Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2013
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2013-0295, written 11 Nov 2013. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 11 Nov 2013 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2013-0295 |
| Deceased | John Gwynfryn Morris |
| Coroner | Edward Thomas |
| Coroner area | Hertfordshire |
| Category | Care Home Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
CareQuality
LOmmrsston
Mr E. Thomas
Coroner
Coroner's Office
The Old Courthouse
St Albans Road East
Hatfield
Hertfordshire
ALlO OES
16 April2014
Care Quallty commission
Citygate
Gallowgate
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 4PA
Telephone: 03000 6161 6l
Fa* 03000 616171
www.cqc.org.uk
Care Quality Commission
Re: The inquest into the death of John Gwynfryn Morris
Dear Mr Thomas
We write in reply to your further letter and to the additional questions that you kindly
invited the Commission to consider and clarifo.
Before addressing those questions we would like to reiterate our sadness and great
concern about the issues that were raised in your report aboui the circumstances
leading to Mr Monis' death. We also wish to emphasise our very real commitment to
address the concerns raised in your report, and to assist in improving ihe care
provided not only generally but also with specific regard to patients living with
dementia. We would also like to apologise for the delay in providing our response
which has been due in part to careful consideration being given to changes that are
currently taking place within the Commission in terms of its structure and the
regulatory framework which underpins the our functions'
In response to your questions we attempt to clariff our response as follows:
'1. The Commission agrees that the extra care that is required for people living
with dementia is sometimes underestimated by providers. The Commission is
also very conscious of the difficulg in assessing the stafflng needs for people
that live with dementia. For that reason when we are inspecting against the
relevant sfafiing regulationr we do not only assess care plan lecords but also . .,.
- laFfu stailal welrasjatiEntsand-relatfircs-wlrcepossibH\lhen we inspeci
care plan records we would expect to see a care plan for a person's needs at
night, and particularly if that person had been assessed as needing support at
night. During the course of an inspection visit we are only able to assess and
track a selection of peoples' care pathways. That does regreftably raise the
-
'
I Regutation 22 ofthe Healih and social care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010
possibility that the selection does not incorporate. someone who has cornplex
needs at night.'Hor"uli, as part oi tn" inspection planning process we do
take into account of intelligence thaiwLuU ndtp to focus the inspection' where
the tevets of staffing are raised' That intelligence
for instance
would include ;"y iliif"ttions oi incidents ol inluries that providers are
"on""int "bJut
well..any concerns..or.complaints that have been
required to notif,i'tr- ot, "r
shared with us, and as a result'of ri"iting with the local authority and the
Ctinical Commissioning GrouP'
'r-;l';-;iri'tOing'
2. The care provided to people that live with dementia is taken extrernely
seriously bv tne commissiin. oi""t"r focus is being given to the ways in
which we can i'ipiouu ine Commission's regulation of providers that offer care
to people witn iementia. As p"tt oi that-development between Decernber
2013 and February 2014 atnemei prfq"tt" oiintRection on the quality of
care for p"op[: il',ln dementia t[f-"pf."".. That. programme focussed in
pt"pl-"-yt$1t^"T:.ntia as they move between
particular on tnJ
c"r"'not"t. The programmg involved inspections of 150
"tp"ti"n""t 91
hospitals
in 22 Oitiu*ri local authorities. understanding the
"nO
hospitals ano "ar"lor"g
experience of peopfe'with demenii", tf,"it families and carers has been the
main focus of ihe ieview. Tne Commiision is also working w1h a number of
dementia org";ir"tions to help inffi ano improve our approach to regulation
ot iuiiai *orks, what doesn't work and how
by enhan.ing
dementia care cari be improv"U. inot" ortanisations include the Dernentia
Action Alliance, Dementia nOvolacy fl"t*"otL, Age UK, the Race Equality
local Healthwatch dS9ryi9s..The results of that prograrnme
Foundation "ni
not only includes the publication-ot iiOiuidual inspection reports but will also
involve tne proJuciion'ot a national opoi in May or June 2014 setting out the
good practice'tnJ'we have fouril'tdgether wjih improvements that can be
made to dementia care across diff#;i services' Consideration of staffing
levels will form part of that report'
rhe Commission has also sousht to improve itsoglfl{t:l1"fjfl*l?,::
dementia bY imPlementing Deilrentia Awareness Training' That !raini.n9, !a1
'Xi;"di#IJ'i""ilitv'";i::-le'.'':-l1T"1":"9:1?S:9
;:ff H?''":t["[i,"iffi
conr.ifidate knowredqe. skills and support
il1"ji,tTil",i.,TJriotn ,,"tr to sain
nf
-^I ^-r^t^
H:?l"y?l'l;r,:d;ilid#ilffiJct of dementia on o6opre's experience of
l:^^' rha+ *raininn haq
i":J"fi Xtl'iffiffi;#^il;'1;t";'i'*qYt1qt.:dvli".'i,ll3l[1':,5?,.*:
^-^arianna
"no
3.
