Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0408, written 28 Dec 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 28 Dec 2018 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2018-0408 |
| Deceased | Joan Wright |
| Coroner | Alison Mutch |
| Coroner area | Manchester South |
| Category | Care Home Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28; REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Secretary of State for Health CORONER | am Alison Mutch, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of South Manchester |2 | CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 18" September 2017 | commenced an investigation into the death of Joan Wright. The inquest concluded on the 12" December 2018 and the conclusion was one of Natural Causes The medical cause of death was 1a) Acute myocardial insufficiency; 1b) Coronary artery atheroma | 4 | Joan Wright resided at Belmont Residential Home. She had poor mobility | and was unable to verbally communicate. The Care Home was rated | inadequate in January 2017. It was subject of ongoing intervention in relation to implementation of an action plan. On 25th August 2017 it was identified she had been given Oramorph incorrectly in the preceding days. She was not seen by a GP. On 16th September 2017 she died at | Belmont Residential Home. Post-mortem examination found that she had | extensive coronary artery atheroma which had caused her death. — EE 5 | CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — 1. The inquest heard that Oramorph has different classifications depending on the strength prescribed. This impacts the storage/handling arrangements. The inquest heard that opioids can have a significant impact at whatever strength they are prescribed if given in excess; 2. Evidence was given that because of the abolition of PCT and replacement with CCG’s there was no designation of the CCG’s as designated bodies with statutory responsibility in relation to drugs. This was an oversight but has not been corrected; 3. Following the maladministration of medication to Mrs Wright, the inquest heard that the matter was reported to GMP .The CDLO investigated but did not liaise with the local police unit or discuss the safeguarding implications; 4, GMP’s call handler did not recognise the potential safeguarding risks of the maladministration of opioids to a vulnerable member of the community and referred the report to the local division. The local division assessor (LRO) failed to recognise the safeguarding risks and filed the report as theft. GMP have changed their policies significantly since the matter was referred to them after Mrs Wright's death. However it was unclear about whether or not the issue had been addressed by Forces nationally. The inquest was told that the CDLO role had been brought in after the Shipman inquiry to ensure safeguarding risks were identified in relation to maladministration of drugs; 5. The home in question has been rated as inadequate by CQC and was under regular monitoring via an action plan. It was also being visited regularly by the Local Authority Quality Support Team every 10 days or so. One of the issues previously identified was poor management/documentation of medication. Notwithstanding that, access and unauthorised repeated administration of Oramorph took place; 6. The CQC gave evidence that the legislation requires regular checks by care homes in relation to medication but there is no statutory definition of what regular means. As a result in some it is monthly in others weekly. 6 | ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 22" February 2019. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons namely 1) He J2ughter of the deceased 2) Greater Manchester Police 3) Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council 4) Care Quality Commission 5) Stockport Clinical Commissioning Group 6) EE who may find it useful or of interest. | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. Alison Mutch OBE HM Senior Coroner 28.12.2018
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
From the Baroness Blackwood Department Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Lords) of Health Department of Health 39 Victoria Street London SWIH 0EU Tel: 020 7210 4850 Your Ref: 8223/CH Our Ref: PFD-1161533 2 | FEB 2019 Ms Alison Mutch OBE HM Senior Coroner, Manchester South HM Coroner's Court 1 Mount Tabor Street Stockport SKI 3AG eae Ms Malek Thank you for your correspondence of 28 December to Matt Hancock about the death of Mrs Joan Wright. I am replying as Minister with portfolio responsibility for medicines. Firstly, I would like to say how sorry I was to read of the circumstances of Mrs Wright’s death. If you have the opportunity to do so, please pass my condolences to her family. I have noted carefully the matters of concern in your report relating to the management of controlled drugs. You mention the Shipman Inquiry in your report. In response to the Shipman Inquiry's Fourth Report', there have been significant changes in the governance arrangements for the use and management of controlled drugs. The Home Office put in place tighter controls through Regulations covering prescribing, record keeping and safe custody of controlled drugs, and the then * http://www.nicpld.org/nes/assets/4thShipmanreport.pdf Department of Health, implemented The Controlled Drugs (Supervision of Management and Use) Regulations 2006 (the 2006 Controlled Drugs Regulations) (as amended)”. These Regulations mandated health care organisations to put in place standard operating procedures on the prescribing, supply and administration of controlled drugs and the clinical monitoring of patients. The 2006 Controlled Drugs Regulations also require the appointment of a Controlled Drug Accountable Officer (CDAO). This Officer has statutory responsibility for the safe management and use of controlled drugs within their organisation. These Officers are required to work with healthcare providers, regulators and enforcement authorities, including Controlled Drug Liaison Officers (CDLOs), through local intelligence networks (CD LINS) to share any