Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2015
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2015-0453, written 28 Oct 2015. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 28 Oct 2015 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2015-0453 |
| Deceased | Kevin Forster |
| Coroner | Andrew Tweddle |
| Coroner area | County Durham and Darlington |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths · State Custody related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: NOMS Equality, Rights and Decency Group, National Offender Management Service, Fourth Floor, 70 Petty France, London 2. G4S, Legal Department, The Manor, Manor Royal, Crawley, West Sussex 1. CORONER lam Andrew Tweddle Senior Coroner, for the Coroner area of County Durham and Darlington CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. (see attached sheet) INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 15" September 2014 | commenced an investigation into the death of Kevin Anthony Forster. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 21“ October 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was:- 3. Kevin was found dead in his prison cell at HMP Durham on 14" September 2014. Kevin was appropriately located in F-Wing upon his entry into HMP Durham on 10" September 2014. After seeing Kevin at 22:00hrs on Saturday 13" September 2014 the response of healthcare staff with regard to Kevin was not appropriate. The level of on-going medical supervision by healthcare staff during the remainder of that night was not appropriate. The level of observation given by discipline staff from 02:00 — 06:00 hrs was appropriate. The decision at 02:00hrs not to search Kevin's cell that night was appropriate. 4. Drug Related CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH The deceased entered HMP Durham after having hidden within his body drugs. During the night of 13°714" September 2014, the deceased (and his cell mate) took many of these drugs. He was noticed by discipline staff and healthcare staff to be under the influence of an unknown substance. No thorough or clinical assessment of his condition was undertaken. There was confusion as to the appropriate means of summoning the senior on-duty healthcare officer and a lack of appreciation of the risk posed by the deceased when he was found at approximately 06:50hrs on 14” September 2014, shortly before he died. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — 1. It was clear from evidence that there is a serious drug problem in HMP Durham. This has led to a degree of complacency and acceptance by staff of that situation. Healthcare staff were unaware of what, if any, drugs policy was in lace at the time. A policy known as a “Drugs Overdose Policy” which had, in various guises been in operation since 2008 included a definition of overdose as the “purposeful or accidental act of ingesting an amount of a drug or substance that may cause harm to health”. As such, the ingestion of unknown drugs is de facto harmful to health and would constitute an overdose which should lead to the triggering of the Overdose Policy. Both discipline and healthcare staff were unaware of the policy, the “overdose” definition and the prescribed steps which should then ensue. 3. Upon obtaining the contract for healthcare at HMP Durham, G4S have instituted have implemented a new policy, but evidence was given that staff had not been given any formal training on it, though the document (running to 12 pages) had been emailed. Evidence indicated that there was still a lack of appreciation of the detail of the policy now in force. 4. The evidence indicated that there was a lack of guidance as to how staff should react when faced with a person who had overdosed; no local procedures as envisaged by the policy were disclosed, what should be done when there is no indicator as to what substance had been ingested and what would be the appropriate level of observations recognising that (Policy paragraph 8.1) symptoms may develop later. 5. Given the apparent scale of the drug problem in HMP Durham, it would seem to be prudent for there to be a clear and workable policy and one which staff that healthcare staff is able to implement with discipline staff knowing sufficient to be able to identify in what circumstances healthcare staff need to become involved. 6. There was a lack of an on-going treatment plan prepared for the deceased by nursing staff who attended on him and there was inadequate recording that they had done and what they had to do. 7. Discipline staff summoned healthcare staff and perhaps not appreciating the significance of the apparent health of the deceased, did not call for the on-duty nurse to attend as an emergency, but just asked for the nurse to attend. Such an oversight could lead to a delay which in certain circumstances might be very significant. 8. The evidence indicated that there was a delay (albeit a short one) in either healthcare or discipline staff calling for an emergency ambulance to attend and/or whether code blue as an expression was used. Other inquests have clearly identified issues at the establishment about the calling of an emergency ambulance. 9. As mentioned earlier the evidence indicated that there was a degree of complacency about prisoners presenting under the influence of drugs and the risks associated therewith (at handover one officer said to another “there are some prisoners sleeping it off”). Due to the scale of the issue, the potential risk to health of a prisoner is such that there needs to be absolute clarity of response and care for prisoners who so present. The evidence indicated that a more integrated approach between healthcare staff and discipline staff would be beneficial notwithstanding there were good lines of communication between the two. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 23" December 2015. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. e COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons Governor, HMP Durham Head of Healthcare, HMP Durham Ben Hoare Bell Solicitors Clifford Johnson Solicitors TSol Berrymans Lace Mawer Solicitors Thompsons Solicitors lam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. Signed ANDREW TWEDDLE LLB HM Senior Coroner County Durham and Darlington
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Andrew Tweddle
HM Coroner for County Durham & Darlington
HM Coroner's Office
PO Box 282
Bishop Auckland
Co Durham
DL14 4FY
Dear Sir
Inquest touching the death of Kevin Anthony Forster
Date of death: 14 September 2014 - HMP Durham
I write in response to your report dated 28 November 2015 made under paragraph 7, Schedule 5 of the
Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
In response to your concerns relating to the existence and applicability of a substance misuse policy at HMP
Durham, I confirm the faltowing:
G4S Forensic & Medical Services (UK) Ltd took over responsibility for provision of healthcare services at HMP
Durham on 1 April 2015. The contract does not include provision of GP and Pharmacy Services and as from 1
April 2015, Spectrum Community Health CIC was appointed to provide GPs, specialist substance misuse GPs
and Pharmacy Services at HMP Durham.
