Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2019

Justin Brown

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2019-0103, written 27 Mar 2019. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report27 Mar 2019
Reference2019-0103
DeceasedJustin Brown
CoronerJacqueline Devonish
Coroner areaSuffolk
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)

NOTE: This from is to be used after an inquest.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

, Head of Health Improvement, NHS Suffolk, Suffolk County Council, Ipswich

1 CORONER
I am Jacqueline Devonish, Area Coroner, for the Coroner area of Suffolk.

2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28
and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 25/02/2016 00:00 Dr Peter Dean commenced an investigation into the death of Justin John BROWN
aged 43.

The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest held by me on 22 March 2019. The
conclusion of the inquest was that Justin Brown died from ketoacidosis due to diabetes and chronic
alcohol abuse, with underlying conditions of chronic pancreatitis and bronchopneumonia.

The jury returned a narrative conclusion finding that the condition causing the death had been
developed through poorly controlled insulin administration by Mr Brown. His past medical history
suggested a previous episode of ketoacidosis resulting in a hospital admission between 27
December 2015 and 4 January 2016. Upon discharge he had been warned that a relapse could be
fatal upon consuming excessive amounts of alcohol combined with poor insulin control.

4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

On 18 February 2016 at 22:19 welfare call was made to the police by Mr Brown’s sister who
resided in London. Justin Brown resided in Suffolk. The information was passed from the
Metropolitan police to Suffolk police who attended the address at 00:37 but got no response from
the communal intercom and therefore left without making contact. The police returned to the
address on 19 February at 12:18 and found Mr Brown deceased. Life was recognised as extinct by
the ambulance service at 12:40.

Mr Brown’s history included periods of support in rehabilitation and the incident referred to on 27
December when he had been admitted to James Paget University Hospital (JPUH) in a life-
threatening condition. Upon discharge he was referred to Turning Point, the Drug and Alcohol
Service, which was at that time the only drug service available in the Suffolk area for referrals from
JPUH. There was no direct means of communication with the service.
In evidence, the court heard
that the process for referrals was by a telephone message to an answerphone. There was no
acknowledgement or confirmation of service user contact. When supported Justin Brown was able
to remain compliant for extended periods. Upon discharge he was keen to remain well.

5 CORONER’S CONCERNS

 During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my
opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it
is my statutory duty to report to you;

Justin Brown had been discharged from hospital without confirmed support for his addiction
between 4 January and his death on 19 February 2019.
In light of his history of cooperation with
the service the hospital would have been assisted by an agreed protocol and closer working with
the commissioned drug service to enable monitoring of referrals sent and outcomes for the service
users.

6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation)
have the power to take such action.

7 YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by May 22, 2019. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

8 COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons

James Paget University Hospital and

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of
your response by the Chief Coroner.

9

Jacqueline DEVONISH
Area Coroner for
Suffolk
Dated: 27/03/2019

Related reports

Other reports by Jacqueline Devonish

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.