Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2018

Joan Wright

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2018-0408, written 28 Dec 2018. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report28 Dec 2018
Reference2018-0408
DeceasedJoan Wright
CoronerAlison Mutch
Coroner areaManchester South
CategoryCare Home Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28; REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Secretary of State for Health
CORONER

| am Alison Mutch, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of South
Manchester

|2 | CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and
Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners
(Investigations) Regulations 2013

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 18" September 2017 | commenced an investigation into the death of
Joan Wright. The inquest concluded on the 12" December 2018 and the
conclusion was one of Natural Causes

The medical cause of death was 1a) Acute myocardial insufficiency;

1b) Coronary artery atheroma

|

4 | Joan Wright resided at Belmont Residential Home. She had poor mobility |

and was unable to verbally communicate. The Care Home was rated

| inadequate in January 2017. It was subject of ongoing intervention in
relation to implementation of an action plan. On 25th August 2017 it was
identified she had been given Oramorph incorrectly in the preceding
days. She was not seen by a GP. On 16th September 2017 she died at

| Belmont Residential Home. Post-mortem examination found that she had

| extensive coronary artery atheroma which had caused her death.

— EE

5 | CORONER'S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur
unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to
report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

1. The inquest heard that Oramorph has different classifications
depending on the strength prescribed. This impacts the
storage/handling arrangements. The inquest heard that opioids
can have a significant impact at whatever strength they are
prescribed if given in excess;

2. Evidence was given that because of the abolition of PCT and
replacement with CCG’s there was no designation of the CCG’s as
designated bodies with statutory responsibility in relation to drugs.
This was an oversight but has not been corrected;

3. Following the maladministration of medication to Mrs Wright, the
inquest heard that the matter was reported to GMP .The CDLO
investigated but did not liaise with the local police unit or discuss
the safeguarding implications;

4, GMP’s call handler did not recognise the potential safeguarding
risks of the maladministration of opioids to a vulnerable member of
the community and referred the report to the local division. The
local division assessor (LRO) failed to recognise the safeguarding
risks and filed the report as theft. GMP have changed their policies
significantly since the matter was referred to them after Mrs
Wright's death. However it was unclear about whether or not the
issue had been addressed by Forces nationally. The inquest was
told that the CDLO role had been brought in after the Shipman
inquiry to ensure safeguarding risks were identified in relation to
maladministration of drugs;

5. The home in question has been rated as inadequate by CQC
and was under regular monitoring via an action plan. It was also
being visited regularly by the Local Authority Quality Support Team
every 10 days or so. One of the issues previously identified was
poor management/documentation of medication. Notwithstanding
that, access and unauthorised repeated administration of
Oramorph took place;
6. The CQC gave evidence that the legislation requires regular
checks by care homes in relation to medication but there is no
statutory definition of what regular means. As a result in some it is
monthly in others weekly.

6 | ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and |
believe you have the power to take such action.

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date
of this report, namely by 22" February 2019. |, the coroner, may extend
the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain
why no action is proposed.

COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following
Interested Persons namely 1) He J2ughter of the
deceased 2) Greater Manchester Police 3) Stockport Metropolitan
Borough Council 4) Care Quality Commission 5) Stockport Clinical

Commissioning Group 6) EE who may find it useful or

of interest.

| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your
response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about
the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

Alison Mutch OBE
HM Senior Coroner

28.12.2018

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Health (PDF)
From the Baroness Blackwood

Department Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Lords)
of Health

Department of Health
39 Victoria Street
London

SWIH 0EU

Tel: 020 7210 4850

Your Ref: 8223/CH
Our Ref: PFD-1161533
2 | FEB 2019
Ms Alison Mutch OBE
HM Senior Coroner, Manchester South
HM Coroner's Court
1 Mount Tabor Street
Stockport
SKI 3AG

eae Ms Malek

Thank you for your correspondence of 28 December to Matt Hancock about the
death of Mrs Joan Wright. I am replying as Minister with portfolio
responsibility for medicines.

Firstly, I would like to say how sorry I was to read of the circumstances of Mrs
Wright’s death. If you have the opportunity to do so, please pass my
condolences to her family.

I have noted carefully the matters of concern in your report relating to the
management of controlled drugs.

You mention the Shipman Inquiry in your report. In response to the Shipman
Inquiry's Fourth Report', there have been significant changes in the governance
arrangements for the use and management of controlled drugs.

The Home Office put in place tighter controls through Regulations covering
prescribing, record keeping and safe custody of controlled drugs, and the then

* http://www.nicpld.org/nes/assets/4thShipmanreport.pdf

Department of Health, implemented The Controlled Drugs (Supervision of
Management and Use) Regulations 2006 (the 2006 Controlled Drugs
Regulations) (as amended)”. These Regulations mandated health care
organisations to put in place standard operating procedures on the prescribing,
supply and administration of controlled drugs and the clinical monitoring of
patients.

The 2006 Controlled Drugs Regulations also require the appointment of a
Controlled Drug Accountable Officer (CDAO). This Officer has statutory
responsibility for the safe management and use of controlled drugs within their
organisation. These Officers are required to work with healthcare providers,
regulators and enforcement authorities, including Controlled Drug Liaison
Officers (CDLOs), through local intelligence networks (CD LINS) to share any
concerms about the use and management of controlled drugs.

