Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018

Aniyah Winston

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0241, written 25 Jul 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report25 Jul 2018
Reference2018-0241
DeceasedAniyah Winston
CoronerAlison Mutch
Coroner areaManchester South
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The Secretary of State for Health
and the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch
CORONER

| am Alison Mutch ,Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of South
Manchester

CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and
Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners
(Investigations) Regulations 2013

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 9" March 2017 | commenced an investigation into the death of
Aniyah Jasmine Winston. The investigation concluded on the 20" July
2018 and the conclusion was one of died as a recognised complications
of a breech delivery contributed to by neglect.

The medical cause of death Osteo-diastasis of the occipital bone on a
background of hypoxia

Aniyah Jasmine Winston was a full term baby with no complications
antenatally. Her Mother arrived at Tameside Genera! Hospital on 8th
March 2017 at about 7am. Her waters had broken. At about 7:25am she
was examined and was fully dilated. Aniyah's presentation did not appear
to be head down. A registrar examined and concluded Aniyah was a
breech presentation. A decision was made to try for vaginal delivery.
From about 8:15am for approximately 30 minutes there were strong,
regular expulsive contractions. The contractions reduced at about
8:45am. Examination showed Aniyah had not moved. At the handover
meeting at about 9am an undocumented decision was taken to
administer Syntocinon without further review, examination or counselling
of her mother. No prescription was written for the Syntocinon that was
then administered. At 09.43 Aniyah's foot was delivered. After
manipulation and intervention by the medical team led to Aniyah being
fully delivered at 10:28am in poor condition. She had sustained damage

to the occiput likely to have been caused as the head was manipulated.
A heart beat was present as the head was being manipulated. Neo natal
life support was commenced . At 10:59am the decision was made to

cease resuscitation.

CORONER'S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur
unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to

report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. ~

1. The inquest heard that Aniyah was an undetected breech birth. By
the time it was identified she was breech her mother was fully
dilated. The inquest heard that there are undetected breech births
are not uncommon and present particular challenges for those
involved in care during labour. The inquest was told that it is the
case that pre delivery scans are not routinely carried out to try and
reduce the number of undetected breeches and midwives/doctors
rely on external examination. The inquest was told that this is due
to availability of scanning facilities and training to utilise the
scanners.

2. The inquest was told by a number of medical professionals
involved in Aniyah’s birth that they whilst they felt the decision to
give Syntocinon was incorrect they did not feel comfortable
challenging the decision. The expert instructed was clear that at
the time it was given it should not have been. The Trust has since
the death of Aninyah put in piace a detailed programme to improve
confidence in challenging decision-making within a MDT setting.

However the extent of recognition of the issue and steps to counter
it nationally were unclear.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and |
believe you have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date

of this report, namely by 19" September 2018 . |, the coroner, may
extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain
why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the followin
Interested Persons namely (Father),

(Mother), Tameside General Hospital and who may find it
useful or of interest

| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your
response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted

or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about
the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

Alison Mutch OBE
HM Senior Coroner
25/07/2018

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Halth Social Care (PDF)
ae From Jackle Doyle-Prica MP’

D ep: artim ent Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Mental Health and Inequalities
Department of Health and Social C.
of Health & ° 39 Victoria Street
. Londo
Social Care SWIHOEU

Your reference: 6847/CLB
Our reference: PFD 1143208

Ms Alison Mutch OBE

HM Senior Coroner, Manchester South
Coroner’s Court

1 Mount Tabor Street

Stockport

SK1 3AG

{3 September 2018

Nees AL Markt

Thank you for your letter of 25 July to the Secretary of State for Health and Social
Care about the death of baby Aniyah Jasmine Winston. I am responding as Minister
with portfolio responsibility for maternity care.

I have noted carefully the matters of concern raised in your report. My officials have
sought the advice of the National Director for Maternity and Women’s Health at NHS
England, as well as the National Clinical Lead and Clinical Director for Maternity
and Children at NHS Improvement in the preparation of this response.

