Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018

Stephen Tidey

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0140, written 8 May 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report8 May 2018
Reference2018-0140
DeceasedStephen Tidey
CoronerAnna Loxton
Coroner areaSurrey
CategoryState Custody related deaths · Police related deaths · Suicide (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

IN THE SURREY CORONER’S COURT 
IN THE MATTER OF: 

__________________________________________________________ 

The Inquest Touching the Death of Stephen Ian William Tidey  
A Regulation 28 Report – Action to Prevent Future Deaths 
__________________________________________________________ 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

  Ms Fiona Edwards, Chief Executive, Surrey & Borders Partnership 
NHS Foundation Trust, 18 Mole Business Park, Leatherhead, 
Surrey KT22 7AD 

  Ms Joanna Killian, Chief Executive, Surrey County Council, 
Contact Centre, Room 269-298, County Hall, Penrhyn Road, 
Kingston upon Thames, Surrey KT1 2DN 

  Mr Nick Ephgrave, Chief Constable, Surrey Police, PO Box 101, 

Guildford, Surrey GU1 9PE 

1  CORONER 

Ms Anna Loxton, HM Assistant Coroner for Surrey 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7(1) of Schedule 5 to The Coroners 
and Justice Act 2009. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 
The inquest into the death of Stephen Ian William Tidey was opened on 
6th January 2017.  It was resumed and concluded on 13th April 2018.  

I found the medical cause of death to be:  

     1a. External Neck Compression 
     1b. Hanging 

I determined that Mr Tidey took his own life, in part, because it was not  
managed despite the fact that the risk of him doing so was recognised by 
the Criminal Justice Liaison and Diversion Service and by Police officers 
who completed Adult at Risk referral forms. 

RT4563 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Stephen Tidey was found hanging deceased from a tree outside a cabin in 
which he had been residing at Woodsmoke, Farley Heath, Guildford. He 
had self-inflicted wounds to both wrists and a note was found on his 
body stating that he intended to end his life to spare his family further 
suffering.  

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

Mr Tidey was arrested on 3rd February 2016 and, whilst in police custody, 
a 24/39 Adult at Risk or Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub (“MASH”) form 
was completed by police officers giving a Red RAG status with high risk 
of suicide indicated if his relationship with his partner and specifically 
his daughter were to fail, and if he lost his job, which were contingent 
events.  
He was assessed by a member of the Criminal Liaison and Diversion 
Service (CLDS) on the same day and was initially assessed by them as 
being at risk of self-harm. The member of the CLDS subsequently 
telephoned the Home Treatment Team to discuss referring him to the 
service. Mr Tidey was then re-assessed by the same member of the CLDS 
who stated he appeared calmer and was no immediate risk to himself. No 
notes were recorded on the Police or Mental Health Service computer 
system to record how this assessment of reduced risk of self-harm had 
been reached.  
During the following months, no contact was made by mental health 
services with Mr Tidey, and he did not seek their assistance.  
On 26th October 2016 he attended Guildford Police Station to be charged 
with the offences and was assessed by Police and a member of the CLDS 
as being at low risk of harm to self. 
On Friday 16th December 2016, Police were made aware that Mr Tidey 
had lost his job as a consequence of being charged with the offences and 
therefore that one of the contingent events highlighted in the MASH 
referral of 3.2.2016 as placing Mr Tidey at higher risk of self-harm had 
materialised. They therefore completed a further MASH referral form 
and this was emailed to the MASH hub at 15.40 and forwarded on to 
Waverley CMHRS at 16.41.  
On Monday 19th December 2016 at 11.30am, Waverley CMHRS 
forwarded the MASH report to Guildford CMHRS, but then emailed 
again at 11.36am to state they noted Waverley CMHRS should actually 
follow up Mr Tidey. However, for reasons, which cannot be ascertained, 
no further action was taken. It is not possible to ascertain who the duty 

RT4563 

2 

 
 
 
 
 worker was who received the referral by email.  