and mental exPerience of those
4. In terms of night time inspections the Commission does currently carry out
inspections at night if we have a concern about the care being provided at
night, and we will be undertaking more out-of-hours inspections in the future.
Satisfying ourselves of the compliance of a service provider over 24 hours is
something that is being given careful consideration and is likely to change as
our methodology changes. Following the inquest into the tragic death of Mf
Morris, and the concerns that were raised into care at night, an inspection was
undertaken at WilloMhorpe Care Home during the evening of 3 March 2014.
The resultant report was published on 20 March 2014 and can be found on the
Commission's website, www.cqc.orq.uk. For completeness we enclose a copy
of that report to this letter. However, we also set out the relevant section
dealing with staffing levels below:
"Our judgement
'The provider was meeting this standard.
"There were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff to meet people's
needs.
"Reasons for our judgement
We inspected Vviilov,lthorye because we had received concerns that there
were insufficient numbers of staff available to meet people's needs, and keep
people safe at night.
"During our inspection on 03 March 2014 we found there were enough
experienced staff to meet people's needs at night. Overall we found that there
was a calm atrnosphere in the home, buzzers were answered in a timely
manner and people were not calling out for help. Staff appeared calm and
organised. There were a group of people still up socialising in the lounge when
we anived at the home. People in the residential unit were able to talk with us
and said they were happy with the time they went to bed and were able to
choose when thls was.
'We spoke with two members of staff, two people who used the service and
looked at the night care records for two people who used the seruice. The
manager provided us with records of the tnining undeftaken by two of the
night members of sfaff sobseguent to our visit. This demonstrated to us that
staff had received regular training in areas such as moving and handling,
dementia care, administration of medicines and safeguarding.
- .
---_
='---: netsegi
Willowthorpe provides care to people in two separate units. We found that
and they were usually suppofted by an additional carer between 4pm and
10pm in the evening. People we spoke with told us that there were sufficient
numbers of staff available to provide their care and support.
"However, the provider may find it useful to note that on the night of our
inspection one carer had called in sick at shoft notice and their shift had not
been covered. We looked at the rotas for the preceding wegk and"noted' this
was a one off occunence. ii"rl i" sp2k9 wiih dui1T,,our inspection told us
that although they were oiii tn"v ielt they were able to support people's
needs aPProPiatelY.
"we .ooked at the care records for two people who used the seruice who were
at risk of devetoping p,"'"ii-;;' W" tien checked they received the care
;r:;;; th;-;;;,;;;inat nai oeen documented as req'uired' For one person
nad been plac.ed'on an appropriate air
who used the service *" i'iiinii
'i;:;;;i;;; iii n" i"tt'ne "" app.ropiate !?!-t!:,t:
needs' However' we
t.oo high fo,r
found for another person th;t the sefting was very .stightly
'ih'
,their
the fotlowins dav' Thev totd us
';;t;',;."w";;"cusiea trrrs'wiirr
'"i"gur
i;;i';i"ii h;;-p*iiiea ru"ii"ii ti inein at handover and that thev had
with the carer
adiusted the setting. fne1-nta is that they had .also..spoken
i;;;r;; ;;; fl;;tr?.""t i"'ti''s" uia nit was to be discussed with att starr in
a ieam meeting
"The two people's care records we looked at identified that they required two
ilhfi,ipZiiiitii a,,iiJ i"' iignt . 2t?!^ :?:!:\"d thev checked and
repositioned them every tio hoursluing the night' applying cream to areas
at risk ofpressrre ,,""'""ii'" Juii ii peoptfs rooms confirmed that this
tool place. Staff totd ,t tnii"tii ii"". i"'ii\ 9't-:y"
hourtv checks of att
people in the dementia.uiii'a-i'J''ouu provide supportto people if this was
required. slaff we tporu"iiiiniii u" ihaf thev offered.p"'oPt" !!:k:^:!L
