Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0315, written 24 Oct 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 24 Oct 2018 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2018-0315 |
| Deceased | Jennifer Lacey |
| Coroner | Fiona Wilcox |
| Coroner area | London Inner (West) |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) · Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Professor Stephen Powis, National Medical Director, NHS England, Skipton House, 80, London Road, London. SEI 6LH. General Pharmaceutical Council, 25 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London. E14 5LQ Bachmaéské némésti 334 60 00 Prague 6 — Dejvice Czech Republic 1 CORONER | am Dr Fiona J Wilcox, HM Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Inner West London 2 | CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 | INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 18 September 2018, evidence was heard touching the death of Jennifer Anne Lacey. Ms Lacey had been found deceased in Room 122 of the Travelodge Hotel in Morden on the 4" June 2018. She was 51 years old at the time of her death. The findings of the court were as follows: Medical Cause of Death 1 (a) Cardiorespiratory failure (b) Tramadol and alcohol poisoning. How, when and where the deceased came by her death: Jenny struggled with alcohol dependence from her teenage years. She also reported feelings of suicidality. On 4/6/2018 she was discovered deceased in a hotel room. She had consumed a large amount of alcohol and 210 tables of tramadol, half of which at least she had obtained over the internet. Conclusion of the Coroner as to the death: Suicide Circumstances of the Death. Evidence taken at the inquest confirmed that Jenny had obtained 100 tablets of tramadol 50 mg via a prescription issued by a doctor registered in Prague, who had never seen her and had no access to her medical records, nor had communicated with her GP. She had simply consulted with him over the internet and filled in an online questionnaire. It was not clear how she had obtained the other tablets. Concerns of the Coroner: 1. That such potentially dangerous and addictive drugs are so freely available over the internet. 2. That they can be prescribed without any contact with the patient's regular medical practitioner or access to the patient's medical records. 3. That such prescriptions of such potentially dangerous and addictive drugs may be being filled in UK pharmacies without any further checks. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. It is for each addressee to respond to matters relevant to them. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons : | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 24" October 2018 Dr Fiona J Wilcox HM Senior Coroner Inner West London Westminster Coroner’s Court 65, Horseferry Road London SW1P 2ED
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
INHS England Professor Stephen Powis National Medical Director Dr Fiona Wilcox 6" Floor, Skipton House HM Senior Coroner 80 London Road Inner West London SE1 6LH Westminster's Coroner’s Court 65 Horseferry Road London 13! February 2019 SW1P 2ED Dear Dr Wilcox, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths — Jennifer Anne Lacey, died on 4th June 2018. Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report concerning the death of Jennifer Anne Lacey on 4" June 2018. Firstly, | would like to express my deep condolences to Ms Lacey’s family. The regulation 28 report dated 24 October 2018 concludes Ms Lacey’s death was a result of cardiorespiratory failure triggered by consumption of tramadol and alcohol and that a conclusion was reached that Ms Lacey took her own life. Following the inquest, you raised the following concerns in your Regulation 28 Report to NHS England: 1. The such potentially dangerous and addictive drugs are so freely available over the internet. 2. That they can be prescribed without any contact with the patients’ regular medical practitioner or access to the patients’ medical records. 3. The such prescriptions of such potentially dangerous and addictive drug may be being filled in UK pharmacies without any further checks. We are grateful you have brought this to our attention and we also share these concerns. Firstly, it is important to set out that providers of controlled drugs based in England must comply with legislation which is enforced by healthcare regulators such as Care Quality Commission (CQC), the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC). In addition, all healthcare professionals are subject to their respective codes of professional conduct and these are enforced by, for example, the General Medical Council (GMC) for doctors. With regards to NHS England’s role, we have a clear responsibility in providing systems oversight for the management and use of controlled drugs, including tramadol. NHS England’s Controlled Drugs Accountable Officers (CDAOs)' undertake 1 https://www.england.nhs.uk/contact-us/privacy-notice/how-we-use-your-information/safety-and-quality/controlled-drugs- accountable-officer-alerts-etc/ Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations this role within each geographical region across England. They provide assurance that all healthcare organisations, including