Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017

Lucy Goldstone

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0168, written 26 May 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report26 May 2017
Reference2017-0168
DeceasedLucy Goldstone
CoronerFiona Borrill
Coroner areaManchester City
CategoryOther related deaths · Railway related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

•  Secretary of State for Health, DoH 
•  Secretary of State for Transport, DoT 

Copied for interest to: 

•  Family of the deceased 
•  Chief Coroner 

1 

CORONER 

I am Fiona Borrill, H.M. Area Coroner for the area of Manchester City. 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INQUEST 

The deceased, Lucy Francesca Goldstone, DoB 4.10.1997 died on 7 April 2016 at 
Manchester Royal Infirmary.  I dealt with the inquest into her death on 24 February 2017 
and recorded the pathological cause of death as: 

1a  

Bronchial asthma and aspiration of food material 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

The deceased had a history of chronic asthma had a severe asthma attack and became 
unresponsive on a tram in Manchester City centre shortly after boarding at 
approximately 22.15hrs on 7 April 2016.  By-stander Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation 
(CPR) was carried out.  North West Ambulance Service attended and administered CPR 
in accordance with Advance Life Support protocols.  The deceased was transferred to 
Manchester Royal Infirmary where despite further CPR death was confirmed at 
23.29hrs. I returned a Natural Causes Conclusion. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 

I heard from a witness who was the Safety Health and Environment Manager for 
Metrolink RATM DeV Limited (MRDL) who at the time of this incident was contracted by 
Transport for Greater Manchester to operate the tram network known as Metrolink that 
covers the Greater Manchester area.  I was informed that in relation to the availability of 
Automated Electronic Defibrillator that no AEDs are provided on any of the trams or at 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 any of the tram stops on the network, and that it is not a legal requirement or industry 
standard practise for AEDs to be available across the various tram networks in the 
United Kingdom.  I was also informed that some of the larger rail and bus stations now 
have AEDs available and that in the absence of a Defibrillator the process in an 
emergency is to contact the emergency services immediately.  In this case there was no 
evidence that the present of a Defibrillator on the tram would have made a difference to 
the outcome on the balance of probabilities, however at the conclusion at the inquest I 
indicated that I would submit a Regulation 28 report to the Department of Health and the 
Department of Transport to be updated as to the current provision and guidance as to 
the availability of AEDs. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your 
organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by Friday 21 July 2017.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to Interested Persons. I have 
also sent it to organisations who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

DATE:                                            NAME OF CORONER: 

26 May 2017  

Fiona Borrill, HM Area Coroner 
Manchester City Area 

2

Related reports

Other reports by Fiona Borrill

See all →

More reports categorised “Other related deaths”

See all →

Track Railway related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Railway related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.