Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2016
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2016-0243, written 30 Jun 2016. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 30 Jun 2016 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2016-0243 |
| Deceased | Luisa Mendes |
| Coroner | Tom Leeper |
| Coroner area | Warwickshire |
| Category | Police related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. The Chief Constable of Warwickshire Police 1 | CORONER lam Tom Leeper, Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of Warwickshire 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 16/11/12 an investigation was commenced into the death of Luisa Mendes (dob 12 April 1968). The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 02/06/16. The conclusion of the inquest was That the Deceased had died from = 1a. Haemoperitoneum * 1b. Peliosis of the spleen with rupture ® 2. Cirrhosis of the liver (alcohol) The Jury returned a narrative conclusion which included findings that there were errors or omissions, which possibly caused or contributed to the death, in the following areas involving the Warwickshire Police: e inthe response to telephone calls made to the Police on the evening of 24 October 2012 in not upgrading the categorisation of the incident from rowdy to nuisance; e inthe handover process between controllers; e inthe deferring of a response to the incident until the following morning; e inthe ability of controllers to configure the display on their computer screens; in the supervision of the control room over 24-25 October 2012. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On 25 October 2012, between 1000 and 1100 hours, Luisa Mendes was pronounced deceased at 27 Briar Close, Leamington Spa. The death was due to a catastrophic bleed to the abdomen caused by a rupture to her spleen. The rupture was a result of a deliberate application of force by a third party caused during or after telephone calls to police on the evening of 24 October 2012. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — (1) The approach of controllers and call handlers to the categorisation of incidents which include allegations of violence. The basis for the concern is that the incident should have been categorised as “violent” but it was not. (2) The handover procedures between controllers coming on and off shift in the Operations and Communications Centre. The basis for the concern is that there are no formalised procedures and no specific training in relation to handovers between controllers coming on and off shift. (3) The set up of the STORM computer system as it relates to deferrals. The basis for the concern is the absence of any feature on the STORM computer system which will alert management to the effect that an unauthorised deferral has been effected by a controller. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe your organisation has the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 25/08/16 |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the Interested Persons. iS lam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. DATED 30/06/16 T.R.G.LEEPER [SIGNED BY CORONER]
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Our Ref:
Your Ref: Regulation 28 Report
Mr T R G Leeper
Assistant Coroner
Coroners Office
Warwickshire Justice Centre
Newbold Terrace
Leamington Spa
Warwickshire CV32 4EL
Dear Mr Leeper,
22nd August 2016
Martin Jelley
Chief Constable
Warwickshire Police
Executive Team
Warwickshire Justice Centre
Newbold Terrace
Leamington Spa
Warwickshire CV32 4EL
Telephone:
Thank you for your letter dated the 30th June and the corresponding regulation 28 report
contained therein. Please find below a comprehensive response to the issues raised.
It is the vision of Warwickshire Police to protect people from harm, with an aspiration of being
great at protecting the most vulnerable. Any improvements that can be made to meet this vision
are taken very seriously. The death of Luisa Mendes is deeply regretted by Warwickshire Police
and we are determined that we will do things differently in the future to try to prevent deaths of a
similar nature. We have personally apologised to the family of Luisa for our failings.
Specifically in response to the concerns raised in your regulation 28 report, I can update as
follows:
www.warwickshire.police.uk
www.westmercia.police.uk
@warkspolice
@wmerciapolice
warwickshire police
west mercia police
1. The approach of controllers and call handlers to the categorisation of incidents which
include allegations of violence. The basis for the concern is that the incident should have
been categorised as ‘violent’ but it was not.
I consider that the focus of controllers and call handlers should be on the need and immediacy
of response rather than the assessed categorisation of any incident. This response should be
focused on the threat, harm, risk and vulnerability of all those who seek our help.
To ensure this happens all staff have been trained regarding the identification of threat, harm,
risk and vulnerability using the National Decision Making model (NDM) as part of their induction
process. As an additional aide to appropriate information capture and decision making, this is
being complemented by the introduction of the THRIVE model, (Threat, Harm, Risk,
Investigation, Vulnerability, Engagement). This provides a framework for staff to consider the
issues evident in each individual case and provide the most appropriate response, assessing
the needs of the caller. This training on NDM and THRIVE was refreshed to all Operations and
Communications Centre (OCC) staff between January and March 2016. All training will be kept
under review with appropriate refresher training given on an ongoing basis.
