Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2013

Phillip Pratt

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2013-0174, written 30 Jul 2013. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report30 Jul 2013
Reference2013-0174
DeceasedPhillip Pratt
CoronerElisabeth Bussey-Jones
Coroner areaWest Sussex
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Coroner’s Office 
West Sussex Record Office 
Orchard Street 
Chichester 
West Sussex 
PO19 1DD 

Penelope A Schofield 
Senior Coroner 
County of West Sussex 

033022 27100 
01243 753644 (fax) 
hm.coroner@westsussex.gov.uk 
www.westsussex.gov.uk 

30th July 2013 

St Richard’s Hospital 
Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust 
Spitalfields Lane 
Chichester 
West Sussex 
PO19 6SE 

 Dear Madam 

 RE: INQUEST INTO THE DEATH OF PHILLIP ARTHUR PRATT 

On the 16th July 2013 I concluded an inquest into the death of Phillip Pratt. The 
inquest hearing began on 18th June 2013 and was adjourned to the 16th July 
when it was concluded. In holding this inquest I sat as Assistant Deputy Coroner 
for the County of West Sussex. 

The medical causes of Mr Pratt’s death were bilateral bronchopneumonia and 
metastatic prostatic carcinoma, fracture of the neck of femur and ischaemic 
heart disease.  

The sudden deterioration in his health immediately prior to his death was 
attributed to the onset of bronchopneumonia following an operation for a 
fracture to the neck of femur incurred as a result of a fall. The verdict that was 
returned was “accidental death”.  

At the conclusion of the Inquest I announced that it was my intention to make a 
report to the Trust under Rule 43 of the Coroners (Amendment) Rules 2008.  
This rule provides that where the evidence at an inquest gives rise to a concern 
that circumstances creating a risk of other deaths will occur or will continue to 
exist in the future, and in the Coroner’s opinion, action should be taken to 
prevent the occurrence or continuation of such circumstances, or to eliminate or 
reduce the risk of death created by such circumstances, the Coroner may report 
the circumstances to a person who may have the power to take such action.  

Summary of the facts  
Mr Pratt passed away on the 2nd of November 2012 at approximately 0030 
hours at St Richards Hospital. 

In June/July 2012 he had suffered a fall at home which led to tests being 
conducted. Those tests revealed a prostrate carcinoma.  As part of his ongoing 
treatment, on the 25th October 2012 Mr Pratt was admitted to St Richards 
Hospital for elective surgery to insert stents into both kidneys. Pre-operative 
assessment raised concern as to the weakness in his legs. Although that 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 assessment meant the elective surgery could not proceed at that point in time, 
Mr Pratt remained in hospital for further investigations to be conducted.  The 
initial concerns were whether there was a compression of the spinal cord caused 
by the cancer.   

Mr Pratt was admitted initially on a short stay basis for surgery that did not in 
fact proceed, he then remained in hospital for further tests and thereafter his 
health had declined to such an extent that he could not be discharged from 
hospital in any event. 

The evidence received during the inquest revealed the following matters:  

(a) 

(b) 

(c) 

(d) 

(e) 

(f) 

(g) 

Mr Pratt began to show signs of confusion on the 
26th October 2013 and that led to a rapid decline in his awareness. 
The onset of confusion may have been due to the prescription of 
tramadol given to him at the hospital, although it may also be due to 
other factors which include withdrawal from alcohol consumption. 
Tramadol was withdrawn on the 28th October and a detoxification 
program was started. By that stage, Mr Pratt was in a significantly 
confused state; 

He suffered 5 falls at hospital which were recorded 

in falls forms. Those falls all occurred between the 26th and 29th 
October 2012; 

 X-rays taken on the 29th October revealed the 

fracture to the neck of femur from the last fall which occurred on that 
day and also a possible fracture to the shoulder believed to be caused 
during the fall at 0045am on 28th October; 

Due to staffing levels, one to one care was not 

available although it had been requested.  Mr Pratt was in a location 
close to the nursing station where he could be observed. The last fall 
occurred when a nurse had been away from her station for a matter of 
minutes; 

of the lungs; 

An operation to address the fracture to the hip was conducted on

His levels of awareness and the state of his 

confusion seemed to have improved after his operation on the 30th 
October; 

His health declined very rapidly and unexpectedly after 11pm on 

Matters of Concern 
During the course of the inquest, 
Hospital, gave evidence in relation to a “Root Cause Analysis Investigation 
Report”. The stated purpose of the report was “To identify the root causes and 
key learning from an incident and use this information”. The report covered a 
gave 
number of areas of concern arising from the investigation. 

, Head of Nursing for St Richards 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 evidence to say that a number of practices and additional training have already 
been put in place to address some of the issues set out in the report.  
The matters of concern that I raise herein deal with issues raised in the report in 
respect of which I understand action has not yet been taken.   

The matters of concern I raise are as follows:  

(1) 

On admission to hospital and at pre-assessment 

stage, there was a note of the patient’s medication but no note as to 
dosage of medication. The Report indicates no attempts were made to 
contact the patient’s GP or family to ascertain precise levels of 
medication; 

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

(5) 

(6) 

As it was not expected the patient would remain at 

hospital for a protracted stay, the need for alcohol detoxification was 
not considered at an early stage and not reassessed when the reason 
for the patient’s admission changed; 

The onset of agitation and confusion had been recognized, with a

There was a delay in discontinuing the prescription 
for Tramadol despite the onset of confusion which is one of the contra-
indications of that medication; 

There was a delay in x-raying the shoulder. The report comments

monitor a high risk patient but extra staff were not available. 

Requests were made for nurse special staff to 

In my opinion action should be taken in order to prevent the risk of future 
deaths and I believe your organisation has the power to take such action.  

You are required to respond to this letter within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by the 1st October 2013. If you are unable to reply within this 
time, you may apply for an extension. The response must contain details of 
action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for such action. 

If no action is to be taken, you must explain why no action is proposed.  
A copy of this report is being sent to the Chief Coroner and to 
who was identified as an interested person at the inquest.   

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he 
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me 
at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your 
response by the Chief Coroner. 

Yours sincerely,  

Elisabeth Bussey-Jones 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Assistant  Coroner for West Sussex

Related reports

Other reports by Elisabeth Bussey-Jones

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.