Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0069, written 12 Mar 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 12 Mar 2020 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2020-0069 |
| Deceased | Jason Pendlebury |
| Coroner | Matthew Cox |
| Coroner area | Manchester North |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Mental Health related deaths · Other related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Chief Constable Greater Manchester Police (GMP)
2. Chief Executive NWAS (NWAS)
CORONER
| am Matthew Cox, Assistant Coroner for the Coroner area of Manchester North
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
1 make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroner’s and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28
and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 12 October 2018 an investigation into the death of Jason Pendlebury was commenced. The inquest
resumed on 9 March 2020 and concluded on 11 March 2020. | recorded a short form conclusion of
accidental death.
CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH
The Deceased had been a known user of cocaine for several years prior to his death. It is likely that he was
under the influence of cocaine when on 29 September 2018 he gained access to the roof area of a block of
flats at Middleton via a roof window in the bathroom of the flat where he was residing at
the time. The deceased was seen to remove slates from the roof and throw them onto the pavement below.
He was observed to run across the roof without any apparent regard for his own safety. The deceased
appeared to lose his balance and fell from the roof sustaining serious injuries. He was transported by
ambulance to Salford Royal Hospital where despite appropriate treatment his condition deteriorated and he
died at Salford Royal Hospital on 2 October 2018.
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is
a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to
report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:-
| heard evidence that between 13 August and 22 August 2018 telephone calls were made to Greater
Manchester Police (GMP) on 8 separate dates by the Deceased, his wife and his business partner. On all but
one of those dates those concerns related to the Deceased's mental health. Of the calls that were made by
the Deceased, the call handler reached the conclusion that he had mental health issues. On 3 of the
occasions, GMP referred the matter to North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) which resulted in telephone
assessments by mental health nurses. The purposes of those telephone assessments was to determine
whether an ambulance should attend the Deceased. On two occasions a decision was taken that no
ambulance was required. On one occasion an ambulance was dispatched although the deceased refused
medical assistance and was not taken to Hospital.
It was not clear from the evidence that the mental health nurses carrying out the telephone assessments
were aware of the number of calls that had been made to GMP or of the previous telephone assessments.
None of the calls made to GMP or the fact that telephone mental health assessments had taken place was
communicated to the Deceased's GP. This meant that when the Deceased's wife contacted the GP on 6
September 2018 with concerns about his threats of suicide, the GP did not have all the information that he
might of had to determine what action to take.
l also heard that a Multi-Agency Adult Care Safeguarding Team meeting was held at Rochdale Police Station
on 28" August 2018. The Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP) who attended that meeting was not
provided with the full details of the telephone calls that had been made to GMP regarding the Deceased's
mental health and consequently assessed the risk of harm to himself and others as low. Had the AMHP
been provided with full information, it would have automatically generated a referral to the Single Point of
Access and led to the involvement of the mental health services.
A further contact with GMP was made on 19'* September 2018 and | heard that this triggered a referral to the
mental health services. However, GMP were unable to confirm what had happened to the referral and the
Mental Health Trust confirmed that they had no knowledge of any referral being made. In addition, GMP did
not notify the Deceased’s GP that a referral to mental health services had been made.
The matters of concern relate to the quality and systems of communication regarding concerns relating to
potential mental health needs between GMP and NWAS and onward communication to General Practitioners
and Approved Menta! Health Practitioners tasked with assessing risk levels.
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe each of you respectively
have the power to take such action.
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely 12 March
2020 |, the Coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
COPIES and PUBLICATION
| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons namely:-
Chief Executive Pennine Care NHS Trust (PCT)
Director General Independent Office for Police Conduct { IOPC )
lam also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary from. He may send a
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me the coroner at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your
response by the Chief Coroner.