provided personat care as ieeded' Records we looked at for one peopte
.showed
of two hourlv checks with
ir"queit nourty checks and care provided'
us that they h"; ';:;;; "'-ii'i'u'
"Aswetouredthebuildingwefoundthatthe.patiodoorleadingtothe.o'utside
from the lounge on tne ieliita init could be opened from the inside' we
iii*'iii'i"d' The stafi reacted immediately to the
opened the door and ",
door alarm sounding and';;;"-;;in';stigate- We also checked another door
on the dementia unit ana tiii nit ii i" alarmed' This meant that at night
there were sufficient numO'ei of staff and safety measures ln place to ensure
'ii"ii'tiiii,ii"i iandering did not leave the home'"
5. Regrettably, it is extremely difficuh for the Commission to say definitively
whether tvvo memDers ;i ktff ;;'" sufficient in numbers in a unit where
p"lij" *itii a.t"nti" t""L iesioent n tne circumstances of this very sad case'
Those circumst"nt"t to,iri-i-nJf'le itte rayout of the home' the needs oJ the
the
service usels at tne noini ai'tne iime"tne skills and experienc€'of
o'ty and what tl'" :i?I-t111"j,":: llY,y:i,:
members of staff that *"i"
ffilliffi"d'o;]id;'t#iJ.i: ;Ju" nau".enoeavoured to set out above we
qre nronosino to oublish t #tLn.ii"port in May or June 2014 whichwiil s-e1
out t(le geuu Pravrrve
areful consideration of
O" ."OE lo dementia care across different services' c;
the sufficiency of staffins llt.'G *irr ro- pqt
9f-111^:^",^t:t-ti::1"11|,';1ll
:F"#ilffi;It:.il?;iy;;"rc in t"'ttbt our approach and methodolosv
il ffil"ii"s;rwiJers tnat care for people with dementia'
"t
We hope that the contents of this letter address the areas on which you sought
further clarification. Please do not hesitate to contact us if we can be of any further
assistance.
Yours faithfully
<*,|Q."1tl Ca*^"^?lA
Care Quality Commission-
CORONER’S OFFICE
DISTRICT OF HERTFORDSHIRE
The Old Courthouse, St Albans Road East, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 0ES
DX: 100702 Hatfield
Tel: 01707 292780 Fax: 01707 897399
MR EDWARD G. THOMAS Senior Coroner
MR GRAHAM DANBURY, Dr FRANCES CRANFIELD, ALISON GRIEF, EDWARD SOLOMONS
Assistant Coroners
11 November 2013
Compliance Manager
Care Quality Commission
Citygate
Gallowgate
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 4PA
Your Ref: ---
Our Ref: 3121-2012
Dear
Re: John Gwynfryn MORRIS, deceased
I am writing to you under the provisions of Schedule 5 (paragraph 7) of the Coroners and
Justice Act 2009 which came into force in July of this year. This reenacted the provisions of the
old Rule 43 of the Coroners Rules 1984. Attached to this letter is information concerning the
new rules and regulations from which you will see, requires a written response and copies of
this letter and the response received from you to be forwarded to the other interested persons
identified at the Inquest in accordance with the list attached. You will note that I am also
sending a copy of this letter to the Hertfordshire County Council who were involved in the
registration of the home as a dementia unit.
On the 6th November 2013 I concluded an inquest into the tragic death of John Gwynfryn Morris
(who everybody knew as Gwyn). I have attached a copy of the Inquisition from which you will
note that Gwyn died of 1a Left ventricular failure, 1b Severe Ischaemic Heart Disease and
Hypothermia, II Dementia. I recorded a Narrative Verdict and outlined in the circumstances in
some detail the manner by which he came by his death. You will note that he suffered from
dementia but was described by everyone working in the residential home as a very contented
pleasant gentleman who liked to help and wander around the unit. Gwyn cared for his wife until
she died. She also suffered from dementia but then, according to his daughter, Gwyn also
begun to suffer with dementia. He endured distressing placements in Shropshire which was at
that time his home area. He had been sectioned under the Mental Health Act and the EMI Unit
to which he was discharged only lasted a very short time. Attempts at looking after him at home
were unsuccessful and he was moved to Willowthorpe Residential Home, High Street,
Cont’d…
/….
