Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0241, written 25 Jun 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 25 Jun 2015 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2015-0241 |
| Deceased | Lottie Reid |
| Coroner | Margaret Jones |
| Coroner area | Birmingham and Solihull |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. The Chief Executive, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust Good Hope © Hospital 1 | CORONER tam Margaret Joy Jones, Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of Birmingham and Solihull 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 2 February 2015 | commenced an investigation into the death of Lottie Reid, aged 95 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 23 June 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was that the deceased died from bleeding duodenal ulcers on a background of other significant natural disease. Her death was probably accelerated by a short time due to the bleeding being exacerbated by a recognised complication of antigoagulant drug therapy. 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH The deceased was 95 years of age with a background of atrial fibrillation, hypertension, congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic kidney disease and hypothyroidism. She had been hospitalised in December 2014 following a fall and discharged for a second time to Perry Trees Intermediate care centre on the 7” January 2015. Her medication included enoxaparin and aspirin. She became more frail in the weeks prior to her death. On the 29" January 2015 she was readmitted to Good Hope Hospital, Rectory Road Sutton Coldfield with hematemesis and melena. She deteriorated quickly and died at 12 o'clock on the 29"" January 2015. Post mortem examination found significant natural disease including previously undiagnosed duodenal ulcers and cirrhosis of the liver. 5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — (1) That following discharge from Good Hope Hospital to Perry Trees Intermediate Care Centre the Printed Electronic Prescribing Medication Admin Chart did not mirror the medication referred to in the Discharge Letter and Prescription. (2) There did not appear to be a protocol in place whereby such discrepancies could be easily checked and this appeared to be especially difficult to do at weekends ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you or your organisation have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this Teport, namely by 20 August 2015. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons. The Family of the deceased, NewLaw Solicitors, DAC Beachcroft LLP, Capsticks, MDU Services Limited | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 25th June 2015 Signed
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
Bordesley Green East
Birmingham
B9 5SS
Tel: 0121 424 2320
AJC/TB/LMcL
20 August 2015
Ms Margaret Jones
HM Assistant Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull
50 Newton Street
Birmingham
Dear Ms Jones,
Inquest into the death of Mrs Lottie Reid – Report to Prevent Future Deaths
I write in response to the Regulation 28 Report made by you following your investigation and inquest
into the death of Mrs Lottie Reid on 9 and 24 June 2015 and your letter to Mr Andrew Foster, Chief
Executive.
I am responding in my capacity as the Trust Executive Medical Director & Deputy Chief Executive.
The Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (the "Trust") has carefully considered the important
matters raised by you at the inquest and I set out the Trust's response below:
1. That following discharge from Good Hope Hospital to Perry Trees Intermediate Care Centre
the Printed Electronic Prescribing Medication Admin Chart ("PEPMAC") did not mirror the
medication referred to in the Discharge Letter and Prescription.
2. There did not appear to be a protocol in place whereby such discrepancies could easily be
checked and this appeared to be especially difficult to do at weekends.
The Trust is aware of the importance of ensuring that there is clarity in relation to the medications
prescribed whilst in hospital, and on discharge into the community or to an intermediate care facility. It
is for this reason that the Trust has a procedure for discharging patients into intermediate care (the
"Intermediate Care Procedure"). Enclosed is a copy of the Intermediate Care Procedure for your
consideration.
As you are aware, the medical staff are not permanently present at the intermediate care facility, which
clearly impacts on their availability to prescribe a given medicine (although it is common practice for
intermediate care facilities to be staffed in this way). Without medication being appropriately prescribed
and documented on a Medicines Administration Chart ("MAC") (also known as a PEPMAC), nurses are
unable to administer the medication.
I understand that the Trust Intermediate Care Procedure requires patients to be discharged to an
intermediate care facility with a MAC chart. The MAC chart should be reviewed by the doctor at the
same time as the To-Take-Out ("TTO") is written up to reflect the medicines required at discharge as
opposed to the medicines being taken during admission.
Regrettably, in Mrs Reid's case when she was discharged into the intermediate care facility, Perry
Trees, there was a discrepancy between the PEPMAC and the discharge letter and prescription.
In responding to your Regulation 28 Report, we have sought the views of the senior responsible
clinician based at Good Hope Hospital,
(Associate Medical Director) and the Clinical
Director and Chief Pharmacist Tania Carruthers.
In order that the risk of future events can be reduced the following steps have been taken by the Trust:
1. On reflection, it was felt that a lack of staff awareness of the Intermediate Care Procedure was a
contributory factor. To ensure this procedure is followed in future, the Trust is sending a clinical alert to
all wards at Good Hope Hospital by the end of August. By way of context, it should be noted that whilst
staff awareness of the procedure was a factor, it appears that this was the first incident of its kind at
one of our intermediate care facilities (although that in no way minimises the seriousness of this case).
2. The Trust is amending the nursing discharge checklist to include a reminder to check the PEPMAC.
In addition to strengthening the processes as described above, we consider that this case is an
opportunity to improve to the discharge process and the documentation in particular:
3. The Trust is in the process of improving the discharge documentation (known as yellow cards),
which is currently used by clinicians discharging palliative care patients to other carers. This procedure
requires the treating clinician to write and sign a separate document which details the patient's
prescribed medication, which is then used by the treating clinicians on discharge.
This process will reduce the risk of inconsistency in the discharge documents for the patient, as there
will only be one document that the clinicians will refer to on discharge. The template will be
standardised to ensure it contains the optimal information for safe prescribing and administration.
Once the new documentation has been approved through our governance processes, it will be piloted
within palliative care. Subject to feedback from the community staff, a final decision as to the
appropriateness of implementing this process for patients being discharged into an intermediate care
facility will be made. It is likely that this decision will be made in the next six months, and will be based
on clarity of the prescribing and a review of any reported incidents.
4. The dissemination of information about the Intermediate Care Procedure to all wards at Good Hope
Hospital will address the issues raised in this case. However, as an additional step, should any
inconsistencies arise in future the staff at the intermediate care facility can check the patient's
prescribed medication by telephoning the discharging ward directly.
5. In addition, discharge letters (excluding paediatrics and cancer services) include a statement at the
bottom that if there are any questions or concerns about the discharge medication they should call the
pharmacy Medicines Helpline (0121 424 4682).
6. To strengthen the current pharmacy processes, when available, MAC charts and TTOs are checked
for discrepancies. As part of our response, the incident was discussed with the pharmacist involved.
The Chief Pharmacist has also reminded all of her pharmacists about the importance of this issue. The
Chief Pharmacist is also reviewing existing SOPs to ensure they are robust and fit for purpose.
Finally, in sad situations such as this, it is important that the family of Mrs Reid are made aware of the
steps that we are taking to reduce the risk of future events.
If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Best wishes.
Yours sincerely,
Deputy CEO and Executive Medical Director
Encs
cc
Deputy Medical Director for Clinical Performance
Rachael Blackburn, Acting Deputy Director of Governance
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.