concerms about the use and management of controlled drugs. The 2006 Controlled Drug Regulations were replaced by the current version of the Regulations in April 2013°. This replacement was largely due to the approval of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 by Parliament, which Jed to the removal of primary care trusts (PCTs) and therefore required the responsibilities and powers of PCT CDAOs to be transferred to the then-new NHS Commissioning Board (now NHS England). Under the 2013 Regulations, clinical commissioning groups are not ‘designated bodies’ but are named as ‘responsible bodies’. The responsibilities of ‘responsible bodies’ are set out in the Regulations. NHS England Area Teams are responsible for the appointment of a lead Controlled Drugs Accountable Officer to ensure that systems are in place for the safe and effective management and use of controlled drugs and that these systems are working effectively in their region. A statutory post-implementation review of the revised 2013 Regulations will be undertaken and published before 31 March 2020. I hope this information is helpful and provides assurance that the Regulations will be reviewed to ensure their continued effectiveness, More generally, the NHS has taken important steps towards improving the safety of medication. ? http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/3 148/contents/made 3 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/373/contents/made Department of Health The chief pharmacist role, following the report Pharmacy in England (2008)', was identified as the organisational lead for medicines safety, and a Patient Safety Alert in 2014 required all organisations to identify the role of Medicines Safety Officer to coordinate local medicines safety processes and work collaboratively nationally. NHS Improvement and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) jointly support a network of Medication Safety Officers and Medical Device Safety Officers. In addition, as part of the Government's response to the World Health Organisation's patient safety challenge on medicines safety, we are developing a programme of work led by NHS Improvement to improve medicines safety. Work is underway to accelerate the roll-out of electronic prescribing to controlled drugs and medicines administration, and to deploy more clinical pharmacists in primary care and care homes. We have also introduced monitoring of the highest risk prescribing practice linked to hospital admissions. Furthermore, in response to the Gosport Inquiry*, NHS England has initiated the following actions: e A review of the governance and leadership of the Controlled Drug Accountable Officer role in NHS England; e A review of the operation of the lead Controlled Drug Accountable Officers in NHS England, including the effectiveness of Local Intelligence Networks; and e An assurance process to assess how 'designated bodies’ (which include NHS trusts and foundation trusts) are reflecting on the learning from the * htups://www.gov.uk/government/publications/pharmacy-in-england-building-on-strengths-delivering-the- future 5 https://www.gosportpanel.independent.gov.uk/media/documents/070618_CCS207_CCS03183220761_ Gosport Inquiry Whole Document.pdf Gosport Panel report and reviewing arrangements in their organisation in the light of it. More broadly, system governance is provided by the Care Quality Commission (CQC), which ensures that health and adult social care providers maintain a safe environment for the management of controlled drugs in England. The CQC reports its findings through individual local inspection reports and by means of published annual updates to Government. It is clearly of great concern that the maladministration of a controlled drug to Mrs Wright occurred at a time when the care home was being monitored by the local authority. It is the registered provider and the registered manager’s responsibility to ensure the proper and safe management of medicines and guidance is available to support them to achieve this. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has produced a national guideline on the ‘Safe use and management of controlled drugs (NG46)°, published in 2016, and a social care guideline (SC1), published in 2014, provides guidance on ‘Managing medicines in care homes”. Furthermore, the CQC has clear guidance on its website on ‘Storing controlled drugs in care homes’®, I note your comment about the definition of ‘regular’. I am advised that guidance with regard to checking stocks is given within the NICE guidance NG46. This makes clear that providers should develop a controlled drugs policy and standard operating procedures for storing, transporting, destroying and disposing controlled drugs. Detailed guidance is provided on process and procedures for storage, stock checks and audits, including on the frequency of stock checks. While no system can ever completely prevent the mismanagement or misuse of controlled drugs, we believe the measures that have been put in place mean that the inappropriate use of opioids and other controlled drugs can be detected more quickly and minimised, so that protracted poor practice is less likely to continue unchecked. © https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng46 T https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/sc] Ree Department of Health Your report raises concerns about the actions of Greater Manchester Police in responding to the potential safeguarding risks following the incident report of maladministration of Oramorph to Mrs Wright, and questions if learning from this incident has been shared at a national level. The Health Act 2006 placed a greater emphasis on Controlled Drugs Liaison Officers being involved in not only the investigation of offences concerning controlled drugs in the health service, but also intelligence and partnership working; particularly through CD-LINs. As CDLOs are employees of the police force, I would suggest taking up this point with the Home Secretary, the Right Honourable Sajid Javid. Ni NICOLA BLACKWOOD
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.