Date: 12 March 2020 Signed: wan ~NO
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
QPM Chief Constable HM Assistant Coroner Mr Matthew Cox HM Coroner's Court The Phoenix Centre Church Street Heywood OL10 1LR GREATER MANCHESTER POLICE 22 May 2020 Dear Mr Cox Re: Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths following the Inquest touching upon the death of Mr Jason Pendlebury Thank you for your report sent by email dated 12 March 2020 in respect of Jason Pendlebury (deceased) and pursuant to Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (investigations) Regulations 2013 and paragraph 7, Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 Having carefully considered your report and the matters therein, I reply to the concerns raised chronology as follows, with additional information in the concluding summary:- Extract from Regulation 28 (Point 1 ): "Between 13 August and 22 August 2018, telephone calls were made to Greater Manchester Police (GMP) on 8 separate dates by the Deceased, his wife and his business partner. On all but one of these dates those concerns related to the Deceased's mental health. Of the calls that were made by the Deceased, the call handler reached the conclusion that he had mental health issues. On 3 of the occasions, GMP referred the matter to North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) which resulted in telephone assessments by mental health nurses. The purposes of those telephone assessments was to determine whether an ambulance should attend the Deceased. On two occasions a decision was taken that no ambulance was required. On one occasion an ambulance was dispatched although the deceased refused medical assistance and was not taken to hospital. It was not clear from the evidence that the (nwas)mental health nurses carrying out the telephone assessments were aware of the number of calls that had been made to GMP or of the preivous telephone assessments". In 2018, if GMP needed to refer an incident to NWAS, GMP would call NWAS and verbally pass on the information contained within the FWIN. A note wou ld be made on the FWIN stating that the incident had been switched to NWAS. There is normally no record of exactly what information was passed. Our IT systems in 2018 were OPUS and GMPICS. Our GMPICS system would only auto search incidents in the last 12 months at the address where the FWIN was created and populate this on the FWIN. In July 2019 Greater Manchester Police invested in a major new IT system, iOPS, which is split into ControlWorks and PoliceWorks. All calls that come into GMP are created on ControlWorks. There are now capabilities within ControlWorks to auto search on a phone Location address: GMP Force Headquarters, Central Park, Northampton Road, Manchester M40 SBP Postal address: Greater Manchester Police, Openshaw Complex, Lawton Street, Openshaw, Manchester M11 2NS Tel : 101 Cont.d pg 2 number, address and informant details, providing more information to the call handler compared to the GMPICS system. One aspect of our ongoing IT Change Programme is the feasibility ofan electronic Force to Force data exchange, which could potentially be used to share data electronically with agencies such as NWAS. It is anticipated that these advances in technology would improve the quality and efficiency of information sharing and is subject to ongoing review. At the time of Mr Pendlebury's death a new "in-house" mental health tactical advice service, called the Control Room Triage (CRT), had just been established within our Operational Communications Branch (OCB). On the 22nd August 2018 the CRT went live and operated between the hours of 8am until midnight. The CRT did not start covering 24/ 7 until 1st October 2018. The CRT still operates in the same way today, however is now called the Mental Health Tactical Advice Service (MHTAS). MHTAS includes a small team of mental health practitioners, collacted within OCB, with on average practitioners on duty at any one time. When a call is received into OCB and the initial call takers assess it as a mental health incident, the staff member will switch the incident through to the Vulnerability Support Unit (VSU). The VSU will review the person in crisis on Police systems and switch the incident through to a MHTAS practitioner. The mental health practitioners access a patients electronic mental health records and provide professional information and telephone advice to either officers at a scene or directly to the person in crisis. This consultation enables the most appropriate support plan to be put in place, which will consider all pathways to treatment and support. MHTAS will then send a letter to the person's GP and any care teams involved, informing them of the incident and any clinically relevant information. This is all recorded electronically on a system called 'Rio'. Currently, MHTAS are a small team and on occasion work to full capacity , unable to advise on all mental health related calls. However, If MHTAS are unable to support due to capacity, the officer has the option of contacting a local service for consultation where necessary (additional information contatined with the Summary section below). There are two FWINS for Mr Pendlebury that occurred following the formation of the CRT - FWINS 302 22/08/18 and 