, Community Services Manager for South West 

Community Mental Health Recovery Service, stated in evidence that had 
he received Mr Tidey’s MASH referral on 16th December 2016, he would 
have taken action the same day, initially via a telephone triage 
assessment and then via the options available of HTT referral; EDT 
Mental Health Act Assessment, crisis planning with safe havens or 
CMHRS non-crisis support, as appropriate.  
Evidence was given that there were no safeguards in place to check 
referrals were being acted upon, and that this remains the case.  
Mr Tidey was found deceased on 22nd December 2016, the day before he 
was due to attend Court for sentencing.  

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are: 

-  How MASH reports are processed by the MASH team upon 

receipt; 

-  Whether there is an effective system in place to ensure that MASH 
reports are followed up by the appropriate Community Mental 
Health Team (where necessary); and  

-  Whether there is an effective system in place to deal appropriately 
with MASH referrals received outside normal weekday office 
hours, and that those completing the MASH referral forms (e.g. 
Police officers) know where these should be send outside normal 
working hours when a high risk is identified 

Consideration should be given to whether any steps can be taken to 
address the above concerns.  

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I 
believe that the people listed in paragraph one above have the power to 
take such action.  

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of its date; I 
may extend that period on request. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be 
taken, setting out the timetable for such action. Otherwise you must 
explain why no action is proposed. 

RT4563 

3 

 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 8  COPIES 

I have sent a copy of this report to the following: 

1.  See names in paragraph 1 above 
2. 
3.  The Chief Coroner 

In addition to this report, I am under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a 
copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who, 
he believes, may find it useful or of interest. You may make 
representations to me  at the time of your response, about the release or 
the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.  

Signed: 

ANNA LOXTON  

DATED this 8th day of May 2018 

RT4563 

4

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Surrey Borders NHS Trust (PDF)
INS)

Surrey and Borders
Partnership
NHS Foundation Trust

Nursing Directorate
Trust HQ

18 Mole Business Park
Randalls Road
Leatherhead

Surrey KT22 7AD
Tel: 01372 216008

xX 01372 203360
Email:

Dear Ms Loxton

Stephen lan William Tidey (deceased)
Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths (PFD)

am writing further to the PFD report that you sent to Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS
Foundation ‘Trust (the Trust) in relation to Mr Stephen Tidey, who sadly died on 22™ December
2016.-Thank you for taking the time to investigate his death so thoroughly and for bringing the
matters of concern you have to our attention.

In response to your concerns, the Trust has actioned the following:

4. We have met with our Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) colleagues from Surrey
County Council to discuss this case and the learning that can be taken from it.

2. Since Mr Tidey’s death, we have already implemented a standardised log across all of our
Community Mental Health Recovery Service (CMHRS) teams, which must be used to
record all of the 39/24 forms (now referred to as Single Combined Assessment of Risk
Form (SCARF)) that are received by the CMHRS. The log must record the date the SCARF
is received, the name to whom the SCARF relates and what action has been taken in
response. | have received assurances that these logs are now being completed by the

CMHRS teams.

3. However, we have also devised a new checking system between the MASH and the
CMHRS teams. In the future, when the Trust’s practitioner within the MASH receives a
SCARF -form which indicates a high risk to an individual and which the practitioner
considers requires urgent action by the CMHRS team, a phone call will be made by the

. MASH practitioner to the relevant CMHRS to check that the SCARF has been received and
to notify the CMHRS that action is required urgently.

_. "We discussed whether a phone call could be made by the Trust’s MASH practitioner to the
« GMHRS every time a SCARF form is sent from the MASH to the CMHRS, however due to
the volume of SCARF forms received and processed this was not considered to be a
workable solution.

4, |t should be borne in mind that the MASH was originally designed as an initial point of
contact for reporting concerns about the safety of children, young people and adults. It is
not a crisis response service, and that is reflected in the MASH’s operational hours
(Monday — Friday, 9am — 5pm).

We have therefore written to Surrey Police, who complete the SCARF forms, to remind
them of the purpose of the MASH and to reiterate its operational hours. We have advised
Surrey Police that, should they become aware of an urgent concern about the safety of a

child, young person or adult outside of, or near to the closing of, the MASH'’s operational
hours, it would not likely be appropriate for the police to document these concerns on a
SCARF form and send it to the MASH. This is because the SCARF form will not be looked
at by the SABP MASH practitioners until the following working day, and therefore no urgent
action will be taken.

