Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016

Helen England

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016-0141, written 16 Mar 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report16 Mar 2016
Reference2016-0141
DeceasedHelen England
CoronerJennifer Leeming
Coroner areaManchester (West)
CategorySuicide (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Secretary of State for Health, Jeremy Hunt, House of Commons, London 

SW1A 0AA   

1  CORONER 

I am M Jennifer Leeming, Senior Coroner for the Coroner Area of Manchester 
West 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 
2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On the 3rd of January 2014 I commenced an investigation into the death of 
Helen England, aged 38.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest 
on the 7th March 2016. The conclusion of the inquest was Suicide. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Helen  England  has  suffered  from  Bipolar  Affective  Disorder  since  1999  and 
between that time and her death she had been detained as an in-patient under 
the terms of the Mental Health Act on eleven occasions.  On the 15th October 
2013 Helen England was discharged from an in-patient compulsory admission to 
Leigh Infimary that had been imposed under the terms of the Mental Health Act.  
On  the  same  date  she  was  made  subject  to  a  Mental  Health  Act  Community 
Treatment  Order  containing  certain  conditions.    Whilst  living  in  the  community 
subject to the order Helen was subject to social stresses and her mental health 
deteriorated.  Her behaviour also gave rise to a concern that she was a risk to 
others.    On  the  18th  November  2013  she  was  re-admitted  to  Leigh  Infirmary 
and  was  subsequently  again  detained  as  an  in-patient  under  the  terms  of  the 
Mental  Health  Act.    On  the  13th  December  2013  Helen  was  again  discharged 
from hospital and a second Community Treatment Order was imposed.  Whilst 
in the community Helen again became subject to social and relationship stresses 
as had previously happened.  On the 22nd December 2013 Helen was admitted 
to The Royal Albert Edward Infirmary in Wigan, having self-inflicted a superficial 
cut  to  her  left  wrist  and  a  deep  lacertion  to  her  right  arm.    This  was  the  first 
occasion  in  Helen's  history  upon  which  she  had  demonstrably  self-harmed.  
During the evening of 22nd December Helen was seen by a Registered Mental 
Health Nurse who decided that Helen was not fit for a mental health assessment 
at that time.  There was a plan for Helen to be seen by her Community Support 
Worker the following day, the 23rd December 2013, but this visit was cancelled 
by the Community Team due to Helen's hospital admission.   

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On  the  24th  December  2013,  Helen  underwent  surgery  for  the  injury  to  her 
right  arm  at  The  Royal  Albert  Edward  Infirmary  in  Wigan,  following  which  she 
was  assessed  as  being  medically  fit  for  discharge  at  about  19.30  hours.    At 
approximately 20.30 hours Helen was seen on the ward by the same Registered 
Mental Health Nurse who had previously seen her on the 22nd December.  The 
nurse conducted an assessment of Helen's mental health in the course of which 
Helen  denied  that  she  had  intended  suicide  when  she  had  injured  herself,  nor 
did she admit to having any suicidal ideas at the time of the examination.  The 
nurse decided that Helen did not meet the criteria for detention under the terms 
of the Mental Health Act and it was planned that Helen should be discharged to 
reside  with  her  family  for  the  next  few  days.    The  nurse  was  not  required  to, 
and did not, seek advice from a doctor when making this decision, despite Helen 
being  subject  to  a  Community  Treatment  Order.    The  nurse  was  aware  that 
Helen was subject to the Order, but was not aware of its terms since they were 
not  included  in  the  records  available  to  the  nurse.    There  was  no  protocol  or 
guidance  in  place  for  the  nurse  to  follow  when  considering  whether  or  not  to 
refer  a  decision  to  discharge  a  patient  to  a  doctor,  either  when  a  patient  was 
subject to a Community Treatment Order or at all.  Following Helen's discharge 
on the 24th December  2013, she  did stay with her family  until the morning of 
the 26th December 2013 when she insisted upon returning to her own home at 
5 Sandy Lane Lowton.  At or about 10.42 on the 26th December 2013 Helen's 
mother  telephoned  Mental  Health  Services  to  advise  that  Helen  had  returned 
home and to express concerns about her safety.  In a second telephone call she 
was advised to contact the Police, but she did not feel able to do this.  That call 
ended at about 11.12 hours.  The Mental Health Nurse tried to contact Helen at 
about 11.36 hours and when she could not do so she first  telephoned Helen's 
mother  and  then  the  Police  at  about  11.44  hours.    The  delay  of  twenty  four 
minutes between the  Nurse speaking to Helen's mother and the Nurse ringing 
the Police has not been fully explained.   The Police call taker received the call 
at  11.51  hours  and  graded  it  as  requiring  an  attendance  at  Helen's  address 
within  one  hour,  and  a  Police  Officer  arrived  at  Helen's  home  at  12.11  hours.  
The Officer then waited for the attendance of a second Officer before entering 
the  property,  because  there  was  intelligence  that  one  of  the  occupants  of  the 
property, who was not  Helen,  had  previously injured a Police  Officer attending 
at the address.  A second Police Officer arrived at 12.30 hours and both Officers 
entered  Helen's  home  at  12.31,  where  they  found  Helen  hanging  from  the 
staircase having left notes indicating an intention to end her own life. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action 
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:   

