Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015

Margaret Wright

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0183, written 11 May 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report11 May 2015
Reference2015-0183
DeceasedMargaret Wright
CoronerJennifer Leeming
Coroner areaManchester (West)
CategoryCommunity health care and emergency services related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. Secretary of State for Health
1 | CORONER

Tam M Jennifer Leeming, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Manchester
West

2 | CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations
2013.

3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 31* December 2014 I commenced an investigation into the death of
Margaret Elaine Wright, 72 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the
inquest on 7" May 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was that Margaret Elaine
Wright died of a complication of surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma which
carcinoma was itself a complication of previous blood transfusions.

4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Between the 7th January 1969 and the 21st January 1969 Margaret Elaine
Wright was transfused 11 units of blood at Bury General Hospital. In 2012 she
was diagnosed to have hepatitis C and to have developed liver cirrhosis. In
2014 she was diagnosed to have developed hepatocellular carcinoma. These
were consequent upon the aforementioned blood transfusions having been
contaminated. On the 7 of November 2014 she underwent surgery for
hepatocellular carcinoma at the Manchester Royal Infirmary. She was
discharged from that hospital on the 11° December 2014. Thereafter her
condition gradually deteriorated until on the 17 of December 2014 her
husband contacted his Doctor's practice and requested a home visit. The
Doctor doing home visits on that day was unaware of Mrs Wright’s recent
surgery since the practice had not received a discharge summary from the
hospital. The Doctor therefore visited other patients during the afternoon of the
17" of December, which meant that he had insufficient time to visit Mrs Wright
until the evening. Before the Doctor arrived Mrs Wright collapsed. An
ambulance was called and she was admitted to hospital, where she died on the
23 December 2014.

5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to
concern, In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:

(1)The Doctors did not at that time telephone patients or their families when a
home visit had been requested to obtain further information about the patient’s
situation. Had that happened in this case Mrs Wright would have received a
priority visit, although there was no evidence that this would have affected the
outcome. Evidence was given that since Mrs Wright's death a system of a
Doctor telephoning patients or their families prior to visiting had been
introduced, both in the Doctors practice in question and in the local area.
Evidence was given that this best practice should be drawn to the attention of
the Secretary of State for Health in order to prevent future deaths.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion urgent action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe you and/or your organisation have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this
report, namely by 6" July 2015. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken,
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action
is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the followin
Interested Persons EEN I have also sent it to Dr ee
may find it useful or of interest.

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me,
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication
of your response by the Chief Coroner.

Dated Signed
11™ May 2015 M Jennifer Leeming

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Health (PDF)
GR Rt Hon Alistair Burt MP

Minister of State for Community and Social Care

Department

of H ealth Richmond House
79 Whitehall

London

SWIA 2NS

POC3000915979 re as

Ms J. Leeming ,

Senior Coroner

Coroner's Officer

HM Coroner's Court

Paderborn House, Howell Croft North 23 JUL 2015

Bolton, BL! 1QY

Dore Ws loaning

Thank you for your letter of 11 May 2015 following the inquest into the death of
Margaret Wright. I was very sorry to hear of Mrs Wright’s death and wish to extend
my sincere condolences to her family.

There are two areas of concern that you raise for our attention as a result of the
inquest:

The first relates to the system of GP patient home visits:

- At the time, the doctors at Mrs Wright’s local GP practice did not routinely phone
the patient or family members to obtain further information about the patient’s
situation following a request for a home visit. Had this happened at the time,
then Mrs Wright would have received a priority visit (although you point out that
this may not have altered the outcome).

- Since Mrs Wright’s death a system of phoning the patient/family prior to a home
visit has been introduced by the GP practice concerned and in the local area.

The second, and most concerning, highlights the fact that the GP practice did not
receive a patient discharge summary for Mrs Wright, from Manchester Royal
Infirmary, leaving the home visits doctor unaware of her recent surgery.

The responsibility for sending a discharge summary rests firmly with the discharging
Trust. The Trust has confirmed that, on discharge, a patient’s discharge notification
should be posted to their GP and a copy filed within the hospital’s patient records.

Staff at the Trust have reviewed Mrs Wright’s notes and have found that a copy of
the discharge notification to her GP was electronically signed by the hospital doctor
on 8 December 2014 and filed in her medical records. The notification contains
details of diagnosis, treatment, discharge medication, out-patient follow up plans and
other relevant information.

Mrs Wright was discharged from hospital on 11 December 2014. Her GP should
have received the discharge information by the time of her request for a GP home
visit. The Trust cannot confirm that the letter was actually posted, or subsequently
received, by the GP practice. This part of the process is not currently tracked or
logged. However, the Trust is planning to utilise email and electronic links to enable
tracking of whether discharge information has been sent and received.

On home visiting itself, GP practices, under contracts with NHS England, are
required to provide services to their patients that include a home visit in cases where
there is a clinical need.

However, the clinical care of the patient in a home setting is one which needs careful
consideration by the GP. The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) is
aware of the importance of this point and its training curriculum includes advice on,
and prompts GPs to consider, the risks of seeing patients in different contexts,
including the home.

The chapter of the Curriculum dealing with patient safety and quality of care
contains a hypothetical “case illustration” setting out an account of the
circumstances surrounding a patient’s death, where home visiting had been a key
factor, and the challenges that the case presented to the practice. Doctors in training
using this resource are prompted to consider how seeing patients in a different
setting such as the home, on a busy day, might impact upon clinical care.

http://www.rcgp.org.uk/training-exams/gp-curriculum-overview/~/media/Files/GP-
training-and-exams/Curriculum-2012/RCGP-Curriculum-2-02-Patient-Safety-and-
Quality-Of-Care.ashx

In addition, the importance of considering the contextual aspects of clinical care are
emphasised in a further chapter of the GP Curriculum entitled “The GP in Wider
Professional Environment”.

http://www.rcgp.org.uk/training-exams/gp-curriculum-overview/~/media/Files/GP-
training-and-exams/Curriculum-2012/RCGP-Curriculum-2-03-GP-In-Wider-
Professional-Environment.ashx

ae

Department
of Health

The introduction states: “As a clinical and general practitioner at the frontline of
health services, you will need to understand not only how to work within systems of
healthcare but also how to work with those systems for the benefit of your patients.

This will require an understanding of the context, structures and processes in and by
which care is delivered that goes beyond that of your specific clinical role”

NHS England has advised that its Primary Care Patient Safety Expert Group, which
focusses on primary care and general practice concerns, is currently considering
home visits. At their next meeting, to be held within the next six weeks, the group
will consider the best way to ensure home visits are appropriate to individual patient
needs. I would be happy to update you with their findings in due course.

In addition, I understand the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence is
currently drawing up guidance on “Home Care”, with a planned publication date of
September 2015.

Furthermore, I can advise that NHS England is making efforts to improve the safety
of patient discharge. In August 2014, a Patient Safety Alert was issued which
launched a national programme of work to support organisations in improving the
communication and management of patient information at handover. One of the
initial priorities is to share best practice to improve the quality and timeliness of
communication.

I hope that you find this reply helpful and I am grateful to you for bringing the
circumstances of Mrs Wright’s death to my attention.

Jousy rear,

ALISTAIR BURT

Oauw Cnr » hea re Ce ce se %y ory oe fod sect & Ww Weak
fu Me Gn & seen Corum ihc

Related reports

Other reports by Jennifer Leeming

See all →

More reports categorised “Community health care and emergency services related deaths”

See all →

Track Community health care and emergency services related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care and emergency services related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.