Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0070, written 8 Mar 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 8 Mar 2018 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2018-0070 |
| Deceased | Bernard Gerrard |
| Coroner | Rachel Syed |
| Coroner area | Derby and Derbyshire |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Community health care and emergency services related deaths |
| Organisation named | East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
= “OR IFO ot RON ET MON. REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. The Chief Executive, NHS Hardwick CCG, Scarsdale Hospital, Nightingale Close, Off Newbold Road, Chesterfield, S41 7PF 2. The Chief Executive, East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust 1 Horizon Place, Mellors Way, Nottingham, NG8 6PY 1 CORONER | am RACHEL SYED, Assistant Coroner, for the Coroner area of DERBY & DERBYSHIRE 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 14 December 2017, an Inquest was opened into the death of BERNARD LESLIE GERRARD which was concluded on Wednesday 28" February 2018. The conclusion of the inquest was Natural Causes and the medical cause of death being 1a. Bronchopneumonia, 1b. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, II. Left Fracture Neck of Femur. During proceedings, the Court heard Pathology evidence which confirmed that the bronchopneumonia caused by the underlying Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease had resulted in Mr Gerrard's fall. 4 | CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr Gerrard sustained injuries following an unwitnessed fall which occurred in his bedroom at around 5pm on 28 November 2017 at the Milford Care Home where he resided, The care home buzzer was activated and the person that discovered Mr Gerrard, dressed his arm wound whilst waiting for other carers to attend. During this period, Mr Gerrard was not noted to be in any pain and there was no shortening of the limbs. 111 was called to request the attendance of the District Nurse. Mr Gerrard was reassessed by care home staff, moved off the floor into his armchair using the hoist and was noted to sound breathless, also indicating to staff that his thigh was sore. At 17:40, 111 called back and were informed of Mr Gerrard's breathlessness and his inability to stand. The care home were advised not to move Mr Gerrard further until the ambulance arrived on scene. According to the Care Home Investigation Report, they had contacted East Midlands Ambulance Service at 18:45, 20:45, 23:11, 03:47 before an ambulance finally arrived on scene at 05:30 on 29 November 2017. Mr Gerrard was transported to Royal Derby Hospital for treatment and care where investigations revealed a Left Fracture Neck Of Femur. Despite the best efforts of his treating clinicians, Mr Gerrard died on 02 December 2017. The care home raised concerns that it had taken 12 hours for an ambulance to respond to Mr Gerrard. The Court heard evidence from an East Midlands Emergency Operations Centre Quality, Audit and Compliance Clinical Lead, that there had been a 10 hour delay in responding to Mr Gerrard, stating the initial 111 referral call, had been time stamped at 18:19 and correctly categorised as a Category 3 response, meaning that a conveying vehicle should respond within 2 hours, in 9 out of 10 cases. East Midlands Ambulance Service (EMAS) conceded at the latest an ambulance should have arrived on scene by 20:19. During evidence, EMAS explained that they had received 3 calls from the care home, at 19:44, 20.58 and 23:07 and a clinician call back had been undertaken at 20:40 confirming there were vehicle shortages resulting in ambulance delays. During the call they advised the care home to monitor the patient’s condition and if there was any deterioration, EMAS should be re-contacted. At 03:10, EMAS correctly re-graded Mr Gerrard’s condition to a Category 2 response, meaning that a conveying vehicle should respond within 18 minutes in 9 out of 10 cases, to reflect his breathing deterioration. EMAS accepted that the upgraded response should have resulted in an ambulance arrival by 03:30 at the latest. An ambulance finally arrived on scene at 04:20, some 10 hours after receiving the initial 111 referral. The Category 3 and upgraded Category 2 responses both fell well outside of the National Response Standards required. EMAS stated that the reasons for the delays were that they had no available resources to deploy due to high Service demands. EMAS accepted that the vehicle response time was unacceptable and stated that the Service could not cope due to insufficient resources and lack of funding. EMAS stated that during the period in question, they were holding three Category 2 calls and eleven Category 3 calls. When asked if these callers had also been waiting over 9 hours fora vehicle response, the reply was probably. EMAS went on to explain that they received the third lowest amount of ambulance funding in the Country which had recently been debated at Parliamentary level and without further funding they could not function. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — (1) There was a 10 hour vehicle response delay to attend to a Category 3 call. When the call was eventually upgraded to a Category 2 response, there was a further 50 minute delay. EMAS report that they cannot cope with the current demands placed on their service due to insufficient funding which is resulting in unacceptable vehicle response times ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by Thursday 03 May 2018. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 08 March 2018 Raskel. Syed Rachel Syed, Assistant Coroner for Derby and Derbyshire