425 19/09/18. FWIN 302 22/08/18 was called in at 0420 hours and was attended by officers at 0435 hours and would therefore not have been referred to the CRT as on that date they finished operating at midnight. FWIN 425 19/09/18 came in as a domestic and was finalised as a domestic. There was nothing on the FWIN to indicate any mental health issues and therefore no requirement to switch the incident through to the CRT. Our records show no additional relevant information in relation to the calls outlined in Point 1. Extract from Regulation 28 (Point 2): "None of the calls made to GMP or the fact that telephone mental health assessments had taken place was communicated to the Deceased's GP. This meant that when the Location address: GMP Force Headquarters, Central Park, Northampton Road, Manchester M40 58P Postal address: Greater Manchester Police, Openshaw Complex, Lawton Street, Openshaw, Manchester M 11 2NS Tel: 101 Contd pg 3 Deceased's wife contacted the GP on fih September 2018 with concerns about this threats of suicide, the GP did not have all the information that he might have had to determine what action to take ''. GMP does not routinely or automatically send referrals directly to an individual's GP. Information is shared via standard local multi-agency arrangements, where a referral is sent through to the appropriate Adu lt, Child or Mental Health Services triage point for that Area. GMP are part of a pilot NHS England patient data sharing scheme. Patient information is shared by GP's with 'appropriate people' in NHS and social care systems, and only when it is needed. The referrals supplied by GMP therefore are fed into these agencies initially for onward sharing, if judged necessary by the social care and mental health practitioners. One action that they may complete upon receipt of the GMP referral will be to contact the It is individual's GP and share information as they consider appropriate and necessary. preferred that the individual has given consent for the sharing of their information . GMP's revised 'Mental ill health, mental incapacity and learning disabilities policy and procedure V3.3', published in July 2019 states: "As a matter of good practice, services needing to share information should routinely consider getting explicit written consent or documented verbal consent to the information sharing from the person about whom the information is concerned. Consent must be given freely and cannot be inferred or provided under duress. When gaining consent the individual should be told clearly what the purpose of sharing information is, how it will happen, what information will be shared and with whom . The individual should be informed of their right to refuse consent but assured they will be kept informed". 28th August and prior to did contact the GP's surgery, after the It is my understanding that the AMHP, MAAST meeting on September 2018 to enquire about Mr Pendlebury. ••■ reported back that she had been told that Mr Pendlebury did not attend GP appointments and he hadn 't been there since 2015. stated that in the ci rcumstances, there was little further that she could do. Multiple cases are discussed in each MASST meeting, which means it is not practicable for GP's to attend in person. As on this occasion, it is normal for professioanls such as AMHP's to liaise separately with the relevant GP. 6th - GMP's Publ ic Service Reform leads, Chief Supt. - consider the effectiveness of the current arrangements regard ing t~ma t ion sharing with partners and the Greater Manchester Health and Justice Board will be briefed on the concerns raised here (additional information on this body is included in the Summary below). and DCl - are to Extract from Regulation 28 (Point 3): "I also heard that a Multi-Agency Adult Care Safeguarding Team meeting was held at Rochdale Police Station on 28th August 2018. The Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP) who attended that meeting was not provided with the full details of the telephone calls that had been made to GMP regarding the Deceased's mental health and consequently assessed the risk of harm to himself and others as low. Had the AMHP been provided with the full information, it would have automatically generated a referral to the Single Point of Access and led to the involvement of mental health services''. Location address: GMP Force Headquarters , Central Park. Northampton Road , Manchester M40 58P Postal address : Greater Manchester Police, Openshaw Complex. Lawton Street, Openshaw, Manchester M11 2NS Tel: 101 Contd pg 4 Multi Agency Adult Safeguarding Teams (MAAST) were still relatively new to Greater Manchester in August 2018, having been introduced initially in April 2018. My understanding is that the AMHP was provided with information about those incidents that had been coded as Public Protection Incidents (PPls) and were deemed to be relevant. Whilst FWIN's 633 16/8/18, 1856 19/8/18, 376 20/8/18 and 329 21/8/18 related to Mr Pendlebury, the closing codes used did not highlight any mental health or adult safeguarding concerns for him and were not recorded as PPls. Three of the four FWINs above relate to the involvement by NWAS and these have been addressed within the above response. As per DC statement, Mr Pendlebury's was heard at the MAAST meeting