(1) There was no protocol nor any guidance in place for Mental Health Nurses at 
the  5  Boroughs  NHS  Partnership  Foundation  Trust  to  follow  when  considering 
whether or not to refer  to a Doctor a decision to discharge a patient, following 
an  attendance  at,  or  admission  to,  an  acute  Hospital  consequent  upon  an 
episode  of  self-harm,  particularly  when  the  patient  is  subject  to  a  Community 
Treatment Order imposed under the terms of the Mental Health Act.  

2

 
 
 
 
 
 Evidence was given at the Inquest that such guidance will be introduced at the 
5 Boroughs Trust and that it would be welcomed in similar Trusts. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion urgent action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I 
believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action.    

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 10 May 2016.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action 
is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons:- 

, Helen’s Mum 

1. 
2. 
3. 
4.  Andrew Foster CBE, CE , The Royal Albert and Edward Infimary 
5.  Simon Barber, CE, 5 Boroughs Partnership 

 Slater and Gordon Solicitors 

 DAC Beachcroft 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he 
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, 
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication 
of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated 

Signed 

16 March 2016                         

M Jennifer Leeming 

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Respondent Not Named (PDF)
Our Ref: INQ14/423 JC/SB/d
Your ref: MJL/YD REG28HE

15 April 2016

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

M Jennifer Leeming
H.M. Coroner
Coroner’s Office
West District
Paderborn House
Civic Centre

Bolton

BL1 1JW

Dear Ms Leeming

Re: Helen England (Deceased)
D.O.B: 28 May 1975
D.O.D: 26 December 2016

5 Boroughs Partnership NHS]

NHS Foundation Trust

Chief Executive’s Office
Hollins Park House
Hollins Lane

Winwick

Warrington

WA2 8WA

Tel: 01925 664001
Fax: 01925 664052
Email: simon.barber@5bp.nhs.uk

Thank you for your letter of 11 April 2016, received in this office on 12 April 2016,
regarding Helen England and the outcome of the inquest into Helen’s death, which

concluded on 4 March 2016.

| note your concerns, raised at a national level with the Secretary of State for Health,
the RT Hon Jeremy Hunt, regarding the absence of any protocol or guidance for
clinical staff to follow when considering whether or not to refer to a doctor in a
decision to discharge a patient following their attendance at an acute hospital,
particularly in relation to those patients who are subject to a Community Treatment

Order.

A Better View... of mind & body

Chief Executive: Mr. Simon J. Barber it May,

Chairman: Mr. Bernard Pilkington = VW
Trust Headquarters, Hollins Park House, Hollins Lane, Winwick, Warrington, WA2 8WA

a

¢

e
5 é

Mini Com Number 01925 664094 “ersag®

! am writing to inform you that although the Regulation 28 was not aimed specifically
at the Trust | would like to confirm that our Community Treatment Order Procedure
has been amended in light of your concerns and the process for communicating this
to our staff is underway.

If | can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely

Simon Barber
Chief Executive

cc: Andrew Foster, Chief Executive, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS
Foundation Trust, Royal Albert Edward Hospital, Wigan Lane, Wigan, WN1
2NN.
Secretary of State for Health, Jeremy Hunt, House of Commons, London
SW1A OAA

A Better View... of mind & body

Chief Executive: Mr. Simon J. Barber tog,
Chairman: Mr. Bernard Pilkington A
Trust Headquarters, Hollins Park House, Hollins Lane, Winwick, Warrington, WA2 8WA. 6 <

Mini Com Number 01925 664094 Asa

Related reports

Other reports by Jennifer Leeming

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Suicide (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.