Page Two
John Gwyn Morris
Stanstead Abbotts Hertfordshire where his daughter and the care staff reported that he had
settled well but that he would wander as Gwyn loved the outdoors. On three occasions he left
the home, one time walking some six miles to Harlow Railway Station. An Interim Deprivation of
Liberty Order was made and further security measures were put in place at the home as he had
escaped through a window.
Gwyn went missing in the early hours of the 6th December 2012 and as you can see from the
Record of Inquest, toxicology confirmed therapeutic levels of his medication and therefore it is
likely that he died quite shortly after he left the unit. The river Lea runs through Stanstead
Abbotts very near to the home. An alarm went off on a door when opened earlier but had to be
deactivated to bring somebody back into the home. On the night he left the home there were
two staff on duty for twenty four residents. Staff had to deal with a lady who suffered a fall and
coax Gwyn back in from the enclosed courtyard adjacent to a fire door the alarm of which had
activated and opened. It appears that that was the door through which Gwyn subsequently left
the home as all the window locks were found to be secure.
I heard from a care assistant that some of her duties involved laundry, setting tables for
breakfast and other tasks that a representative from Hertfordshire County Council described as
tasks appropriate for domestics. Staff both during the day and night need to be able to give
attention to residents. Those suffering from dementia may not sleep well and having good
mobility may well be inclined to get up and wander around in their confusion.
I know that many hospitals are looking carefully at their staffing levels at night particularly in the
wards where patients suffer from dementia and may be at a risk of falls through wandering and
I am drawing this case to your attention so that you and your inspectors can look carefully at
whether staffing levels for night time are adequate to meet the various needs of all the
residents/patients in residential, nursing and hospital environments. It seems to me that only
two members of staff caring for over twenty four residents, some of whom suffer from dementia
and are restless, is not enough to meet all the complex needs, especially with their other duties
over a long shift of almost twelve hours.
I would look forward to hearing from you in due course and appreciate your interest in this
matter. The schedule requires a response from you within 56 days of receipt which I calculate
is the week ending 10th January 2014. Please let me know if there are difficulties in complying
with this timescale or wish to discuss this matter further. I am willing to extend this deadline with
good reasons.
Many thanks for your anticipated assistance in this matter,
Yours sincerely
Edward Thomas
H M Coroner
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
CareQuality
LOmmrsston
Mr E. Thomas
Coroner
Coroner's Office
The Old Courthouse
St Albans Road East
Hatfield
Hertfordshire
ALlO OES
16 April2014
Care Quallty commission
Citygate
Gallowgate
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 4PA
Telephone: 03000 6161 6l
Fa* 03000 616171
www.cqc.org.uk
Care Quality Commission
Re: The inquest into the death of John Gwynfryn Morris
Dear Mr Thomas
We write in reply to your further letter and to the additional questions that you kindly
invited the Commission to consider and clarifo.
Before addressing those questions we would like to reiterate our sadness and great
concern about the issues that were raised in your report aboui the circumstances
leading to Mr Monis' death. We also wish to emphasise our very real commitment to
address the concerns raised in your report, and to assist in improving ihe care
provided not only generally but also with specific regard to patients living with
dementia. We would also like to apologise for the delay in providing our response
which has been due in part to careful consideration being given to changes that are
currently taking place within the Commission in terms of its structure and the
regulatory framework which underpins the our functions'
In response to your questions we attempt to clariff our response as follows:
'1. The Commission agrees that the extra care that is required for people living
with dementia is sometimes underestimated by providers. The Commission is
also very conscious of the difficulg in assessing the stafflng needs for people
that live with dementia. For that reason when we are inspecting against the
relevant sfafiing regulationr we do not only assess care plan lecords but also . .,.
