Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0269, written 8 Aug 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 8 Aug 2018 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2018-0269 |
| Deceased | Donald Clegg |
| Coroner | Lisa Hashmi |
| Coroner area | Manchester North |
| Category | Community health care and emergency services related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. , Managing Director, Persona Care and Support Ltd. 2. Bury Metropolitan Borough Council 1 CORONER I am Ms L J Hashmi, Area Coroner for the Coroner area of Manchester North. 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroner’s and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 5th March 2018 I commenced an investigation into the death of Dr Donald Clegg. This concluded by way of inquest on the 7th August 2018, having been adjourned part-heard from the 26th June 2018. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH Against a backdrop of deteriorating physical and mental health, including a complex neurological condition, chronic alcohol issues, depression, hypertension and asthma, the deceased was admitted to an intermediate care placement. When that placement came to an end after a 6 week period, he was transferred to another 24-hour short-term residential placement on the 26th January 2018. Soon after transfer, it became apparent that the establishment in question could not manage his care needs. There had been no face to face assessment of the deceased’s suitability for this placement and communication between the care placement teams was inadequate. Assessment was based upon a brief questionnaire completed by an Administrator. Whilst the deceased was known to take excessive amounts of medication of his own volition (Co- Codamol), he was deemed by staff to have sufficient capacity to make his own decisions and was therefore allowed to continue to self-medicate. Whilst staff at the placement knew, or ought to have known, of the deceased’s propensity to regularly take higher than prescribed doses of Co- Codamol, it was not until the 22nd February 2018 that staff discovered that a significant quantity of Co-Codamol was unaccounted and/or had been taken to excess. Between the 16th and 22nd February 118 out of a 124 repeat prescription Co-Codamol tablets went unaccounted for. As there was reason to suspect that the deceased had taken Co-Codamol in overdose, staff contacted the GP who recommended immediate hospital admission. The deceased declined and so it was agreed that the GP would attend the following day to carry out a review. In the meantime, staff were asked to monitor the deceased. On balance, he was not monitored any more closely than he would normally have been. A GP reviewed the deceased the following day and prescribed Codeine for pain relief. This was never dispensed as events superseded. On the night of the 25-26th February 2018 the deceased's health showed a marked decline. The out of hours GP was not contacted for advice. On the morning of the 26th February the deceased started to shown signs of difficulties with his breathing and seizure-like activity. An emergency ambulance was called and he was conveyed to hospital. On admission, he was hyper-pyrexial, tachycardic and confused. Despite treatment, he continued to deteriorate and died in Hospital later the same day. Following post mortem examination and antemortem blood sample toxicological analysis, there was no evidence to suggest that the deceased died as a result of a drugs overdose. The cause of death, on the balance of probabilities, was natural. The medical cause of death was: 1a) Acute left ventricular heart failure 1b) Severe ischaemic heart disease and left ventricular hypertrophy 1c) – 2) - 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:- Persona and Bury MBC: 1. Communication/transfer of care/handover between social services, the first placement and/or the final placement was insufficient, given the complexities of the deceased’s case. Persona Only: 2. The process of assessment of care needs prior to admission was inadequate. Assessment is critical in establishing the suitability and safety of a placement – in this case, capable of meeting complex physical and mental health needs of the individual. Assessment of risk, in particular, was inadequate. 3. The evidence indicated that the: i) Medicine Policy &/or ii)Medicine administration training, supervision and audit processes at Persona were inadequate and unsafe (indeed, the audit process was perfunctory). 4. Staff were unable to recognise the deteriorating adult and did not seek medical attention in a timely manner when signs of change became apparent. This potentially puts service users at risk of harm/death. 5. Record keeping was inadequate and in parts, incomplete. Record keeping is vital in keeping service users safe. 6. There is no policy/protocol for the observation/monitoring of service users e.g. when directed to do so by a medical practitioner. Staff are left to interpret for themselves what this means. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe each of you respectively have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely the 3rd October 2018. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons namely:- - - - The deceased’s family CQC Bury CCG I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary from. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me the coroner at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Date: 8th August 2018 Signed:
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Julie Gonda
BA (Hons), ACA, Msc – Leadership, Health & Social Care
Interim Executive Director of Communities & Wellbeing
Date
Please ask for
Direct Line
4th December 2018
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Ms. L J Hashmi
HM Area Coroner
Greater Manchester North
Dear Ms. Hashmi,
Department for
Communities & Wellbeing
–
Interim Assistant Director
of Adult Operation
I am writing in response to your letter dated 9th August 2018. In my response I have included
an overview of the discharge process from Killelea, what we are changing going forwards and
also the rationale for the decision to discharge the late Dr Donald Clegg to a short stay
placement.
