Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Emma Morrissey

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0317, written 4 Sep 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report4 Sep 2023
Reference2023-0317
DeceasedEmma Morrissey
CoronerJacqueline Devonish
Coroner areaCheshire
CategoryOther related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation  28:  REPORT TO  PREVENT FUTURE  DEATHS 

NOTE:  This  form  is  to  be  used  after an  inquest. 

REGULATION  28 REPORT TO  PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1  Regenesis  Health Travel  Limited 

1  CORONER 

I  am Jacqueline  DEVONISH,  Senior Coroner for the coroner area  of Cheshire 

2  CORONER'S LEGAL  POWERS 

I  make this  report under paragraph  7,  Schedule  5,  of the Coroners  and  Justice Act 2009 
and  regulations  28  and  29  of the Coroners  (Investigations)  Regulations  2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and  INQUEST 

On  28 July  2022 I  commenced  an  investigation  into the death  of Emma  Louise  MORRISSEY 
aged  44.  The  investigation  concluded  at the end  of the inquest on  31  August 2023.  The 
conclusion  of the inquest was  that: 

Narrative Conclusion  - Died  as  a  result of a  massive  uncontrolled  bleed  caused  by an 
instrument perforation  within the abdomen  during  surgery. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE  DEATH 

On  06 July  2022  Emma  Louise  Morrissey flew to Turkey's  private Termessos  Hospital  in 
Antalya  for gastric sleeve  surgery.  Arrangements were  made through  a  health tourism 
company  Regenisis.  On  07 July  2022  Emma  was  operated.  The  surgeon  perforated  her 
abdomen  with  an  instrument. The  area  was  packed  to stem the  bleed  but no  platelets for 
blood  clotting  were  administered  causing  continued  bleeding  and  her sad  death  on  08 July 
2022 at 12: 45  hours. 

5 

CORONER'S CONCERNS 

During  the course of the  investigation  my inquiries revealed  matters giving  rise to concern. 
In  my opinion  there  is  a  risk that future deaths could  occur unless action  is taken.  In the 
circumstances  it is  my statutory duty to  report to you. 

The  MATTERS OF CONCERN  are  as  follows: 
(brief summary of matters of concern) 

1. The  health  tourism  company Regenesis  UK  relied  upon  patient self declaration  of health 
and  made  no  independent enquiries to satisfy themselves that Emma  was  fit for the gastric 
sleeve  procedure  before  making the arrangement for her to  have  surgery at the Termessos 
Hospital,  Antalya  in  Turkey. 
2.  The  series  of health  related  pre-assessment questions asked  before  referral  to the 
private  hospital  in  Turkey were  unclear,  as  there was  no evidence  of a standard  form 
produced  by a  medically trained  source for the  referring  staff to  refer to.  The  questions did 
not include an  enquiry about family history of medical  conditions  such  as  cardiac  related 
relevant to Emma. 

Regulation 28 - After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 3.  There  has  been  no  evidence  of an  investigation  into the operating  table death  by the 
Ministry of Health  in  Turkey, the  private Termessos  Hospital  or Regenesis  UK  despite 
Regenesis  having  been  informed that the death  had  been  caused  by the surgeon  during the 
operation. 
4.  The  embalming  process  for repatriation  from Turkey to the  UK  was  inadequate due to 
there  being  no evidence  of fluid  perfused  to the great vessels,  leaving  Emma's  body at risk 
of infection  during  transit. This  presented  a  risk of decomposition  as  well  as  a  health  risk to 
the  professionals  receiving  her body in  the  UK. 
5.  The  surgery  note  provided  to  Regenesis  stated that the sleeve  gastrectomy operation 
was  not completed  following  the  intra-abdominal  bleed  in  the omentum. The UK  post 
mortem confirms that the surgery  had  been  completed  and  that the site of the  bleed  was 
the  lieno-renal  ligament and  not the omentum.  The  lieno-regal  ligament site  had  been 
packed  to stem the  bleed  during  the operation  and  was  present at post mortem. 
5.  The  cause  of death  reported  in  Turkey was  natural.  It was  recorded  as  la, Cardigenic 
Shock,  due to  lb.  Disseminated  Intravascular Coagulation.  In the circumstances of a 
massive  bleed  in  the abdomen  following  the  introduction  of the instrument known  as  the 
optical  trocar, the death  is  regarded  as  unnatural.  The  evidence  before the  inquest was 
that three  incisions  had  been  made to the abdomen, two of which  with  a sharp  instrument. 

6  ACTION  SHOULD BE  TAKEN 

In  my opinion  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent future  deaths and  I  believe you  (and/or 
your organisation)  have the  power to take such  action. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You  are  under a duty to respond  to this report within  56  days  of the date of this  report, 
namely by October 30,  2023.  I, the coroner,  may extend the  period. 