pharmacies, adopt a safe practice for appropriate clinical use, prescribing, storage, destruction and monitoring of controlled drugs. CDAOs facilitate the routes to share concerns, report incidents, and take remedial action as well as highlighting good practice. This is shared with wider partners such as Clinical Commissioning Groups and the Police through the Controlled Drugs Local Intelligence Networks (CD LINs). Details of all CDAOs in England are held on a national register, which is owned and published by the CQC: www.cqc.org.uk/content/controlled-drugs-accountable-officers However, we are aware of cases where coroners have highlighted an online consultation with a doctor, issue of a prescription and supply of medicines, as having contributed to a death. We recognise further work is needed to ensure patient safety where consultations are given online. As a result, in April 2017, the National Quality Board? - jointly chaired by NHS England and CQC - held a workshop focusing on online providers of primary care services and online prescribing. The workshop identified a number of challenges for the system including gaps in the current regulatory framework to protect patients from harmful practice. Following the workshop, the CQC established a UK-wide forum to review the regulatory landscape for online prescribing. As well as CQC, the group includes Healthcare Inspectorate Wales (HIW), Healthcare Improvement Scotland (HIS), The Regulation and Quality Improvement Authority (RQIA) (Northern Ireland), Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), the General Medical Council (GMC), General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) and Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). This group now meets regularly. Linked to this, the CQC inspected every company in England that provided online primary care services. Its findings were published in March 2018 in ‘The state of care in independent online primary health services’ °. Providers were assessed against five key areas: whether they were safe, caring, effective, responsive to people’s needs and well-led. The CQC also reviewed the provider's registered location, its systems and policies, examined how it delivered care, and analysed information it held against the provider including, where available, feedback from people who have used or have come into contact with the service. One of the questions CQC’s inspectors asked included, how the service makes sure the identity of the patient is authenticated and that their NHS GP is kept informed of any treatment. These issues are important for NHS England and we will ensure that NHS online consultations provide a safe and secure way for patients to discuss their health concerns with an appropriate clinician connected to their own GP practice and place centred around their needs. NHS England has adopted a robust system of quality assurance, safety and security standards so that patients and clinicians can feel confident in using online consultations. These services will continue to be regulated by CQC and we understand that they are progressing plans to help increase public understanding of the quality and safety of online services in England by rating providers as ‘outstanding’, ‘good’, ‘requires improvement’ or ‘inadequate’, as used on other healthcare services. ? The National Quality Board is a national cross organizational board comprising the clinical leaders of national arms-length bodies across health care, social care and public health. It is jointly chaired by NHS England and Care Quality Commission. * httos://www.cac.org.uk/publications/major-report/state-care-independent-online-primary-health-services Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations With regard to this case, and based on the information provided within the Regulation 28, it appears that this death was not the result of services provided by NHS, but from services outside of the NHS. It is unclear where this doctor or company were registered and the site from which the deceased obtained the consultation, prescription and medication. Nevertheless, the provision of remote consultations and the supply of medicines through distance selling remains a concern. We are working with other health regulators who have a greater role in responding to this challenge. Relevant UK agencies, such as the CQC and MRHA, have worked collaboratively to review the healthcare framework and, importantly, identify gaps to ensure patients are protected from loopholes — notably, for example, where some companies have deliberately configured themselves to avoid regulation by CQC - within and outside the UK system. NHS England remains committed to improving the safety of controlled drugs and online prescribing. We will continue to work across the system with key partners nationally, regionally and locally to ensure patient safety. We would also suggest that contact is made directly with the CQC and MRHA would will be better placed should you wish to understand the work in this area further. Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information. Yours sincerely i os Professor Stephen Powis National Medical Director NHS England Health and high quality care for all, now and for future generations
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.