Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0376, written 16 Oct 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 16 Oct 2015 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2015-0376 |
| Deceased | Caroline Robey |
| Coroner | Lydia Brown |
| Coroner area | Leicester City and South Leicestershire |
| Category | Community health care and emergency services related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Ms. S. Noyes Chief Executive. East Midlands Ambulance Service. Nottingham. po Eg Care Centre, Loughborough, Leicestershire. Assistant Director Corporate Affairs. West Leicester CCG GE NHS England, Central Midlands. CORONER | am Lydia Brown, assistant coroner, for the coroner area of Leicester City and Leicestershire South 2 CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 4 March 2015 | commenced an investigation into the death of Caroline Robey. At inquest heard on 29 September 2015 my conclusion was natural causes contributed to by neglect Cause of death 1a Multiple organ failure 1b Bronchopneumonia 1c Group A Streptococcal infection 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH At inquest the determinations were that Mrs Robey was a fit 34 year old working mother when she became unwell. She presented on 6 separate occasions over a course of 3 days to the community health care service providers, including her General practitioner, the urgent care centre and the ambulance service. She was diagnosed initially with a viral infection and then diarrhoea and vomiting, but advised to remain at home. An ambulance was then summonsed and she was taken to the Emergency Department at Leicester Royal Infirmary with a pre-alert for sepsis as a time-critical patient. Despite all possible interventions on her arrival in ED and then ICU she did not survive the Group A streptococcal infection and evolving sepsis and died the following day. Evidence suggested that earlier intervention, on the balance of probabilities, would have treated the infection and prevented this death. “5 | CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — 1. No sepsis screening tool was being used by the community health care providers, and so opportunities were lost to consider a diagnosis of sepsis and refer as an emergency for hospital admission and treatment 2. Apatient safety alert issued 2 September 2014 by NHS England clearly sets out resources available in the provision of a UK sepsis clinical tool kit, but this had not been recognised or adopted by the health care providers involved in this case. 3. Inadequate note was taken of the number of different attendances Mrs Robey had initiated despite previous good health, and there was no suggestion she was a frequent attender or had ever sought medical assistance inappropriately. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by Friday 11" December 2015. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: (Husband) GP) GP) | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. [DATE] /BY CORONER] 16" October 2015 2
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Sent via Post and Email to: STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL Addressee Only Mrs LC Brown Assistant Coroner Leicester City & South Leicestershire The Town Hall Town Hall Square Leicester LE1 9BG ,,,1:kj England Midlands & East (Central Midlands) Medical Directorate Fosse House 6 Smith Way Grove Park Enderby Leicestershire LE191SX 16 March 2016 Dear Mrs Brown Re: Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths I write in response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths sent to NHS England, Central Midlands and confirm that this case was discussed at the Performance Advisory Group (PAG), held on Wednesday 24 February 2016. The remit of the PAG is to consider all concerns raised any relevant information and recommend options for the management of these according to the NHS England Framework for Managing Performer concerns. The information reviewed included: • The Coroners Regulation 28 Report • Patient Medical Records • Central Nottinghamshire Clinical Services (CNCS) Serious Incident (SI) report response to Assistant Coroner, background information and • Sepsis Screening Toolkit poster • reflective report The PAG considered the case and concluded that the following actions should be undertaken: • has been requested to reflect on his record keeping at his next appraisal and on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with suspected sepsis. The PAG was assured that had shown significant reflection and learning into this case and , having considered the options put forward, agreed to close this case within the Practitioner Performance Team process. Continued/ ... High quality care for all, now and for future generations 2. 16 March 2016 NHS England has, through the local medical committee, highlighted the importance of diagnosing sepsis and the use of the sepsis screening tool (attached). Yours sincerely MB ChB MD FRCGP Medical Director and Responsible Officer NHS England, Midlands & East (Central Midlands) High quality care for all, now and for future generations General Practice Sepsis Screening and Action Tool Sepsis is a time critical condition. Screening, early intervention and immediate treatment saves lives. This tool should be applied to all adult patients who are not pregnant who have a suspected infection or their clinical observations are outside of normal limits Patient groups to consider screening: those in whom you are considering antibiotic prescription or stewardship discussion, patients with "Flu", patients with gastroenteritis and the unwell patient without clear cause. I. Might this be more than a self- N limiting infection? Symptoms of infection (e.g. a recent h,storyoflever) Acute deterioration Unexplained illness, especially 1n 1mmunosuppressed or elderly people y 2. Perform a full set of observations. Are any 2 of the following present? N > 38.3°c or < 36°C Temperature Respiratory rate > 20 per minute > 90 per minute Hea1t rate Acute confusion, disorientation, reduced conscious level Consider blood glucose: > 7.7 relevant 1n non-diabetics 3. Is any red flag present? Systolic B.P < 90 mmHg Heart rate > 130 per minute Respiratory rate > 25 per minute Oxygen saturations < 91 % (may be approprrate lo accept Sp02 < 91 % ,n patient, w,to loov.m COPD) Responds only to voice or pain/ unresponsive Purpuric rash N Y THEUK SEPSIS TRUST Sepsis unlikely. Continue usual care. Sepsis may be present Evaluate whether acute referral / admission required, especially if: -already on antibiotics -partially treated -no clear source of infection If treating in the community, consider: -planned second assessment -brief written handover documenting observations -specific safety net advice Red Flag Sepsis This is a time critical condition, immediate action is required. Dial 999 An·ange blue light transfer Write a brief clear handover including observations and antibiotic allergies where present. Administer oxygen and other appropriate immediate care as available'
