Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018

Eileen Cooke

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0311, written 25 Oct 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report25 Oct 2018
Reference2018-0311
DeceasedEileen Cooke
CoronerKevin McLoughlin
Coroner areaWest Yorkshire (East)
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)

‘| REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1. Dr Karen Stone, Medical Director, Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust,
Aberford Road, Wakefield, WF1 4DG

_:
1

CORONER

| am Kevin McLoughlin, Senior Coroner for the coroner area of West Yorkshire (Eastern)

[2 | CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

rB INVESTIGATION and INQUEST “|

On 5 January 2018 | commenced an investigation into the death of Eileen Cooke, aged
80. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 23 October 2018. The
conclusion of the inquest was a Narrative conclusion which recorded her complex
medical and nursing needs and noting that she was discharged from hospital on 7
November 2018 to a nursing home despite ongoing unmet medical needs. The cause of
her death was 1a) Pneumonia, 1b) Dementia and 2) Ankle fracture with pressure ulcer

| secondary to Contractures and Osteoporosis.

ba

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Eileen Cooke aged 80 died in Pinderfields Hospital on 21 December 2017. She was the
epitome of a vulnerable elderly lady who had been bed bound for some years and was
frail. She had dementia and gross contractures of her left leg as a result of previous leg
fractures, exacerbated still further by a fracture of her left ankle in September 2017. In
consequence, her left foot lay permanently in a distorted position under her bottom. She
was thus susceptible to pressure sores. The management of her condition presented
complex problems to the clinicians and nurses involved in her care. Z|

~| CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. in the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

1. Consideration was given to an amputation of her left leg at her groin but it was
recognised this would entail significant risks for a frail lady aged 80 with a range
of co-morbidities. A ‘best interests’ multi-disciplinary meeting was mooted but
never organised.

2. She was nevertheless deemed medically fit to be discharged from hospital on 7
November 2017 despite the progressive deterioration of the soft tissues around
her left ankle fracture site and painful ulceration between her thighs. At this
Point in time the question of amputation or an alternative management plan
were unresolved. The discharge letter was produced by a ‘Trust Grade Doctor-
Career Grade Level’ unknown to the family.

3. The family were not involved in her discharge from hospital at all. it was
arranged in haste. Inadequate preparatory work had been done to establish how
her wound dressing could be carried out and the pain control needed whilst this
was done. No consideration was given to the skills required to achieve this, or
the wisdom of involving a tissue viability nurse.

i___4.__Evidence taken from healthcare professionals at the Inquest indicated thatthe |

7.11.17 discharge was an error of judgement. It effectively passed an
unresolved problem to a nursing home.

5. A’‘best interests’ meeting was required to assess her needs and formulate a
management plan. This should have involved the orthopaedic surgeon, the
vascular surgeon, nurses, a physio-therapist, a care of the elderly physician, a
palliative care specialist, the general practitioner and the family. In the event no
such meeting was arranged. It appeared difficult for senior clinicians to get hold
of each other. Even if the issues proved unsolvable the family would have at
least understood the positon and could brace themselves for a period of
palliative care, rather than being left in the dark.

6. After about three weeks in the nursing home, during which period her condition
deteriorated, Mrs Cooke was re-admitted to Pinderfields Hospital after the GP
and a local MP became involved.

7. The Inquest heard further evidence that hastily arranged discharges from
Pinderfields Hospital are not uncommon and as a result patients can be sent
home without an adequate supply of prescribed medication (for example,
because the hospital pharmacy has closed by the time the discharge is
organised).

8. Having heard the evidence relating to the treatment received by this vulnerable
elderly lady, | am concerned that the safety of others may be put at risk by
precipitously arranged discharges.

bs | ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you
[AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action.

a

{| __
YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 21 December 2018. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or Proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

ol

|
COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons daughter), , Registered Manager,
Priory G are Home, Ladybalk Lane, : 1JQ, HC-One Limited
Southgate House, Archer Street, Darlington, DL3 GAH. | have also sent it to

HEB General Practitioner, The Surgery, Stuart Road, Pontefract, WF8 4PQ. Rt Hon
Yvette Cooper MP, 1 York Street, Castleford, WF10 1RB and the Care Quality
Commission HQ in Bury who may find it useful or of interest.