Between 2011 and 31 March 2015, Care UK were the healthcare providers at the prison. Prior to 2011,
healthcare services were provided by NHS England.
1 understand NHS England operated a “Drugs Overdose” policy at the prison and it is my understanding this
policy document was considered at the inquest touching the death of Mr Forster. This policy was written prior
to 2011 by a specialist substance misuse nurse employed by the NHS.
Following their appointment, Care UK produced new policy documents in relation to a number of practices
and procedures at the prison. The “Drugs Overdose" policy document was not updated or re-written by Care
UK. My recollection is that Care UK did not make a “Drugs Overdose” policy document available on the
intranet or in the Healthcare folder containing hard copies of written policy documents.
It is my belief that the absence of an updated policy document is the reason why there appeared to be
confusion on the part of the healthcare witnesses at the inquest regarding the existence and applicability of a
"Drugs Overdose” policy. In particular, whilst those nurses employed at the prison by the NHS prior to 2011
would have known about the existence and content of the policy, they were confused as to its application
once Care UK took over the contract, and the policy document was not readily available on the intranet or in
the Healthcare folder.
After G4S took over the contract in April 2015, it became clear to me that the situation relating to the “Drugs
Overdose" policy required clarification. The previous policy was too rigid and did not allow specialist
practitioners to exercise their expertise and manage individuals as safely and appropriately as possible. 1
therefore updated the Substance Misuse policy. The draft policy document was submitted to and approved
by the G4S Clinical Governance Lead, prior to formal introduction and implementation at the prison. Once
approved, the Substance Misuse Policy was introduced to all healthcare staff. A copy of the policy was sent by
email to every member of healthcare staff.
Some months after the introduction of the new Substance Misuse Policy, however, towards the beginning of
September 2015, I was made aware there had been changes in clinical practice which meant the Policy was
outdated in some respects. It was felt at this stage that clinical guidelines, would be a preferable, more flexible
“policy”, preferable to a formal Policy document, because clinical guidelines envisage all different situations
and respond accordingly.
Spectrum Community Health and G4S, in liaison with NHS England, therefore began a joint project, working
together to update the procedures in operation at the prison.
A GP employed by Spectrum Community Health, Dr Bray, and the Substance Misuse Clinical Lead, Deb Miller,
have been tasked to work together to produce clinical guidelines relating to all substance misuse issues,
including the treatment and care to be delivered to any patient presenting as under the influence of illicit
drugs. The work is being undertaken in conjunction with NHS England.
A draft report and overarching pathway for Drugs and Alcohol Recovery Teams was produced at the end of
November 2015. Following consultation between all contributors, including NHS England, the pathway is not
designed to be a weighty document, but one that all practitioners and prison staff can use to understand the
Drugs and Alcohol Recovery Team pathway, guidance, protocols and interventions. It is proposed the
pathway features space to embed documents and to hyperlink to guidance.
A final briefing session is scheduled for 22 December 2015 to discuss the pathway and next steps, to ensure
key leaders are fully briefed on the content of the pathway and the next steps, prior to wider circulation.
The belief in the clinical team is that clinical guidelines are preferable to an inflexible written policy, as given
the varying circumstances of how individual incidents can present, clinical guidelines will not restrict the ability
of doctors and nurses to utilise clinical discretion and decision making, taking into account all the aspects of
the patient's presentation, clinical observations and other external factors. Clinical guidelines will enable the
healthcare professionals to respond with absolute clarity to ensure individual patients receive the most
appropriate treatment and care for their precise circumstances and symptoms.
The clinical guidelines are intended for implementation at all prisons within the North East Cluster and
therefore it is essential that the guidelines are suitable and safe for implementation at each of the different
establishments within the North East Cluster, before they are implemented. This will ensure consistency and
suitability of approach, regardless of the establishment at which the patient is resident. It is also an important
reason why clinical guidelines are preferable to an inflexible policy document, to allow more flexibility in terms
of treatment and care, to suit an individual's needs, within the structure of the clinical guidelines.
G4S has appointed, on a consultancy basis, a substance misuse specialist doctor, Dr Martin Von Fragstein, to
oversee the content, form and appropriateness of the clinical guidelines and to act as G4S' advisor on any
substance misuse issue.
