Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016

Stewart Akins

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016-0091, written 3 Mar 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report3 Mar 2016
Reference2016-0091
DeceasedStewart Akins
CoronerDavid Reid
Coroner areaWorcestershire
CategoryPolice related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

SPECIMEN: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT |S BEING SENT TO:

1. Chief Constable, West Mercia Constabulary

CORONER >

lam DAVID DONALD WILLIAM REID, HM Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of
Worcestershire,

CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 2 June 2015 | commenced an investigation into the death of STEWART AKINS, then
aged 51. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 3 March 2016. The
conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion.

The medical cause of death was 1a. Extensive head injury; 1b. Collision by train.

assaults. He was taken to Worcester Police Station, where his detention was authorised.
Throughout his time in custody it was recorded that Mr. Akins repeatedly stated his
intention to end his own life, and he was properly viewed as presenting a high risk of
suicide and/or self-harm. When he made his first appearance before the Worcester
Magistrates’ Court on 25.5.15, the Court was not told of this risk and no application was
made for him to be remanded in custody because of that risk and for his own protection.
Later that same day, having been released on conditional bail, he took his own life by
placing himself in the path of a train on a railway line near Malvern Walls."

CORONER'S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken, In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

(1) Throughout Mr. Akins’ time in custody, entries were made on the custody record
which recorded his repeatedly stated intention to end his own life. Statements to
that effect were recorded as having been made, inter alia, to the Custody

t, ME to 2 nurse, to a Forensic Medical Examine:
En ou eee acartrenesctea igati at the
end of his police interview. The view was taken that he presented a high risk of
suicide/self-harm.

(2) The officer in charge of the investigation into the offences with which Mr. Akins
was eventually charged, a submitted an MG7 remand application
form for consideration by the Crown Prosecution Service, and with a view to bail
being opposed in the Magistrates’ Court. In that form, she set out objections on

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
The narrative conclusion stated:
"On 23.5.15 Stewart Akins was arrested on suspicion of having committed two domestic

@ number of grounds including a remand for Mr, Akins’ own protection,
However, in giving details substantiating that particular ground for opposing bail
she stated:
“AKINS has a problem with alcohol and mental health, clearly a combination
that does not mix well. AKINS spoke of his suffering with post traumatic stress
disorder (PTSD) and there is @ real concern that, being charged with offences
and now being NFA, he may pose a significant risk to not only those he
encounters, but also to himself. It is therefore requested that a remand in
sought for AKINS own protection, °

evidence at the inquest was that those details substantiating that
ground for opposing bail ( for Mr. Akins’ own protection ) were based solely on
her own dealings with Mr. Akins, and not on what was recorded in the Custody
Record. In fact, she was not aware of any of the entries recorded on the
Custody Record and was therefore not aware of the level of risk of suicide/self-
harm which those in charge of his detention felt that Mr. Akins presented, She
had not sought to check the Custody Record for any such entries, nor to speak
to the Custody Sergeant, nor had the Custody Sergeant sought to make her
aware of such entries.
Because was unaware of the contents of these entries in the Custody
Record, the description in the MG7 of the risk of suicide/self-harm which Mr.
Akins presented was significantly downplayed.
In addition to that under-reporting of risk, prior to the hearing in the Magistrates’
Court, EE was informed by the Senior Crown Prosecutor that she was
considering agreeing to bail with certain conditions. Those conditions did not
address the issue of risk of suicide/self-harm, bull accepted that she
had not sought to raise this with the prosecutor,

(6) A direct result of that under-reporting of risk of suicide/self-harm, and ofl
HE failure to raise it with the prosecutor, was that the prosecutor was minded
to agree to conditional bail as proposed. No objections to bail were raised with

the Magistrates, and conditional bail was duly granted.

{7) 1am therefore concerned that no chain of communication appeared to be in
place whereby [EE was made aware of the risks highlighted in the Custody
Record, so that an MG7 could be properly and fully prepared.

(8) The explanations for this appear to be either:

(i) that provision does not exist generally for such a chain of
communication to be in place; or

(ii) that provision does exist, and that lJ and/or the Custody
Sergeant(s) failed to operate in accordance with such provision

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe that you
have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 29 April 2016. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons:
RE Chicf Crown Prosecutor, CPS West Midlands.

WR brother of deceased )

| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Respondent Not Named (PDF)
GE West Mercia HBC-(s

&} POLICE Ce)

David Shaw
Chief Constable

West Mercia Police Headquarters, Hindlip Hall
PO Box 55, Worcester WR3 8SP

Email: chief@westmercia.pnn.police.uk
Direct Dial: 01905 332233

Your Ref: DDWR/TW/W 1182.15 18" April 2016

Mr D DW Reid

HM Assistant Coroner
Worcestershire Coroner's Court
The Civic

Martins Way

Stourport on Severn
Worcestershire, DY13 8UN.

Dear Mr Reid,

Re: Stewart Akins deceased
Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths

Further to my letter of 10” March 2016 please find below a response in relation to the issues raised
within the Regulation 28 report:

A full review into Mr Akins’ detention was conducted on the 4” June 2015. As you correctly identify,
Mr Akins made a number of comments to persons he encountered within the custody environment
highlighting his intention to harm himself upon his release. | am satisfied that these comments were
properly and accurately recorded on the custody record and presented Mr Akins as an individual
with a high risk of suicide / self harm.

It is clear that there were failings in suitably communicating the degree of risk that was posed by Mr
Akins following his movement from custody to the Magistrates Court. As a result of this incident
West Mercia Police have immediately revised its’ practice to minimise risk and prevent future
deaths by ensuring that all Prisoner Escort Forms (PER), whether completed by a detention officer
or sergeant, are signed as accurate by the custody sergeant responsible for the detainees welfare
prior to their release / movement from custody. The custody sergeant will have overall
responsibility for ensuring that the risks are correctly documented and communicated. This practice
will ensure that all known and documented risks contained within the custody record will travel with
the person and properly inform others in their decision making processes.

West Mercia has also ensured that mandatory training for custody sergeants includes the
awareness of highlighting known risks and concerns to the OIC upon consideration of a MG7
remand application. This will enable prosecutors and the courts to make fully informed decisions
about a person's vulnerabilities and needs.

POLICE NON-EMERGENCY

101 Pe

EMESOENCY

ALWAYS

CALL 999 www. westmercia police.uk v @wmerciapolice west mercia police

| trust that these positive changes and enhanced channels of communication will deter incidents
like this from occurring again.

Yours sincerely,

died ...

David Shaw ‘
Chief Constable

Related reports

Other reports by David Reid

See all →

More reports categorised “Police related deaths”

See all →

Track Police related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Police related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.