In the case of urgent concerns that arise either outside of, or near to the closing of, the
MASH's operational hours, we have advised Surrey Police to contact either:

e Surrey County Council's Emergency Duty Team (EDT), which provides an
emergency social work service for urgent situations which arise out of normal office
-- hours and which cannot be left with an appropriate degree of safety until the next
normal working day. The-EDT operates Monday to Friday from 5pm to 9am, 24
hours at weekends and over all bank holiday periods.

° The Trust's Crisis Mental Health Helpline, which provides advice-and assistance in
-relation to persons who are in a mental health crisis. The Crisis Line operates
Monday to Friday from 5pm'to 9am, 24 hours at weekends and over all bank holiday
periods. a : : of

° The Trust’s Safe Havens, which provide out of hours.help and support to people
and their carers who are experiencing a mental health crisis or emotional distress.
There are five Safe Havens open in town centre locations across Surrey and north
east Hampshire, and we have provided the police with the details of all of these.

5. We have set up an automated email reply, which is sent from the Mental Health/Drug &

~~’ Alcohol inbox within the MASH. This automated email details the MASH’s operational hours
and advises of the out of hours services that are available. The automated email is sent in
response to any email that is received outside of the MASH’s operational hours, so that ~
anybody sending a SCARF form to the MASH Mental Health/Drug & Alcohol inbox will be
aware that the SCARF form will not be processed until the next working day, and will know
where to seek urgent advice or assistance if required. .

6. The Trust will soon be introducing a Single Point of Access (SPA), which will be phased in
from October 2018. The SPA will operate 24 hours a day, 7 days per week and will be
contactable for advice or to discuss concerns about a person who has a mental health —

need. We:have advised Surrey Police that they will, in due course, be’able:to contact the
SPA if they need to obtain any urgent, out of hours advice. : ‘

- On behalf-of the Trust, | would like to offer our'sincére ‘condolences to Mr Tidey’s relatives for their

‘ loss‘and ‘hope that our actions outlined above assures you and them that we-have learnt-and
continue to‘learn from his death. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Chief
Medical Officer, should you require any further information. me a 7

Yours sincerely,

Jonathan Warren
Acting Chief Executive
Response from Surrey Police (PDF)
Our Ref: NE/AJ

Hr een Court SURREY
‘oroner’s Cour

Station Approach POLICE
Woking With you, making
GU227AP Surrey safer

www.surrey.police.uk

Nick Ephgrave QPM
Chief Constable

4" July 2018

Dear Ms Loxton,

| write in response to your letter dated the 9" of May 2018 regarding the Inquest touching the death
of Stephen lan William TIDEY and the Regulation 28 Report — Action to Prevent Future Deaths. In this
report you posed 3 questions which | will respond to in turn.

Qi. How Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) reports are processed by the MASH team upon
receipt?

Police Officers submit a risk assessment form called a Single Combined Assessment of Risk Form
(SCARF) to the Police MASH where it is triaged.

A triage will include:

e Checking the content of the referral itself to ensure it reflects factual information rather
than opinions or assumptions.

e Review the content of the referral to assess whether there are any unidentified risks or
vulnerabilities. Staff are trained to assess risk and will consider primary, secondary and
tertiary risks. If identified, these are referred immediately back to the original officer for
appropriate action.

e Checking for hidden crime/s. If crimes are identified, the officer will be notified and
requested to record and further investigate. This will not delay the sharing of the SCARF
which will be shared in the usual way

e If the referral is related to Domestic Abuse (DA), the DASH (Domestic Abuse, Stalking and
Harassment assessment) section of the SCARF is completed by the officer. This will be
reviewed as part of the SCARF as described above. The DASH section is however removed
from the SCARF before sharing as this remains confidential but significant information which
may impact on risk will be written into the main section of the SCARF for partners to be
aware. The outcome of DA related referrals will also be shared

e Checking whether there are any warnings on our Surrey Police records management system
for those involved.