due to this being the fourth reported Police incident in 2018 that identified that Mr Pendlebury was at risk due to potential mental health concerns. DC wanted to bring Mr Pendlebury's case to the meeting to ascertain whether there was any further support that could be offered from partnership agencies, namely mental health. The Operational Communications Branch (OCB) radio operator on the remaining FWIN (376 20/8/18) did not identify Mr Pendlebury as a repeat caller nor any vulnerability. Besides the introduction of the 24/7 CRT and Vulnerability Support Unit in 2018, the OCB have been transitioning through a key change project. The Command & Control Project aims are to develop the capability and professional expertise of our staff so they are fully supported in triaging demand effectively, confidently identifying and assessing vulnerability, threat, harm and risk. Knowledge Support Officers (KSO's) are now in role within OCB and currently have a scheduled upskill programme for all Radio Supervisors. The matters addressed relate to structural changes within the OCB, and cultural and behavioural factors that had previously contributed to tragic incidents. These measures put a focus on developing staff capability within their role and supporting them throughout the day. Extract from Regulation 28 (Point 4): "A further contact with GMP was made on September 2018 and I heard that this triggered a referral to the mental health services. However, GMP were unable to confirm what had happened to the referral and the mental Health Trust confirmed that they had no knowledge of any referral being made. In addition, GMP did not notify the Deceased's GP that a referral to mental health services had been made". 19th September 2018 is The mental health services referral form from the incident on recorded on GMP's safeguarding system as having been created on 25th September 2018. Ordinarily it would then be emailed to the relevant mental health trust. Due to the passage of time, it has not been possible to confirm the existence or not of that email referral. 19th However, it is confirmed that a number of other referrals were made after that incident to support the family, including an Early Help and Safeguarding Hub referral. It is recorded on the system that Vulnerable Adult Referral forms for earlier incidents had been created on 16th and 23rd August 2018 and these did appear to have been received and actioned. As outlined above, current multi agency arrangements are that GMP make any referral directly to the local social care and mental health triage services, who are responsible for onward referral to the relevant GP. Location address: GMP Force Headquarters, Central Park, Northampton Road, Manchester M40 5BP Postal address: Greater Manchester Police, Openshaw Complex, Lawton Street, Openshaw, Manchester M11 2NS Tel: 101 Cont.d pg 5 Extract from Regulation 28 (Summary): For North West Ambulance Service and Greater Manchester Police "The matters of concern relate to the quality and systems of communication regarding concerns relating to potential mental health needs between GMP and NWAS and onward communication to General Practitioners and Approved Mental Health Practitioners tasked with assessing risk levels''. Response: Greater Manchester Police acknowledges your concern. The Force recognises the importance of ensuring that partners including GMP have a common understanding of the respective roles and responsibilities of each agency in their collective response to people in mental health crisis. Furthermore this includes a shared understanding of risk and effective communication between agencies when incidents are reported and as circumstances change. In 2019 The Greater Manchester Health and Justice Board oversaw work to develop and implement a common approach to people in mental health crisis. The involed a working group, Health and Justice Task and Finish Group, which included senior representatives form GMP and the North-West Ambulance Service, in addition to the mental health trusts serving Greater Manchester, local authority approved mental health practitioners and Greater Manchester Combined Authority. This group examined multi-agency protocols and worked towards a common, documented, and consistently applied GM-wide procedure for responding to 'risk to life' where it presented as a result of mental health to blue light services. A key issue identified was the lack of 24-hour mental health services and provision of the best qualified people to respond to people in mental health crisis. Prior to the implementation phase and in response to the COVI D-19 pandemic, two significant mental health crisis lines have been established, which assists in addressing this gap in services: Firstly, Greater Manchester Mental Health and Pennine Care Foundation Trust now offer a 24-hour, 7 days a week mental health crisis line to known service users. Secondly, North West Borough Healthcare offer a 24-hour, 7 days a week mental health crisis line to known and unknown service users. In addition to these lines, in April 2020, a Clinical Assessment Service (CAS) line went live for known and unknown service users. Any 999 calls and 111 calls that are an NWAS category 3 or 4 are sent for review by NWAS mental health practitioners. Incidents for