Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0236, written 26 Sep 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 26 Sep 2017 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2017-0236 |
| Deceased | Rodney Hampshire |
| Coroner | Jennifer Leeming |
| Coroner area | Manchester (West) |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Sir David Dalton, Chief Executive, Salford Royal Foundation Trust 1 | CORONER I am Professor M Jennifer Leeming, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Manchester West 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 19" May 2017 I commenced an investigation into the death of Rodney Hampshire, 78 years of age. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 15" September 2017. The conclusion of the inquest was Rodney Hampshire died as a consequence of naturally occurring heart and kidney disease precipitated by the challenge of surgery for Colorectal Cancer and Hernia Repair. The cause of death was: 1a) Ischaemic Heart Disease 2) Resection of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Parastomal Hernia Repair, Hypertension related Chronic Kidney Disease (Stage 3), Bronchopneumonia. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On the 12 May 2017 Rodney Hampshire underwent bowel surgery at Salford Royal Hospital following which he was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit where he remained until the 15" May 2017 when he was transferred to a surgical ward. On the 16" May 2017 he suddenly deteriorated and sustained a cardiac arrest. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: During the inquest evidence was given that the division of surgery at Salford Royal Foundation Trust is conducting a review examining the benefits of having a small number of monitored beds on the surgical wards such as the ward to which Mr Hampshire had been transferred. Whilst there was no evidence that this would have affected the outcome in this case, evidence was given that monitored beds of the type envisaged would potentially save lives. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion urgent action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and/or your organisation have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 21% November 2017. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. | 8 | COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons EE daughter of deceased. T am aiso under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 | Dated Signed . 26" September 2017 Professor g Jennifer afd N
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
RECEIVED
27 NOV 2017
STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
Professor M Jennifer Leeming
Senior Coroner - Manchester West
H M Coroner's Court
Paderborn House
Howell Croft North
Bolton
BL1 1QY
Dear Professor Leeming,
Re: Rodney Hampshire (Deceased)
Salford Royal NHS}
NHS Foundation Trust
————$
University Teaching Trast
safe e clean e personal
James Sumner
Chief Executive
Trust Executive
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
Stott Lane
Salford
M6 8HD
Telephone Number: 0161 206 3178
DATE: 21° November 2017
Response to Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths to Pennine Acute Hospitals
NHS Trust.
Please find below the response of Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (‘the Trust’) following
the inquest into the death of Rodney Hampshire on 15 September 2017 and the Regulation 28
Report which you issued on 26 September 2017.
Your concerns were set out in the Regulation 28 Report as follows, at section 5:
1. During the inquest, evidence was given that the Division of Surgery at Salford Royal
Foundation Trust is conducting a review examining the benefits of having a small number
of monitored beds on the surgical wards such as the ward to which Mr Hampshire had
been transferred. Whilst there was no evidence that this would have affected the
outcome in this case, evidence was given that monitored beds of the type envisaged
would potentially save lives.
Review examining the benefits of having a_small number of monitored beds on the
surgical wards at Salford Royal
2. In October 2017, a proposal was put together with regard to the effective post-surgical
management of patients in the post-surgical setting. It was confirmed in this proposal that
two initiatives were to be used to provide optimal management of patients in the post-
surgical setting:
{i) H6 Monitored Unit.
(ii) An Extended Recovery Unit
H6 Monitored Unit
3. The H6 Monitored Unit was implemented in June 2017 at Salford Royal.
4. The Unit is an 8 bed unit adjacent to Critical Care. The unit provides level 1 care (the
Intensive Care Society defines this as critical care for “patients in need of additional
monitoring/clinical interventions, clinical input or advice”) to elective and non-elective
surgical patients. The unit provides invasive monitoring and optimisation of patients’ care
by experienced nurses under the management of the surgical teams.
This Unit provides care for those patients who do not require critical care, but require closer
management than is provided on the general surgical wards. This allows for close monitoring of
acute deterioration or post-surgical complications by a specialist team with a high patient to
nurse ratio.
Extended Recovery Unit Model
5. Salford Royal are currently progressing an Extended Recovery Unit Model for surgical
patients. It is expected that the Extended Recovery Unit will be in place by quarter 1
2018, after the Trust has obtained the necessary funding for the unit.
6. The immediate period post-surgery is associated with the acute complications of surgery
and there is potential during this period for patient deterioration. It is expected that the
Extended Recovery Unit will:
i) ensure the optimisation of patient care post-surgery;
ii) reduce complications post-surgery; and
2
iti) facilitate the appropriate use of critical care beds.
7. The Extended Recovery Unit will allow for patients to be monitored following surgery by
medical and nursing teams experienced in the management of these patients. This group
of patients would otherwise be transferred to critical care or managed on a surgical ward.
8. Itis intended that the Unit will provide extended recovery to patients for a 48 hour period
within an environment adjacent to the theatres.
9. The Extended Recovery Unit will allow the close management of patients by experienced
nursing staff trained to manage higher care patients. It is intended that the Unit will be
staffed by anaesthetists with the input of the surgical teams.
The Unit will manage patients to a level 1 of critical care (the Intensive Care Society defines this
as critical care for “patients in need of additional monitoring/clinical interventions, clinical input or
advice’).The nursing ratio is 1 nurse to 3 patients and the unit will have therapy teams
supporting that are sat within the surgical division. The unit patients will be assessed daily by
consultant.
10. Those patients requiring level 2 care would be directly transferred to critical care post
operatively.
| hope that this response provides some level of assurance to you and Mr Hampshire’s family
that Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust has worked hard to put provisions in place to assist
with the effective management of patients in the post-surgical setting. Please do not hesitate
to contact me if you require any further information in relation to our response.
Yours sincerely
2
\
James Sumner
Chief Office Salford Care Organisation
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.