Your response  must contain  details of action  taken  or proposed  to  be  taken,  setting  out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise you  must explain  why no  action  is  proposed. 

8  COPIES and  PUBLICATION 

I  have  sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and  to the following  Interested 
Persons 

Warrington  Borough  Council 
Private Termessos Hastanesi 

I  have also  sent it to 

Foreign, Commonwealth &  Development Office 

who  may find  it useful  or of interest. 

I  am  also  under a duty to send  a copy of your response  to the Chief Coroner and  all 
interested  persons who  in  my opinion  should  receive  it. 

I  may also  send  a copy of your response  to any person  who I  believe  may find  it useful  or 
of interest. 

The  Chief Coroner may publish  either or both  in  a complete  or redacted  or summary form. 
He  may send  a copy of this report to any  person  who  he  believes  may find  it useful  or of 
interest. 

Regulation 28 - After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 
 
 You  may make  representations to  me,  the coroner,  at the time of your response  about the 
release  or the  publication  of your response  by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

Dated:  04/09/2023 

Jacqueline DEVONISH 
Senior Coroner for 
Cheshire 

Regulation 28 - After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Health and Social Care (PDF)
From Maria Caulfield MP 
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State 
Department of Health & Social Care 

39 Victoria Street 
London 
SW1H 0EU 

Ms Jacqueline Devonish  
HM Senior Coroner  
The Cheshire Coroner's Service East and West Annexes  
Town Hall  
Sankey Street  
Warrington   
Cheshire  
WA1 1UH  

15 November 2023  

Dear Ms Devonish,  

Thank  you  for  your  letter  of  4  September  2023  to  the  Secretary  of  State  for  Health  and 
Social  Care  about  the  death  of  Emma  Louise  Morrissey.  I  am  replying  as  Minister  for 
Mental Health and Women’s Health Strategy.  

Firstly, I would like to say how deeply saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Ms 
Morrissey’s  death.  I  appreciate  how distressing  her  unexpected death  must  be  for  family 
and loved ones, and I offer my heartfelt condolences. It is vital that we take the learnings 
from what happened to her in order to prevent future deaths.   

On  receipt  of  your  report,  the  UK  Government  expressed  our  concerns  to  the  Turkish 
Ministry of Health, given the circumstances surrounding Ms Morrissey’s death.   

More broadly, my officials are investigating the issues surrounding global medical tourism. 
Our efforts to understand the consequences of international health tourism are global, but 
we have a strong interest in Türkiye given it is a key destination for healthcare tourism for 
UK nationals.  

The Department has been consulting with the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development 
Office,  NHS  England,  the  Devolved  Governments  and  other  relevant  stakeholders  to 
obtain a better picture of the impact of medical tourism on patient safety and the NHS. My 
officials will also be visiting Türkiye shortly to meet with their counterparts. The intention is 
to discuss the regulatory framework, and the protections that are in place for UK nationals, 
and to identify concrete areas where the UK and Turkish authorities should work together 
to reduce the risks to patients in the future.  

Specifically,  I  have  noted  in  your  report  the  lack  of  standard  pre-assessment  questions 
provided  to  Ms  Morrissey  in  Türkiye.  This  meant  the  clinicians  failed  to  address  family 
medical  history  and  her  associated  cardiac  risk.  We  remain  aware  countries  providing 
healthcare  tourism  often  conduct  pre-assessment  checks  that  may  not  match  UK 

 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 regulatory standards and we want to encourage all providers treating UK nationals to meet 
international  best  practices  on  pre-operative  procedures  whenever  possible.  Such 
transparency  and  standardisation  are  important  to  reduce  potential  risks  to  patients  and 
improve patient care in the UK and overseas.   

I  also  noted  your  remarks  on  Ms  Morrissey's  inadequate  embalming  prior  to  the 
repatriation  of  her  body.  My  officials  will  ensure  that  Turkish  authorities  understand  the 
public  health  risks  when  bodies  are  not  appropriately  embalmed  and  lobby  that  further 
action is taken to ensure that there is no repeat of what happened to Ms Morrissey.  

The  Government  is  considering  how  we  can  most  effectively  communicate  with  those 
considering  medical  treatment  abroad,  to  ensure  people  are  better  informed  about  the 
risks ahead of surgery and understand the need to ensure appropriate aftercare, including 
considering when it may be safe to travel home.  

I  hope  this  response  is  helpful  in  setting  out  how  seriously  the  UK  Government  is taking 
the issues raised in your report.  

Yours sincerely, 

MARIA CAULFIELD

Related reports

Other reports by Jacqueline Devonish

See all →

More reports categorised “Other related deaths”

See all →

Track Jacqueline Devonish

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Jacqueline Devonish, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.