On the first matter of concern, I can confirm that it is not the case that a lack of
equipment or training accounts for a lack of pre-delivery scans to detect fetal
malpresentation. Rather, it is that there is currently no evidence base to recommend
routine third trimester scanning.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has issued a clinical
guideline on Antenatal care for uncomplicated pregnancies’ that was last updated in
January 2017. The guideline recommends the following:

e 1.10.4 Fetal presentation should be assessed by abdominal palpation at 36
weeks or later, when presentation is likely to influence the plans for the
birth. Routine assessment of presentation by abdominal palpation should
not be offered before 36 weeks because it is not always accurate and may
be uncomfortable,

e 1.10.5 Suspected fetal malpresentation should be confirmed by an
ultrasound assessment.

e 1.10.9 The evidence does not support the routine use of ultrasound
scanning after 24 weeks of gestation and therefore it should not be offered.

I am advised that it is recognised that there will be situations where breech
presentation is first diagnosed in labour. The key issue is the response and actions
following the diagnosis. NHS maternity service providers should have a breech
guideline in place and this should include a section on undiagnosed breech in labour.

It will be helpful to note that the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
(RCOG) Green-top Guideline No. 20b — on the Management of Breech Presentation?
was updated in March 2017 (shortly after this incident). The guidance states that:

e Where a woman presents with an unplanned vaginal breech labour,
management should depend on the stage of labour, whether factors associated
with increased complications are found, availability of appropriate clinical
expertise and informed consent. [New 2017]

" hups://www.nice.org.uh/guidance’cg62

2 hups://www.rcog.orp.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/ guidelines /nig20b/

e Women near or in active second stage of labour should not be routinely offered
caesarean section. [New 2017]

e Where time and circumstances permit, the position of the fetal neck and legs,
and the fetal weight should be estimated using ultrasound, and the woman
counselled as with planned vaginal breech birth. [New 2017]

© All maternity units must be able to provide skilled supervision for vaginal
breech birth where a woman is admitted in advanced labour and protocols for
this eventuality should be developed. [New 2017]

The RCOG guidance also states that:

© Augmentation of slow progress with oxytocin should only be considered if the
contraction frequency is low in the presence of epidural analgesia. [New
2017] As a means to treat dystocia, augmentation should usually be avoided
as adequate progress may be the best evidence for adequate fetopelvic
proportions. However, if epidural analgesia has been used and the contraction
Jrequency is low, its use should not be excluded. Notably, labour augmentation
is not supported by many experienced advocates of vaginal breech birth who
favour a less interventionist approach.

I hope this information offers some assurance that there are guidelines available to
providers of maternity services on how to manage undetected breech presentations.

Turning to your second matter of concern about staff having the confidence to
challenge decision-making in a multi-disciplinary environment, I can confirm that
this is recognised as an important area in ensuring patient safety and there is much
work underway at a national level to support the NHS to strengthen multi-
professional team working.

The Matemity Safety Strategy’ sets out the Government’s vision and an action plan
to achieve the national ambition to halve the rates of stillbirths, neonatal and maternal
deaths, and brain injuries that occur during or soon after birth by 2030, now brought
forward to 2025. The action plan was structured around five key drivers for
delivering safer maternity care, one of which is a focus on teams: prioritising and

rere
5 hutps:// www.gov.uk/government/publications/safer-maternity-care-propress-and-next-steps

investing in the capability and skills of the maternity workforce and promoting
effective multi-professional team working.

A major element of the Safer Maternity Care Action Plan was the distribution of the
£8.1 million Maternity Safety Training Fund by Health Education England to 136
NHS trusts throughout England, including all 134 NHS trusts with maternity units.
The funding is supporting multi-disciplinary teams to train together and further
develop skills and experience in leadership, multi-professional team communication,
human factors and situational awareness, cardiotocography (CTG), as well as
midwifery and obstetric emergency skills and drills.

The Department is also providing additional funding over the next three years to
provide support for the RCOG and the Royal College of Midwives to launch ‘Each
Baby Counts Learn and Support® - a programme of work to enable greater
collaboration between the Royal Colleges and the NHS via the Maternal and
Neonatal Health Safety Collaborative - this aims to align quality and safety
improvement, multi-professional learning and clinical leadership into a consistent and
sustainable safety strategy across the system.

] hope this information is helpful. Thank you for bringing your concerns to our

attention.

J DOYLE-PRICE

—

4 hups://improvement.nhs. h-baby-counts/

Related reports

Other reports by Alison Mutch

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.