Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0032, written 28 Jan 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 28 Jan 2019 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2019-0032 |
| Deceased | Conor Crutchley |
| Coroner | Christopher Morris |
| Coroner area | Manchester South |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: The Chief Executive of Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, 225 Old St, Ashton-under-Lyne OL6 7SR . CORONER lam Chris Morris, Area Coroner for Manchester South. CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/S/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 26" April 2018, Rachel Galloway, Assistant Coroner for Manchester South, opened the inquest into the death of Conor Crutchley who died at his home address on 14" January 2018 at the age of 19 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest whish was heard on 9" January 2019. The inquest concluded that Mr Crutchley’s death was drug-related. CIRCUMASTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr Crutchley had a significant history of mental health problems, and also had significant periods when he misused drugs. Following an attendance at hospital in summer 2017, Mr Crutchley was referred to Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust’s Early Intervention Team. He was diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder and prescribed medication. Over the course of Mr Crutchley’s care and treatment, a family member disclosed to a member of Trust staff that she had become concerned he had started using street drugs again. When this was raised with Mr Crutchley, he denied it. Staff signposted Mr Crutchley to local drug and alcohol services, should he wish to avail himself of them. Mr Crutchley was subsequently found dead at the home he shared with his parents. A post mortem examination concluded he died as a consequence of the combined toxic effects of cocaine and alprazolam. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. - In the course of the inquest, evidence was heard to the effect that a significant proportion of the Early Intervention Team’s patients have a dual-diagnosis of substance abuse and mental health problems. It is a matter of concern that the Early Intervention Team does not include specialist drug and alcohol workers amongst its number. Such professionals work for external providers and interaction with service users appear to be dependent on self-referral. Whilst the witness who gave evidence on behalf of the trust was unable to provide details of current waiting times, it is a matter of additional concern that at times significant wait can be encountered by service-users referred for talking therapies. The evidence before the court suggested such delays were often associated with difficulties recruiting and retaining appropriately qualified therapists. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 25" March 2019. I, the coroner, may extend the period. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to Mr Crutchley’s parents, and to the Chief Coroner. | have sent a copy of my report to the Accountable Officer of Tameside Clinical Commissioning Group, who may find it useful or of interest. | am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of. yaur response by the Chief Coroner. Cae, Signature: Chris Morris HM Area Coroner, ester South. HM Area Coroner 28/01/2019
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
NHS Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust 20" March 2019 Legal Department Trust Headquarters: 225 Old Street Ashton-under-Lyne Lancashire + . L Strictly Private and Confidential lelisttAsis2 Mr Christopher Morris Telephone; 0161 716 3000 HM Area Coroner j Coroner's Court 41 Mount Tabor Street Stockport SK1 3AG Dear Mr Morris Ref: Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths following the Inquest of Conor Crutchley who died on the 14" January 2018. | am writing to respond to the concerns raised by your investigation on the 9 January 2019 into the circumstances surrounding the tragic death of Conor Crutchley. The matters of concern raised and the actions we will take to address these concerns are as follows:- Concern The Early Intervention Team does not include specialist drug and alcohol workers and that access to the substance misuse service that is provided outside of the trust is dependent on self-referral. Response ‘Approximately 40% of people with psychosis misuse substances at some point in their lifetime, at least double the rate of the general population’ (nice.org.uk/guidance/cg 120). In an audit that was completed with the Tameside Early Intervention Team (EIT) in 2016 it was identified that 44% of service users were using both alcohol and substances and 22% using substances alone. (Audit of Substance Misuse Needs input for Tameside Early Intervention Team 2016). This audit identified that out of the 63 people who were in need of alcohol and/or substance misuse intervention: 34.9% had their need met e 32% of these interventions were successful. e 45% of these interventions had been commenced but the outcome was unknown e 23% of these interventions had been unsuccessful due to the individual relapsing to alcohol and/or substance abuse or the individual stopped engaging. - 57.1% of the individuals were offered intervention but refused to uptake the intervention. Visit us at www.penninecare.nhs.uk. - 8% of the needs were unmet. The self-assessment completed by Tameside EIT in 2017/18, facilitated by the Early Intervention in Psychosis Network