Choices for Living Well bed based (Killelea) discharge process
Planning for discharge
Planning for discharge commences upon a customer’s admission to Killelea.
The MDT works closely with customers to facilitate safe and timely discharges from the Choices
for Living Well bed based service.
The decision to discharge
The decision to discharge a customer is made as an MDT, and involving the customer / family.
Where a customer has been assessed as lacking the mental capacity to make a decision about
discharge, the decision to discharge and discharge destination are made as a Best Interests
decision.
For customers who have completed their period of rehabilitation or who are not able / unwilling
to participate in rehabilitation a decision to discharge to an alternative setting will be made if
they are not ready to return home.
Electronic or fax service of Legal documents is not accepted
Killelea, Brandlesholme Road, Bury BL8 1JJ
www.bury.gov.uk
For customers show are awaiting a package of home care, they may require a transfer to a
short stay setting in the interim, as there is often is a high demand for beds at Killelea e.g.
customers awaiting discharge form hospital. This decision is made as an MDT and professional
rationale for not transferring to an interim bed are considered on a case by case basis by the
management team e.g. customers with dementia, who may find an additional move unsettling.
The following actions are completed prior to discharge:
Therapy staff confirm that equipment and adaptations that are essential for discharge are in
place
Transport arrangements are made – these may be with family/ friends, or depending on moving
and handling needs, a wheel chair taxi or hospital transport may be required.
Date and time of discharge agreed with the customer and family
If the customer is to have a formal package of care at home or is transferring to a short stay
setting or residential care, the date and time of discharge is agreed with all parties
Arrangements are made for discharge of medications, and ensuring the appropriate
documentation is taken with the customer e.g DNAR/ District Nurse file.
Handover of information/ transfer of care:
GP, Chemist, District Nursing team, Continence Team, other involved services are informed of
the discharge time and date
Onward referrals are made e.g. to the District nursing team to order pressure relieving
equipment. Contact is made to ensure that the appropriate pressure
relieving equipment is in place e.g. air flow mattress prior to discharging the customer home/
alternative setting to help ensure a safe discharge.
For customers having local authority commissioned support at home:
Relevant information form the support plan is shared by the Brokerage team with care providers
prior to discharge
For complex cases – care providers are encouraged to attend a moving and handling handover
discussion with the therapy staff at Killelea
The care agency/ setting is provided with contact telephone numbers for the Connect and Direct
(CAD) Hub and the Out of Hours service.
Electronic or fax service of Legal documents is not accepted
Killelea, Brandlesholme Road, Bury BL8 1JJ
www.bury.gov.uk
For customers having local author commissioned placement in a short stay setting, residential
care or nursing care:
For complex cases – care providers are encouraged to attend a moving and handling handover
discussion with the therapy staff at Killelea
Arrangements are made for the provider to visit to complete their own assessment, as part of
their admissions process
For providers who accept referrals over the telephone, a copy of the social care assessment and
support plan will be provided prior to admission
The care agency/ setting is provided with contact telephone numbers for the Connect and Direct
(CAD) Hub and the Out of Hours service.
For customers with complex health needs:
Continuing Health Care screening is completed by the MDT at Killelea and assessments/ reports
are requested from the District Nursing Team / Consultant Geriatrician to provide evidence for
funding appropriate support for such customers , for example ‘Fast Track’ funding for a nursing
placement.