- laFfu stailal welrasjatiEntsand-relatfircs-wlrcepossibH\lhen we inspeci
care plan records we would expect to see a care plan for a person's needs at
night, and particularly if that person had been assessed as needing support at
night. During the course of an inspection visit we are only able to assess and
track a selection of peoples' care pathways. That does regreftably raise the
-
'
I Regutation 22 ofthe Healih and social care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010
possibility that the selection does not incorporate. someone who has cornplex
needs at night.'Hor"uli, as part oi tn" inspection planning process we do
take into account of intelligence thaiwLuU ndtp to focus the inspection' where
the tevets of staffing are raised' That intelligence
for instance
would include ;"y iliif"ttions oi incidents ol inluries that providers are
"on""int "bJut
well..any concerns..or.complaints that have been
required to notif,i'tr- ot, "r
shared with us, and as a result'of ri"iting with the local authority and the
Ctinical Commissioning GrouP'
'r-;l';-;iri'tOing'
2. The care provided to people that live with dementia is taken extrernely
seriously bv tne commissiin. oi""t"r focus is being given to the ways in
which we can i'ipiouu ine Commission's regulation of providers that offer care
to people witn iementia. As p"tt oi that-development between Decernber
2013 and February 2014 atnemei prfq"tt" oiintRection on the quality of
care for p"op[: il',ln dementia t[f-"pf."".. That. programme focussed in
pt"pl-"-yt$1t^"T:.ntia as they move between
particular on tnJ
c"r"'not"t. The programmg involved inspections of 150
"tp"ti"n""t 91
hospitals
in 22 Oitiu*ri local authorities. understanding the
"nO
hospitals ano "ar"lor"g
experience of peopfe'with demenii", tf,"it families and carers has been the
main focus of ihe ieview. Tne Commiision is also working w1h a number of
dementia org";ir"tions to help inffi ano improve our approach to regulation
ot iuiiai *orks, what doesn't work and how
by enhan.ing
dementia care cari be improv"U. inot" ortanisations include the Dernentia
Action Alliance, Dementia nOvolacy fl"t*"otL, Age UK, the Race Equality
local Healthwatch dS9ryi9s..The results of that prograrnme
Foundation "ni
not only includes the publication-ot iiOiuidual inspection reports but will also
involve tne proJuciion'ot a national opoi in May or June 2014 setting out the
good practice'tnJ'we have fouril'tdgether wjih improvements that can be
made to dementia care across diff#;i services' Consideration of staffing
levels will form part of that report'
rhe Commission has also sousht to improve itsoglfl{t:l1"fjfl*l?,::
dementia bY imPlementing Deilrentia Awareness Training' That !raini.n9, !a1
'Xi;"di#IJ'i""ilitv'";i::-le'.'':-l1T"1":"9:1?S:9
;:ff H?''":t["[i,"iffi
conr.ifidate knowredqe. skills and support
il1"ji,tTil",i.,TJriotn ,,"tr to sain
nf
-^I ^-r^t^
H:?l"y?l'l;r,:d;ilid#ilffiJct of dementia on o6opre's experience of
l:^^' rha+ *raininn haq
i":J"fi Xtl'iffiffi;#^il;'1;t";'i'*qYt1qt.:dvli".'i,ll3l[1':,5?,.*:
^-^arianna
"no
3.
and mental exPerience of those
4. In terms of night time inspections the Commission does currently carry out
inspections at night if we have a concern about the care being provided at
night, and we will be undertaking more out-of-hours inspections in the future.
Satisfying ourselves of the compliance of a service provider over 24 hours is
something that is being given careful consideration and is likely to change as
our methodology changes. Following the inquest into the tragic death of Mf
Morris, and the concerns that were raised into care at night, an inspection was
undertaken at WilloMhorpe Care Home during the evening of 3 March 2014.
The resultant report was published on 20 March 2014 and can be found on the
Commission's website, www.cqc.orq.uk. For completeness we enclose a copy
of that report to this letter. However, we also set out the relevant section
dealing with staffing levels below:
"Our judgement
'The provider was meeting this standard.
"There were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff to meet people's
needs.
"Reasons for our judgement
We inspected Vviilov,lthorye because we had received concerns that there
were insufficient numbers of staff available to meet people's needs, and keep
people safe at night.
"During our inspection on 03 March 2014 we found there were enough
experienced staff to meet people's needs at night. Overall we found that there
was a calm atrnosphere in the home, buzzers were answered in a timely
manner and people were not calling out for help. Staff appeared calm and
organised. There were a group of people still up socialising in the lounge when
we anived at the home. People in the residential unit were able to talk with us
and said they were happy with the time they went to bed and were able to
choose when thls was.
'We spoke with two members of staff, two people who used the service and
looked at the night care records for two people who used the seruice. The
manager provided us with records of the tnining undeftaken by two of the
night members of sfaff sobseguent to our visit. This demonstrated to us that
staff had received regular training in areas such as moving and handling,
dementia care, administration of medicines and safeguarding.
