Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019

Gail Bailey

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0027, written 23 Jan 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report23 Jan 2019
Reference2019-0027
DeceasedGail Bailey
CoronerPaul Smith
Coroner areaLincolnshire
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards)
Organisation namedUnited Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

HM SENIOR CORONER 
 Lincolnshire 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust

1. 

CORONER 

I am Paul Duncan Smith,  Area Coroner for the Coroner Area of Lincolnshire, 4 Lindum Road 
Lincoln LN2 1NN 

2. 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3. 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 7 February 2018 I commenced an investigation into the death of Gail Bailey (dob 03.07.81). The 
investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 18 November 2018. The inquest returned a 
narrative conclusion in relation to Mrs Bailey's death, the medical cause of death being:  

1a. 
1b.        Ruptured ectopic pregnancy of the left fallopian tube. 

Haemoperitoneum 

4. 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

1.  On 5 August 2017 Mrs Bailey was on holiday with her family in a caravan at Promenade 

Caravan Park Ingoldmelds. She was known to be 9 weeks pregnant. 

2.  During the afternoon she began to experience abdominal discomfort. The telephoned the 

Early Pregnancy Unit at her home hospital in Rotherham. She was advised to seek a scan 
at a local hospital. 

3.  An ambulance was called at 17.02 hours but due to delays by EMAS did not arrive until 

19.40 hours. Mrs Bailey was taken to Boston Pilgrim Hospital at 20.16 hours and arrived at 
20.51 hours. She was declared deceased at 21.40 hours. 

5. 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion 
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my 
statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

A)  I received evidence that on the facts of this case, the latest time that Mrs Bailey could have 
arrived at hospital with any realistic prospect of survival was 19.40 hours. Ultimately the 
decision to take her to Boston Pilgrim hospital was futile, although that was not known at 
the time. 

B)  I also received evidence that two pre-alert calls were made by the travelling paramedics to 
Boston Pilgrim Hospital to advise of the serious nature of Mrs Bailey's condition, those calls 
being made at approximately 20.30 hours and at 20.42 hours.

1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 C)  I received evidence from Mr Bailey that upon arrival at hospital the clinicians appeared not 

to be ready for his wife's arrival. 

D)  I received evidence from Mr 
Boston Pilgrim Hospital, that 
present at the time had noted in the medical records that he, together with other doctors 
had attempted to resuscitate Mrs Bailey who had presented to A & E in a collapsed state 
around 21.00 hours and had noted that " a cardiac arrest call-out had also been initiated in 
or around the time of the patient's  arrival to Pilgrim." 

, consultant in the Accident and Emergency Unit at 
, a Specialty Doctor in Emergency medicine 

E)  I received evidence from the locum registrar for the labour ward, 

 that "[My 
understanding at that time was that] no Obstetrician and gynaecologist was forewarned 
about this patients arrival to the A & E department." 

F)  The ED records confirmed that two pre alert calls were recorded but not dated nor signed. 

G)  Whilst the severity of Mrs Bailey's condition meant that in the particular circumstances of 
this case the treatment Mrs Bailey received at hospital neither caused nor contributed to 
her death, the apparent breakdown in communication does raise an area of concern in 
relation to future emergency admissions. 

6. 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you AND/OR your 
organisation has the power to take such action.  

7. 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by   
29 March 2019. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8. 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons 

1. 
2.  EMAS 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may 
send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may 
make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the 
publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

Dated this 23rd January 2019  day of January 2019 

……………………………………………………………. 
P D Smith 
Area Coroner 

2

Related reports

Other reports by Paul Smith

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.