Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015

Philip Robinson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0225, written 13 Mar 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report13 Mar 2015
Reference2015-0225
DeceasedPhilip Robinson
CoronerElizabeth Didcock
Coroner areaNottinghamshire
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedDoncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  The Chief Executive of the Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS 

Foundation Trust 

1 

CORONER 

I am Dr Elizabeth Didcock, Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of Nottinghamshire 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On the 4th April 2014, I commenced an investigation into the death of Philip Robinson, 
age 42 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 28th January 
2015. The conclusion of the inquest was a Narrative: Philip Robinson died on the 26th 
March 2014 at Bassetlaw Hospital from an acute Myocardial Infarction. He had severe 
coronary artery disease. He had been discharged the previous day, with the significance 
of his clinical condition not appreciated by the treating team.  

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 
Mr Robinson was a reasonably fit man, although he did have risk factors for the 
development of early Coronary Artery disease. He developed symptoms of vomiting and 
breathlessness over the three days prior to his death, with coughing up blood and pain 
in his lower back and side. Two days prior to his death he was seen at the Emergency 
Department at Bassetlaw Hospital. He was sent home, but asked to return that 
afternoon as some investigations were abnormal. He was monitored overnight on the 
Assessment and Treatment unit, and had an episode of breathlessness during the night. 
On the morning of the 25th March, the day before his death, he was seen by a 
Consultant, and a scan organised, to look for a pulmonary embolus. Throughout the day 
Mr Robinsons National Early Warning Scores rose from 1 to 3. There was no escalation 
for medical review.  He was discharged home again, and readmitted the following day in 
cardiac arrest from which he could not be resuscitated.  

The Trust completed a Serious Untoward Incident report, produced an action plan, and 
submitted further statements and reports following the Inquest. All these documents 
went some way to addressing concerns raised in evidence, however, in my view there 
remain outstanding concerns that allow for the continuation of circumstances creating a 
risk that other deaths will occur if such matters are not addressed. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

  The results from audits of compliance with safe discharge arrangements using a 

discharge stamp, including the recording of the Early Warning Score on 
discharge are unsatisfactory 

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   The improved recording and communication of the EWS from Health Care 

assistant, to Nurse, to doctor as necessary, is not evident throughout the 
Hospital 

  The medical staff involved in this Inquest do not agree with the SUI author, that 
an ECG was indicated during Mr Robinson’s admission. There are no clear 
guidelines to assist medical staff with this clinical decision making when a 
patient presents with acute breathlessness. An audit to monitor the threshold for 
performing an ECG has shown this is still not reliably performed when clinically 
indicated 

  The risk of there being no one available to provide senior medical review when a 

registrar is absent remains an ‘extreme risk’ 

  The iHospital which undoubtedly will assist in improving EWS recording, is not 
yet in place. Implementation is planned for June 2015, and there is potential for 
delay. Interim plans for a ‘At a glance Board’ are not clear, with confusion as to 
where the EWS will be recorded. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have 
the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by the 12th May 2015. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons:  

(Widow, and Next of Kin) 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

13th March 2015                        Dr E A Didcock 

2

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Doncaster Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Trust (PDF)
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals

NH5 Foundation Trust

Medical Director’s Office

Our Ref RIC/jj

11 May 2015

Dr E Didcock

HM Assistant Coroner for Nottinghamshire
The Council House

Old Market Square

Nottingham

NG1 2DT

Dear Dr Didcock

Re Mr Philip Robinson - D.O.B. - 5.3.1972 : D.O.D. - 26.03.2014

| am responding to the Regulation 28 Report dated 16 March 2015 sent to Mr Pinkerton,
Chief Executive of Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. | have been

assisted in my response by i ——/ Acute Physician & Assistant Care Group

Director, Matron at Bassetlaw Hospital and PY Patient Safety

Facilitator, Emergency Care Group.
| will respond to the issues raised as follows:

¢ The results from audits of compliance with safe discharge arrangements using a
discharge stamp, including the recording of the EWS on discharge are
unsatisfactory.

The discharge stamp was trialled and found to be unsuccessful within ATC with its
high turnover of patients.

Since this incident ATC has undergone an “observations project” which included the
documentation and recognition of EWS on discharge.

The i-Hospital white board system is due for implementation later this year. This will
highlight which patients have a high EWS and the next due time of observations. On
discharging a patient from the system, the system will provide the nurse with an
additional opportunity to assess EWS on discharge.

The improved recording and communication of the EWS from Health Care
assistant, to Nurse, to doctor as necessary, is not evident throughout the Hospital
The safety brief at the end of the ward round involves the whole of the ward team
including HCA’s to improve communication of EWS between all the Multi-disciplinary
team. The observations project has been completed and education undertaken with
respect to the importance of clear communication between all members of the
team. A safety brief is embedded in practice between shift change overs to improve
whole team awareness of issues on the whole unit.

Audits on ATC of documentation of EWS by HCA in the notes have consistently
improved, reducing the chance of verbal communication failure. Recent audits show
100% compliance with the escalation policy on ATC.

The medical staff involved in this Inquest do not agree with the SUI author, that an
ECG was indicated during Mr Robinson's admission. There are no clear guidelines
to assist medical staff with this clinical decision making when a patient presents
with acute breathlessness. An audit to monitor the threshold for performing an
ECG has shown this is still not reliably performed when clinically indicated

There are no clear national guidelines to assist medical staff when ordering ECGs in
patients who present with breathlessness. Acute medicine at Bassetlaw relies on
early senior review by consultants. However variation in clinical judgement will
occur. This incident has been communicated widely within the emergency care
group by way of awareness.

The risk of there being no one available to provide senior medical review when a
registrar is absent remains an ‘extreme risk’

This is now no longer seen as an acceptable option to leave a SHO without registrar
cover out of hours. In 2015 to date there has been three occasions where no cover
could be obtained. On these occasions the consultant on-call was informed and
provided extra support to the SHO. The issue around senior medical staffing remains
a concern within the Trust. We currently have an ongoing recruitment programme
and are considering alternative ways to utilise senior staff within the trust to support
this. The hospital 24/7 program is aimed at providing senior nurse practitioner
cover to support the hospital out of hours. Similar hospital sites have implemented
this system with good outcomes with regards patient safety.

The i-Hospital is not yet in place. Implementation is planned for June 2015, and
there is potential for delay. Interim plans for a ‘At a glance Board’ are not clear,
with confusion as to where the EWS will be recorded.

The “status at a glance” board is now embedded in practice on ATC. The board
shows the EWS Score and the next time observations are due to be performed.

The i-Hospital program is progressing well and plans remain optimistic that it will be
in place by late summer 2015.

| trust that the above wiil allay your concerns.

Please do be hesitate to revert back to me should you feel it necessary.

j
i

.
Yours sincerely

a
MD. ChM. M.Ed FRCS
Deputy Medical Director - Clinical Standards

Cc | Head of Risk and Legal Services

Mike Pinkerton, Chief Executive, DBHFT

HE Medical Director, DBHET

i
i
i
i
f
i
\

Related reports

Other reports by Elizabeth Didcock

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.