Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0012, written 6 Jan 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 6 Jan 2015 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2015-0012 |
| Deceased | John Ioannou |
| Coroner | Andrew Walker |
| Coroner area | London (North) |
| Category | Mental Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Northern District of Greater London —Bamet ENS 4BE (Harrow, Brent, Barnet, Haringey and Enfield) Telephone 0208 447 7680 Fax 0208 447 7689 REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Department of Health Richmond House 79 Whitehall London SWI1A 2NS CORONER 1am Andrew Walker, senior coroner, for the coroner area of Northern District of Greater London 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3. | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 4" day of April 2014 | opened an investigation touching the death of John loannou , 58 years old. The inquest concluded on the 21" November 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was “Suicide”, the medical case of death was 1a Multiple Injuries. 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On the 4" April 2014 shortly before 9.56 hrs John loannou jumped from a window at his home fatally injuring himself. Mr loannou had not been taking medication from mid-September the year before and had begun to become seriously unwell. Mr loannou was being treated for Bipolar Affective Disorder under the care of Barnet, Enfield and Harringey Mental Health Trust and also the urology department at the Whittington Hospital. Mr loannou was also being treated for hypertension by his GP who prescribed the medication to treat his Bipolar Affective Disorder. . Mr loannou was last prescribed 1 months supply of medication for his Bipolar Affective Disorder on the 16" August 2013. It would have been of assistance to the Mental Heath Team to know that Mr loannou had not been taking his medication as he had not been to his GP to collect further prescriptions since August 2013. og North London C Court, % — Her Majesty's Coroner for the 99 Wood Stet | | | Her Majesty’s Coroner for the Northern District of Greater London (Harrow, Brent, Barnet, Haringey and Enfield) CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — There was no guidance for GPs where the patient is not collecting medication required to treat their mental health condition (s). ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by Monday 30" February 2015. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons;- Representatives of the family and the Mental Health Trust. lam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. @ January 2018 | va
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
AOS From Norman Lamb MP Minister of State for Care and Support Department of Health Richmond House 79 Whitehall London SWIA 2NS Mr Andrew Walker, Tel: 020 7210 4850 North London Coroner’s Court 29 Wood Street Barnet ENS 4BE 27 FEB 201% - Prde> (eer, Thank you for your letter regarding matters of concern arising from the inquest into the death of Mr John Ioannou. I understand that Mr Ioannou committed suicide at his home while under the care of Barnet, Enfield, and Haringey Mental Health Trust for Bipolar Affective Disorder. Mr Ioannou’s medication for Bipolar Affective Disorder was prescribed by his GP and the last prescription was written in August 2013, approximately eight months prior to Mr Ioannou’s death. You raised a concern that there is no guidance in place for GPs to use when a patient does not collect medication prescribed to treat a mental health condition. I note you have previously raised concerns about the difficulty of ensuring patients are taking prescribed medications for mental health conditions in relation to the deaths of Duncan Lockhart and Dean Elie. The same legislation applies in this case. That is; under the Mental Health Act 1983 a person in England or Wales with a ‘mental disorder’ can be admitted to hospital, detained, and treated without consent either for the safety of the individual or for the protection of other people. The decision to detain a person to hospital or put a person under supervised community treatment is taken by clinicians and other health professionals following specific procedures. There is also provision for a court or judge to make an order to admit a person to hospital. The Mental Health Act 1983 aims to protect people who cannot make decisions for themselves. People are assumed to have capacity to make their own decisions, unless a lack of such capacity can be established. Capacity is based on a person’s ability to understand relevant information, retain relevant information, use or weigh relevant information, and communicate decisions. It is important to note that where a person has capacity to make their own decisions the person may do so, even if their decisions are considered unwise. People with and without mental health conditions might make decisions considered to be unwise or not in their own best interest. It was not established that Mr Ioannou lacked capacity; therefore he was free to make his own decisions. Health and care services have a duty to ensure that patients receive adequate support. This means that all patients must receive relevant information about treatments, including any potential consequences of not following a course of treatment. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has published guidelines which set out best practice for the treatment of Bipolar Disorder. This includes guidance that where a patient is being treated solely in a primary care setting (e.g. by a GP) the patient should be re-referred to secondary care if treatment adherence is poor. The guidelines also state that in managing crisis, risk and challenging behaviour in adults with Bipolar Disorder secondary care providers should develop a risk management plan and share it with the patient’s GP. We expect all GPs to follow best practice guidance when caring for patients with Bipolar Disorder, and therefore to re-refer a patient back to a secondary care provider when that patient is not consistently taking medication prescribed for the treatment of Bipolar Disorder. However, there is a larger question of how a GP would become aware that a patient had stopped taking medication, particularly if medication is prescribed on a repeat prescription which allows patients to order re-fills without seeing their GPs. Over one billion prescription items are issued by general practices each year and it would therefore be a large and complex task to monitor individual patients. Aside from the practicalities, there would be issues of appropriate data sharing, patient consent, and the right to refuse treatment. NHS England advises that it has sought the advice of its Primary Care Patient Safety Expert Group and Mental Health Patient Safety Expert Group on what action might feasibly be taken in this area. NHS England will be able to provide an update on these discussions by the end of April 2015. It is also worth noting that, although not the case with Mr Ioannou, patients might collect prescriptions (or have them collected on their behalf by a friend or family member) but not actually take the medication. It is therefore very difficult to be sure that any patient with capacity is actually taking prescribed medication. Department of Health Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. I trust this reply has addressed your concerns. c —a dnnce eA, ‘ NORMAN LAMB
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Mental Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.