East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS) NHS Trust Emergency Care | Urgent Care | We Care Trust Headquarters 1 Horizon Place Mellors Way Nottingham Business Park Nottingham NG8 6PY Telephone: 0115 884 5000 Fax; 0115 884 5001 Website: www.emas.nhs.uk Mrs L. Brown Assistant Coroner The Town Hall Town Hall Square Leicester LE1 9BG 11" December 2015 Dear Mrs Brown Re: Report to Prevent Future Deaths in the case of Caroline Elisabeth Robey Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths, dated 16" October 2015, bringing to my attention the Coroner's concerns arising from the inquest into the death of Mrs Caroline Elisabeth Robey. | would like to assure you that within the East Midlands Ambulance Service (EMAS) all matters related to patient safety are taken extremely seriously. The delivery of high quality, evidence based care is at the heart of the Trust's clinical strategy. This work is continuous, however, | trust you will take assurance from the measures outlined in this response which are pertinent for the time-frame from the date of Mrs Caroline Elisabeth Robeys' death to the present day. The concerns defined in the Prevention of Future Death notice pertaining to the inquest into the death of Mrs Caroline Elisabeth Robey: 1. No Sepsis Screening tool was used by the community health providers, and so opportunities were lost to consider the diagnosis of sepsis and refer as an emergency for hospital admission and treatment. 2. A patient safety alert was issued on the 2 September 2014 by NHS England clearly sets out the resources available in the provision of a UK Sepsis clinical tool kit, but this has not be recognised or adopted by health care providers in this case. 3. Inadequate note was made of the number of different attendances Mrs Robey had initiated despite previous good health, and there is no suggestion that she was a frequent attender or had ever sort medical attention inappropriately. | 17 DEC 2015 East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS} NHS Trust Emergency Care | Urgent Care | We Care Background East Midlands Ambulance Service (EMAS) serves a resident population of 4.8million across the East Midlands region (Derbyshire, Leicestershire and Rutland, Lincolnshire (including North and North East), Northamptonshire and Nottinghamshire), across 6,425 square miles. Each year we respond to over 616,000 emergency and urgent calls. Sepsis screening tools In March 2015 EMAS introduced an updated sepsis screening tool (both adult and paediatric) based upon the Sepsis 6 red flags and NHS England Safety Alert (2014) (appendices 1a and 1b). Prior to this EMAS had in place a generic sepsis screening tool based upon the same features as the updated tool but did not have specific paediatric element included (appendix 2). In addition to the Sepsis screening EMAS has in place the Paramedic Pathfinder Triage tool (PP). The PP Triage tool is a pre hospital assessment guide based around the widely used and validated National Early Warning Score. This is an objective screening tool which is based upon both physiological parameters and clinical presentations to allow for safe See and Treat care and also to ensure the early recognition of the sickest patients requiring Emergency Department admission. . Since its introduction in April 2014 94% of staff have completed training. The application of this tool in this case would have required Emergency Department conveyance based upon the presenting symptoms. A copy of the PP tool can be found in appendix 3. Communication and Education As a part of our annual education programme for 2014/15 Sepsis assessment and management was included for all clinical staff and continued into the 2015/16 plan to allow for all staff to undertake this education. The educational material for this is found in appendix 4. In addition to educational material, awareness of staff has been promoted via clinical bulletins issued over the period of the last four years. Following this incident a further clinical bulletin has been issued to highlight the learning gained from this incident and other cases where Sepsis management could have been improved (appendix 5). In addition to our allocated annual education programme Paramedic Pathfinder has been delivered as an additional face to face education session to all clinical staff from 2014. This tool was primarily launched for Paramedics but has now been extended to include other qualified clinicians within EMAS. As with any patient safety incident or incident investigation learning is taken both organisationally and at an individual clinician level as required. In such cases, as a part of the investigation process, the EMAS organisational learning team is utilised to develop support programmes for any member of staff noted to have a linked educational need or support. It is essential that learning is taken across all levels; this ensures that responsive changes to practice are achieved. In this case a supportive programme was provided to the clinician both as a supportive and developmental measure. This process is supported by a number of key policies within EMAS such as the Supporting Capability Policy. East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS) NHS Trust Emergency Care | Urgent Care | We Care | trust that the measure and safeguards cited above and evidenced in the