Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2014
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2014-0134, written 25 Mar 2014. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 25 Mar 2014 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2014-0134 |
| Deceased | Margaret Walker |
| Coroner | Jennifer Leeming |
| Coroner area | Manchester (West) |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Chief Executive, 5 Boroughs Partnership 1 CORONER I am M Jennifer Leeming H M Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Manchester West 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 10th August 2012 I commenced an investigation into the death of Margaret Walker, who was 97 years of age. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 14th March 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was that Margaret Walker died of natural causes. The medical cause of death was 1a) Acute Myocardial Ischaemia 1b) Coronary Artery Atheroma 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On the 4th August 2012 Margaret Walker, who was diabetic was admitted to the Sephton Unit at Leigh Infirmary as a detained patient under the terms of the Mental Health Act. At or about 6am on the morning of the 7th August 2012, Margaret Walker was found unresponsive in bed on the Sephton Unit. She was showing no sign of life. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was commenced. A defibrillator was obtained but was not used prior to the arrival of ambulance personnel at or about 6.16am. Ambulance personnel continued resuscitation efforts and applied a defibrillator which did not reveal any heart rhythm. There is no evidence that the earlier use of a defibrillator would have prevented Margaret Walker's death. Margaret Walker was then taken by ambulance to the Royal Albert Edward Infirmary in Wigan where her death was diagnosed. Her diabetes care during the time that she was a detained inpatient on the Sephton Unit was inconsistent. The inconsistencies in her care did not cause or contribute to her death from Coronary Artery Disease. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action 1 is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (1) Following Mrs Walker’s admission to the Sephton Unit at Leigh Infirmary as a detained patient on 4th March 2012, details of her previous medication regime for her diabetes were not sought until the 6th August 2012. When these details were obtained on the 6th August 2012, information concerning the medication was passed to relevant clinical staff but information concerning what blood test results were acceptable for her was not so passed. (2) Information concerning Mrs Walker’s medical condition and blood test readings was not appropriately recorded in her clinical notes. (3) When Mrs Walker was found unresponsive at approximately 6.00am on the morning of the 7th August 2012, cardio-pulmonary resuscitation was appropriately commenced and continued and a defibrillator was obtained. However the defibrillator was not applied prior to the arrival of ambulance personnel who then applied their own defibrillator, which did not reveal a heart rhythm suitable for a shock to be given. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion urgent action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 20th May 2014. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons deceased). I have also sent it to Care Quality Commission who may find it useful or of interest. (the grandsons of the I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated Signed 25th March 2014 M Jennifer Leeming 2
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
5 Boroughs Partnership NHS} NHS Foundation Trust Our Ref: JE/DC Chief Executive's Office Hollins Park House Your Ref: MJL/SBR/M-Walker Hollins Park Hollins Lane Winwick Warrington 20 May 2014 WA2 8WA Tel: 01925 664001 Mrs M Jennifer Leeming Fax: 01925 664052 HM Coroner HM Coroner’s Court Paderborn House Civic Centre Howell Croft North Bolton BL1 1JW Dear Mrs Leeming, Re: Mrs Margaret Walker - deceased Thank you for letter dated 26 March 2014 with regards to your findings into the death of Mrs Margaret Walker and the directions given under Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. The Trust takes the matters described within the letter extremely seriously and hopes this response addresses the concerns you have raised. In addition we hope we are able to demonstrate to your satisfaction the learning within the Trust as a result of your correspondence. Taking your points in turn | can confirm the Trust have completed the following: i) Information Concerning Medication The Trust recognises the vital importance of the recording and sharing of accurate information with regard to medication. This is covered within our core training programme on our medicines policy. As a result of this case we have reviewed our policy and processes and will be issuing further guidance to raise awareness of the medicines reconciliation process and particularly the specific responsibilities of staff with regard to this. Your letter states that Mrs Walker was admitted on 4 March 2012; however | would like to confirm that Mrs Walker was admitted as a detained patient on 4 August 2012. | note your concerns in the apparent delay in obtaining an accurate medication regime. 6 August 2012 was a Monday and while it was a significant delay (up to 48-hours after admission), it was the earliest possibility at that time for obtaining GP practice held information needed to complement other information sources to establish an accurate medication regime. Recently members of the Medicines Management Team have gained access to the electronic Summary Care Record for patients; this links to GP practices and provides access to the A Better View... of mind & body GPs record of the patient's medication in most cases; however, it will not provide clinical details or blood test results or required ranges. Routine access to the Summary Care Record is included in the work plan for the Trust’s new Clinical IT system (RiO). Specifically this will improve medicines reconciliation out of routine working hours. The Medicines Management Team provide services on our in-patient wards daily (Monday- Friday) to support a number of functions including medicines reconciliation. The team’s work is audited regularly and the accuracy of their work is assured. The Trust has developed and put in place a process to regularly audit and to report any failings in the medicines reconciliation process. Our data shows almost 100% of admissions have a medicine reconciliation completed; the small number that don’t represent inpatient admissions lasting less than one day/one week- end. ii) Recording of Information in Clinical Notes | would like to reassure you