For customers having a privately arranged package of support / placement:
Arrangements are made with the provider to visit and complete their own assessment
A copy of the social care assessment completed at Killelea is made available
The customer/ family is made aware of their right to a review from the local authority as
required by the Care Act 2014
The care agency/ setting is provided with contact numbers for Bury Council should
circumstances change/ additional input is required
The care agency/ setting is provided with contact telephone numbers for the Connect and Direct
(CAD) Hub and the Out of Hours service.
Following discharge
Within 24 – 72* hours post discharge (*if discharged prior to the weekend)
Electronic or fax service of Legal documents is not accepted
Killelea, Brandlesholme Road, Bury BL8 1JJ
www.bury.gov.uk
A safe and telephone call is made to check that the customer is settling in well back at home /
care setting
If any issues have arisen these will be addressed initially by Killelea staff and further action
taken. This may be a follow up from Killelea staff e.g. a visit , or signposting to another service
Contact telephone number are shared with customers and with care providers, The customer/
care provider will be notified that their caser will be reassigned to an alternative team for review
and the contact telephone number for that team will be shared ( as well as the number for
CAD// Out of Hours)
Self –discharge
Occasionally, a customer will decide to self-discharge from Killelea
A discussion takes place with the customer by a member of staff, to ensure that the customer is
making an informed decision and to check that they are aware of any risks
Prior to discharge the customer will be asked to sign a disclaimer form
The customer is provided with contact telephone numbers for the Connect and Direct (CAD)
Hub and the Out of Hours service.
If the customer is assessed as lacking the mental capacity to make this decision, consideration
is given to where a DOLs application needs to be made. The decision to discharge and discharge
destination would be made in the customer’s best interest, following the Best Interests process.
Within 24 – 72* hours post discharge (*if discharged prior to the weekend)
A safe and telephone call is made to check that the customer is settling in well back at home /
care setting
If issues have arisen, Killelea staff will make a professional judgement as to next actions,
depending on the level of need/ risk e.g. signposting to another service or contacting the
locality duty team.
Change to the discharge process
Following a review of the discharge process from Killelea we have made the following change:
For customers who are being discharged to a short stay placement at either Elmhurst or Spurr
House we will arrange to invite Elmhurst or Spurr House staff to attend the discharge planning
meeting at Killelea, so that they can meet the customer and assess if they are suitable for the
service.
Electronic or fax service of Legal documents is not accepted
Killelea, Brandlesholme Road, Bury BL8 1JJ
www.bury.gov.uk
Rationale for discharging Dr Clegg to a short stay placement
The allocated social worker for Dr Clegg,
with Dr Clegg and his son
arranging for a home care provider to assess Dr Clegg’s needs for a private package of care
on the 10 January 2018. The Agreed actions included
, arranged a discharge planning meeting
Ms. Barnes contacted a number of home care providers between 10th January and 24th January,
however none had capacity to arrange to assess at that time, nor to provide a package of home
care.
There was a very high demand for beds at this time, from both the hospital and the community.
When a customer is ready for discharge but there is no support available to enable discharge to
destination of choice, a move to a short stay placement may be required.
We have used Elmhurst on many occasions and have considered this to be a safe and
appropriate placement setting to meet the residential care needs of customers, where a nursing
placement is not required.
The proposed move to a short stay placement was discussed with Dr Clegg and his son on
24th January 2018 and this discharge arrangement was agreed.
Ms. Barnes followed the admission process for Elmhurst when booking the placement, and
liaised with the relevant Occupational Therapist to refer for appropriate pressure equipment and
ensured that this was in place before the discharge took place.
also provided a copy
of the social care assessment which detailed Dr Clegg‘s needs.
