Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2017

Ivy Mitchell

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2017-0453, written 18 Jul 2017. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report18 Jul 2017
Reference2017-0453
DeceasedIvy Mitchell
CoronerAlison Mutch
Coroner areaManchester South
CategoryCare Home Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS.

“| REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The Manager of Fairfield View Care Centre, The
Chief Executive of Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
CORONER

lam Alison Mutch , Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of South Manchester
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations
2013

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 27" January 2017 | commenced an investigation into the death
of Ivy Mitchell. The investigation concluded on the 11" July 2017 and
the conclusion was one of Narrative: Died as a result of natural
causes with a contribution being made by injuries sustained in an
accidental fall. The medical cause of death was 1a Left sided
bronchopneumonia; i! _ Left subcapital fracture

Circumstances of the Death

Ivy Mitchell was a resident at a care home. She had a history of falls. On 29th
December 2016 she had a fall in her room. She appeared to mobilise
afterwards. On the evening of 29th December she said she felt unwell. On 30th
December following a discussion with her GP, a taxi was called and she went to
Tameside General Hospital. A subcapital fracture and pneumonia was
diagnosed. She was initially too unwell for surgery. She was operated on, on 7th
January 2017. She dislocated her hip on 19th January 2017 but was not suitable
for further surgery. She began to show further signs of infection on 25th
January 2017. She deteriorated and died on 26th January 2017.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving rise to
concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action

is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

1. The documentation relating to the falls risk was inaccurate. It did not refer to
previous falls and did not reflect her mobility;

2. There was a lack of understanding amongst the care home staff of risk
assessments; reviews and the required process following a fall. This included
documenting observations after a fall.

3. Processes relating to escalation following a fall were not complied with; and
4. There was a lack of understanding of the trigger for a referral to the
community nutrition team.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you
have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this

report, namely by 12" September 2017. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken,
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action
is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner, CQC and to the following
Interested Persons namely daughter of the deceased, who
may find it useful or of interest.

lam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me,
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication
of your response by the Chief Coroner.

Alison Mutch 0.B.E
HM Senior Coroner
18" July 2017

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Fairfield View Care Centre (PDF)
FAIRFIELD VIEW

CARE C EN TRE

st ee
31° August 2017 | i, JBIVED
Miss A Mutch erp on}

HM Senior Coroner | (41 SEP col
Coroners Court ee CH.
1, Mount Tabor Street a
Stockport

SKI 3AG

Dear Miss Mutch
Re: Mrs Ivy Mitchell

I enclose my reply, in response to regulation 28 in the case of Mrs Ivy Mitchell. | have now
audited ail the documentation in relation to falls and mobility of all the service users. In
relation to Mrs Mitchell, | accept that the documentation and risk assessments did not
accurately reflect her falls or mobility, which has caused me great concern.

Senior staff attended the meeting held in relation to documentation and the falls
procedure. Details of which, I enclose. This information has been cascaded down to staff, and
the importance of completing all the relevant documentation was discussed at length. I have
emphasised the failings in relation to Mrs Mitchell, and that we must ensure it does not
happen again to any of the service users. | am now auditing all care plans and daily records on
a daily and weekly basis, to ensure accuracy regarding risk assessments, and that
documentation in the event of a fall is completed accurately and in a timely manner,

Unit Managers, Deputies and Senior Care Staff are undertaking a course on care planning,
this will commence in September of this year with Tameside College. This will include how
to complete an accurate risk assessment as well as identifying the needs of the service user.
This course will provide them with more knowledge about the importance of documentation
and of the need to involve the service user, where there is capacity, or their relatives in all
care planning activities.

[have again made staff aware of the referral process that needs to be completed where there is.
a cause for concer over the nutritional status of a service user. This is an area that | will also
be auditing on a regular basis and giving advice about referrals where | feel it is necessary to
do so. | have enclosed the nutritional referral form that is used by the Community Dieticians
for all referrals in the community.

te sage Fairheld View Care Cenure, 85 Manchester Road, Audenshaw, Manchester M34 5GB
Telephone: 0161-170 6719 Fax: 0161-370 8429
1 et

1 remaee Dnwetors: | Awsedah, Ht, Meredah, & Mosedity (NVESTON IN tures,

I hope my response addresses your concerns in relation to the regulation 28 notice. If you
require any further information on this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely

scam Manager

Enc.

Related reports

Other reports by Alison Mutch

See all →

More reports categorised “Care Home Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Care Home Health related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.