for all EIT’s across England, identified that: e 46% of people on the EIT caseload at the point of data collection used alcoho! in the last 12 months and 26% of these individuals were assessed as engaging in harmful or hazardous use of alcohol. e Of the total number of people on the caseload o 2% received brief intervention and advice 2% received motivational interviewing 2% were referred to a specialist services 5% refused any interventions 85% did not need any interventions for alcohoi use 60090 0 e 24% of people on the EIT caseload at the point of data collection misused substances. e Of the total number of people on the caseload. o 2% received brief intervention and advice o 7% were referred to a specialist services o 10% refused any interventions co 80% did not need any interventions for substance misuse The Tameside Early Intervention Team does not employ a specialist drug and alcohol worker. Specialist drug and alcohol services within the Tameside & Glossop area are commissioned from an external provider, currently Change Grow Live (CGL). This service is accessed by referral; with the expectation that a Care Coordinator from the EIT would support a service user to self-refer to this service and/or, with consent, complete the referral on their behalf. This can be completed on-line, by letter or telephone. There is a further expectation that the Care Coordinator would offer any required support to attend the initial assessment with CGL. NICE guidance (nice.org.uk/guidance/cg120) recommends consideration of seeking specialist advice and initiating joint working arrangements where individuals with psychosis are known to be; severely dependent on alcohol; dependent on both alcohol and benzodiazepines or dependent on opioids and/or cocaine or crack cocaine; where substance misuse is difficult to control and/or leads to significant impairment of functioning: family breakdown or significant social disruption such as homelessness. EIT practitioners undertake joint working arrangements with CGL where substance and/or alcohol misuse is identified and individuals are willing to engage with support to address this. Care Coordinators and other professionals within the EIT are expected to be competent in the recognition, treatment and care of those with psychosis and coexisting alcohol and/or substance use. Recognition includes an exploration of particular substance use, quantity, frequency and pattern of use and the history of and route of administration. Supplementary information regarding alcohol and substance use is also gathered from family, carers and friends with the service user consent. The assessment of alcohol and substance use is also undertaken during physical health assessments completed by the team, followed by the provision of brief interventions where appropriate. In order to enhance the assessment of 2 A = Visit us at www penninecare nhs uk > alcohol and substance use the team are in the process of scoping available validated measures to assess dependency, such as the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST), for utilisation as part of the physical health assessment process. Training is provided to care coordinators and other professionals within the EIT in relation to co-morbid alcohol and substance use. Training includes dual diagnosis training, motivational interviewing (techniques to assess the person's readiness for change and movement forward on level of change), updates on new and emerging substances and risk assessment. This has been provided in-house and by external providers. The majority of . care coordinators within the team have previously undertaken dual diagnosis training and will attend refresher training as required. The EIT team manager will ensure that staff who have not completed training in this area will access appropriate training opportunities as soon as they are available. This will be monitored through the management supervision process. The Tameside EIT are in the process of developing roles for dual diagnosis champions within the team who will be supported to undertake additional training in relation to substance and alcohol use and cascade these skills within the team through a ‘train the trainer’ model. This will support the team to provide a comprehensive offer in relation to assessment of alcohol/substance use, risk assessment including impact of use on illness and other risks including risk to self, other, neglect, vulnerabilities and exploitation, education, motivational work, harm minimisation and encouraging and supporting referral to and engagement with specialist drug and alcohol services. Where service users give incorrect or inconsistent information around suspected substance and/or alcohol use, for example denying use where there is suspicion of use, the relationship between the individual, their supporting network including their family and carers, and the care coordinator is utilised to work towards a point of reflection and acknowledgement of use in order to encourage engagement with appropriate interventions. The EIT aims to offer evidence based interventions to individuals with needs pertaining to substance and/or alcohol misuse. A Cochrane review based on 25 Randomised Controlled Trials compared the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions offered (Psychosocial Interventions for People with both Severe Mental Illness and Substance Use; Cleary et al 2008). These included Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), motivational interviewing, 12 step recovery, skills training and psycho-education. The