover times: Phase 1: Two weeks targeting a maximum handover time of 80 minutes, after which Yorkshire Ambulance Service (YAS) staff were instructed to leave. Phase 2: Two weeks targeting a maximum handover time of 65 minutes. Phase 3: Transitioning to a 45-minute target. These measures are in line with the North Bank Escalation and Surge Plan, developed by the Humber Health Partnership, of which the Trust is a member, and include the Ambulance Delay Protocol, which provides a structured framework to minimise handover delays and restore patient flow. Key actions undertaken include: 1. Ambulance Delay Protocol Activation: The Ambulance Delay Protocol mandates that ambulance patients should be handed over within 15 minutes of arrival, with no patient waiting longer than 60 minutes. If a delay exceeds 45 minutes with no immediate plan to hand over, the protocol is triggered, requiring: • Escalation to the Site Manager. • Identification and transfer of six stable patients from the Emergency Department (ED) to appropriate wards within 30 minutes. • Priority transfer of patients with a NEWS2 score of less than 4 who do not require isolation. Working in partnership: Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust United by Compassion: Driving for Excellence. 2. Senior Oversight and Escalation: The Site Team plays a critical role in monitoring capacity risks, initiating escalation protocols, and providing leadership to manage ambulance delays. Escalation actions are informed by continuous assessment of capacity and demand, with operational and clinical leadership ensuring rapid responses to emerging pressures. 3. Proactive Patient Flow Management: • Revising the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to offload up to eight ambulances per • hour and facilitate the transfer of ten patients from the ED to inpatient wards. Implementing the Pull for Safety process, which establishes a regular patient flow from the ED to assessment areas and wards. • Utilising escalation areas and reverse boarding protocols to create immediate capacity for new arrivals, as detailed in the policy. 4. Communication and Collaboration: • Establishing a standardised communication protocol, including regular updates via secure platforms such as WhatsApp, to enhance coordination and decision-making. • Engaging system partners, including YAS and Integrated Care System (ICS) colleagues, to expedite mutual aid and support ambulance operations. Since the implementation of these measures, there has been demonstrable progress in reducing handover times and improving patient flow. For example, the Trust’s approach to boarding patients and optimising escalation spaces has been instrumental in minimising the risks associated with prolonged delays. (4) There appears to be an issue with No Criteria to Reside (NCTR) patients and the ability to hand over patients into ED at Hull Royal Infirmary who arrive in emergency ambulances. The management of NCTR patients is a recognised challenge that directly impacts ED flow and contributes to ambulance handover delays. NCTR patients are identified as those who no longer meet the Criteria to Reside set out in the national Hospital Discharge and Community Support Guidance but remain in hospital due to delays in discharge pathways. Between March and April 2023, 20–25% of the Trust's bed base (approximately 180 beds, equivalent to six wards) was occupied by NCTR patients on discharge pathways 1–3. This occupancy severely impacted patient flow and the availability of beds for incoming ED patients. In response, the Trust has undertaken a series of strategic measures to alleviate these pressures. In November 2024 the Trust implemented the Temporary Escalation Space (TES) and Boarding SOP, which provides a framework for managing capacity challenges and improving flow. Measures Implemented 1. Creation of Additional Capacity: • Opened a 54-bed NCTR unit on the 13th floor of Hull Royal Infirmary to accommodate • patients awaiting discharge, reducing reliance on acute beds. Initiated the construction of the Rossmore Intermediate Care Centre, which will provide an additional 60 short-term placement beds for rehabilitation and reablement. 2. Formal Discharge and Flow Improvements: • Collaborated with system partners to deliver a reduction in NCTR occupancy to 12.6% of the bed base, surpassing the national target of 15%. Implemented updated discharge protocols, including: • - Enhanced cooperation with local authorities to align discharge models with available resources and budgets. - Increased involvement of families and carers in discharge planning to ensure timely and appropriate placements. - Use of care transfer hubs to manage complex discharges effectively. 3. Operational Measures from the TES and Boarding SOP: • Boarding Protocols: The SOP outlines structured boarding processes to manage NCTR patients effectively and create capacity in the ED. This includes: - Identifying and moving up to three patients per ward to temporary escalation spaces (TES) or discharge lounges within 30 minutes. - Ensuring timely handovers from ED to inpatient wards to free up ED spaces. • Proactive Discharge Management: Board rounds and huddles on AMU and inpatient wards focus on early identification of patients for discharge, with targets of 30% discharges by 12:00 and 70% by 17:00. • Zero Tolerance for Delays: The SOP enforces zero tolerance for patients remaining in AMU for more than 24 hours or in ED for over 12 hours, ensuring flow is maintained. 4. Senior Oversight and Escalation: • The Site Matron monitors ambulance arrivals and ED capacity in real time, triggering • escalation actions when thresholds are met. Issues affecting boarding or discharge are escalated to the Care Group and Site Matrons, with further escalation to senior leadership if unresolved. Impact These measures, underpinned by the TES and Boarding SOP, have significantly improved patient flow and reduced the impact of NCTR patients on acute services. Early discharge planning, effective use of escalation spaces, and coordinated efforts across the Trust ensure timely ED handovers and minimise ambulance delays. Conclusion We remain committed to addressing the concerns outlined in your report and have implemented targeted interventions to improve ambulance handovers and NCTR management. We are confident that these measures, combined with continued collaboration across the healthcare system, will reduce the risk of future incidents. If further information or clarification is required, we would be happy to provide it. Yours sincerely Group Chief Nurse
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.