Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2013

Kuldip Singh Dhillon

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2013-0254, written 8 Oct 2013. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report8 Oct 2013
Reference2013-0254
DeceasedKuldip Singh Dhillon
CoronerChinyere Inyama
Coroner areaEast London
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS(1) 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  The Department of Transport. 

1. 

I  am  Chinyere  Inyama,  senior  coroner  for  the  coroner  area  of  East 
London. 

2.  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroner’s and 
Justice  Act  2009  and  regulations  28  and  29  of  the  Coroners 
(Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3. 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On  30th  May  2012  I  commenced  an  investigation  into  the  death  of 
Kuldip Singh Dhillon then aged 57. The investigation concluded at the 
end  of  the  inquest  on  the  20th  September  2013.  The  conclusion  of  the 
inquest  was  accidental  death  and  the  medical  cause  of  death  being 
extensive full thickness burns. 

4.  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

1.  Essex  Police  were  performing  a  rolling  road  block  to  clear  debris 

off the M25 on the 25th May 2012. 

2.  Vehicles had slowed and stopped. 

3.  The deceased was driving a lorry when he (as confirmed by CCTV 

footage) collided into a stationery vehicle. 

4.  He was trapped in his vehicle when the vehicle exploded following 

the impact, engulfing his cab in fire. 

5.  He was confirmed dead at the scene. 

5.  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest, evidence revealed matters giving rise 

 
 
 
 
 to  concern.  In  my  opinion  there  is  risk  that  future  deaths  will  occur 
unless  action  is  taken.  In  the  circumstances  it  is  my  statutory  duty  to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:- 

1.  Evidence  was  given  at  the  inquest  that  the  load  which  the 
deceased  was  carrying  was  sitting  on  the  vehicle’s  load  bed 
without any restraint at all. 

2.  This,  according  to  the  evidence  given,  was  ‘common  practice 
nationwide with palletised loads’. You note that this evidence was 
given by a senior engineer from the Engineering Safety Unit of the 
Health and Safety Laboratory. 

3.  This type of lack of restraint not only puts a driver at risk whilst 

driving but also at risk during loading and unloading. 

4.  Evidence  was  given  at  the  inquest  by  the  senior  engineer  that 
similar  evidence  has  been  given  be  her  at  inquests  nationwide 
over a number of years without any apparent change in industry 
practice. 

5.  Evidence  was  given  at  the  inquest  that  it  is  the  Department  of 
for  enforcing  and  auditing 
Transport  that 
compliance  with  the  pieces  of  legislation  (supported  by    specific 
guidance  and  codes  of  practice)  that  govern  the  loading  and 
transport of goods by road in the UK. 

is  responsible 

6.  Evidence  was  given  that  there,  clearly,  is  insufficient  enforcing 

and auditing of the guidance and codes of practice.    

6.  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent  future  deaths  and  I 
believe you/or your organisation have the power to take such action. 

It  is  clear  there  should  be  a  review  of  the  systems  in  place  that  are 
meant to ensure there is no risk of anaphylactic shock in such cases. In 
addition,  the  operation  of  the  system  should  be  audited  on  a  regular 
basis  since  potential  consequences  of  absence  of  or  poor  operation  of 
such systems are potentially so serious. 

7.  You  are  under  a  duty  to  respond  to  this  report  within  56  days  of  the 
date  of  this  report  namely  by  3rd  December  2013.  I,  the  coroner,  may 
extend the period. 

 Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or  proposed  to  be 
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

8.  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Person -

I  am  also  under  a  duty  to  send  the  Chief  Coroner  a  copy  of  your 
response. 

The chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he  believes  may  find  it  useful  or  of  interest.  You  may  make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release of the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9.  8th October 2013.

Related reports

Other reports by Chinyere Inyama

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.