- .
---_
='---: netsegi
Willowthorpe provides care to people in two separate units. We found that
and they were usually suppofted by an additional carer between 4pm and
10pm in the evening. People we spoke with told us that there were sufficient
numbers of staff available to provide their care and support.
"However, the provider may find it useful to note that on the night of our
inspection one carer had called in sick at shoft notice and their shift had not
been covered. We looked at the rotas for the preceding wegk and"noted' this
was a one off occunence. ii"rl i" sp2k9 wiih dui1T,,our inspection told us
that although they were oiii tn"v ielt they were able to support people's
needs aPProPiatelY.
"we .ooked at the care records for two people who used the seruice who were
at risk of devetoping p,"'"ii-;;' W" tien checked they received the care
;r:;;; th;-;;;,;;;inat nai oeen documented as req'uired' For one person
nad been plac.ed'on an appropriate air
who used the service *" i'iiinii
'i;:;;;i;;; iii n" i"tt'ne "" app.ropiate !?!-t!:,t:
needs' However' we
t.oo high fo,r
found for another person th;t the sefting was very .stightly
'ih'
,their
the fotlowins dav' Thev totd us
';;t;',;."w";;"cusiea trrrs'wiirr
'"i"gur
i;;i';i"ii h;;-p*iiiea ru"ii"ii ti inein at handover and that thev had
with the carer
adiusted the setting. fne1-nta is that they had .also..spoken
i;;;r;; ;;; fl;;tr?.""t i"'ti''s" uia nit was to be discussed with att starr in
a ieam meeting
"The two people's care records we looked at identified that they required two
ilhfi,ipZiiiitii a,,iiJ i"' iignt . 2t?!^ :?:!:\"d thev checked and
repositioned them every tio hoursluing the night' applying cream to areas
at risk ofpressrre ,,""'""ii'" Juii ii peoptfs rooms confirmed that this
tool place. Staff totd ,t tnii"tii ii"". i"'ii\ 9't-:y"
hourtv checks of att
people in the dementia.uiii'a-i'J''ouu provide supportto people if this was
required. slaff we tporu"iiiiniii u" ihaf thev offered.p"'oPt" !!:k:^:!L
provided personat care as ieeded' Records we looked at for one peopte
.showed
of two hourlv checks with
ir"queit nourty checks and care provided'
us that they h"; ';:;;; "'-ii'i'u'
"Aswetouredthebuildingwefoundthatthe.patiodoorleadingtothe.o'utside
from the lounge on tne ieliita init could be opened from the inside' we
iii*'iii'i"d' The stafi reacted immediately to the
opened the door and ",
door alarm sounding and';;;"-;;in';stigate- We also checked another door
on the dementia unit ana tiii nit ii i" alarmed' This meant that at night
there were sufficient numO'ei of staff and safety measures ln place to ensure
'ii"ii'tiiii,ii"i iandering did not leave the home'"
5. Regrettably, it is extremely difficuh for the Commission to say definitively
whether tvvo memDers ;i ktff ;;'" sufficient in numbers in a unit where
p"lij" *itii a.t"nti" t""L iesioent n tne circumstances of this very sad case'
Those circumst"nt"t to,iri-i-nJf'le itte rayout of the home' the needs oJ the
the
service usels at tne noini ai'tne iime"tne skills and experienc€'of
o'ty and what tl'" :i?I-t111"j,":: llY,y:i,:
members of staff that *"i"
ffilliffi"d'o;]id;'t#iJ.i: ;Ju" nau".enoeavoured to set out above we
qre nronosino to oublish t #tLn.ii"port in May or June 2014 whichwiil s-e1
out t(le geuu Pravrrve
areful consideration of
O" ."OE lo dementia care across different services' c;
the sufficiency of staffins llt.'G *irr ro- pqt
9f-111^:^",^t:t-ti::1"11|,';1ll
:F"#ilffi;It:.il?;iy;;"rc in t"'ttbt our approach and methodolosv
il ffil"ii"s;rwiJers tnat care for people with dementia'
"t
We hope that the contents of this letter address the areas on which you sought
further clarification. Please do not hesitate to contact us if we can be of any further
assistance.
Yours faithfully
<*,|Q."1tl Ca*^"^?lA
Care Quality Commission-
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.