The following further steps have been taken to address your concerns surrounding other issues arising at the
inquest:-
2 Client Confidential
A request has been made to prison officers’ Line Management to inform officers at staff meetings that
they are advised to report any suspicions of substance misuse (whether alcohol or drugs) to
healthcare staff. {f there is any suspicion whatsoever then a report should be made to healthcare.
We have intraduced, under the leadership of Dr Bray. a monthly training event specific to ail aspects
of substance misuse issues which is held monthly on a Friday afternoon in the Prison Tra ning Centre
The training event is open to all staff at the prison from all disciplines of the various organisations
within the prison and wider region, both healthcare staff and discipline staff. Each session usua ty lasts
for a couple of hours. The training is a mixture of white board training, discussion, group wark, multi-
disciplinary discussions, sharing information and experiences and clinical reviews This training
reinforces the seriousness of substance misuse and overdose issues and emphasises the
inappropriateness and unacceptability of attitudes of complacency and acceptance towards the issues.
Clinical and non-clinical staff attend the training which improves knowledge, liaison and
understanding on all aspects of substance misuse within the custodial environment, as well as learning
and intelligence from the wider community, regionally and nationally
Substance misuse training is also being provided by the organ:sation. Lifeline, which employs the non
chnical Drugs and Alcohol Recovery Team at HMP Durham, which focuses on psycho-social issues,
undertaking a similar role to one undertaken by counsellors, and which provides Psychosocial support
m relation to addictions within the prison.
The clinical guidelines being developed for substance misuse issues will include a treatment plan
template to be included on SystmOne for use in substance misuse cases. The treatment plan will
include ail relevant care options, including the requirement far a care plan and regular observations
Healthcare staff have been reminded of the requirement and importance of making full and
contemporaneous notes in each patient's medical records
it ts my understanding that if any individual is found in medical distress, the first person to find the
individual has responsibility for calling the correct emergency code. As soon as “code blue” ts called, it
automatically triggers the calling of an ambulance by the prison’s contrai room staff, On 4 November
2015, at a full staff meeting of the prison, Mr Tim Allen emphasised the need for the correct cades to
be called in an emergency It is also Planned that posters will be sited for use in discipline staff areas
and training repeated to prison officers in the correct allocation of codes in a healthcare emergency
Recent incidents related to a significant increase in the illicit use of new psychoactive substances at
the prison, have demonstrated a high degree of cooperation and joint working between both
discipline and healthcare staff, with Patients being closely monitored in a wing environment or if
deemed necessary for the individual patient's circumstances, transferred to the healthcare in patent
department or external hospital, until clinically stable
| trust my response addresses the concerns outlined in your recent report.
Yours sincerely
Eric Stephens
Head of Healthcare at HMP Durham
\.
3 Chent Confidential
Ministry of JUSTICE National Offender BURA Management Service National Offender Management Service North East Area HMP Durham Old Elvet Ourham DH1 3HU Telephone 0191 332 3600 Fax 0191 332 3401 14" January 2016 Statement for HM Coroner in relation to the Emergency Code Protocol Sir Following the death of Mr Kevin Anthony Forster on 14" September 2015, while in custody at HMP Durham, the following actions have already been taken by the prison to ensure all staff have a full understanding of the Emergency Code Protocol which covers the use of Codes Blue and Red. These steps were taken prior to the Inquest occurring and were in response to the comments made by the Prison Probation Ombudsmen Report and also from the prison’s own learning exercise that was undertaken following this death. All current staff either directly employed, those employed by HM Prison Service or non-directly employed, those employed by partner agencies for example G4S and Manchester College have signed to say they have full understanding of the protocol and how to implement it. Line managers have satisfied themselves prior to staff signing that the staff members are fully aware as to how the protocol works by gauging there verbal responses to the protocol. All staff have been issued with pocket sized cards explaining the protocol. All residential areas which are the wings on which prisoners live have displayed the protocol in bold colours in prominent places which are A4 size. These posters can be located in the wing main offices which everyone attending a wing must report to. A Governors Notice to Staff has been issued to ensure that all new staff either directly or non-directly employed attend the Safer Custody department and receive a full explanation of the Emergency Code Protocol as part of the joining process. When safer custody staff are satisfied they have full understanding they sign to this effect and are issued with a pocket size card from the Safer Custody department. The Emergency Protocol has been an agenda item on monthly team meetings with staff and the protocol fully explained. It is also discussed at the Safer Prisons meeting as part of a wider discussion on deaths in custody. The Deputy Governor has addressed the emergency protocol issue with all functional heads at meetings and this has been cascaded to staff by line managers The Governor has issued a notice to staff which has been sent out by email and is on the intranet. The Governor also used a full staff meeting to raise this issue with staff. Yours Sincerely A Turpin Mrs Alison Turpin Head of Safer Prisons and Equalities HMP Durham
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.