the CAS are then inputted into the 'Adastra' system and reviewed by the CAS. The CAS is currently staffed by GP's who call the patient back, complete an assessment and refer to the appropriate service. Phase 1 of the CAS has now been implemented, with further phases planned to expand this service. One of areas of expansion is to look at a referral pathway for GMP into the CAS. GMP lead, DCI Whittaker-Murray, attends the Greater Manchester Mental Health CAS planning meeting with key stakeholders, which are reviewing and developing future phases. Location address: GMP Force Headquarters, Central Park, Northampton Road, Manchester M40 5BP Postal address: Greater Manchester Police, Openshaw Complex, Lawton Street, Openshaw, Manchester M11 2NS Tel: 101 Cont.d pg 6 The introduction of mental health Trust lines and CAS lines is a significant step forward in addressing the collective response to people in mental health crisis and ensuring effective communication between agencies. Furthermore, GMP have an embedded 24/7 Mental Health Tactical Advice Service (as per point one) who share information with GP's and any local care teams involved . GMP also has an established referral pathway to partnership agencies for onward referrals to GP's (as per point 2). It is important to note that GMP does not commonly have access to or hold details of an individual's GP. Sharing infroamtion with GP's is carried out via local partnership referral mechanisms. GMP has undergone a major IT system upgrade, an aspect of which has now given the Force the opportunity to look at the feasibility of an electronic information sharing system from GMP call handlers to NWAS call handlers (as per point one). This would improve the quality and system of communication between GMP and NWAS. Work within the Health and Justice Task and Finish Group and previous Regulation 28 investigations have identified a training need within OCB and plans are in place to look at developing an appropriate training package for OCB staff. Following on from this Regulation 28, it is recommended that OCB training should also include clear instructions regarding what information is shared with NWAS and guidelines to improve the quality of information shared . We anticipate, this response illustrates some of the ongoing work within GMP to diligently work to address concerns raised and take on board the lessons learned. Greater Manchester Police and partners are committed to improving our individual agency and collective response to the needs of people with mental ill-health. We are using the knowledge we have gained from this case in our continuing work with partners. I hope that this response is helpful in outlining the actions that we are taking to address the issues you raised and in demonstrating our total commitment to learning from the tragic death of Mr Pendlebury, so that we can prevent death or serious injury arising in similar circumstances in the future. Yours sincerely Chief Constable Location address: GMP Force Headquarters, Central Park, Northampton Road , Manchester M40 58P Postal address: Greater Manchester Police, Openshaw Complex, Lawton Street, Openshaw, Manchester M11 2NS Tel: 101
Our services:
Emergency and urgent care
Non-emergency patient transport
NHS 111
HM Assistant Coroner Cox
H M Coroner’s Court
Phoenix Centre
Heywood
OL10 1LR
11 June 2020
Dear HM Assistant Coroner Cox
Headquarters
Ladybridge Hall
399 Chorley New Road
Heaton, Bolton
BL1 5DD
Tel: 01204 498400
www.nwas.nhs.uk
INQUEST TOUCHING UPON THE DEATH OF JASON PENDLEBURY
I write further to Regulation 28 Report which you issued against the Trust on 12 March 2020,
following the conclusion of the Inquest touching upon the death of Mr Jason Pendlebury.
I understand that a copy of this response will be shared with Mr Pendlebury’s family and, on
behalf of North West Ambulance Service, I wish to express my sincere condolences for their
loss.
This Regulation 28 report was jointly issued to North West Ambulance Service and Greater
Manchester Police. By this letter, I wish to address the matters that you raised specifically to
NWAS and I address each of those in turn below:-
1. It was not clear from the evidence that the NWAS mental health nurses
carrying out telephone assessments were aware of the number of calls that
had been made to GMP or of THE previous telephone assessments. The fact
that telephone assessments had been carried out were not communicated to
the Deceased’s GP
When an NWAS mental health nurse carries out a telephone assessment, they would only
be aware of a previous assessment by GMP or previous calls to GMP if this is
communicated to NWAS by the police and documented by the call taker. GMP, and indeed
any police force or emergency service, would be expected to share any information they felt
to be pertinent. Once a clinician has completed an assessment, or returned the incident to
dispatch if unable to carry out a triage, NWAS would not be made aware of any further
updates from GMP as the clinicians no longer have sight of the incident.
NWAS mental health nurses would, however, be aware of previous calls to NWAS. It is
common practice to check previous calls so an NWAS mental health nurse would be aware
if a patient had been assessed by another NWAS clinician previously and what the outcome
was.