The 2006 Controlled Drug Regulations were replaced by the current version of
the Regulations in April 2013°. This replacement was largely due to the
approval of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 by Parliament, which Jed to
the removal of primary care trusts (PCTs) and therefore required the
responsibilities and powers of PCT CDAOs to be transferred to the then-new
NHS Commissioning Board (now NHS England). Under the 2013 Regulations,
clinical commissioning groups are not ‘designated bodies’ but are named as
‘responsible bodies’. The responsibilities of ‘responsible bodies’ are set out in
the Regulations.

NHS England Area Teams are responsible for the appointment of a lead
Controlled Drugs Accountable Officer to ensure that systems are in place for the
safe and effective management and use of controlled drugs and that these
systems are working effectively in their region.

A statutory post-implementation review of the revised 2013 Regulations will be
undertaken and published before 31 March 2020. I hope this information is
helpful and provides assurance that the Regulations will be reviewed to ensure
their continued effectiveness,

More generally, the NHS has taken important steps towards improving the
safety of medication.

? http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/3 148/contents/made

3 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/373/contents/made

Department
of Health

The chief pharmacist role, following the report Pharmacy in England (2008)',
was identified as the organisational lead for medicines safety, and a Patient
Safety Alert in 2014 required all organisations to identify the role of Medicines
Safety Officer to coordinate local medicines safety processes and work
collaboratively nationally.

NHS Improvement and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory
Agency (MHRA) jointly support a network of Medication Safety Officers and
Medical Device Safety Officers.

In addition, as part of the Government's response to the World Health
Organisation's patient safety challenge on medicines safety, we are developing a
programme of work led by NHS Improvement to improve medicines safety.
Work is underway to accelerate the roll-out of electronic prescribing to
controlled drugs and medicines administration, and to deploy more clinical
pharmacists in primary care and care homes. We have also introduced
monitoring of the highest risk prescribing practice linked to hospital admissions.

Furthermore, in response to the Gosport Inquiry*, NHS England has initiated the
following actions:

e A review of the governance and leadership of the Controlled Drug
Accountable Officer role in NHS England;

e A review of the operation of the lead Controlled Drug Accountable
Officers in NHS England, including the effectiveness of Local
Intelligence Networks; and

e An assurance process to assess how 'designated bodies’ (which include
NHS trusts and foundation trusts) are reflecting on the learning from the

* htups://www.gov.uk/government/publications/pharmacy-in-england-building-on-strengths-delivering-the-

future
5

https://www.gosportpanel.independent.gov.uk/media/documents/070618_CCS207_CCS03183220761_ Gosport
Inquiry Whole Document.pdf

Gosport Panel report and reviewing arrangements in their organisation in
the light of it.

More broadly, system governance is provided by the Care Quality Commission
(CQC), which ensures that health and adult social care providers maintain a safe
environment for the management of controlled drugs in England. The CQC
reports its findings through individual local inspection reports and by means of
published annual updates to Government.

It is clearly of great concern that the maladministration of a controlled drug to
Mrs Wright occurred at a time when the care home was being monitored by the
local authority.

It is the registered provider and the registered manager’s responsibility to ensure
the proper and safe management of medicines and guidance is available to
support them to achieve this. The National Institute for Health and Care
Excellence (NICE) has produced a national guideline on the ‘Safe use and
management of controlled drugs (NG46)°, published in 2016, and a social care
guideline (SC1), published in 2014, provides guidance on ‘Managing medicines
in care homes”. Furthermore, the CQC has clear guidance on its website on

‘Storing controlled drugs in care homes’®,

I note your comment about the definition of ‘regular’. I am advised that
guidance with regard to checking stocks is given within the NICE guidance
NG46. This makes clear that providers should develop a controlled drugs
policy and standard operating procedures for storing, transporting, destroying
and disposing controlled drugs. Detailed guidance is provided on process and
procedures for storage, stock checks and audits, including on the frequency of
stock checks.

While no system can ever completely prevent the mismanagement or misuse of
controlled drugs, we believe the measures that have been put in place mean that
the inappropriate use of opioids and other controlled drugs can be detected more
quickly and minimised, so that protracted poor practice is less likely to continue
unchecked.

© https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng46
T https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/sc]

Ree

Department
of Health

Your report raises concerns about the actions of Greater Manchester Police in
responding to the potential safeguarding risks following the incident report of
maladministration of Oramorph to Mrs Wright, and questions if learning from
this incident has been shared at a national level.

The Health Act 2006 placed a greater emphasis on Controlled Drugs Liaison
Officers being involved in not only the investigation of offences concerning
controlled drugs in the health service, but also intelligence and partnership
working; particularly through CD-LINs.

As CDLOs are employees of the police force, I would suggest taking up this
point with the Home Secretary, the Right Honourable Sajid Javid.

Ni

NICOLA BLACKWOOD

Related reports

Other reports by Alison Mutch

See all →

More reports categorised “Care Home Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Care Home Health related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.