Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Fahmida Khanam

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0039, written 22 Jan 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report22 Jan 2025
Reference2025-0039
DeceasedFahmida Khanam
CoronerKevin McLoughlin
Coroner areaWest Yorkshire (East)
CategoryOther related deaths · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Organisation Name: Savile Town Medical Centre 

GP Treatment of Immediate Family 
Members 

Policy 
Number 

Version 

Edited by 

Date issued 

STMC-301 

1.0 

T Jan 

29/01/2025 

Next review 
date 
30/06/2026 

Named individual 

Position 

Practice Manager 

Lead GP 

Deputy Lead GP 

Table of contents 

1 
1.1 
1.2 
1.3 
1.4 

2 
2.1 
2.2 
2.3 
2.4 
2.5 
2.6 
2.7 
2.8 

INTRODUCTION 

Purpose 

Scope 

Policy Statement 

Status 

POLICY 

Definitions 

General Guidelines 

Ethical Considerations 

Exceptions 

Procedure 

Responsibility 

Enforcement 

References 

2 
2 
2 
2 
2 

2 
2 
2 
3 
3 
3 
4 
4 
4 

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1 

Introduction 

1.1  PURPOSE 

The purpose of this policy is to establish clear guidelines for GPs to follow regarding the 
treatment of immediate family members (i.e., spouse, children, parents, siblings) to maintain 
ethical medical practice and ensure patient safety, confidentiality, and professional 
boundaries. 

1.2  SCOPE 

This policy applies to all General Practitioners (GPs) and healthcare providers working within 
the practice, including locum doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals. 

1.3  POLICY STATEMENT 

GPs should avoid treating immediate family members due to potential conflicts of 
interest, emotional bias, and challenges in maintaining professional boundaries. Exceptions 
may be made in urgent or emergency situations, but these should be documented and 
reviewed in accordance with ethical and legal guidelines. 

1.4  Status 

In accordance with the Equality Act 2010, we have considered how provisions within this 
policy might impact on different groups and individuals. This document and any procedures 
contained within it are non-contractual, which means they may be modified or withdrawn at 
any time. They apply to all employees and contractors working for the organisation. 

2  Policy 

2.1  Definitions 

• 

Immediate Family Member: A family member who is related by blood, marriage, or 
domestic partnership, including parents, children, siblings, and spouses. 
•  Treatment: Any medical intervention, including but not limited to diagnosis, 

prescription of medications, surgery, or counselling. 

2.2  General Guidelines 

1.  Avoidance of Direct Treatment: 

GPs are advised not to treat their immediate family members directly unless in an 
emergency where no other healthcare provider is available. 

2.  Referral Requirement: 

If a GP's immediate family member seeks treatment, the GP should refer them to 
another qualified healthcare professional or GP within the practice, ensuring 
continuity of care while maintaining professional objectivity. 

3.  Emergency Situations: 

In the case of an emergency, where treatment is necessary to prevent harm or injury 
and no other healthcare provider is available, the GP may provide initial treatment. 
However, this should be followed by referral to an external healthcare provider as 
soon as possible. 

2 

 
 4.  Clear Documentation: 

All decisions regarding the treatment of family members must be clearly documented 
in the patient’s medical record, including any referrals made, the reason for the GP's 
involvement, and any risks or conflicts of interest identified. 

5.  Patient Consent: 

If a GP must treat a family member in an emergency or unavoidable situation, 
informed consent should be obtained, acknowledging the potential conflict of interest. 
The GP should explain the reasons for their involvement and the limitations this 
might impose. 

2.3  Ethical Considerations 

1.  Impartiality: Treatment of family members could be compromised by emotional 

involvement, which may impair the GP's ability to offer impartial and objective care. 

2.  Confidentiality: The GP should ensure that patient confidentiality is upheld at all 
times, even with immediate family members. GPs must avoid sharing any medical 
information about the family member with others, unless consent is provided. 

3.  Professional Boundaries: Clear professional boundaries should be maintained 
between the GP and their family member to avoid inappropriate dynamics and 
ensure effective care. 

2.4  Exceptions 

While it is generally discouraged for GPs to treat family members, exceptions may 
include: 
•  Emergencies: If immediate treatment is necessary to preserve life or prevent 

significant harm. 

•  Geographic/Access Limitations: In areas with limited healthcare providers, a GP 
may need to treat a family member, but this should be a temporary solution until a 
referral to an external provider is possible. 

2.5  Procedure 

1.  Family Member Requests Treatment:  

•  The GP should first assess whether they can provide appropriate care without 

compromising ethical guidelines. 

