Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016-0150, written 21 Apr 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 21 Apr 2016 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2016-0150 |
| Deceased | Mary Walker |
| Coroner | Alison Mutch |
| Coroner area | Manchester (West) |
| Category | Community health care and emergency services related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)
NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Belong Central Office, Pepper House, Market Street, Nantwich, Cheshire
CW5 5DQ
2.
Inspector, Bolton, Wigan and Salford Team, Adult
Social Care Directorate, Care Quality Commission, Citygate, Gallowgate,
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4PA
1 CORONER
I am Alison Mutch Assistant Coroner for the Coroner Area of Manchester West
2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations
2013.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On the 12th October 2015 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mary
Walker aged 91. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 11th
April 2016. The conclusion of the inquest was that she died of natural causes
namely bronchopneumonia.
4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
She developed dementia
Mary Walker resided at
and was cared for by her family. She was admitted to Royal Albert Edward
Infirmary, Wigan after a stroke. She was discharged home but fell and was
readmitted to hospital. She had fractured her ramus pubic. She was
discharged to Belong Village, Atherton on 14th September 2015. She was seen
by two nurse practitioners and the District Nurse. She was thought to have a
urinary infection and was prescribed antibiotics. On 9th October she was put to
bed. She was checked at 10pm, 1am and 4.30am. On 10th October at 5.45am
she was found dead. She had died of bronchopneumonia.
5 CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
1
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
(1) At the inquest there was no specific evidence about what was revealed
in the night time checks that had been carried out upon the deceased.
There was a global summary stating the times at which checks had been
carried out but there was no information as to what the patient’s
condition was at the checks. This procedure requires review.
(2) During the inquest there was a lack of clarity in relation to the
procedures to be followed by Care Assistants when they wanted to
escalate health concerns. This system requires review.
6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion urgent action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe your organisation have the power to take such action.
7 YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this
report, namely by 16th June 2016. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken,
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action
is proposed.
8 COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following
Interested Persons:-
Son of Mary Walker
, Wrightington, Wigan & Leigh NHS Trust
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me,
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication
of your response by the Chief Coroner.
9 Dated
Signed
21st April 2016
Alison P Mutch
Assistant Coroner
2
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Belong Central Office Pepper House Market Street fe WY Nantwich . _ Cheshire CW5 5DQ 27 April 2016 www.belong.org.uk H M Coroner’s Court Paderborn House Howell Croft North Bolton BL1 1QY Dear Ms Lomax | acknowledge receipt of your letter dated 21 April 2016 and the Regulation 28 Report to prevent future deaths. The report confirms that the conclusion of the inquest was that the cause of death of Mary Walker who resided in Belong Wigan, was natural causes namely bronchopneumonia. | note the Coroner’s matters of concerns and would like to provide my response: 1. At the inquest there was no specific evidence about what was revealed during the night checks. The global summary stated the times of the checks but there was no information about the resident’s condition during the checks. | have noted that the report provided a general summary of the resident's condition during the night and therefore it was difficult to determine the exact time of her deterioration. This was a breach of the organisation’s ‘Safe Management of records’ procedure. Actions taken: ° Refresher training has been provided by the management team to all staff in Belong Wigan, on the ‘Safe management of records’ policy and procedures with an emphasis on the importance of accurate recording of progress against dates and times. e Meetings have been held with all senior staff to identify the uses of an approved audit tool to ensure sure safe and correct procedures are being followed. ° Nurses are required to follow policy and procedure and will record any professional advice and direction provided within the customers’ individual records. or“ Belong is part of: CLS Care Services Limited | Registered in England & Wales, Industrial & 4 ¥ INecoRke N PEOPLE Provident Society No. 27346R | VAT No. 887 1375 81 | Registered Office as above. bee 2. During the inquest we failed to provide you with clarity about the procedures. that are used by Support Workers to escalate health concerns. Actions taken: ° All Support Workers have been reminded of the correct procedures to follow and how to seek advice from outside professionals for non-nursing customers in their care, when they need to escalate health concerns. This is incorporated into the care practice training for all staff, to include staff induction, supervision, life plan review and audit. | trust that my response will provide you with the reassurance that we have reviewed and communicated our procedures following the Coroner's concerns over the death of Mary Walker, and therefore improved the safety of our practice. Yours sincerely Wound — Director Belong
Care Quality Commission Citygate Gallowgate Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4PA Telephone: 03000 616161 Her Majesty’s Coroner Manchester West H M Coroner’s Court Paderborn House, Howell Croft North, Bolton, BL1 1QY BY EMAIL 16 June 2016 Your ref: Our ref: MARY WALKER – Deceased, Prevention of future death report Dear HM Coroner We are writing in response to the 21 April 2016 Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Death Report issued by Alison Mutch, Assistant Coroner to Belong Central Office, Pepper House, Market Street, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 5DQ and to , CQC Inspector, Bolton Wigan and Salford Team following the Inquest into the death of Mary Walker. This letter is the CQC’s response to the Report issued to . Following receipt of this Report we held a management review meeting to look at the information we held in relation to this case. At this meeting we took the decision to: firstly, undertake a comprehensive ratings inspection at Belong Wigan Care Village where Mary Walker resided prior to her unfortunate death and to specifically look at actions the provider had taken in response to the Report findings; and secondly, to request copies of the documentation you held so we could also consider if we needed to undertake a criminal investigation. As you are aware from 1 April 2015 CQC is the lead enforcement body for health and safety incidents in the health and social care sector. As Mary Walker’s death occurred after 1 April 2015 CQC considered when undertaking its inspection whether further investigations or criminal enforcement were appropriate. We noted the response provided to you by the registered provider, CLS Care Services Limited known as Belong on 27 April 2016. In light of this response it was not felt necessary for CQC to contact the registered provider to request written confirmation and 1 evidence of the action they have taken to date following this death and any additional action they intended to take in response to the prevention of future death report. However, we did consider the response sent to you during the course of proceedings as part of the comprehensive inspection we undertook. We undertook an inspection at Belong Wigan Care Village across two days, the 06 and 16 May 2016. We found steps had been taken by the provider to respond to the concerns identified in the Regulation 28 report. The detail relating to this can be found in the ‘safe’ and ‘well led’ sections of the report. We found a flow chart for unexpected changes in health had been developed and given to every member of staff and was displayed within each household at the service. On the 2nd day of the inspection all the night staff were spoken with, and all were able to describe the procedure that was in place. We found that a night time record sheet had been introduced. The record was time specific and was completed by staff as people's care and support needs were met. This meant clear and concise records were now being maintained throughout the night, which enabled management to illicit information regarding people's health and care needs and the specific time at which things had occurred. We spoke to 11 night staff who confirmed the records had been implemented immediately following the issue being identified. As a result of our inspection we have provisionally rated the service as ‘good’ subject to the factual accuracy process. The report of our inspection is currently in draft form. We have provided this draft report as an attachment to this letter as a disclosure permitted under S.79 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008. We would respectfully request that this draft report is not widely published at this time. We will publish a final report of our inspection as soon as it is possible for us to do so. Thank you for providing us with disclosure during the Coronial investigation. We can confirm that following our inspection and a review of these documents we do not intend to undertake further investigations in relation to the death of Mary Walker or the provision of regulated activities by CLS Care Services Limited. Yours sincerely, Head of Inspection 2
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care and emergency services related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.