Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020

Daniel Moran

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0072, written 15 Jan 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report15 Jan 2020
Reference2020-0072
DeceasedDaniel Moran
CoronerRachel Syed
Coroner areaManchester (West)
CategoryMental Health related deaths · Suicide (from 2015)
Organisation namedGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)

NO.

TE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

[| REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. Chief Executive of Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS
Foundation Trust, Trust Headquarters, Bury New Road, Prestwich,
Manchester,M25 3BL

Fr | CORONER
I am Rachel Syed, HM Assistant Coroner for the Coroner Area of Manchester
West.
i
2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS |
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations
2013.
|
3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On the 18" July 2019, I commenced an Investigation into the death of Daniel
Jeffrey Moran, born on the 20% November 1986, The Investigation concluded
at the end of the Inquest on the 08" January 2020.

The medical cause of death was: -

Ta. Hanging

The Inquest conclusion was, The deceased died as a consequence of injuries
sustained from self-application of a ligature. He left notes expressing his
intention to end his own life. Despite muitiple suicide attempts in the period
leading up to his death, he was not deemed suitable to be detained under the
Mental Health Act. If the deceased had been detained under the Mental Health

window on the date in question.

Act, he would not have had the Opportunity to partially suspend himself from a
4

2019, the deceased was admitted to hospital as a voluntary patient. During

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

The dec unced dead on the 14th July 2019, at his home address
of | Bolton, having used a rope as a ligature to partially
suspend himself from a window. The deceased left goodbye notes expressing

his intentions to end his own life. The deceased had a complex medical history
including depression and alcohol misuse and had attempted to end his own life
on multiple occasions in the period leading up to his death. The deceased was
taken to hospital on 11th July 2019 due to a suicide attempt. On 12th July

1

[

| this period, he became aggressive and agitated and requested self-discharge

from hospital. He was assessed as not meeting the criteria to be detained
under the Mental Health Act and self-discharged from hospital, contrary to
medical advice and was found dead on the above date.

cai CORONER'S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
During the Inquest, evidence was heard that: -

1. Staff were unaware of the situations where it was appropriate to breach
patient confidentiality and notify family or friends, when concerns arose
regarding patient safety/welfare.

2. Ward staff needed to have a greater understanding of how to prioritise
new admissions and ensure the better flow of patients through the ward

3. Ward staff and ward doctors need to have a greater understanding of
each other's roles and responsibilities in relation to managing patient risk
and whose responsibility it is to authorise leave and ensuring
contemporaneous documentation are kept in relation to the decision
making rationale (documenting any changes in risk and capacity),

4. Doctors and ward staff involved in making decisions about self -
discharge should consider the circumstances of admission as well as
current risks when making decisions around discharge. They also need a
greater understanding of the circumstances when it is appropriate to
seek more senior opinions in regards to whether the patients meets the
criteria to be detained under the Mental Health Act, section 5 (2) and
ensuring contemporaneous documentation are kept in relation to their
decision making rationale.

I request that you undertake a review to ensure staff receive the appropriate

“6 __| training on the issues identified above.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion urgent action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe that you have the power to take such action.

4

te

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this
report, namely by 11 March 2020. I, the Coroner, may extend the period,

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken,
Setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action
iS proposed.

8 | COPIES and PUBLICATION ‘|

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following
Interested Persons:-

1 RE 22:02:01 fomiy

T am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or
summary form.

He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it
useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the Coroner, at the
time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by
the Chief Coroner.

9 | Dated Signed |
15 January 2020 ye /

Rachel Syed
HM Assistant Coroner

Related reports

Other reports by Rachel Syed

See all →

More reports categorised “Mental Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.