• 

If possible, refer the family member to another GP or healthcare provider within 
the practice or externally. 

2.  In the Case of an Emergency: 

•  Provide immediate care to the family member if no other healthcare provider is 

available. 

•  After providing emergency care, make a formal referral to an external healthcare 

provider. 

•  Ensure that all steps taken are thoroughly documented in the patient’s record. 

3.  Referral Process: 

3 

 
 •  For non-emergency situations, if the GP is unable or unwilling to treat a family 
member, they should refer the family member to another GP or specialist in a 
timely manner. 

•  The GP must ensure a smooth transition and provide any necessary medical 
information to the treating physician with the family member’s consent. 

4.  Documentation: 

•  Record all details of the decision-making process, including the rationale for any 

deviation from standard practice, consent obtained, and referrals made. 

5.  Review: 

•  Periodically review the appropriateness of the policy and make adjustments as 
necessary based on patient feedback, staff input, and regulatory changes. 

2.6  Responsibility 

All GPs and clinical staff within the practice are responsible for adhering to this policy and 
ensuring that immediate family members are treated with the highest standards of care while 
respecting professional boundaries. 

2.7  Enforcement 

Failure to adhere to this policy may result in disciplinary action, including but not limited to 
formal warnings or review of clinical practice. 

2.8  References 

GMC Good Medical Practice Guideline, 2024 

4
Also filed under 2025-0039: Fahmida-Khanam-Prevention-of-Future-Deaths-Report-2025-0039.pdf
OFFICE OF THE  
SENIOR CORONER 
for the County of West Yorkshire 
(Eastern District) 

His Majesty’s Coroner’s Office 
The Coroner’s Courts 
Burgage Square 
Wakefield WF1 2TS 

Telephone: 

Email: 

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

    1. General Medical Council 

    2. 

CORONER 

1 

2 

3 

I am Kevin McLoughlin, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner area of West Yorkshire (East) 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 12th November 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Fahmida Khanam, 74. 
The investigation concluded on 16th January 2025. The conclusion of the investigation that the 
death was due to natural causes, specifically:  

1a     Myocardial infarction  

1b     Severe coronary artery atheroma  

2       Hypertension, asthma, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease 
CIRCUMSTANCES 

THE 

OF 

DEATH 

4 

Mrs  Khanam  died  on  12th  November  2024.  A  post  mortem  attributed  her  death  to  natural 
causes.  It  emerged  that  her  husband, 
  had  been  treating  his  wife.  The 
Medical Examiner refused to countersign the cause of death put forward by another doctor in 

’s practice. This necessitated a post mortem.   

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the investigation the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

5 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:  – 

It is NOT suggested that any suspicious conduct has taken place.  

The matter is reported as it is understood to be a cardinal principle that a doctor should not 

 
  
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 treat a close relative.  

The following documents accompany this report: 

1     Post mortem report dated 15th January 2025 

2     My letter to 
ACTION 

 dated 14th November 2024 

SHOULD 

BE 

TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation 
has the power to take such action. 
YOUR 

RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely 
period. 
by 

Coroner,  may 

19th  March 

extend 

2025. 

the 

the 

I, 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or  proposed  to  be  taken,  setting  out  the 
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 
COPIES 

PUBLICATION 

and 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner  

I  am  also  under  a  duty 

to  send 

the  Chief  Coroner  a  copy  of  your  response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He 
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. 

You  may  make  representations  to  me,  the  coroner,  at  the  time  of  your  response,  about  the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 
Signed: 

7 

6 

8 

9 

KEVIN McLOUGHLIN 
Senior Coroner 
West Yorkshire (E) 

Date: 22 January 2025

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from General Medical Council (PDF)
10 March 2025 

Kevin McLoughlin 
His Majesty’s Coroner’s Office 
The Coroner’s Courts 
Burgage Square 
Wakefield 
WF1 2TS 

Sent via email: 

Dear Mr McLoughlin 

Thank you for sending the Rule 28 report arising from the investigation into the death of Mrs 
Fahmida Khanam. May I offer our sincere condolences to the family for their loss. You draw 
attention to the fact that Mrs Khanam’s husband, 
, had been treating her. While 
you concluded that Mrs Khanam died of natural causes and do not suggest any suspicious conduct 
on the part of 
, you have referred the matter to us based on your understanding that ‘it is a 
cardinal principle that a doctor should not treat a close relative’. As the independent statutory 
regulator of doctors, physician associates (PAs) and anaesthesia associates (AAs) in the UK, our focus 
is to support good, safe patient care. One of our key functions is to set and maintain the professional 
standards expected of our registrants.   