Yours sincerely,
Head of Service
Adult Operations Senior Management Team
Electronic or fax service of Legal documents is not accepted
Killelea, Brandlesholme Road, Bury BL8 1JJ
www.bury.gov.uk
° Persona We're all about you 28 September 2018 PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL FAO: Mrs L Hashmi, Area Coroner HM Coroners Court The Phoenix Centre L/Cpl Stephen Shaw MC Way Heywood 91 OC pes OL10 1LR Dear Mrs Hashmi, Regulation 28 Notice - Dr Donald Stuart Clegg (Deceased) - Ref: 64436 I write further to your letter and the Regulation 28 notice in relation to the inquest following the death of Dr Clegg. Firstly may I personally express my sadness at the loss of Dr Clegg and I send my sincere condolences to his family. Secondly.I am disappointed that there are areas of our support which fell short of the high quality of care that we always aim to provide. I would like to reassure you that the comments you have raised have been fully considered and it is my priority that we learn from these and continue to improve our practice. We have a culture internally of continual improvement and we are not afraid to challenge the way we work. I have set out some further details below in response to your letter: Persona and Bury MBC 1. Communication and transfer of care between social services, the first placement and the final placement The comments raised relate to the inadequate communication between the care teams at Killelea (Bury Council) and Elmhurst (Persona), particularly given the complexities of Dr Clegg’s circumstances. A meeting has now taken place between the Persona Operations Director and the Business Manager responsible for Intermediate Managed Care at Bury Council. It has been agreed that going forward and with immediate effect where a customer is being discharged from Killelea to Persona services, or vice versa, a representative from Persona will be included in a multi- disciplinary team meeting with the appropriate health professionals. I will ensure that this is monitored to see how it works in practice and whether we need to review additional methods to ensure we have the right level of communications between the respective teams. Persona Care and Support Ltd Grundy Centre Wellington Road BLO 9AH 0161 253 6000 info@personasupport.org www.personasupport.org.uk Company Registration Number: 09725580 Persona 2. The process of assessment of care needs prior to admission was inadequate The established assessment process within Persona is for a Customer Relations Assistant to take the initial referral, capturing information via an Initial Assessment proforma. The Registered Manager would then make a decision on whether they could meet the individual’s needs and accept the referral, based on the information contained within the Initial Assessment. I must stress that the Registered Manager or their Deputy are the only individuals who would make a decision about whether to accept a referral and this would never be the decision of a junior member of the care or administration team. In light of the findings from this inquest we have reviewed the assessment process and we will be enhancing our approach to admissions. . This involves the establishment of an additional post within our short stay services which will focus on admissions, ensuring that we obtain detailed information for the Registered Manager to allow them to make an informed judgement. This will also provide capacity for a face to face assessment or involvement in multi-disciplinary team meetings (as described at point 1) as required. 3. The Medicine Policy and/or staff training were inadequate and unsafe. The audit process was perfunctory As an organisation we are striving for 100% accuracy on our medication management. We are fully committed to improving our processes and have opened a dialogue with staff to obtain their views and to review medication management. Throughout the year we have undertaken a number of different forms of analysis to better understand how and why errors occur. We have also reviewed the policies, protocols and training that we have in place. We have found due to the complexity of the services we deliver there is not a “one-size-fits-all solution” and each service needs a tailored approach. An action plan is currently in place which we are actively progressing in order to improve performance. By way of summary the actions taken so far include: 3a. Investment in an Electronic Medication Administration System (EMAR) which is designed to improve accuracy and safety in respect of medication administration whilst also improving audit trails. This is being implemented at Elmhurst this week (w/c 24/9/18) and will be rolled out to our other short stay unit Spurr House in October 2018. 3b. On-going exceptional Board reporting on medication errors and. progress against the medication action plan. 3c. Review and amendment of the medication policy to make it clearer for staff and to develop visual one page guides on certain key aspects of the policy. 3d. Review of our current medication training which we felt could be improved. We have therefore sourced an additional detailed and assessed training package which will be rolled out to staff imminently. 3e. Review and amendment of the self-administration assessments and protocols. These now include a requirement to count medication weekly for people who are self- administering, and a mapping tool to allow the amount actually taken to be tracked against that which should have been consumed. 