© Checking for previous SCARF referrals. An escalation process exists whereby, if a 4" referral
is received into MASH within a 90 day period, the risk of the 4" referral is automatically
increased by one level and shared, highlighting the frequency of referrals. This will prompt
partners to consider underlying concerns and appropriate support or intervention.

Surrey
CRIMESTOPPERS
800 555 111

Surrey Police, PO Box 101, Guildford, GU1 9PE

e Noting of officers initial risk assessment level and consideration throughout the triage
process as to its appropriateness. MASH staff have the ability to increase or decrease the
risk rating as a result of their triage but, if changed, a rationale must be included as to why.

e Check Early Help Management (Surrey County Council Children’s Services system) to confirm
if child subject of referral is known/open to them. If they are currently working with the
child, then the referral is shared directly with the team involved. This process is not in place
for Adults so all adult referrals are sent to the MASH Adult Social Care.

e Review and assign one of four Police MASH Risk level/Level of Need.These are defined as;

o Red (level 4) High Risk — requiring Specialist intervention — these are dealt with
within 4 working hours.

o Amber (level 3) Medium Risk — requiring Targeted and Timely Intervention — dealt
with within 24 working hours.

o Green (level 2) Standard Risk — requiring Early Help — dealt with within 72 hours.

© Blue (level 1) No/Minimal risk — Not shared — no set target as not requiring Local
Authority intervention or support.

e Bring to the attention of MASH Detective Sergeant anything that may need escalating or
requires fast time action, for example where a MASH officer considers a child or adult to still
be at risk of harm

Once triaged, the SCARF referral is shared electronically via secure email. This process is the same
irrelevant of risk as the mail boxes are monitored throughout the working day.
All adult referrals are shared directly — with MASH Adult — Social Care
Childrens referrals are shared either directly with Social Care teams already working with the
children (as above) and the remainder to MASH Childrens Social Care
Referrals relating to Missing Children or those who’s parents/carers are involved in a domestic
dispute where police have been called are also shared with Education and Health
The Niche report is updated with a record of triage and sharing and an individual staff ‘tracker’ is
completed with action taken for future audit trail and statistical requirements.

Q2. Whether there is an effective system in place to ensure that MASH reports are followed up by
appropriate Community Mental Health Team (where necessary)

Once a referral is made from Surrey Police to a partner agency via the MASH there is no current
means for Surrey Police to ensure it is being acted upon and this would be outside of the existing
agreement between Surrey Police and Surrey County Council. A partners response to a referral is not
monitored by Surrey Police and unfortunately we are unable to respond in detail to this question.
Surrey Police therefore respectfully request that this question is passed onto the SABP and Adult
Social Care for their response.

Q3. Whether there is an effective system in place to deal appropriately with MASH referrals
received outside normal weekday office hours, and that those completing the MASH referral
forms (e.g. Police officers) know where these should be sent outside normal working hours when a
high risk is identified

The Police MASH is in operation seven days a week (08:00 — 17:00 Monday to Friday and 08:00 —
16:00 Saturday and Sunday). There is only ever approximately one day’s worth of backlog and this is
risk assessed at the start of each working day.

Red risk graded SCARFS (refer to risk grading and timescales in Q1) submitted after the end of
business on any given day are prioritised at the start of the next working day and the timescales
outlined above are adhered to.

Procedures are in place that allows Police Officers, outside of normal working hours, to refer directly
to the Emergency Duty Team (EDT) when a high risk situation is identified. This can include, for
example, where a child needs urgent accommodation or coordination for contact with an Approved
Mental Health Practitioner (AMPH) in the case of a vulnerable adult with urgent mental health
needs. These out of office hours referrals are made by the officer directly by telephone but will
always be followed up with a detailed SCARF referral

Please let me know if | can be of any further assistance.

Yours sincerely

flepore

Related reports

Other reports by Anna Loxton

See all →

More reports categorised “State Custody related deaths”

See all →

Track State Custody related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching State Custody related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.