Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0064, written 19 Feb 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 19 Feb 2015 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2015-0064 |
| Deceased | Elizabeth Leah |
| Coroner | John Pollard |
| Coroner area | Manchester South |
| Category | Community health care and emergency services related deaths |
| Organisation named | Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The Secretary of State for Health. 1 | CORONER | am John Pollard, senior coroner, for the coroner area of South Manchester 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 19" September 2014 | commenced an investigation into the death of Elizabeth Muriel Leah dob 24" May 1927. The investigation concluded on the 10" February 2015 and the conclusion was one of Accidental Death. The medical cause of death was 1a Aspiration pneumonia 1b Fracture right femur 11. Advanced dementia 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On the 2"? July 2014 she fell at the Care Home where she was resident and broke her femur. 5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — On the occasion when she fell, an ambulance was called using the 999 system. On describing the circumstances, the Care Staff were told that they would get a call back from NHS within 60 minutes. They were also informed that there would be a delay of up to 6 hours for the ambulance to arrive. 50 minutes later the ambulance service called back and advised that she should be taken to hospital in a Taxi. This meant that an 87 year old lady with severe dementia and a broken leg, was delivered to the hospital Emergency Department in a wheelchair in a Taxi. When | questioned the Ambulance service Manager about this, she was very candid and accepted that the problem is that they do not have sufficient ambulances or staff available and that they are working “at 100%” all the time. This problem is exacerbated by the delays in getting patients into the A and E Departments, which in turn is exacerbated by the bed blocking throughout the hospital systems. These are not problems which can be alleviated locally, but require an urgent input and direction from Central Government. 6 | ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. 7 | YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 16" April 2015. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 | COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons namely CRE (avscitier of the deceased). | have also sent it to the Chief Executive, Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust who may find it useful or of interest. | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of inférest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your respopise, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 | 19" Febr; ary 2015 John Pollard, HM Senior Coroner
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
aoe Tamara Finkelstein Departm ent Chief Operating Officer of Health Richmond House 79 Whitehall London Mr John Pollard SWIA 2NS HM Senior Coroner for South Manchester van Po Coroner’s Court EXD \ 1 Mount Tabor Street psy \ Stockport \ SK1 3AG ok 28 April 2015 Dear Mr Pollard Thank you for your letter to the Secretary of State for Health about the death of Elizabeth Leah. As Parliament was dissolved on 31 March, I am responding as Chief Operating Officer at the Department of Health. I was saddened to learn of Mrs Leah’s death and would be grateful if you would pass my condolences to her family. Thank you for your report, which details the circumstances surrounding Mrs Leah’s fall at a care home and subsequent treatment following a request for an ambulance. You have raised a number of important issues, which I hope my response will address. I should stress that although NHS England maintains oversight of the day-to-day operation of the commissioning side of the NHS in England, it is for local commissioners to ensure that ambulance services receive sufficient funding according to the needs of their local populations. Individual Trusts must ensure a high quality service which includes determining the type of clinician, vehicle and equipment required to respond to calls based on the clinical needs of the patient. Having said that, I am clear that taxis should not be used for patients in emergency or life threatening situations. I understand that during very busy periods, and on limited occasions, it is possible that some Ambulance Trusts use taxis to help transport 999 patients to hospital. However, this should only be after the patient has been assessed as having a minor ailment and confirmed as having a transport only need. I certainly would not expect a patient with a suspected broken femur to be transported to a hospital by a taxi. On delays in A&E departments, the national guidance document, Operational resilience and capacity planning for 2014/15, was issued by NHS England, Monitor, the NHS Trust Development Authority and the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services. The guidance is designed to help local NHS and social care organisations to prepare for year round Operational resilience and describes the role of System Resilience Groups (SRGs). It can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/urgent-and-planned-care-operational-resilience-and- capacity-planning-for-201415 ; The Trust has reported that the last 12 months has seen an unprecedented demand on ambulance services. NWAS has answered an additional 64,367 ‘999’ calls between 1 April 2013 and the end of February 2015, an increase of 6.32 per cent compared to the same time period the year before. As well as the increase in the overall level of activity — the Trust reported a significant rise in the number of Red 1 and 2 calls, the most serious, life-threatening and potentially life-threatening calls. In the same period outlined above, NWAS saw a 10.38% increase in Red incidents. Due to the nature of these calls, NWAS must prioritise them and this unfortunately can mean a delay for those patients with less serious conditions. As you also reported, the Trust has been open about how some patients will experience delay as a result of the prioritisation. The Trust has concentrated the best use of its resources to the adaptation of working models to ensure ambulances are available for those who urgently need emergency care by deflecting less urgent cases to other services such as the Urgent Care Desk. As part of this process I gather that patients whose conditions are not deemed to be serious or potentially life-threatening receive a call back from a Specialist Paramedic who will ask additional questions over the phone to establish the right care for the patient’s needs. This could also mean a visit by a GP, self-help advice or an ambulance response. To this end, NWAS introduced a number of initiatives including;- Increasing staffing levels, particularly in control rooms with seven starting in December 2014 and a further 42 before the end of March 2015; Increasing road staff with 68 new clinical staff in December 2014 and a further 68 before the end of March 2015; Advanced Community Paramedics (ACPs) - individual clinicians based permanently within communities who will help deliver more locally co-designed models of care. The purpose of the role is to improve the local community infrastructure and to provide safe care closer to home; The use of volunteer services such as Mountain Rescue teams, Red Cross and St John’s Ambulance and the increased use of Community First Responders; e Frequent caller scheme to identify and support frequent callers.; The Trust has also advanced with its collaboration work with agencies such as Fire and Rescue (LFRS) with co-responder schemes in Cheshire, Lancashire and Greater Manchester. whereby LFRS will be sent to incidents if the NWAS mobilising system believes they can get there more quickly than NWAS resources and an ambulance resource will be dispatched at the same time; and Throughout the North West, commissioners and providers are working collaboratively with NWAS’ urgent care team to support the identification and effective care management of vulnerable populations. I hope that you find this response helpful. Thank you again for bringing this matter to our attention.
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.