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust Trust Headquarters 1 Horizon Place Mellors Way Nottingham Business Park Nottingham NG8 6PY Telephone: 0115 884 5000 Fax: 0115 884 5001 Website: www.emas.nhs.uk Our Ref: SB/Coroners 30 April 2018 Miss Rachel Syed Assistant Coroner for Derby and Derbyshire Coroner's Court St Katherine’s House St Mary Mary's Wharf Mansfield Road Derby DE1 3TQ Dear Miss Syed Re: Report to Prevent Future Deaths: Bernard Leslie GERRARD (deceased) Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths, dated 9th March 2018 (received on 12 March 2018), bringing to my attention HM Coroner's concerns arising from the Inquest into the death of Mr Bernard Leslie Gerrard. | would like to assure you that within the East Midlands Ambulance Service (EMAS) all matters related to patient safety are taken extremely seriously. In particular, matters arising from Coroners’ Inquests from which lessons can be learnt, including Prevention of Future Death Reports, are discussed within the incident Review Group and Lessons Learned Group. This process has been applied to the Prevention of Future Deaths notice pertaining to the Inquest into the death of Bernard Leslie Gerrard. Chief Executive: Richard Henderson Chairman: Pauline Tagg Emergency Care | Urgent Care | We Care The MATTERS OF CONCERN specific to EMAS are as follows: There was a 10 hour vehicle response delay to attend a Category 3 call. When the call was eventually upgraded to a Category 2 response, there was a further 50 minute delay. EMAS report that they cannot cope with the current demands placed on their service due to insufficient funding which is resulting in unacceptable vehicle response times. | set out below the actions that EMAS proposes to take and our response to HM Coroner’s concerns as detailed in the PFD notice. EMAS acknowledges its responsibility to enact a duty of care to all patients. East Midlands Ambulance Service (EMAS) does not believe it is funded correctly to deliver the service our patients require. As a result the EMAS 2016/17, Urgent and Emergency Ambulance Contract, documented the agreement made between the Commissioners and ourselves to undertake a jointly commissioned Independent Strategic Demand and Capacity Review, to understand the number of staff we require to deliver the nationally agreed standards. Within that agreement EMAS formally committed to the implementation of the outcome of the review, while Commissioners formally committed to support the implementation of the outcome. Due to the implementation of the national standards following the introduction of the Ambulance Response Programme in July 2017, the review concluded at the end of March. The review has confirmed that EMAS has a substantial resource gap and requires approximately 295 additional frontline operational staff and 48 additional staff to work within the Emergency Operations Centre to enable us to deliver the nationally defined performance standards. Negotiations are currently on-going with our Coordinating Commissioner regarding the contract settlement for 2018/19 and 2019/20. We are expecting negotiations to be concluded in early May. In anticipation of the settlement EMAS has produced a workforce and recruitment plan which will enable us to recruit and train these new staff so that they become operational during 2018/19 and the early part of 2019/20. As part of this review the Trust has already established an Urgent Care Transport Service (UCTS) which went live on Tuesday 3 April. We operate 25 crews on duty across the region responding to patients who either require urgent admission to hospital, as determined by their general practitioner or other healthcare professional (HCP), or who have low acuity healthcare needs as assessed by our Clinical Assessment Team or frontline emergency crews. The crews are dispatched by a dedicated urgent care desk based in our Emergency Operations Centre and we have noted a positive impact on the times patient wait for an ambulance. Each day the crews are responding to over 90 patients, ensuring they reach hospital safely and promptly. This has resulted at peak times in a five hour reduction in the length of time patients are waiting for an ambulance to arrive. The provision of the Urgent Care Team Service has reduced the number of patients requiring an A&E response, which results in a reduction in the number of patients experiencing a prolonged wait. | hope that the measures set out in this letter provide you with the appropriate level of assurance in relation to EMAS’ commitment to continuous improvement of services. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any additional information, or any clarification, in connection with the above. Yours sincerely _#t S Richard Henderson Chief Executive
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.