Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017

Thomas Coyne

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0207, written 19 Jan 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report19 Jan 2017
Reference2017-0207
DeceasedThomas Coyne
CoronerJohn Pollard
Coroner areaCheshire
CategoryRailway related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 
The chief Executive Officer, Northern Rail,Northern House, 9, Rougier Street, York, YO1 
6HZ 

1 

CORONER 

I am John Stanley Pollard,, Assistant coroner for the coroner area of Cheshire 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 24th May 2016 I commenced an investigation into the death of Thomas Coyne born 
8th August 1959. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 18th January 
2017. The conclusion of the inquest was one of Accidental Death with the medical cause 
being 1a Multiple Injuries. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 
On the 21st May 2016 the deceased attended a stag party and consumed a quantity of 
alcohol. He was later making his way home when he inadvertently entered Earlestown 
Railway station. He wandered across all three platforms and then progressed along 
platform three, down the unprotected slope, and on to the lines. a short time thereafter he 
was struck by a passing train as he walked along the left hand cess. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The 

MATTERS OF CONCERN

 are as follows.  –  

I was informed by the representative of the British Transport police who gave evidence to 
me , that Northern Rail own the train which struck the deceased and they also 
own/manage Earlestown station. 

Two matters of concern arose:- 

1. The CCTV installed at the station and which can be monitored by the staff on 

duty, does not actually cover all the platform areas, and thus the member of staff 
could not see Mr Coyne (who was the only passenger on the station at the time) 
as he mistakenly wandered on to the tracks. 

2. There is apparently absolutely no physical barrier of any kind at the end of 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
​
​
 
 
 
 
 platform three, thus allowing unfettered access to the tracks at that point. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the 
power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 20th March 2017. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Person 
namely 
R.A.I.B. who may find it useful or of interest. 

 (widow of the deceased). I have also sent it to 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, 
about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

Dated   19th January 2017                                          SIGNED 

John Pollard.                                                        Assistant Coroner 

2
Also filed under 2017-0207: 2017-0207-Arriva-Rail-North-Limited.pdf
~ @ARRIVA sa ev it

a company 1 Admiral Way
Doxford International Business Park
2 0 MAR 207 Sunderland
SR3 3XP

Tel +44 (0)191 520 4000
Fax +44 (0)191 520 4001
www.northernrailway.co.uk

Our Ref: P|

16 March 2017

Mr J S Pollard

HM Assistant Coroner
The West Annexe
Town Hall

Sankey Street
WARRINGTON

WA1 1UH

Dear Mr Pollard

In the Inquest Touching the Death of Thomas Coyne
Regulation 28 Report

We are writing to respond to your Regulation 28 Report dated 19 January 2017
addressed to Northern Rail.

Thank you for drawing your concerns to our attention. Your Report has caused us to
review carefully the arrangements at Earlestown Railway Station, following the death
of Mr Coyne on 21 May 2016.

At the outset, it may assist if we clarify responsibility relating to the station. Arriva Rail
North Limited manage the station as part of a network of approximately 500 stations.
Network Rail are responsible for the infrastructure of the stations themselves.

The CCTV system does not extend to the entirety of every platform area on all 500
stations. As the system is developed it has been necessary to prioritise extensions
and this has been done by reference to the risk profile of each station, by reference to
a diverse range of factors, including the incidence of suicide, vandalism, theft and
antisocial behaviour. Earlestown is not considered a high risk station on this
evaluation.

As CCTV technology evolves, it is hoped to expend the coverage area and quality of
the images produced, but this must inevitably be an incremental programme across
the entire network.

A further factor to be considered in relation to CCTV coverage is that the system is
only monitored when booking office staff are on duty. The presence of the system
itself is intended to have a deterrent effect but it is reliant upon staff observing the

monitors at a time when a passenger endeavours to gain access to the rail tracks.

22%

The issue raised in relation to barriers and fencing arrangements to prevent a person
walking onto the tracks, properly falls to Network Rail as part of the station
infrastructure. In an effort to assist the court we forwarded the Regulation 28 Report
to them and understand that they were already considering installing platform end
fencing at this location, having regard to the circumstances in which Mr Coyne gained
access to the tracks and walked for approximately % mile before being struck by a
train. The Network Rail Performance Improvement Co-ordinator has indicated that he
has asked that the location at Earlestown Station be treated as a priority. It would be
necessary, however, for contact to be made directly with them in order to obtain
further details.

We offer our condolences to Mr Coyne’s family at their tragic loss.

Yours faithfully

Chartered Legal Executive

Related reports

Other reports by John Pollard

See all →

More reports categorised “Railway related deaths”

See all →

Track Railway related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Railway related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.