Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015

Olive Nugent

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0134, written 31 Mar 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report31 Mar 2015
Reference2015-0134
DeceasedOlive Nugent
CoronerKaren Dilks
Coroner areaNewcastle Upon Tyne
CategoryOther related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Karen Dilks
Senior Coroner for the City of Newcastle Upon Tyne

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: { Corporate Director of Children, Adult
and Families, South Tyneside Council, Town Hall & Civic Offices, Westoe Road,
South Shields, Tyne & Wear, NE33 2RL

CORONER

lam Karen Dilks, Senior Coroner for the City of Newcastle Upon Tyne

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

http://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7

http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 18/12/2014 | commenced an investigation into the death of Olive Nugent, 92 years old, dob
14/6/1922. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 30th March 2015. The
medical cause of death was established:

1a. Multiple Contusions Intracerebral Haemorrhage and diffuse Axonal Injury
1b. Head Injury (consistent with a fall)
Il. Cerebrovascular Disease

The conclusion of the inquest was accidental dearth.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Olive Nugent lived independently with a care package including carer visits 4 times daily. She
was provided with a falls detector device designed to automatically activate in the event of a fall.
The device also had a facility for summoning help when required. Wardens were provided with
guidance requiring response to device activation within 45 minutes.

On the 16" December 2014 Mrs Nugent fell down stairs at her home address. Her device
activated at 8.58am. No attendance by a warden occurred until 11.25am. Mrs Nugent had
sustained an un-survivable brain injury that led to her death.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my
opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it
is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

(1) Mrs Nugent lay critically injured in her home for 2 hours and 27 minutes without assistance
or access to medical treatment.

(2) Her falls activator device had activated automatically indicating that she had fallen.

(3) Her inability to respond verbally to call handlers via the device was a crucial factor in the
decision not to prioritise her case.

(4) Priority was given to clients whose devices had activated in some cases at a time later than

Lord Mayor’s Gallery, Civic Centre, Barras Bridge, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 8QA
Tel 0191 2777280 | Fax 0191 2612952

Mrs Nugent's but who had been able to verbally respond to call handlers via their devices.

(5) The prioritising of response to device activation is entirely subjective and heavily dependent
upon (a) staffing levels and (b) the personal practices of individual team leaders.

(6) On 16 December 2014 there were insufficient staff to meet the demand for assistance.
This contributed to the delayed response to Mrs Nugent's needs.

(7) A review of the Guidance to be adopted when responding to device activation was

undertaken following Mrs Nugent's death.

The Policy Document entitled “Mobile Response Time Targets, Prioritising Mobile Response

and Escalation Process”, however, reaffirms that prioritisation of response remains a

subjective process. A proposed escalation process in the event of demand exceeding the

capacity of available staff is dependent upon other agencies whose availability is not

guaranteed or the subject of any Memo of Understanding.

(9) The provision of Falls Detection Device is intended to ensure timely aid and assistance
including medical treatment of injuries if required to vulnerable persons in the event of a fall.

(10)Further deaths could potentially occur in the future; particularly in cases of persons injured
and unable to respond verbally to call handlers.

(11)Review of the Guidance and Policy Document and staffing levels is necessary to reduce this
risk.

(8

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you
have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by
4'" June 2015. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons
Martin Swales, Chief Executive, South Tyneside Council, Town Hall & Civic Offices, Westoe
Road, South Shields, Tyne & Wear, NE33 2RL.

| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest.
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

Dated 31 March 2015

Signature
Senior Coroner for the City of Newcastle Upon Tyne

Lord Mayor’s Gallery, Civic Centre, Barras Bridge, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 8QA
Tel 0191 2777280 | Fax 0191 2612952

Related reports

Other reports by Karen Dilks

See all →

More reports categorised “Other related deaths”

See all →

Track Karen Dilks

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Karen Dilks, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.