With regards to communication with Mr Pendlebury’s GP, Mr Pendlebury was advised to
contact his GP and on one call he stated he was due to visit his GP therefore information
was not sent separately by the clinicians. The process within NWAS has now changed. The
Adastra system now ensures that all patients who are referred or discharged with self-care
Headquarters: Ladybridge Hall, 399 Chorley New Road, Bolton, BL1 5DD
Chairman: Peter White
Chief Executive: Daren Mochrie
advice and, therefore, do not receive an ambulance response have an automatic Post Event
Message sent to their GP, which would provide an overview of the 999 call.
2. The general quality and systems of communication regarding concerns
relating to potential mental health needs between GMP and NWAS and onward
communication
to General Practitioners and Approved Mental Health
Practitioners tasked with assessing risk levels
The Trust jointly chaired a task and finish group with GMP, which was set up last year in
response to a Regulation 28 report issued by Ms Joanne Kearsley in December 2018 to
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership, Greater Manchester Combined
Authority, Greater Manchester Police, North West Ambulance Service and Pennine Care
NHS Foundation Trust. It was agreed that enhancements to the response around concern
for welfare, and particularly risk to life, must be applied on a pan-GM basis, therefore
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust and North West Boroughs
Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust are also partners, despite not being involved in the
specific case in question.
The task and finish group was established to take action and improve the joint service
response in the event of immediate risk to life arising as a result of mental health crisis in the
community by
inter-agency
communications and procedures.
risk management and
risk assessment,
looking at
The sad case of Mr Pendlebury took place before this task and finish group was
commissioned, however four of the eight issues identified as requiring attention by the task
and finish group are relevant to the care provided to Mr Pendlebury and ultimately, to the
prevention of future deaths. Those issues are:
A common understanding of the duties, powers and training of staff in the
respective agencies in their response to demands for service from people with
mental ill health
Improved information sharing processes through the development of the multi-
agency ‘Mental Health Control Room Triage’ pilot service, jointly funded by NHS
commissioners and the Greater Manchester Combined Authority, and district
multi-agency safeguarding hubs
Effective communication with middle managers and front line staff to ensure
consistent service delivery and in particular that relevant frontline staff are clear
about their responsibility to share information at the point of crisis and feel
confident in doing so
Enhanced
inter-agency communications to ensure accurate reporting and
evaluation of all assessments and actions undertaken by blue-light partner
agencies – in response to calls for welfare or life at risk
The task and finish group has drawn together a pan-GM protocol for responding to ‘risk to
life’ where it presents as a result of mental health to blue light services to achieve a common
understanding of roles and responsibilities; to ensure a shared view of risk and to promote
communication and escalation at the first point that a common understanding may falter.
The Greater Manchester Clinical Assessment Service (CAS) was piloted from March-June
2019 and re-commissioned from November 2019-July 2020. In April 2020, mental health
providers joined the CAS and it went live with referrals for clinically triaged patients who call
- 2 -
999 or 111. The current process is that NWAS Clinical Hub will identify two mental health
incidents per hour from 999 or 111 that are either a Category 3 or Category 4 mental health
incident. The incidents for referral would be clinically reviewed, ideally by a mental health
practitioner, for suitability of referral to the GM CAS. Secondary triage is then undertaken by
a GP from the GM Alliance.
This referral process was only due to go live in 2021, but has been brought forward in light of
the current COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has otherwise impacted the ability of the
respective organisations to operationalise the pan-GM protocol, with regards to the time
commitment required and the fact that the system is in a state of flux, with significant
changes being seen across mental health services. All organisations remain in a response
phase to COVID-19 and a period of stability will be required for each organisation to re-
assess the protocol.
In the meantime, a meeting has been arranged with Ms Joanne Kearsley and key strategic
leads of the task and finish group. This meeting has been cancelled on previous occasions
but is currently diarised for July. The Trust should be grateful if you would allow us to provide
an update following that meeting and within six months of the date of this letter to report the
work that has been undertaken to better meet the needs of individuals such as Mr
Pendlebury and those in mental health crisis in the community.
Yours sincerely
DAREN MOCHRIE QAM, MBA, Dip IMC RCSEd, MCPara
Chief Executive
- 3 -
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.