that processes and systems are in place to ensure that records are kept in line with Trust policies and procedures. There are Trust approved documents for recording of vital signs and charts for the monitoring of Blood Glucose. in this instance the staff invoived in this case did not follow policies and procedures and did not record the clinical information they had in the correct place. The competency of these staff to undertake the accurate and timely recording of information within clinical notes has been addressed through supervision and additional training. In addition, the Trust has also introduced care quality records audits for each named practitioner, which is undertaken by the ward leadership team. The audits enable managers to identify the level of completeness and to address any areas of concern, including incomplete assessments. Record keeping audits and re-audits are undertaken by the Trusts Records Team and identified improvements from these audits are communicated and actioned by the Team Managers. The Trust has also produced a number of Managers Briefing Notes (MBN’s), circulated Trust wide, reinforcing the importance of recording information in clinical notes, these include: e MBN circulated 20 June 2013 reinforcing the requirement of completing and documenting physical health checks. e As part of the work stream to improve physical health assessment and monitoring, an MBN was issued January 2014 providing guidance re the completion of Charts for recording Blood Glucose Monitoring, Glasgow Coma Scale assessment, Fluid Input/Output recording, Hydration Assessment and Open Wound Assessment in Mental Health and Learning Disability Services. e An MBN was issued in April 2014 regarding the Physical health competency declaration within the (staff's) Personal Development Review process for all nurses, assistant practitioners and health care assistants. A key improvement in 2013-14 has been the development of the physical health competencies process, including a competency self-declaration process linked to performance reviews and training needs identification, to ensure that our staff understand the 2 A Better View... of mind & body key elements of managing patients with co-morbid physical health problems. All Trust policies and procedure for clinical skills and physical health assessments have been updated and there is a dedicated page on the intranet containing this and other useful information. We are also piloting a Modified Early Warning System (MEWS) for the deteriorating patient on both our adult and older people’s wards with the aim of rolling this out to all in-patient areas. iii) Cardio-Puimonary Resuscitation and the use of a Defibrillator In line with National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) RRR010 “Resuscitation in Mental Health and Learning Disability inpatient settings’ (November 2008) and Resuscitation Council UK (RCUK) requirements, all medical staff and registered nurses working within inpatient settings are expected to be competent to the standard of Immediate Life Support (ILS). All support workers are expected to be competent to the standard of Basic Life Support (BLS). BLS and ILS training is mandatory for all staff within our inpatient settings. The training curriculum for BLS and ILS was in line with RCUK 2010 standards. This covers effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation including: e Knowing what actions to take in the event of a medical emergency. e Knowing how to summon the emergency paramedic service. e Basic Life Support - maintenance and management of the airway, CPR, immediate management of anaphylactic reaction, management of the choking patient. e Immediate Life Support - management of a collapsed casualty, BLS, use of emergency oxygen, use of an automated external defibrillator, insertion of an airway. Medical and nursing staff are required to demonstrate and achieve the required level of competency before being approved. In this case, while the staff involved in the incident were compliant with their mandatory training requirements they had not appropriately followed the Trust approved Resuscitation policy and procedures in relation to the use of the automated external defibrillator. | would like to reassure you that this has been addressed with the staff in question who has undergone specific Trust processes in relation to their competency. In line with NPSA and RCUK guidelines, it is recommended that services undertake practice drills to support further learning within the clinical environment. The Trust operates an annual practice drill schedule that includes use of an automated external defibrillator. Practice drills are undertaken by the Trust resuscitation trainers to ensure correct standards of practice are demonstrated. Staff are assessed against the RCUK competency framework during practice drills; the outcomes of practice drills are documented to identify areas of good practice and areas requiring improvement. Local actions plans are agreed to address any areas of concern. Records are available which evidence that Sephton Ward have had 4 practice drills completed between November 2012 and January 2014. The Trust approved Resuscitation policy and procedures requires local services to undertake daily checks of the resuscitation equipment including the automated external defibrillator. These checks are documented; and are subject to annual audit. The outcomes of the annual audit are scrutinised by the Trust Resuscitation Steering Committee as part of the annual work programme. Further to the completion of the Serious Untoward Incident report in relation to this case, an action plan was developed by the Business Manager. | can confirm that these actions have been completed and led to the implementation of Trust wide initiatives in relation to the 3 A Better View... of mind & body management of physical health and diabetes within the Trust in patient facilities. Examples of this activity include; e Development of Diabetes guidelines to support delivery of inpatient diabetes care by nursing staff e Diabetes Link Nurses/Associates — This initiative was introduced across the Trust and identified both qualified and non-qualified staff to act as Diabetes leads within their teams. e Hospital at Home service — This is a partnership initiative between the Trust and Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust that provides direct input from physical health services at Leigh Infirmary site to the wards at Leigh. If | can be of any further assistance or you require further information about the steps we have taken please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours sincerely Simon Barber Chief Executive Officer A Better View... of mind & body
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.