Additionally to add context, increase professional knowledge and to aid decision making, staff
have been provided with specific inputs around protecting vulnerable people from harm. Officers
and staff with specialist knowledge have provided bespoke training around high harm issues
such as Domestic Abuse, Mental Health and Child Sexual Exploitation at OCC training days.
These sessions are supported where applicable by on-line learning and knowledge checks
provided by the College of Policing.
More recently, we have commenced innovative one day workshops to encourage and develop
our staff to recognise and respond to vulnerability. These workshops will include all relevant
staff within Warwickshire Police and are at the core of the ambition I have of protecting the most
vulnerable in our society. To support these workshops, all supervisors and managers are being
provided with additional inputs in how we can support our staff in dealing with the challenging
issues that this ambition will create. The workshops are pioneering within policing and their
impact will be subject of academic assessment by Worcester University. The workshops
commenced in July and will have been delivered to all relevant Warwickshire officers and staff
by December 2016.
I have been reassured that all our OCC staff are provided with appropriate training in a
consistent manner. An experienced OCC Manager has responsibility for staff development and
for quality assurance.
2. The handover procedures between controllers coming on and off shift in the
Operations and Communications Centre (OCC). The basis of the concern is that there are
no formalised procedures and no specific training in relation to handovers between
controllers coming on and off shift.
Compelling evidence was identified during the preparation and ultimate delivery of the evidence
to the inquest that showed the handover procedure between controllers in the OCC required
improvement. However, the complex and varied nature of the calls received within the OCC
means that the handover process must be dynamic and cannot be subject of an over-
prescriptive process. It has been recognised that there was a need to reinforce the critical
importance of passing vital information between controllers. In order to achieve this, changes
have been made to the initial training programme for controllers and additional requirements
incorporated into the controller ‘task book’, which is a list of skills that controllers need to
demonstrate before progression in their role. Additionally, we are exploring the option of an
electronic reminder for controllers that will pop-up and remind them of the requirements of
handovers when they log on to the system and commence their handover; this is dependent on
whether the current system allows for such a development. This is being researched and we
await a response as to its feasibility.
3. The set up of the STORM computer system as it relates to deferrals. The basis for the
concern is the absence of any feature on the STORM computer system which will alert
management to the effect that an unauthorised deferral has been effected by a controller.
There remains a difficulty with substantive technical adaptations to the STORM system as it is
used by a large number of police forces and other emergency service providers. After
discussions with the company who own the system, Sopra-Steria, we have identified a change
to the system that we are seeking to introduce in the next few weeks that will provide some
mitigation to the issue of unauthorised deferrals. This change is still under development and it is
intended that it will provide an alert on all priority incidents out of time. It is recognised that this
does not prevent irregular deferrals being made, however within the current restraints of the
system, is considered the best change we can deliver.
The change will be in addition to the reinforcement of the policy in relation to deferrals and the
commitment that for a given period, all deferred priority incidents should be subject to checks to
ensure that they were deferred with the consent of a supervisor. This will also serve to reinforce
the training that no priority incident should be deferred without the consent of a supervisor. It
addresses the deferral issue because, if the incident in question has been deferred, either
rightly or wrongly, the system will automatically re-activate it and then send the relevant alerts.
Finally, Warwickshire Police and West Mercia Police are in the advanced stages of the
procurement of a new Command and Control system. We are building the new platform with
the suppliers, to our specifications, which will include the changes required as a result of the
learning through the inquest. This will include the correct authority level around deferring
incidents.
I hope that the above response adequately answers your concerns in relation to the matters
raised. Please be assured that we take this matter seriously and would welcome any further
feedback you may have. We will take all practical steps to minimise the danger to members of
the public now and in the future.
Yours sincerely
Martin Jelley
Chief Constable
Warwickshire Police
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Police related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.