Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026

James Coates

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0167, written 19 Mar 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report19 Mar 2026
Reference2026-0167
DeceasedJames Coates
CoronerRobert Cohen
Coroner areaCumbria
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Miss K J Gomersal LLB | Senior Coroner | Cumbria 

           HM Coroner's Courts, Allerdale House, Workington, Cumbria CA14 3YJ            

Tel: 0300 303 3180 | Email: hmcoroner@cumbria.gov.uk | Web: hmcoronercumbria.org.uk  

Case Ref: 12890429 

24 March 2026 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  The Secretary of State for Transport 

1) CORONER 

I am Robert Cohen  HM Assistant Coroner for Cumbria 

2) CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3) INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 29 August 2024 an investigation commenced into the death of James Scott COATES. 
The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest. The conclusion of the inquest was: 

Road Traffic Collision 

The medical cause of death was: 

1a   Burns 

1b   Road Traffic Collision 

1c    

 II     

 
  
   
  
  
  
  
 4) CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

I recorded the following matters in relation to Mr Coates' death: 

Mr Coates was 39 years old. He lived in Tyne and Wear and worked in Barrow-in-Furness. 
On  20th  August  2024,  at  approximately  22:28,  Mr  Coates  was  driving  his  car  along  Park 
Road in Barrow. It was dark. Park Road is a rural road, without overhead lighting. It is subject 
to  the  national  speed  limit.  Mr  Coates  drove  toward  a  left-hand  bend.  75%  of  the  Cats  Eye 
reflectors  leading  into  that  bend  were  not  functioning.  As  Mr  Coates  entered  the  bend  his 
speed was in the region of 90 mph. He was not able to maintain full control of the vehicle at 
that  speed,  and  it  crossed  into  the  oncoming  carriageway,  where  a  head  on  collision  with 
another  vehicle  occurred.  In  that  collision  Mr  Coates  sustained  unsurvivable  injuries;  his 
death was confirmed at the roadside at 23:20. Mr Coates had also used cannabis prior to the 
collision, and it is likely that this had an adverse impact on his ability to control the vehicle. 

An  additional  feature  of  the  evidence  was  that  Mr  Coates  suffered  from  epilepsy  and  was 
used cannabis every day. According to the evidence I heard, both his epilepsy and cannabis 
use  should  have  been  reported  to  the  DVLA  but  neither  was.  In  fact,  Mr  Coates  medical 
records confirmed that several months after he was diagnosed with epilepsy he accepted to 
clinicians that he had not informed the DVLA of his condition. He was reminded to do so but 
did not follow that advice. It appears that he was never even advised to tell the DVLA of his 
cannabis use. For the avoidance of doubt, I did not find that epilepsy caused or contributed to 
the collision.  
5) CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my 
opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  – 

I previously sent you a Prevention of Future Deaths Report (in relation to the deaths of Neil 
Errington  and  Gareth  and  Patricia  Evans)  highlighting  my  concern  that  the  expectation  that 
drivers  would  self-report  their  conditions  (which  arises  as  a  matter  of  legislation)  was  not 
being followed.  

The evidence in this inquest provides further cause for concern. Once again, the evidence is 
that  a  person  with  potentially  significant  conditions  never  notified  the  DVLA,  and  that  his 
doctors did not draw it to the DVLA's attention because legislation places the onus on licence 
holders and not their doctors. I remain of the view that this is insufficiently robust to ensure 
that drivers with serious conditions are not having their licenses properly reviewed.  

6) ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you the Secretary 
of State have the power to take such action. 

7) YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 20th May 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

 8) COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and each interested person.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He 
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. 
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

24 March 2026 

Signature 

Robert Cohen HM Assistant Coroner for

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department for Transport
RESPONSE TO A REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 
REGULATION 29 OF THE CORONERS (INVESTIGATIONS) REGULATIONS 
2013 

Please do not include any living persons’ names in this document, in 
accordance with the Chief Coroner’s PFD Publication Policy (2026). 

THIS RESPONSE IS BEING SENT TO: Mr Robert Cohen 

The Senior Coroner, Mr Robert Cohen for the Coroner Area Cumbria in response 
to a ‘REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATH REGULATION 28’ following an 
inquest into the death of Mr Scott Coates that concluded on  

1. 

RESPONDENT 

In  line  with  our  duty  under  Regulation  29  of  the  Coroners  (Investigations) 
Regulations  2013, 
,  Minister  for  Local  Transport 
provides this response within 56 days (plus any extension granted) of the date 
of the Report to Prevent Future Deaths. 

2.  DATE OF RESPONSE TBC 

3.  CONFIRMATION OF CORONER’S MATTERS OF CONCERN 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN were identified in the report are as follows: 

The reliability and safety of the current self-declaration system and the risk that 
some drivers may not inform the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) of 
relevant medical conditions that may affect their fitness to drive. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3. 

DETAILS OF ACTION TAKEN, how has the concern been addressed. 

The actions  being taken by my Department and the DVLA to address the issues 
raised  in  this  Prevention  of  Future  Deaths  Report  include  reviewing  the 
self
declaration  forms  for  notifying  the  DVLA  of  a  medical  condition,  raising 
public awareness of the legal duty to notify medical conditions to the DVLA and 
the consequences of not doing so and reinforcing the existing General Medical 
Council  guidance  which  advises  doctors  when  to  notify  the  DVLA  where  a 
patient continues to drive despite being advised to  notify the DVLA. 

‑

I can confirm that the DVLA is engaging with healthcare professionals and has 
delivered a series of educational sessions to encourage clinicians to notify the 
DVLA directly where a patient is unable or unwilling to do so themselves. Further 
engagement  with  regulatory  bodies,  clinical  networks  and  healthcare 
professionals will continue to better understand any concerns or issues that may 
be  preventing  notifications  being  made  to  the  DVLA  by  doctors  and  driving 
licence holders.    

4.  DETAILS 

OF 

PROPOSED 
Please  note  that  any  links  to  webpages  included  in  the  response  will  not  be 
checked for sensitive information prior to publication, as the information is already 
online. 

FURTHER 

ACTION 

The  work  to  review  and  improve  the  self-declaration  forms  and  associated 
processes is ongoing and timescales will continue to be considered alongside 
wider organisational changes already underway. Driver licensing for those with 
medical  conditions  is  a  highly  complex  area  involving  an  extensive  range  of 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 conditions, medical standards, legal and operational requirements and wide a 
range  of  stakeholders.  It  is  important  that  any  changes  are  considered  and 
introduced carefully to ensure they are safe, workable and sustainable. 

SIGNATURE 

 MP, MINISTER FOR LOCAL TRANSPORT.

Related reports

Other reports by Robert Cohen

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.