Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018

Ian Wolstenholme

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0272, written 8 Aug 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report8 Aug 2018
Reference2018-0272
DeceasedIan Wolstenholme
CoronerLisa Hashmi
Coroner areaManchester North
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Community health care and emergency services related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. Department of Health, London

2. Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency, London

CORONER

tam Ms L J Hashmi, Area Coroner for the Coroner area of Manchester North.

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroner's and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28
and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST |

On the 21*' December 20171 commenced an investigation into the death of lan Paul Wolstenholme,
concluding by way of inquest on the 6" August 2018.

CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH

Against a backdrop of pre-existing co-morbidities (including Diabetes Mellitus and associated
neuropathy), chronic alcoholism and a history of heroin addiction (under long-term treatment), the
deceased was found in a collapsed state at his home address on the 17" December 2017.
Emergency services were summoned. Paramedics confirmed the fact of the deceased's death
later the same day.

The deceased had a complex medical history and was prescribed a significant number of
medications (polypharmacy), all of which were clinically indicated and prescribed with caution. At
the time of his death the deceased remained under review by secondary care Diabetologists and
the substance misuse service. His GP’s involvement in the management and review of his
medication was therefore minimal. Whilst clinicians were of the overall view that the deceased was
compliant with his medication regime, the evidence suggested that he tended to hoard some
medication yet take others as prescribed. The police investigation identified large amount of
medication at the deceased's home address, including 112 unused bottles of Methadone.

Whilst the deceased was on balance, afforded some degree of tolerance, his variable compliance
had a material bearing upon this. Furthermore the presence of liver cirrhosis identified at post
mortem examination, more likely than not, impacted upon his ability to metabolise medication
resulting in a degree of accumulation. The combination of the drugs identified by way of
toxicological analysis brought about a respiratory depressant effect, resulting in the deceased’s
death.

There was no evidence to suggest that the deceased deliberately took any of his medication to
excess, with the intent to harm himself.

The medical cause of death was:

1a) Combined drug toxicity (Codeine, Morphine, Pregabalin, Methadone)
te)

2) Liver cirrhosis, Diabetes Mellitus

My Conclusion was:

‘Drug related death to which natural, pre-existing co-morbidities more than minimally contributed’.

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is
a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to
report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:-

1. During the course of the evidence, it became apparent that there is no guidance — national or
otherwise - available to Clinicians such as GPs, Hospital doctors etc. on the how best to approach
the prescribing of highly addictive and potentially very harmful drugs alongside one another. In this
case, the deceased had been legitimately prescribed three different types of neuropathic analgesia
(including Pregabalin), alongside other opiate based medications. Whilst such drugs are almost
always prescribed for very good clinical reason/s, this type of polypharmacy gives rise to the
potential risk of serious harm/death. | believe that guidance would help to prevent future deaths
from combined drug toxicity.

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe each of you respectively
have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely 3" October
2018. 1, the Coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION
| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons namely:-

The deceased's family

Bury/Rochdale Oldham CCGs

NHS England

Public Health England

Royal Pharmaceutical Society

Royal College of Physicians

Royal College of General Practitioners

MIDAS (Drugs & Alcohol)

(sent to all the above for information purposes only)

lam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary from. He may send a
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me the coroner at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your
response by the Chief Coroner.

8" August 2018

Signed: Fra eae SN
<r”

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Health (PDF)
y) be From the Lord O'Shaughnessy
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Health (Lords)

Department

of Health

Our reference: PFD 1144474

39 Victoria Street,
Ms L J Hashmi Pare
HM Area Coroner, Manchester North
Coroner’s Service, Tel: 020 7210 4850
Phoenix Centre
L/Cpl Stephen Shaw MC Way (formerly Church Street)
Heywood, OL10 1LR

02 OCT 2018
Dear Ms Hashmi

Thank you for your letter of 8 August to the Department of Health and Social Care
about the death of Mr Ian Paul Wolstenholme. I am responding as Minister with
portfolio responsibility for medicines and I am grateful for the additional time in
which to do so.