3f. Development of a comprehensive quality assurance framework (QA Framework). This has been completed in partnership with an external consultant. The work on the QA Framework has drawn current audit tools together to ensure that they are fit for purpose and all audits are meaningful, signed off by a more senior manager, and any actions are captured at a scheme and organisational level in an Improvement Plan. This work has taken place across the summer months and is currently being rolled out in short stay during September and early October. We will work hard as a team to ensure it is embedded throughout the organisation. 3g. As medication in short stay services is particularly complex and busy we have reviewed the structure and are currently piloting having a Medication Co-ordinator role to provide more specialist knowledge and support in this area, as well as additional skilled capacity to undertake pharmacy and GP liaison and auditing. 3h. Review of the skills required by staff who administer medication has identified that there are skills around numeracy and attention to detail which had been underestimated in the previous job description and core attributes. These have now been added to job descriptions and will form part of the recruitment assessment in the future. 3i. Focus groups with staff are due to take place in early October 2018 to understand the challenges that they see in administering medication and any solutions which they feel would improve their ability to perform consistently well in this area. We are also talking to other service providers to look at sharing best practice tips and tools. 3j. In addition we have recruited a Compliance Manager (this is a senior appointment) who will be responsible for auditing medication. This post reports directly to me as the Managing Director. The post-holder commences on 1 October 2018. 4. Staff were unable to recognise the signs of deterioration and did not seek medical attention in a timely manner This finding is one which we have reflected on at some length. As you will be aware, Elmhurst does not hold a Nursing registration and the staff we employ are social care staff and not medically qualified. Therefore the monitoring that we undertake when someone is unwell needs to be appropriate to the specifics of our registration. Having reflected and reviewed our approach I believe that this service would benefit from additional training and we also need to empower staff to ask more and better questions of medical professionals in order to understand what to expect, and what triggers to look for in an individual’s specific case in order to know when to seek further advice or involve medical professionals. This is an area that we need to further review and we have added it to our Improvement Plan and we will be taking it forward during October 2018. 5. Record keeping was inadequate and in parts incomplete Record keeping in social care has become an increasingly significant part of the role in recent years and as a result during 2017 we investigated a number of electronic care planning systems and in autumn 2017 purchased and began implementation of our chosen system Access Mobizio. Roll-out to Elmhurst took place in February 2018. It is now the case that all care planning is in the majority digital within short stay. The system allows real time recording, voice recording and more structured prompts which all contribute to improved record keeping. The QA Framework includes audits and spot checks of care records to assess the quality and accuracy of these. We have identified that there is still further work to do with staff to continue to embed the approach and to drive a culture of improved record keeping. Part of this process included a series of staff workshops on the system and on person centred recording in general which took place during August 2018. Continuing to improve record keeping remains a high priority on our Improvement Plan for this service. We will look at ways to fully embed this throughout the organisation as we strongly believe it will significantly help with accuracy of record keeping. 6. There is no policy/protocol for observation/monitoring of service users when directed to do so by a medical practitioner Having reviewed this area, we do not have an adequate system and protocol. This links closely to Point 4 (above). We will be developing a simple protocol for staff and an appropriate recording system for observations to sit alongside the training mentioned earlier. The new Compliance Manager will be tasked with this as an urgent action. Beyond the findings of your report I also wanted to take the opportunity to personally respond to the comment made about Persona representatives leaving court before the conclusion of evidence. I apologise on their behalf if this appeared in any way disrespectful or disinterested. This certainly was not the case and can be explained by the lack of experience in Coroner’s of Court of these individuals. They believed they had been dismissed from Court and that it was appropriate for them to leave. We have recently developed a set of guidance around responding to Inquests, including what to expect when appearing as a witness. We are also exploring opportunities for Managers to observe cases at Coroners Court to increase their awareness of Court etiquette and confidence in this arena. I hope the contents of this letter provides you with satisfactory assurances that as an organisation, we are actively and continually learning and improving our practices to safeguard our customers from risk, harm or injury. In the event, that you require further information or have any follow up questions please do not hesitate to contact me on or via email at Yours sincerely Yesova— Kat Sowden Managing Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community health care and emergency services related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.