Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015

Maria Nekrasova

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0141, written 20 Feb 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report20 Feb 2015
Reference2015-0141
DeceasedMaria Nekrasova
CoronerPaul Matthews
Coroner areaLondon Inner (South)
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

MARIA NEKRASOVA DECEASED _

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1.  The Secretary of State for Transport
2.  Transport for London
3.  The City of Westminster
4.  The London Borou  h of Lambeth

1

CORONER

am Paul Matthews, assistant coroner for the coroner area of Inner South London.

2

CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS

make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009

and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 12 May 2014 an investigation was commenced into the death of Maria Nekrasova,
aged 18 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest held by me on 19
February 2015. The medical cause of death was: 1a Severe traumatic head injury.
The conclusion of the inquest was: Accident.

4

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATFI

At about 1.50 am on 4 May 2014, the deceased, who had been drinking, was whilst
standing in the hatched area in the middle of the carriageway of Westminster Bridge,
London SW1, hit by the front offside of a licensed taxi cab being driven by an
experienced night-time driver across the bridge from the Lambeth end towards the
Westminster end, so that she was thrown up onto the bonnet and her head hit the
windscreen, sustaining the severe traumatic head injury from which she died.

5

CORONER'S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  —

(1)There is nothing to prevent pedestrians crossing the carriageway of the bridge (such
as a central fence) and neither is there any protection for pedestrians who have reached
the middle of the carriageway (such as a central reservation);
(2) At night the level of street lighting is low, the lamp standards producing pools of light
which have the effect of leaving contrasting areas of the carriageway in relative
darkness;
(3) The glare of the headlights of oncoming vehicles makes it impossible for drivers of
vehicles crossing the bridge to see pedestrians standing in the carriageway until it is too
late to avoid hitting them.

6

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

1

 In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I  believe that one or
more of you has or have the power to take such action.

7

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 10 April 2015. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

8

COPIES and PUBLICATION

have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested

Persons, namely the parents of Maria Nekrasova.

am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

9

Dated: 20 February 2015

._./~

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Transport for London (PDF)
Transport for London

Mr Paul Matthews Transport for London
Southwark Coroner's Court, Surface Transport

1 Tennis Street, Asset Management
London 4" Floor, Palestra

SE1 1YD 197 Blackfriars Road

London, SE1 8NJ

as wort. gov.uk

10" June 2015
Dear Mr Matthews,

Maria Nekrasova — Regulation 28 Report

My colleagues and | were very sorry to hear of the tragic accident which occurred on 4 May
2014 and would wish to pass our condolences to the family of Miss Nekrasova.

Your Prevention of Future Deaths report was received by TfL on 16 April 2015 and | respond
as follows:

Introduction

Westminster Bridge runs East to West across the River Thames and links Westminster
Bridge Road in Lambeth to Bridge Street and the Victoria Embankment in Westminster.
The Houses of Parliament, Portcullis House, Parliament Square and Westminster
Underground station are located immediately to the west of the bridge (north side of the
river). St Thomas’s Hospital, the old County Hall complex and Waterloo mainline station are
located immediately to the east (south side of the river). TfL is the highway authority for the
A302 as it crosses Westminster Bridge.

The ‘Matters of Concern’

1. There is nothing to prevent pedestrians crossing the carriageway of the bridge (such
as a central fence) and neither is there any protection for pedestrians who have
reached the middle of the carriageway (such as a central reservation).

TfL’s policy is a presumption against the provision of pedestrian guardrail, except
where there is a proven safety requirement. Having considered this location, and the
possible physical segregation of pedestrians from vehicular traffic, the erection of a
barrier could potentially create a safety hazard for pedestrians, joggers or cyclists
who could become isolated on the wrong side of the barrier. For this reason, no
barriers will be erected. Central reservations are usually provided to separate the
flow of opposing high speed traffic, to prevent overtaking on the approaches to
junctions or at designated pedestrian crossing points. Given that Westminster Bridge
is subject to a 30mph speed limit and that there are no junctions or locations across
the bridge which justify the provision of a pedestrian crossing, the provision of a
central reserve would be inconsistent with other urban locations and TfL do not feel it
would be appropriate to install one.

Page 1

2.

At night the level of street lighting is low, the lamp standards producing pools of light
which have the effect of leaving contrasting areas of the carriageway in relative
darkness;

The light output from each of the ‘heritage’ lighting points on the bridge is similar to
that provided from conventional street lights. However, TfL will be carrying out a
detailed investigation of the lighting levels and the distribution of light over the bridge
by August 2015. Following the outcome of the investigation, we will consider what
alterations might be appropriate or possible, taking into account the physical
constraints of providing additional lighting points across the bridge deck and in such
a historic location.

The glare of the headlights of oncoming vehicles makes it impossible for drivers of
vehicles crossing the bridge to see pedestrians standing in the carriageway until it is
too late to avoid hitting them.

Glare from headlights is not a matter that TfL has any ability to influence or control,
and no further comment is made in this respect.

Further information

We will be consulting the public in the summer of 2015 on the road layout across the bridge
as part of TfL’s ‘Better Junctions’ works programme. More information can be found at
https:/Avww. tfl. gov.uk/travel-information/improvements-and-projects/road-modernisation-plan

In addition, the bridge will link two proposed cycling improvement schemes; the East-West

Cycle

Superhighway on the north side of the river and a junction improvement at

Westminster Bridge Road/Addington Street on the south side which will result in some
changes to the carriageway.

Yours sincerely,

Director of Asset Management

TfL Legal

Windsor House
42-50 Victoria Street
London
SW1H OTL

Page 2

Related reports

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.