(am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

—|

25 October 2018 Kevin McLoughlin

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Mid Yorkshire Hospitals (PDF)
NHS

The Mid Yorkshire Hospitals

NHS Trust
Your ref: KM/JS/4188/17 liz/ / ce - of 5
Our ref: KS/VJ/12/18 a ve <7 C
Date: 21 December 2018 Wr ms woo bir
Mr K McLoughlin |
Senior Coroner Medical Director
Coroner’s Office and Court Trust Headquarters and Medical Education Centre
71-Northgate aol
Wakefield West Yorkshire
WF1 3BS WF1 4DG

Dear Mr McLoughlin

Re Inquest touching Eileen Cooke (deceased) — Regulation 28 Report to
Prevent Future Deaths

Following our correspondence on this matter | am providing a response to assure
you that the Trust has a robust process for the safe discharge of elderly patients.

The Mid Yorkshire Trust is a large multi-site acute trust serving the population of
Wakefield and North Kirklees. Frail elderly patients may be discharged from
Pinderfields, Pontefract or Dewsbury and District Hospitals. The majority of
discharges from the medical department occur from the older person’s wards —
Ward 41, 42, 43 at Pinderfields and Ward 2, 9 and 11 at Dewsbury Hospitals.

The Trust defines frailty in the following way:

F | Falls (not alcohol related) or new reduced mobility

R. | Repeat Hospital attendances >= 3 in last 12 months and/or Rated as atleast
bad | moderate Frailty in the community __|

OK | Acute confusion (Delirium) or Chronic Confusion (incl. Dementia)
lot Mi [ New INCONTINENCE (urinary/faecal)

he Lives in residential or nursing home 0
t BA Treatment for Parkinson’s  ~
YM Years >=t0yeasod

Wherever possible frail elderly patients are admitted to one of the Acute Care of the
Elderly (ACE) Units. This ensures that a holistic approach is taken and a
comprehensive geriatric assessment completed. When frail patients are admitted to
other areas the care of the elderly department does offer consultations to help guide
clinical care and discharge planning.

Chaiman — Jules Preston MBE Chief Executive — Martin Barkley

Striving for excellence 27 DEC 2018 An Associated Teaching Trust

There are a number of possibilities for the discharge for frail older patients with most
being discharged back to their usual place of residence. All patients who have had a
deterioration in their mobility are reassessed by therapists. Frail older patients,
regardiess of their location as an inpatient, have access to occupational therapy
assessments and if necessary physiotherapy. These therapy assessments allow
patients and their relatives to obtain valuable information about other support
available to them in the community. ,

Therapy assessments along with those made by nursing and medical staff may
reveal that a person requires more support. This may be. a new or increased
package of care, require placement in an interim bed or care home. Others require a
further period of rehabilitation, to improve their mobility and general health which
may be delivered from a respite placement. Those patients returning to 24 hour care
in residential or nursing homes do not require an occupational therapy review (which
looks at community needs on discharge) but do have a physiotherapy review if their
mobility is not altered. The therapy reviews are not required if the patient is bed
bound but they are followed up in the community. When concerns about care home
placements are raised then teams ensure. that there are no outstanding
safeguarding issues which do not need addressing to keep patients safe.

For all older patients, there are a number of community services which may need to
be accessed:

a) District nurses for wound dressings, monitoring or follow up review for
example to check lying/ standing blood pressures

b) Tissue viability nurses

c) Vascular nurses for those who have wounds which have a vascular origin

d) Diabetes nurses

e) Comniunity pharmacists — They can look at medications and their delivery for
those who are discharged who have a history of no or poor compliance

Discharge plans for frail older patients are discussed with patients themselves and
often their family or next of kin. In those who lack capacity to make decisions for
themselves, discharge plans are discussed with relatives especially those who have
Power of Attorney over health and well-being. The Trust. has a safeguarding adult
team to support clinical teams in their decisions and discussion if required.