review found no compelling evidence to support any one psychological treatment over treatment as usual. A further study explored a mode! of integrating care/intervention which found that compared with standard care, integrated treatment for co-occurring disorders led to significant improvements in psychiatric symptoms and levels of met need but not in substance use or quality of life. (Integrated care for Co-occurring Disorders; Psychiatric Symptoms; Social Functioning and Service Costs at 18 months; Craig et al 2008) A suggestion from this study was to create a single role on each team dedicated to the delivery of psychological therapy, with time set aside to deliver therapy and supervise a broadly trained workforce. The EIT currently has a dedicated psychological therapy resource to support individuals through provision of a range of psychological interventions. 3 an Ses BYE & Visit us at www.penninecare.nhs uk © S E 21s Concern At times there can be a significant wait for individuals to access talking therapies and that this is associated with difficulties in recruiting and retaining suitably qualified therapists. Response The waiting list for talking therapies that was in place at the time that Conor was being supported by the EIT was as a result of not having sufficient capacity within the team to provide the level of psychological therapies required rather than difficulties in recruiting and retaining qualified staff. Tameside Early Intervention Team is working towards achieving the NICE Early Intervention in Psychosis Access and Waiting time standards. This includes the offer of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Psychosis (CBTp) and family therapies. Nationally there are different levels of attainment of these standards, linked to a planned incremental improvement by providers and commissioners over a period of time to work towards the standards set for achievement by 2020/2021. The standards for provision of NICE recommended interventions for people experiencing a first episode psychosis include the following: e more than 24% of EIT service users will take up individual CBTp. © more than 16% of families will take up family intervention. These standards take into account that it may not be appropriate to offer interventions to all service users, for example those that joined the service recently, and that not all service users offered interventions will take them up. All service users and families who are supported by an EIT will be offered access to psychological therapy. The self-assessment completed by Tameside EIT in 2017/18 facilitated by the Early Intervention in Psychosis Network for all EIT's across England identified that: e 68% of individuals with a First Episode Psychosis of people on the EIT caseload at the point of data collection started a course of CBTp. This was a 16% improvement from 2016/17. The national average for this standard was 34%. Tameside EIT was rated as one of the top performing teams in the country against this standard. e 2% of individuals with a First Episode Psychosis of people on the EIT caseload at the point of data collection started a family intervention. This was a 4% reduction from 2016/17. The national average for this standard was 18%. Tameside EIT was rated as one of the teams requiring greatest improvement against this standard. The Tameside EIT actively promote uptake of psychological interventions as there is a good evidence base for their effectiveness. This is a popular intervention with service users supported by the team and a high percentage of the service users supported by the team accept the offer of this intervention which can lead to a wait for the appropriate therapy to commence. In order to support the reduction in the wait for psychological interventions for individuals supported by the EIT, Tameside and Glossop CCG provided funding for an additional psychological therapist post within the team. This post was successfully recruited to and the practitioner commenced in post in December 2018. The practitioner is trained to 4 Visit us at www. penninecare.nhs uk provide both individual and family interventions. This has resulted in a reduction in the waiting times for therapy within the team. The current wait for CBTp for individuals with first episode psychosis is approximately 10 weeks and there is only 1 person waiting for CBTp who is being managed on the ‘At Risk Mental State’ (ARMS) pathway. In addition to this a practitioner within the team has also undertaken ‘train the trainer’ training in Family Intervention and has completed a 5 day training programme within the team to equip practitioners with the skills to offer this intervention in order to improve capacity to respond to requests for this intervention in a timely manner. There is currently no wait for family intervention. The management of the waiting list for psychological interventions in the team has also been reviewed and now includes a process of making monthly contact with individuals on the waiting list to ensure they still wish to access therapy and to provide an update on current waiting times. | hope that the information provided offers assurances that the findings of your investigations and the areas highlighted for the prevention of future deaths have been considered and prompted action. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further information. Yours sincerely CBr Clare Parker Executive Director of Nursing, Healthcare Professionals & Quality 5 Visit us at www penninecare nhs uk
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.