I was extremely saddened to read of the circumstances surrounding Mr
Wolstenholme’s death. If you have the opportunity, please convey my sympathies
to his family.

I have noted carefully the matters of concern identified in your report. My officials
have made enquiries with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory
Agency (MHRA), to which you also issued your report. Please accept this
response on behalf of the MHRA.

The MHRA monitors the safety of medicines and endeavours to ensure that up-to-
date information on the benefits and risks of a medicine is available for healthcare
professionals and patients. The Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) for a
medicine provides information for healthcare professionals about the medicine,
including warnings and precautions of use in higher risk situations. The same
information is provided to patients in a patient information leaflet, which is written
in language that can be understood by the lay person and accompanies each
medicine.

Codeine is a weak opioid which is available in pharmacies under the supervision of
a pharmacist or by prescription. Morphine is a prescription only medicine
indicated for the treatment of severe pain. Pregabalin is indicated for neuropathic
pain, epilepsy and generalised anxiety disorder, whilst methadone is indicated for

the treatment of opioid addiction. Each of these drugs carry a risk of dependence,
addiction and tolerance.

The SmPC for each medicine (codeine, pregabalin and methadone), contain
warnings concerning interactions with other medicines and advises healthcare
professionals and patients that concomitant use of central nervous system
depressants, can increase the risk of side effects. The SmPC and leaflet provides
guidance for healthcare professionals and patients on dose control and advises that
cessation of treatment should be undertaken gradually over a period of time. The
MHRA endeavours to ensure that the patient information leaflet and labelling have
clear and understandable information for patients and carers with clear direction to
seek medical advice in the event of adverse reactions suggestive of tolerance,
sedation or respiratory depression.

You will be interested to note that the MHRA is currently undertaking a review of
the product information for all opioid medicines and will be seeking the advice of
an Expert Working Group of the Commission on Human Medicines. The Expert
Working Group will consider the benefit risk of opioid-containing medicines and
make recommendations for regulatory action to better support appropriate use of
prescription opioids, including educational initiatives to ensure awareness of risks
for both patients and healthcare professionals.

In addition, the information in your report relating to the medicines involved in Mr
Wolstenholme’s death has been added to the MHRA’s Yellow Card database that
collates suspected adverse drug reactions to help monitor medicine safety
(reference ADR 24340935).

My officials also sought the advice of the National Institute for Health and Care
Excellence (NICE) on the matters of concern in your report. NICE advises that it
has issued a guideline on ‘Mutltimorbidity: clinical assessment and management "'
(NG56), and a guideline on ‘Medicines optimisation: the safe and effective use of
medicines to enable the best possible outcomes’? (NGS). NICE has also published
a key therapeutic topic on ‘Multimorbidity and polypharmacy” (KTT18).

The guideline on multimorbidity (NG56) includes the following recommendations:

1.3.2 Consider using a validated tool such as eF'l, PEONY or QAdmissions,

if available in primary care electronic health records, to identify adults with
multimorbidity who are at risk of adverse events such as unplanned hospital
admission or admission to care homes.

1.3.5 Consider an approach to care that takes account of multimorbidity for
adults of any age who:
' https://www.nice,org.uk/guidance/ng56/chapter/Recommendations

*

https://www,nice,org.uk/guidance/ng5

3 https://www.nice.org.uk/advice/ktt18

Department
of Health

° are prescribed 10 to 14 regular medicines
e are prescribed fewer than 10 regular medicines but are at particular
risk of adverse events
Establish treatment burden by talking to people about how treatments for
their health problems affect their day-to-day life, including the number and
type of medicines a person is taking and how often, and any harms from
medicines.

I am advised that NICE agrees that there is currently no guidance, national or
otherwise, available to clinicians specifically on how best to approach the
prescribing of highly addictive and potentially harmful drugs alongside one
another, However, I can confirm that NICE has been commissioned to produce
guidance on safe prescribing and withdrawal management of prescribed drugs
associated with dependence and withdrawal. This work is due to start in early
2019.

I hope this information is helpful. Thank you for bringing your concerns to our
attention.

JAMES O’SHAUGHNESSY

Related reports

Other reports by Lisa Hashmi

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.