appendices provide you with the appropriate level of assurance in relation to the commitment and planning of EMAS in relation to patient safety and the management of suspected sepsis. Yours Sincerely Ss Sue Noyes Chief Executive INHS) West Leicestershire Clinical Commissioning Group CCG Headquarters 55 Woodgate From the office of: Loughborough Telephone: Leicestershire Your ref: CEM/GA/00705-2015 LE11 212 Tel: 01509 567 700 Fax: 01509 567 792 11 December 2015 H.M Coroner For Leicester City and South Leicestershire The Town Hall - - — Town Hall Square | = Leicester T LE1 9BG Dear Mrs Mason Re: Caroline Elisabeth Robey — Regulation 28 Report Sa | write further to your report made in accordance with paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. As outlined within your report, it is considered that action should be taken to prevent future deaths and that NHS West Leicestershire CCG has the power to take such action. | am now in a position to provide you with the following information. | would firstly like to clarify that NHS West Leicestershire CCG is the commissioner of the Loughborough Urgent Care, with Central Nottinghamshire Clinical Services (CNCS) providing the clinical services from the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre. This response has been jointly prepared by both the CCG and CNCS. | can confirm that the matters raised Mrs Robey's care has been formally reported as a Serious Incident (SI) and is being managed through the CCG's SI process. | will now respond to each of your specific requests for information in turn. No sepsis screening tool was being used by the community health care providers, and so opportunities were lost to consider a diagnosis of sepsis and refer as an emergency for hospital admission and treatment Please see the enclosed action plan developed by the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre. As you will note, an organisational sepsis policy has been developed and during April and May 2015 all staff at the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre completed a training course in sepsis recognition. In addition, work is currently ongoing at the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre to implement the sepsis6 pathway. a Patients, Practices, Partners A patient safety alert issued 2 September 2014 by NHS England clearly sets out resources available in the provision of a UK sepsis tool kit, but this had not been recognised or adopted by the health care providers involved in this case | would again refer you to the enclosed action plan developed by the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre. As you will note, an approved system to review and implement patient safety alerts at the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre will be developed by January 2016, with regular assurance reports subsequently provided to the Clinical Governance Committee at CNCS on the implementation of all relevant Patient Safety Alerts. In addition, the CCG's Head of Infection Control has arranged for an email to be circulated to all GPs within Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland (LLR) entitled ‘Managing Sepsis’ as follows: In September 2014 NHS England issued a Stage Two Patient Safety Alert relating to the prompt recognition of sepsis and the rapid initiation of treatment. This alert was sent out to all GP’s by NHS England via the CAS system on 3 September 2014. The aim of the alert was to raise awareness of sepsis and signpost GP's to a set of resources developed by the UK Sepsis Trust, and others, to support the prompt recognition and initiation of treatments for all patients suspected of having sepsis. Following a Coroner's case the CCG has re-issued the alert reminding GPs of the need to ensure staff have access to both adult, paediatric and infant sepsis screening and action tools that can be used for patients presenting on first attendance or developing suspected infection. Staff are reminded that the resources should now have been introduced into clinical practice, in particular the administration of antibiotics within one hours of suspicion of sepsis. The UK Sepsis Trust Toolkit: General Practice management of Sepsis guidance is available at: http:/sepsistrust.org/wpcontent/uploads/20 15/08/1409322498GPtoolkit2014.00f | can further confirm that a WLCCG Board GP, Dr Chris Barlow, has a meeting arranged with Dr John Parker, a Critical Care Consultant at the University Hospitals of Leicester (UHL), on 15 December 2015; as UHL have successfully implemented a number of quality improvement projects for sepsis in UHL, they have offered to meet with the CCG with the aim of sharing their experience/materials and to provide support in ensuring that staff have a developed understanding of the management of sepsis. Following the above meeting, a Protected Learning Time (PLT) event will subsequently be arranged to further raise awareness of sepsis within primary medical care. Inadequate note was taken of the number of different attendances Mrs Robey had initiated despite previous good health, and there was no suggestion she was a frequent attender or had ever sought medical assistance inappropriately | would again refer you to the enclosed action plan developed by the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre. As you will note, a clinical newsletter was circulated in July 2015 to alert clinicians at the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre to key learning points from the case of Mrs Robey. In addition, the Loughborough Urgent Care Centre are in the process of developing a Local Operating Procedure for multiple attendances, which is to be approved and implemented by February 2016, It is my understanding that the CCG’s Chief Nurse has liaised with the Head of Quality at NHS England regarding the actions of the specific GPs involved in Mrs Robey's care and has received assurances that Dr Khokar has been referred to their Professional & Practice Information Gathering Group (PIGG) to review their individual performance as a practitioner.
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care and emergency services related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.