On the two ACE Units, there is a dedicated multidisciplinary/ multiagency team
named the Rapid Elderly Assessment Care Team (REACT) — the Trust was one of
the Phase One Sites for the Future Hospitals Programme at tS Royal College of
Physicians which supported the expansion of the service.

The team at Dewsbury and District Hospital is slightly different as the Clinical
Commissioning Group have a Hospital Avoidance Team which supports discharges
which occur within 5 days. The teams at both hospitals have close links with
community providers and use various community services to ensure discharge is
safe for patients following an acute admission. AgeUK Wakefield often take patients
home and also now have an advice hub within Pinderfields Hospital were advice on

their services can be obtained. This can be accessed by all in patients and their
relatives whether they are on the elderly care wards or other wards in the hospital.
The REACT service is aimed at the first 72 hours of a patient’s admission.

Each of our Care of the Elderly wards has access to therapy teams who attend daily
board rounds which occur on a Monday to Friday. Treatment and prospective
discharge plans are discussed. This allows issues to be raised and concern
addressed: such as how someone is going to manage at home or whether further
information or time is needed. At these daily board rounds and safety huddles,
therapists, nurses, doctors and discharge coordinators are present. Each of our care
of the elderly wards has a dedicated discharge coordinator, who helps to facilitate
safe and timely discharges of frail older patients. Once a patient is deemed
medically fit, the therapists work to establish the baseline and whether a patient's
current needs have changed. In some this can be established quickly, in others
especially those with cognitive issues, assessments may be reliant on engagement
of the patient and family in the discharge process. The options for discharge do vary
and the most appropriate decision is made in consultation with those concemed. If
during the discharge process, things change such as the patient becomes unwell
then discharge plans are put on-hold and their clinical condition and suitability for
discharge is reassessed. -

In instances where our frail elderly patients are being cared for out with the elderly
care areas, the Care of the Elderly Department offers a consultation option to help
manage patients with complex needs or support with discharge plans. Although we
would prioritise an elderly care bed for these patients, the complexities of some
conditions necessitate their care being delivered in a specialist area. The team will
also support best interest decisions.

If a patient is returning to a care home, discussions take place with the care home to
see if their needs can still be met. This would be standard practice for those who are
bedbound due to frailty. If necessary, such conversations are followed up by a visit
from the care home staff to the ward.

The Trust is committed to improving our liaison with care homes and where possible,
the disruption of an admission to hospital for their patients. There are currently two
clinicians who outreach into the local care homes visiting the care homes, often after
a patient has been discharged, to talk through advanced care planning or to review
patients so they do not have to attend a clinic at the hospital. They have set up a
dedicated email for communication and each home will have a named geriatrician
that they can access. Both these geriatricians have knowledge of the management
of moderate/ severe frailty and have set up good liaison with the neurophysiologist
who manages contractures in the Trust to ensure patients with severe/ moderate
frailty with contractures can be seen.

Patient and family feedback is a really important way in which the Trust learns and
improves. REACT actively seeks this feedback by working closely with their patient
representatives gaining feedback ‘prior to discharge and post discharge with follow
up phone calls. The patient representatives contact patients who have been
discharged obtaining feedback on the discharge process and whether services were

provided as planned on discharge. The majority of responses have been positive.
Where we establish discharge plans have not fully satisfactory then the team strive
to ensure that improvements in the discharge process are made and shared.

| hope that this provides the information that you require.
Yours sincerely

Yor SS

BChB MRCP FRCPCH

Medical Director

es Chairman
Cc Martin Barkley, Chief Executive
Director of Nursing & Quality

Related reports

Other reports by Kevin McLoughlin

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.