In the introduction to Good Medical Practice, we say: 

“. . . it isn’t a set of rules. You must use your professional judgement to apply the standards in 
Good medical practice to your day to day practice. This means working out which of the 
professional standards are relevant to the specific circumstances you are facing, and using 
your knowledge, skills and experience to follow them in that context.” 

On the specific concern that you highlight, in paragraph 97 of that guidance, we say ‘You must, 
wherever possible, avoid providing medical care to yourself or anyone with whom you have a close 
personal relationship’. You go on to point registrants to the more detailed guidance on Good practice 
in proposing, prescribing, providing and managing medicines and devices and in particular 
paragraphs 66 to 68 regarding record keeping and the issues around prescribing controlled drugs.  

So, our guidance does not forbid doctors from treating those close to them - there may be 
circumstances where no other doctor is available, for example when they live in remote rural areas.  
However, best practice would be to avoid doing so wherever possible because of the potential 
pitfalls. For example, it may be difficult to be objective when treating a family member (including 
issuing prescriptions): the family member may feel constrained in being open and honest about their 
condition. 

And not every departure from our standards will be considered serious enough to justify action 
affecting a registrant’s registration and licence to practice.  

The GMC is a charity registered in 
England and Wales (1089278) 
and Scotland (SC037750). 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 When a concern is raised with us about a registrant, we must assess whether that individual poses 
any current and ongoing risk in line with our regulatory responsibilities: 

•  protecting, promoting and maintaining the health, safety and wellbeing of the public 
•  promoting and maintaining public confidence in the medical professions, and 
•  promoting and maintaining proper professional standards and conduct for members of those 

professions. 

Further information about our processes and the types of action we might need to take can be found 
on our fitness to practise webpages. 

Thank you for highlighting this matter with us. 

Yours sincerely 

Medical Director and Director of Education and Standards 

gmc.uk.org                                                                                                                                                                                                                        2
Response from Saville Town Medical Centre (PDF)
Saville Town Medical Centre,

T. 01924 461124 E: admin.saviletownmedicalcentre@nhs.net
Providing NHS Services

Katie Lee

Coroner's Services Team Leader

His Majestys Coroners Office

The Coroners Courts, Burgage Square,
Merchant Gate, Wakefield, WF12TS

Your Ref:
Date: 28/01/2025
Dear Katie

Thank you for sharing the report.

Mrs. Khanam was registered with Leigh View Medical Practice from 2008 until July 2023. During this
time, she had several comorbidities, including uncontrolled asthma, hypertension, type 2 diabetes
mellitus (T2DM), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3. Being a GP myself, | observed that her
clinical needs were not adequately met, particularly regarding her uncontrolled asthma and
hypertension.

Both Mrs Khanam and | were registered at Leigh View Medical Practice, but we were dissatisfied with
the care provided, which led us to leave the practice and seek care elsewhere. Mrs. Khanam chose to
register with Savile Town Medical Centre, where a team of Health care professionals including GPs
could share the workload, ensuring better care. Mrs. Knanam also worked as a senior administrator at
this practice.

Prior to joining Savile Town Medical Centre, Mrs. Khanam was seen by a Nurse Practitioner at her
former practice, but she expressed dissatisfaction with the care provided. She felt the treatment was
inadequate and not aligned with current clinical pathways or NICE guidelines.

After discussing her concerns with another colleague GP at Savile Town Medical Centre, | referred Mrs.
Khanam to a respiratory physician for her uncontrolled asthma—something that had not been
addressed at her previous practice. Additionally, based on her clinical symptoms, | also referred her to
an ENT specialist.

Once she has seen respiratory physician at the hospital, where her treatment management was
reviewed with commencing of new medication which resulted her Well control of Asthma.

Also, with hypertension management when she was prescribed new medication her blood pressure
became well controlled.

Mrs khanum was only issued repeat prescriptions for her Asthma and a couple of referrals to secondary
care for treatment management, as mentioned above.

However, | have discussed this with the GP partner and management, on how to avoid this happening
again in the future. The practice is to adopt a protocol/procedure immediately to ensure a GP must not
treat immediate family members according to GMC guidelines and current Good Medical

Practice guidelines.

Your Sincerely

Address Saville Town Medical Centre, 786 Scarborough Street, Dewsbury West Yorkshire. WF12 9AY

Related reports

Other reports by Kevin McLoughlin

See all →

More reports categorised “Other related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.